95-19232. Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D Series Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 154 (Thursday, August 10, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 40754-40756]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-19232]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 40755]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 81-ANE-03; Amendment 39-9327; AD 95-16-07]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney JT8D Series Turbofan 
    Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to Pratt & Whitney JT8D series turbofan engines, that 
    currently requires initial and repetitive inspections of 9th through 
    12th stage high pressure compressor (HPC) disks at the tierod holes. 
    This amendment eliminates an optional on-wing ultrasonic inspection of 
    the 10th stage high pressure compressor (HPC) disk. This amendment is 
    prompted by a report of an uncontained failure of a 10th stage HPC disk 
    that was previously inspected using the on-wing ultrasonic inspection 
    method. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent 
    uncontained fractures of 9th through 12th stage HPC disks and engine 
    failure.
    
    DATES: Effective September 11, 1995.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of September 11, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Pratt & Whitney, Technical Publications Department, M/S 
    132-30, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT 06108. This information may 
    be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England 
    Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark A. Rumizen, Aerospace Engineer 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
    238-7137; fax (617) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 7, 1984, the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA) issued airworthiness directive (AD) 81-08-02 R2, 
    Amendment No. 39-4817 (49 FR 7361; February 29, 1984), to require 
    initial and repetitive inspections of 9th through 12th stage high 
    pressure compressor (HPC) disks at the tierod holes in Pratt & Whitney 
    (PW) JT8D series turbofan engines. That action was prompted by cracks 
    in the tierod holes in HPC disks that resulted in engine failures. That 
    condition, if not corrected, can result in uncontained fractures of 9th 
    through 12th stage HPC disks and engine failure.
        On August 30, 1984, the FAA issued a correction to AD 81-08-02 R2, 
    Amendment 39-4817 (49 FR 35618; September 11, 1984), to include an 
    engine model that had been inadvertently omitted from the AD.
        Since issuance of AD 81-08-02 R2, the FAA received a report of an 
    uncontained fracture of a 10th stage HPC disk. This disk had been 
    subjected to three previous on-wing ultrasonic inspections prior to 
    fracture. This method has since been determined as inadequate for 
    detecting tierod hole cracking.
        On May 8, 1989, the FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking 
    (NPRM) that was published in the Federal Register (54 FR 22306; May 23, 
    1989), that would have amended the existing AD by eliminating the 
    optional on-wing ultrasonic inspection of the 10th stage HPC disk, and 
    by including an engine model inadvertently omitted.
        Since the issuance of that NPRM, the FAA has determined that the 
    reference to the inadvertently omitted engine model was unnecessary, as 
    the FAA had remedied this discrepancy in the August 30, 1984, 
    correction. Also, the FAA now utilizes a revised format that supersedes 
    existing AD's by publishing a complete document rather than only 
    amending applicable paragraphs of the compliance section. Since the FAA 
    changed the format of the proposed rule, the FAA determined that it was 
    desirable to reopen the comment period to provide additional 
    opportunity for public comment.
        A Supplementary NPRM was published in the Federal Register on 
    December 19, 1994 (59 FR 65281). That action reprints the corrected AD 
    compliance section text in its entirety for clarity.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comment received.
        The commenter states no objection to adoption of the proposed rule.
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
        There are approximately 200 engines that are affected by this AD, 
    and the FAA has determined that eliminating the optional on-wing 
    ultrasonic inspection will have negligible economic impact, since most 
    operators use uninstalled tenth stage disk inspections.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-4817 (49 FR 
    35618, September 11, 1984) and by adding a new airworthiness directive, 
    Amendment 39-9327, to read as follows:
    
    95-16-07  Pratt & Whitney: Amendment 39-9327. Docket 81-ANE-03. 
    Supersedes AD 81-08-02 R2, Amendment 39-4817.
    
