2017-16051. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 37360

    AGENCY:

    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

    ACTION:

    Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

    SUMMARY:

    We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-12-12, for all Airbus Model A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, A330-300, A340-200, and A340-300 series airplanes; and AD 2013-16-26 for all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200 and -300, and A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. AD 2012-12-12 requires repetitive inspections of the outer skin rivets of the cargo doors; repair if necessary; and other repetitive inspections. AD 2013-16-26 requires repetitive inspections of certain cargo doors, and repair if necessary. Since we issued AD 2012-12-12 and AD 2013-16-26, we have determined that a new inspection procedure is necessary to address the unsafe condition. This proposed AD would continue to require repetitive inspections and repair if necessary. This proposed AD would add a one-time inspection and adjustment of certain hook gaps; reinforcement of the door frame structure; related investigative and corrective actions if necessary; and a modification, which would allow deferring reinforcement of the cargo door structure. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

    DATES:

    We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 25, 2017.

    ADDRESSES:

    You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:

    • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    • Fax: 202-493-2251.
    • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80; email: airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

    Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0713; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-1138; fax: 425-227-1149.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2017-0713; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-199-AD” at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.

    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD.

    Discussion

    On June 7, 2012, we issued AD 2012-12-12, Amendment 39-17092 (77 FR 37797, June 25, 2012) (“AD 2012-12-12”), for all Airbus Model A330-200 series airplanes, Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes, Model A330-300 series airplanes, Model A340-200 series airplanes, and Model A340-300 series airplanes. AD 2012-12-12 was prompted by reports of sheared fasteners located on the outside skin of the forward cargo door and cracks on the frame fork ends, as well as cracks of the aft cargo door frame 64A. AD 2012-12-12 requires a detailed inspection of the outer skin rivets at the frame fork ends of the forward and aft cargo doors for sheared, loose, and missing rivets; repair of the outer skin rivets if necessary; and other repetitive inspections. We issued AD 2012-12-12 to detect and correct sheared, loose, or missing fasteners on the forward and aft cargo door frame, which could result in the loss of structural integrity of the forward and aft cargo door.

    On August 9, 2013, we issued AD 2013-16-26, Amendment 39-17564 (78 FR 53640, August 30, 2013) (“2013-16-26”), for all Airbus Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes, Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes, and Model A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. AD 2013-16-26 was prompted by reports of cracked adjacent frame forks of a forward cargo door. AD 2013-16-26 requires repetitive detailed inspections for cracks and sheared, loose, or missing rivets of the forward cargo door and, for certain airplanes, of the aft cargo door, and repair if necessary. We issued AD 2013-16-26 to detect and correct cracked or ruptured cargo door frames, which could result in Start Printed Page 37361reduced structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo door.

    Since we issued AD 2012-12-12 and AD 2013-16-26, we have determined that a new inspection procedure is necessary to address the unsafe condition. In addition, the manufacturer has released some terminating action modifications for the cargo door structure, and provided procedures that allow postponing the structural reinforcement modification, which terminate the repetitive inspections.

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 2016-0188, dated September 21, 2016; corrected September 22, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or “the MCAI”); to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes; Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes; and Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Several cases of cracked forward (FWD) and aft (AFT) cargo door frames, as well as loose, lost, or sheared rivets, have been reported by operators. Investigation showed that these findings are due to the low margins with respect to fatigue requirements for the AFT/FWD cargo door internal structure. Further analysis determined that the cargo door hook adjustment is a contributing factor to this issue. In case of a cracked or ruptured (FWD or AFT) cargo door frame, the loads will be transferred to the remaining structural elements. However, the secondary load path is able to sustain those loads only for a limited number of flight cycles (FC).

    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to rupture of adjacent vertical frames and consequent reduced structural integrity of the FWD or AFT cargo door, possibly resulting in a cargo door failure, decompression of the aeroplane and injury to occupants.

    To initially address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A330-52-3043 and SB A340-52-4053 and, consequently, DGAC [Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile] France issued AD 2001-124(B) and AD 2001-126(B), requiring a special detailed inspection of A330 and A340 AFT cargo doors. Since those [DGAC] ADs were issued, prompted by new occurrences, Airbus issued Alert Operators Transmission (AOT) A330-52A3085, AOT A340-52A4092, AOT A330-52A3084, AOT A340-52A4091, AOT A330-A52L003-12, AOT 340-A52L004-12, AOT A330-A52L001-12 and AOT A340-A52L002-12, providing instructions to inspect the affected areas of both FWD and AFT cargo doors.

