98-21363. Closure of Harry S Truman Animal Import Center  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 153 (Monday, August 10, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 42593-42596]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-21363]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 153 / Monday, August 10, 1998 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 42593]]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    9 CFR Parts 93, 94, and 130
    
    [Docket No. 98-070-2]
    
    
    Closure of Harry S Truman Animal Import Center
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are proposing to close the Harry S Truman Animal Import 
    Center (HSTAIC) and to amend the animal import regulations to remove 
    all provisions related to HSTAIC. The facility, which is used for high 
    risk imports, such as ruminants from countries where foot-and-mouth 
    disease exists, is chronically under used and has never generated 
    enough revenue to be self-sufficient. Closing HSTAIC would eliminate a 
    drain on government resources, which does not appear to be justified by 
    demand.
    
    DATES: Consideration will be given only to comments received on or 
    before October 9, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Please send an original and three copies of your comments to 
    Docket No. 98-070-2, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, 
    suite 3C03, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please 
    state that your comments refer to Docket No. 98-070-2. Comments 
    received may be inspected at USDA, room 1141, South Building, 14th 
    Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing to 
    inspect comments are requested to call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to 
    facilitate entry into the comment reading room.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Gary Colgrove, Chief Staff 
    Veterinarian, National Center for Import and Export, VS, APHIS, 4700 
    River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301) 734-3276; or e-
    mail: gcolgrove@usda.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The Harry S Truman Animal Import Center (HSTAIC) is an offshore, 
    maximum biosecurity animal import facility owned and operated by the 
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), an agency of the 
    United States Department of Agriculture. It is the only facility of its 
    kind in the United States.
        HSTAIC was dedicated in 1979. Authorized by statute in 1970 (The 
    Act of May 6, 1970, 7 U.S.C. 135-135b), HSTAIC was designed to be used 
    as a quarantine facility for ruminants and swine from countries where 
    high-risk diseases, such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) or rinderpest, 
    hog cholera, African swine fever, and swine vesicular disease, exist. 
    Animals are consigned to the facility upon arrival in the United 
    States, and then tested and monitored for a period of time to ensure 
    their freedom from disease. The full cost of operating HSTAIC was to be 
    paid for by the importers using the facility.
        At the time HSTAIC opened, demand for breeding stock, particularly 
    cattle, from high disease-risk countries was projected to grow. It was 
    anticipated that HSTAIC would be fully utilized--with at least three 
    importations per year--and costs would be fully covered.
        These assumptions turned out to be wrong. From the time it opened, 
    HSTAIC has never been fully used. Only animals from countries where FMD 
    or rinderpest exists have been imported through the facility, and on 
    average, there has been only one importation per year. Since 1979, a 
    total of 633 cattle, 574 swine, 460 goats and sheep, and 4,596 camelids 
    have been imported through HSTAIC. The last importation of cattle 
    through HSTAIC occurred in 1985. Since 1995, the only animals imported 
    through HSTAIC have been camelids.
        As a result of chronic under use, HSTAIC has never generated enough 
    revenue to be self-sufficient. During periods when importers are not 
    using HSTAIC, APHIS must keep the facility staffed, provide electric 
    and telephone service, and cover other minimal operational and 
    maintenance costs. These costs ranged from $98,000 in FY 1995 to 
    $385,000 in FY 1997, averaging $219,000 per year. We tried in the early 
    1990s to curtail losses by amending our HSTAIC regulations. We 
    eliminated the ``tier system,'' which gave preference to certain types 
    of animals. We also instituted a requirement that applicants deposit 
    $32,000 with their application. We draw on the winning applicant's 
    deposit to cover the cost of preparing and maintaining HSTAIC in 
    readiness for that applicant's animals. Together, these changes 
    encouraged more importations through HSTAIC and shifted some of the 
    cost of preparing the facility to receive animals from APHIS to the 
    winning importer. In turn, this encouraged importers to carry through 
    and use the facility. However, these changes did not eliminate APHIS' 
    losses, but only reduced them. Since 1991, we have lost $1.6 million 
    keeping HSTAIC open for importers.
        We do not anticipate any increase in demand to use HSTAIC. Instead, 
    we expect demand to continue falling. There has never been any demand 
    to use HSTAIC for animals from regions other than those where FMD or 
    rinderpest exists. In 1970, only 10 countries or territories were 
    recognized as free from FMD and rinderpest. As of January 1998, 51 
    countries had been recognized as free of these two diseases. In 
    addition, we recently amended our animal import regulations to 
    recognize regions, not only countries, as free of disease. Over time, 
    more and more regions, or geographical areas, will be able to acquire 
    status as FMD and rinderpest free. As a result, importers can import 
    animals from a growing number of sources without needing to use HSTAIC.
        In addition, since HSTAIC opened, international trade in live 
    animals for breeding purposes has fallen. Instead, germplasm--embryos 
    and semen--is imported for breeding. Using germplasm is less expensive 
    and more reliable. Germplasm can be imported even from high-risk 
    countries without using HSTAIC.
        We have considered keeping HSTAIC open. Currently, importers who 
    use the facility must pay APHIS approximately $1 million per 
    importation to cover the cost of operating the facility during the time 
    the animals are in quarantine. This figure can only increase. HSTAIC 
    needs urgent and substantial repairs to keep it operational and in 
    compliance with environmental and other requirements.
    