        Applicability: Pratt & Whitney (PW) JT8D-1, -1A, -7, -7A, -7B, -
    9, -9A, -11, -15, -15A, -17, -17A, -17R, and -17AR turbofan engines 
    with 9th through 12th stage high pressure compressor (HPC) disks 
    specified in 
    
    [[Page 40756]]
    Tables I through V and Table VIII of PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 
    No. 4723, Revision 12, dated March 8, 1990, installed. These engines 
    are installed on but not limited to Boeing 727 series and 737 
    series, and McDonnell Douglas DC-9 series aircraft.
    
        Note: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the 
    authority provided in paragraph (e) to request approval from the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This approval may address 
    either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe 
    condition, or different actions necessary to address the unsafe 
    condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an 
    assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe 
    condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any 
    modification, alteration, or repair remove any engine from the 
    applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously in accordance with PW ASB No. 4723, Revision 9, dated 
    July 13, 1983; Revision 10, dated September 15, 1986; or Revision 
    11, dated October 30, 1987. All inspections subsequent to the 
    effective date of this AD must be accomplished in accordance with 
    the methods and intervals identified in PW ASB No. 4723, Revision 
    12, dated March 8, 1990, except as is specified in paragraph (d) of 
    this AD.
        To prevent uncontained fractures of 9th through 12th stage HPC 
    disks and engine failure, accomplish the following:
        (a) Initially inspect 9th through 12th stage HPC disks at the 
    tierod holes in accordance with Tables I through V and Table VIII of 
    PW ASB No. 4273, Revision 12, dated March 8, 1990.
        (b) Thereafter, inspect 9th through 12th stage HPC disks at the 
    tierod holes in accordance with Tables I through V and Table VIII of 
    PW ASB No. 4723, Revision 12, dated March 8, 1990. Disks initially 
    inspected prior to the first inspection limit must be reinspected 
    before reaching the specified reinspection interval, or before 
    reaching the first inspection limit, whichever is later. In no case 
    shall the established life limits of the disks be exceeded.
        (c) Remove cracked disks from service prior to further flight, 
    and replace with a serviceable part. Disks may be returned to 
    service if repaired in accordance with Paragraph 7 of PW ASB No. 
    4723, Revision 12, dated March 8, 1990.
        (d) For 10th stage HPC disks that were last inspected in 
    accordance with the on-wing ultrasonic inspection procedure 
    specified in AD 81-08-02 R2 prior to the effective date of this AD, 
    inspect as follows:
        (1) Perform a magnetic particle inspection or eddy current 
    inspection in accordance with the procedure defined in Paragraph 6 
    and Appendix B of PW ASB No. 4723, Revision 12, dated March 8, 1990, 
    no later than 750 cycles in service (CIS) since the last on-wing 
    inspection.
        (2) Accomplish all subsequent inspections in accordance with the 
    methods and intervals specified in PW ASB No. 4723, Revision 12, 
    dated March 8, 1990.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. The 
    request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative method of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) The actions required by this AD shall be done in accordance 
    with the following ASB:
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      Document No.                               Pages             Rev.              Date           
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    PW ASB No. 4723.................................  1.........................      12  Mar. 8, 1990.             
                                                      2-8.......................      10  Sept. 15, 1986.           
                                                      9-10......................      11  Oct. 30, 1987.            
                                                      11-25.....................      10  Sept. 15, 1986.           
    Appendix A......................................  A-1.......................      10  Sept. 15, 1986.           
                                                      A-2.......................                                    
    Appendix B......................................  B-1--B-9..................       7  Feb. 16, 1981.            
                                                      B-10......................       8  July 9, 1982.             
                                                      B-11--B-12................       7  Feb. 16, 1981.            
    Total pages: 38.                                                                                                
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Pratt & Whitney, Technical 
    Publications Department, M/S 132-30, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, 
    CT 06108. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England Region, 
    Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
        (h) This amendment becomes effective on September 11, 1995.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 26, 1995.
    James C. Jones,
    Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-19232 Filed 8-9-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/11/1995
Published:
08/10/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-19232
Dates:
Effective September 11, 1995.
Pages:
40754-40756 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 81-ANE-03, Amendment 39-9327, AD 95-16-07
PDF File:
95-19232.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13