    Consequently, EASA issued AD 2011-0007 (later revised) [which corresponds to FAA AD 2012-12-12], and AD 2012-0274 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2013-16-26], to require repetitive detailed visual inspections of AFT and FWD cargo doors at specific frames and outer skin at all frame fork ends. Since these EASA ADs were issued, Airbus published SB A330-52-3087, SB A330-52-3095, SB A340-52-4095, SB A340-52-4101, SB A340-52-5020 and SB A340-52-5023, which took over the instructions of the above mentioned AOTs, and introduced revised thresholds and intervals. In addition, the inspection program was expanded to A340-500/-600 aeroplanes. Taking into account experience from inspections accomplished in accordance with the applicable Airbus SBs at original issue (listed above), Airbus issued Revision 01 of these SBs.

    Consequently, EASA issued AD 2015-0192, which superseded EASA AD 2011-0007R1 and EASA AD 2012-0274, to require for each FWD and AFT cargo door, a one-time inspection/adjustment of the hook gaps “U” and “V”, repetitive detailed inspections (DET) of all frame fork areas, frame head areas and outer skin areas to detect cracks or loose/sheared/missing fasteners, and, depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s). In addition, EASA AD 2015-0192 expanded the Applicability to Airbus A340-500/-600 aeroplanes.

    Since EASA AD 2015-0192 was issued, Airbus published Revision 02 of the inspection SBs, introducing high-frequency eddy-current inspection method for the frame forks structure. Airbus also determined that the interval for these repetitive inspections could be increased. In addition, Airbus released some modifications (mod) introducing reinforcements to the cargo door structure improving the fatigue characteristics. These modifications and associated SBs constitute terminating action for the required repetitive inspections. Furthermore, Airbus also published other SBs, introducing cold working after oversizing of the fastener holes as a means for structural reinforcement. Accomplishment of these SBs allows postponement of the required Point of Embodiment (Structural Modification Point) for the structural reinforcement modification SBs which terminate the repetitive inspection requirement.

    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD partially retains the requirements of EASA AD 2015-0192, which is superseded, and requires for each FWD and AFT cargo door initial and repetitive special detailed inspections (SDI) of all frame fork areas and detailed inspections (DET) of frame head areas and outer skin areas, and a one-time inspection/adjustment of the hook gaps “U” and “V” and, depending on findings, the accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s). Additionally, this [EASA] AD requires reinforcement of the cargo door frame structure, while accomplishment of a cold working modification allows to defer the reinforcement of the cargo door structure.

    It should be noted that additional inspections exist for the cargo doors, as specified in Airbus A330 ALS [Airworthiness Limitation Section] Part 2 task 523211-02-01 and task 523211-02-02, and in Airbus A340 ALS Part 2 Task 523211-02-01.

    This [EASA] AD is re-published to correct typographical errors when referencing Airbus SB A340-52-4118.

    Related investigative actions include detailed inspections and high frequency non-destructive test inspections. Corrective actions include reaming holes, bushing holes, replacing affected parts, and repairing cracks. Additional work includes a one-time inspection of the “U” and “V” hook gaps, and if necessary, an adjustment of the hook gaps.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0713.

    Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued the following service information.

    The following service information describes procedures for inspecting and repairing the frame fork area at beam 4 and frame head area at beam 1 from frame 20B to frame 25 of the forward cargo door, and adjusting the hook gaps “U” and “V.” This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3087, Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated February 18, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4095, Revision 02, including Appendix 01, dated November 29, 2015.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-5020, Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated November 27, 2015.

    The following service information describes procedures for modifying the frame fork area at beam 4 and frame head area at beam 1 from frame 20B to frame 25 of the forward cargo door frame. This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models and configurations.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3105, dated February 24, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3110, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3111, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4108, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4113, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4114, dated February 15, 2016.

    The following service information describes procedures for modifying the fastener holes in the forward cargo door frame structure by cold working and changing the fastener type and size. This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models and configurations.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3116, dated April 20, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3117, dated April 20, 2016.Start Printed Page 37362
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3118, dated April 20, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4119, dated April 20, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4120, dated April 20, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4121, dated April 20, 2016.