    [[Page 42594]]
    
    We have already spent $1 million to repair and modify an incinerator, 
    test emissions, and replace stack pipes in order to meet environmental 
    standards set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the 
    Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Even with these 
    repairs, we cannot operate the HSTAIC incinerators at full capacity: if 
    we did so, we would be in violation of EPA and FDEP standards. Such 
    limited incinerator capacity means we cannot quickly dispose of 
    diseased animals, should that need arise.
        We estimate that HSTAIC urgently needs approximately $4.5 million 
    worth of additional repairs and upgrades for which APHIS does not have 
    an appropriation. Having this work done would significantly increase 
    the already substantial fees for use of HSTAIC if the cost of the 
    repairs and upgrades were to be recovered from users. The required work 
    includes repairing and upgrading the facility's waste water treatment 
    facility; replacing a generator, an incinerator, the roof, and 
    underground fuel storage tanks; and upgrading the fire suppression/
    alarm, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. Our highest 
    priority is replacing the wastewater treatment facility, at an 
    estimated cost of $1.2 million. If we do not do this work soon, APHIS 
    may face significant fines from EPA and FDEP.
        Recently, HSTAIC has been used mainly by persons importing llamas 
    and alpacas into the United States. These animals are currently 
    imported mainly for animal exhibits and as pets. At some time in the 
    future, enough llamas and alpacas will have been imported into the 
    United States that animals bred in this country will satisfy demand, 
    and importations will drop.
        At this time, the only way importers can import animals directly 
    into the United States from regions where high-risk diseases exist is 
    through HSTAIC. Closing HSTAIC would stop these importations entirely. 
    We are therefore looking into other possible means by which these 
    animals can be safely imported into the United States. If it appears 
    that high-risk animals could be imported into the United States by some 
    other route or under other conditions without presenting an undue 
    disease risk, we will publish a proposal in the Federal Register.
        On July 13, 1998, we published a notice in the Federal Register (63 
    FR 37483, Docket No. 98-070-1) announcing that we do not plan to hold a 
    lottery in December, 1998 for exclusive use of HSTAIC in calendar year 
    1999. (Under Sec. 93.430(a) of the regulations, APHIS enters into a 
    cooperative-service agreement with only one importer for each 
    importation through HSTAIC. We refer to this as ``exclusive use''.) In 
    the same notice we also announced that we will not enter into any 
    cooperative-service agreements with importers for use of the facility 
    unless it is certain the animals will enter HSTAIC on or before 
    December 31, 1998. This will ensure that no animals are in the facility 
    beyond March 31, 1999, and allow us to close the facility by the end of 
    FY 1999, should we decide to do so as a result of this rulemaking.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. 
    The rule has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of 
    Executive Order 12866 and therefore, has not been reviewed by the 
    Office of Management and Budget.
        If this proposed rule is adopted, we will close HSTAIC and amend 
    the animal import regulations by removing all provisions related to 
    HSTAIC.
        HSTAIC is a maximum-security APHIS animal import center that 
    provides quarantine services for animals which would otherwise be 
    excluded because they are being imported directly from countries where 
    high-risk diseases such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), rinderpest, 
