94-19495. Centerior Energy, et al.; License Amendment Requests Proposed Merger of Toledo Edison Co. and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.; Antitrust Determination  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 153 (Wednesday, August 10, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19495]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 10, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-346 and 50-440]
    
     
    
    Centerior Energy, et al.; License Amendment Requests Proposed 
    Merger of Toledo Edison Co. and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.; 
    Antitrust Determination
    
        Pursuant to two separate license amendment requests from licensee 
    Centerior Energy (Centerior) dated June 2, 1994 and June 6, 1994, the 
    staff hereby notices the request by Centerior to amend the Perry 
    Nuclear Power Plant (Perry) and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station 
    (Davis-Besse) operating licenses to reflect a new owner-operator of 
    Perry and Davis-Besse. The new owner-operator, temporarily named 
    (``NEWCO'' by Centerior, will result from the proposed merger between 
    the Toledo Edison Company (TE) and the Cleveland Electric Illuminating 
    Company (CEI)--both existing licensees and owners of the Perry and 
    Davis-Besse facilities.
        The staff has interpreted the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended, and the Commission's regulations, to require an antitrust 
    review of an owner or operator prior to the proposed new owner taking 
    possession of the facility or prior to the proposed new operator 
    assuming responsibility for operating the facility in question. Where 
    the new operator is a non-owner, the staff has developed, with the 
    Commission's approval, an antitrust license condition that prohibits 
    the new operator from marketing or brokering power or energy from the 
    facility. (This type of license condition would not apply in the 
    instant case because NEWCO will be both an owner and an operator of 
    Perry and Davis-Besse.) The intent of the staff in developing the non-
    owner operator license condition is to forgo the need for an extended 
    review of the operator's competitive practices and any accompanying 
    analysis of how any practices impact or could impact the electric bulk 
    power services market. By agreeing not to be involved in the facility's 
    marketing or brokering of bulk power services, the staff believes the 
    new non-owner operator will not possess enough market power to 
    significantly impact the market.
        The instant amendment requests involve two licensees, TE and CEI, 
    that have undergone antitrust reviews by the staff at the construction 
    permit and operating license stages of the licensing process. The 
    construction permit antitrust review in the combined Perry/Davis-Besse 
    proceeding resulted in extensive antitrust license conditions 
    obligating TE and CEI to cease certain anticompetitive practices and 
    make available certain bulk power services to power entities in the 
    affected bulk power services market. This review analyzed the practices 
    of the power pooling group known as CAPCO, i.e., Central Area Power 
    Coordination Group, as a whole and also the practices of the five 
    individual utility operating companies, including TE and CEI, that made 
    up CAPCO. The staff believes the construction permit antitrust review 
    and the operating license review, which found no significant antitrust 
    changes since the previous review, adequately defined the problems 
    associated with TE's and CEI's competitive practices and addressed 
    these problems during the review process.
        The license conditions that evolved from the Commission's antitrust 
    review process are extensive and procompetitive. The licensee has 
    agreed that the new owner-operator will be bound by the existing 
    antitrust license conditions now binding TE and CEI--by doing so, the 
    staff believes that there is no need to conduct another antitrust 
    review as a result of the proposed merger nor is there any need to seek 
    public comment on the proposed merger.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    applications for amendment dated June 2, 1994 (Perry) and June 6, 1994 
    (Davis-Besse), which are available for public inspection at the 
    Commission's Public Document Room, located at the Gelman Building, 2120 
    L Street NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the local Public Document 
    Rooms: for Perry, at the Perry Public Library, 3753 Main Street, Perry, 
    Ohio 44081; for Davis-Besse, at the University of Toledo Library, 
    Documents Department, 2801 Bancroft Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43606.
    
        Dated At Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of August, 1994.
    
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Anthony T. Gody,
    Chief, Inspection and Regulatory Criteria Branch, Program Management, 
    Policy Development and Analysis Staff, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-19495 Filed 8-9-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/10/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-19495
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 10, 1994, Docket Nos. 50-346 and 50-440