    The following service information describes procedures for inspecting the frame fork area at beam 4 and frame head area at beam 1 of the aft cargo door from frame 60 to frame 64A, adjusting the hook gaps “U” and “V,” and doing corrective actions. This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models and configurations.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3095, Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated February 19, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4101, Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated November 27, 2015.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-5023, Revision 02, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated November 27, 2015.

    The following service information describes procedures for modifying the frame fork and head of the aft cargo door frame from frame 59A to frame 65. This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models and configurations.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3106, dated February 24, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3112, dated February 24, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3113, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3114, dated February 15, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4109, dated February 25, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4115, dated February 19, 2016.

    The following service information describes procedures for modifying the fastener holes in the aft cargo door frame structure by cold working and changing the fastener type and size. This service information is distinct since it applies to different airplane models.

    • Service Bulletin A330-52-3115, dated April 20, 2016.
    • Service Bulletin A340-52-4118, dated April 20, 2016.

    This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

    FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type designs.

    Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 73 airplanes of U.S. registry.

    We estimate that it would take up to 888 work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost up to $126,420 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be up to $14,738,700, or up to $201,900 per product.

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD.

    Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in “Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

    Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

    1. Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;

    2. Is not a “significant rule” under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);

    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and

    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    • Air transportation
    • Aircraft
    • Aviation safety
    • Incorporation by reference
    • Safety
    End List of Subjects

    The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

    Start Part

    PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

    End Authority
    [Amended]
    Start Amendment Part

    2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:

    End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

    a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2012-12-12, Amendment 39-17092 ( 77 FR 37797, June 25, 2012); and AD 2013-16-26, Amendment 39-17564 (78 FR 53640, August 30, 2013); and

    End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part

    b. Adding the following new AD:

    End Amendment Part

    Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2017-0713; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-199-AD.

    (a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 25, 2017.

    (b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2012-12-12, Amendment 39-17092 (77 FR 37797, June 25, 2012) (“AD 2012-12-12”); and AD 2013-16-26, Amendment 39-17564 (78 FR 53640, August 30, 2013) (“AD 2013-16-26”).

    (c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certified in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers, except those on which Airbus Modification 202702 and Modification 202790 have been embodied in production; and the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(3) through (c)(5) of this AD, certified in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers.

    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, and -243F airplanes.

    (2) Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes.

    (3) Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes.

    (4) Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes.Start Printed Page 37363

    (5) Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes.

    (d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

    (e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracked forward and aft cargo door frames, and loose, missing, or sheared rivets. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracked or ruptured cargo door frames, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the forward or aft cargo door.

    (f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

    (g) Affected Cargo Doors

    For the purpose of this AD, the affected cargo doors are pre-modification 202702 (forward cargo door) and pre-modification 202790 (aft cargo door), and are listed by part number (P/N) in the applicable service information identified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. For post-modification doors, which are not affected by this AD, the P/Ns are identified as F52370900XXX (forward cargo door) and F52372315XXX (aft cargo door), where “XXX” can be a combination of any three numerical digits.

    (h) Forward Cargo Door Repetitive Inspections

    (1) Before exceeding 5,300 total flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane, or within the applicable compliance time specified in table 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, whichever occurs later, except as specified in paragraph (q) of this AD: Do all applicable detailed and high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin areas of each affected forward cargo door, as applicable; in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i), (h)(1)(ii), or (h)(1)(iii) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative actions and corrective actions before further flight in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (h)(1)(i), (h)(1)(ii), or (h)(1)(iii) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD. Repeat the applicable inspections of the frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin areas of each affected forward cargo door thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,400 flight cycles.

    Table 1 to Paragraph (h)(1) of This AD—Forward Cargo Door Inspection Compliance Time

    Airplane condition (on the effective date of this AD)Compliance time
    Inspected only as specified in Airbus Alert Operator Transmission (AOT) A330-52A3085 or AOT A340-52A4092, as applicableWithin 1,100 flight cycles after the last inspection, but without exceeding 10,600 flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A330-52A3085 and as specified in AOT A330-A52L003-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A330-A52L003-12Within 1,100 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A330-52A3085.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A330-52A3085 and as specified in AOT A330-A52L003-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A330-52A3085Within 1,100 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A330-A52L003-12.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A340-52A4092 and as specified in AOT A340-A52L004-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A340-A52L004-12Within 1,100 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A340-52A4092.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A340-52A4092 and as specified in AOT A340-A52L004-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A340-52A4092Within 1,100 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A340-A52L004-12.
    Inspected as specified in the original issue of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A330-52-3087, or SB A340-52-4095, or SB A340-52-5020, as applicableThere is no compliance time for the initial inspection in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified paragraph (r)(1) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 01 of Airbus SB A330-52-3087, or SB A340-52-4095, or SB A340-52-5020, as applicableThere is no compliance time for the initial inspection in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified in paragraph (r)(2) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 02 of Airbus SB A330-52-3087, or SB A340-52-4095, or SB A340-52-5020, as applicableWithin 1,400 flight cycles after the last inspection, but without exceeding 5,300 total flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane.
    Never inspectedWithin 1,100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, but without exceeding 6,400 flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane.