    African swine fever, hog cholera, and swine vesicular disease are 
    found. HSTAIC was designed to be a self-supporting facility, to as a 
    great degree as possible, with costs defrayed by charges to the 
    importers of the animals who use the facility. However, this has not 
    been the case. Instead, the facility has been under used and has never 
    generated enough revenue to be self-sufficient.
        Vital repairs and maintenance of the facility and its equipment has 
    been accomplished by diverting the Agency's scarce resources, as APHIS 
    has no funds allocated for this purpose. However, these costly short 
    term repairs and maintenance have not been adequate to upgrade the 
    facility. Regulations concerning the use of the facility were revised 
    in the early 1990's so that any user of HSTAIC for a single animal 
    importation would be responsible for paying all related costs, except 
    capital expenses, incurred in qualifying and quarantining the imported 
    animals at HSTAIC, but the deficit has persisted. At inception a strong 
    demand was projected for breeding stock in order to import strains of 
    livestock that had specific traits needed for improving U.S. domestic 
    breeds, particularly cattle from high disease-risk countries. However, 
    after the first six imports, this has not occurred. The facility has 
    not had the optimal three imports in any year and money for capital 
    expenditures has not been appropriated. Therefore, we are proposing to 
    close the facility and remove from the CFR the current regulations 
    concerning HSTAIC. Under the terms of this proposal, the Center would 
    not accept animals for quarantine after December 31, 1998, and APHIS 
    would enter into an agreement with a prospective importer for final 
    exclusive use of the facility only if it was certain that the animals 
    could enter the Center on or before that date.
        Since HSTAIC was dedicated in 1979 there have been 21 ruminant and 
    swine importations (including Alpaca imports from Peru which are still 
    in quarantine and to be released on September 1998). The first imports 
    (cattle from Brazil) were released in July 1980. A total of 6,713 
    animals have been quarantined and released during this period, 
    including cattle (633), swine (574), sheep and goats (460) and camelids 
    (5,046). Several countries in Latin America (Bolivia, Brazil, Chile and 
    Peru), Europe (France, Germany), Asia (China), and Africa (South 
    Africa) were the sources of the imports. Of these, Chile, France and 
    Germany are now recognized as FMD free. Certain regions in South Africa 
    are also in the process of being recognized as free. The first six 
    imports were cattle (3 from Brazil and 3 from Europe). Camelids have 
    accounted for 11 imports (5 from Bolivia, 1 from Chile/Brazil and 5 
    from Peru). There have been three imports of swine (1 from China, 1 
    from France and 1 from Germany), and one import of sheep and goats 
    (from South Africa). Eight out of the nine most recent imports have 
    been camelids.
        The above total, 21 imports in nearly 20 years, has fallen short of 
    the anticipated three shipments of animals per year. Based on three 
    months of isolation at the center for each group and one month between 
    shipments for cleaning and disinfecting, with full use, there should 
    have been 57 imports handled through HSTAIC. Furthermore, the size of 
    individual imports has been smaller than the capacity of the facility, 
    and thus importers have failed to take advantage of economies of scale, 
    which would have reduced the per animal cost of using the facility, as 
    costs per animal are lower as numbers increase. The capacity of the 
    facility is about 400, plus sentinel animals (This designation is for 
    cattle. For smaller animals, such as sheep and goats, even larger 
    numbers can be accommodated). Only 6,713 animals were actually imported 
    and
    
    [[Page 42595]]
    
    quarantined during the entire 21 years. The potential number should 
    have been more than 22,800 animals.
        The quarantine process is costly regardless of numbers, and is paid 
    entirely by the importers. The average fee for the last 10 imports has 
    been $1,920 (or $16 per day) per head. Each selected applicant has 
    exclusive rights to use HSTAIC for the importation during the 
    quarantine period and is responsible for paying all costs, excluding 
    capital expenditure, incurred in qualifying and quarantining the 
    specified animals through HSTAIC. A partial list of costs includes: 
    expense for sentinel animals, laboratory tests, medical treatment, 
    official travel by APHIS personnel, courier services to transport test 
    samples to the Foreign Agricultural Disease Diagnostic Laboratory 
    (FADDL), salaries of HSTAIC personnel, all supplies needed for animal 
    care, maintenance, and testing and the post-quarantining cleaning and 
    disinfection of HSTAIC, as well as utilities and overhead, including 
    salaries and benefits of support staff. The operational cost of an 
    average importation is high--between $750,000 and $1 million per import 
    period. This cost is likely to increase, should the center remain open, 
    since substantial infrastructure repairs are needed immediately and 
    there is an ever-increasing requirement to maintain the aging facility. 
    Expenses charged to selected importers vary by importation depending on 
    the kind and number of animals in each shipment, and the country of 
    origin.
        Since operating costs while the facility is in use are charged 
    entirely to the importers, if HSTAIC were fully utilized (that is, 
    housing three importations during each year), it could probably be 
    nearly self-supporting. However, due to under-utilization, the minimum 
    operating budget must cover costs borne by the facility in the absence 
    of animal shipments. The facility has never had three imports in a 
    single year since its opening. In fact, no quarantines at all occurred 
    for two years (1986 and 1990), two imports each for only three years 
    (1993, 1996 and 1998), and the remaining years have had only one import 
    each year. Thus, up to two-thirds of operational costs have had to be 
    covered from agency funds. During a non-used year, approximately 
    $390,000 must be allocated, from the agency budget, just to maintain 
    the facility. In a partial-use year the deficits ranged between 
    $130,000 and $260,000. Over the duration of the facility, the agency 
    has diverted approximately $4 million in nominal dollars, or about $6.4 
    million in 1998 dollars, for operational expenditures to keep the 
    facility ready for very few users.
        These deficit amounts do not reflect the depreciation of the 
    component parts of the facility and of replacement needs. While the 
    property presently has no other purpose except maintaining readiness 
    for the small number of importers of special livestock from countries 
    that are not free from FMD, equipment, supplies and the physical plant 
    still lose their value, whether with disuse or use, as they wear out or 
    become obsolete. Furthermore, as the facility has aged, maintaining the 
    building in useable condition has required more frequent upgrading of 
    its components, which have varying degrees of life expectancy. The 
    annual adjusted depreciation value of the various physical components 
    of the facility is approximately $93,776 (obtained by straight line 
    depreciation of all replaceable assets and equipment whose useful life 
    is still active) or about $257/day. This is the cost of depreciation 
    the facility has been incurring annually even with full use, the amount 
    that should have been collected for the purpose of upgrading equipment. 
    By initially excluding capital expenditures from the fee structure, the 
    agency has forfeited the opportunity to charge users approximately $1.8 
    million in nominal dollars (or about $2.4 million in 1998 dollars) that 
    it could have been collecting over the entire period. Overall, the 
    operational deficits and the capital expenditures have accounted for 
    about $8.8 million. If the facility is kept open, the agency would 
    continue to incur similar losses, with only slight relief if these 
    costs are prorated and added to user fees.
        The agency has already spent over $1 million in the last five years 
    to repair and modify an incinerator, test emissions, and replace stack 
    pipes, in an effort to meet standards set by the U.S. Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Environmental 
    Protection (FDEP). Attempting to keep this aging facility in compliance 
    with EPA/FDEP standards will continue to be expensive for the agency. 
    (These needed repairs include repairing and upgrading the facility's 
    wastewater treatment facility; replacing a generator, an incinerator, 
    the roof, and underground fuel storage tanks; and upgrading the fire 
    suppression/alarm and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning 
    systems.) Currently about $4.5 million are needed to make the most 
    urgently needed repairs. Closing the facility would make this 
    unnecessary. Since the agency is currently operating with a large 
    deficit, even increased use would still not immediately meet revenue 
    needs. The money and human resources needed to keep this facility 
    operating could be diverted to other programs that play a more 
    important role in protecting the United States against animal disease 
    incursions. The cost of closing the facility, about $1 million, would 
    be offset by the future saving the agency would realize.
        The proposed closure of the facility would not impact a substantial 
    number of importers, because most importers do not use HSTAIC. Despite 
    the original expectation that cattle and swine would be the predominant 
    imports, over the last six years the facility has been used mainly by 
    importers of llamas and alpacas. Using public funds in the maintenance 
    of a facility that serves only specific importers places an undo burden 
    on tax payers. The action is not expected to have a negative economic 
    impact on this small number of entities, which could still import 
    camelids into the United States from Chile, which has been recognized 
    as FMD free since HSTAIC was dedicated. The facility closure could 
    produce positive budgetary impact for the agency.
        Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and 
    Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State 
    and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule 
    will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this 
    rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required before 
    parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This proposed rule contains no information collection or 
    recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
    (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Lists of Subjects
    
    9 CFR Part 93
    
        Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Poultry and poultry products, 
    Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    
    9 CFR Part 94
    
        Animal diseases, Imports, Livestock, Meat and meat products, Milk, 
    Poultry and poultry products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
    [[Page 42596]]
    
    9 CFR Part 130
    
        Animals, Birds, Diagnostic reagents, Exports, Imports, Poultry and 
    poultry products, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Tests.
    
        Accordingly, we are proposing to amend 9 CFR parts 93, 94 and 130 
    as follows:
    
    PART 93--IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN ANIMALS, BIRDS, AND POULTRY, AND 
    CERTAIN ANIMAL, BIRD, AND POULTRY PRODUCTS; REQUIREMENTS FOR MEANS 
    OF CONVEYANCE AND SHIPPING CONTAINERS
    
        1. The authority citation for part 93 would be revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622; 19 U.S.C. 1306; 21 U.S.C. 102-105, 
    111, 114a, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134d, 134f, 136, and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 
    9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
    
    Secs. 93.430 and 93.431  [Removed and reserved]
    
        2. In part 93, Secs. 93.430 and 93.431 would be removed and 
    reserved.
    
    
    Secs. 93.522 and 93.523  [Removed]
    
        3. In part 93, Secs. 93.522 and 93.523 would be removed.
    
    PART 94--RINDERPEST, FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE, FOWL PEST (FOWL 
    PLAGUE), EXOTIC NEWCASTLE DISEASE, AFRICAN SWINE FEVER, HOG 
    CHOLERA, AND BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY: PROHIBITED AND 
    RESTRICTED IMPORTATIONS
    
        4. The authority citation for part 94 would continue to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 147a, 150ee, 161, 162, and 450; 19 U.S.C. 
    1306; 21 U.S.C. 111, 114a, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134f, 136, and 136a; 31 
    U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 4331 and 4332; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 
    371.2(d).
    
        5. In Sec. 94.1, paragraph (b) would be revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 94.1  Regions where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists; 
    importations prohibited.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) The importation of any ruminant or swine or any fresh (chilled 
    or frozen) meat of any ruminant or swine 1 that originates 
    in any region where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists, as 
    designated in paragraph (a) of this section, or that enters a port in 
    or otherwise transits a region in which rinderpest or foot-and-mouth 
    disease exists, is prohibited:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Importation of animals and meat includes bringing the 
    animals or meat within the territorial limits of the United States 
    on a means of conveyance for use as sea stores or for other 
    purposes.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (1) Except as provided in part 93 of this chapter for wild 
    ruminants and wild swine; and
        (2) except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section for meat of 
    ruminants or swine that originates in regions free of rinderpest and 
    foot-and-mouth disease but that enters a port or otherwise transits a 
    region where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease exists; and
        (3) except as provided in Sec. 94.4 of this part for cooked or 
    cured meat from regions where rinderpest or foot-and-mouth disease 
    exists.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 130--USER FEES
    
    
    Sec. 130.1  [Amended]
    
        6. The authority citation for part 130 would be revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5542; 7 U.S.C. 1622; 19 U.S.C. 1306; 21 
    U.S.C. 102-105, 111, 114, 114a, 134a, 134b, 134c, 134d, 134f, 136, 
    and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(d).
    
        7. In Sec. 130.1, the definition of Animal Import Center would be 
    amended by removing the last sentence.
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 1998.
    Joan M. Arnoldi,
    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-21363 Filed 8-7-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/10/1998
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
98-21363
Dates:
Consideration will be given only to comments received on or before October 9, 1998.
Pages:
42593-42596 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-070-2
PDF File:
98-21363.pdf
CFR: (2)
9 CFR 94.1
9 CFR 130.1