    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3087, Revision 02, dated February 18, 2016 (“A330-52-3087, R2”).

    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4095, Revision 02, dated November 29, 2015 (“A340-52-4095, R2”).

    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5020, Revision 02, dated November 27, 2015 (“A340-52-5020, R2”).

    (2) Concurrently with the first inspection required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD: Do a one-time detailed inspection of the hook gaps “U” and “V” of each affected forward cargo door for proper adjustment, and, depending on findings, adjust the hook(s), in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i), (h)(2)(ii), or (h)(2)(iii) of this AD. Do all required hook gap adjustments before further flight.

    (i) A330-52-3087, R2.

    (ii) A340-52-4095, R2.

    (iii) A340-52-5020, R2.

    (i) Forward Cargo Door Modification

    (1) Except as specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, before exceeding 18,500 total flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane, or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do reinforcement modifications on the frame structure of each affected forward cargo door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (i)(1)(i) through (i)(1)(vi) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD.

    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3105, dated February 24, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -223, and -243 airplanes; and Model A330-301, -321, -322, -341, and -342 airplanes).

    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3110, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes; and Model A330-303, -323, and -343 airplanes).

    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3111, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, and -243F airplanes; and Model A330-302, -303, -323, -342, and -343 airplanes).

    (iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4108, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Start Printed Page 37364Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes; and Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes).

    (v) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4113, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A340-312 and -313 airplanes).

    (vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4114, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A340-313 airplanes).

    (2) Accomplishment of the reinforcement modifications required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD may be deferred, provided that, before exceeding 18,500 total flight cycles since first installation of the forward cargo door on an airplane, or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, but not earlier than 14,500 total flight cycles for Model A330 airplanes, or 12,500 total flight cycles for Model A340 airplanes, cold working is accomplished on the frame structure of each affected forward cargo door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (i)(2)(i) through (i)(2)(vi) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD. Modification of an airplane by accomplishment of the cold working specified in this paragraph does not constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.

    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3116, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -223, and -243 airplanes; and Model A330-301, -321, -322, -341, and -342 airplanes).

    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3117, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes; and Model A330-303, -323, and -343 airplanes).

    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3118, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, and -243F airplanes; and Model A330-302, -303, -323, -342, and -343 airplanes).

    (iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4119, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes; and Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes).

    (v) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4120, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A340-312 and -313 airplanes).

    (vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4121, dated April 20, 2016 (for certain Model A340-313 airplanes).

    (3) Within 18,500 flight cycles after cold working is accomplished on the frame structure of each affected forward cargo door as specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: Do the reinforcement modifications on the frame structure of each affected forward cargo door, using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).

    (j) Forward Cargo Door Terminating Action

    Modification of an airplane by reinforcement of the cargo door frame structure required by paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(3) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD for that airplane.

    (k) Definitions of Pre-Modified and Post-Modified Airplanes

    (1) For the purpose of this AD, pre-modified Model A330-200 series airplanes, Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes, Model A330-300 series airplanes, Model A340-200 series airplanes, and Model A340-300 series airplanes are defined as those not having Airbus Modification 44852, or Modification 44854 applied in production, or being in pre-Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3044 or pre-Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4054 configuration, as applicable.

    (2) For the purpose of this AD, post-modification Model A330-200 series airplanes, Model A330-200 Freighter series airplanes, Model A330-300 series airplanes, Model A340-200 series airplanes, and Model A340-300 series airplanes are defined as those having Airbus Modification 44852 or Modification 44854 applied in production, or modified in service as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3044 or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4054, as applicable.

    (l) Aft Cargo Door Repetitive Inspections

    (1) Before exceeding 4,000 total flight cycles for pre-modified airplanes, or 12,000 total flight cycles for post-modified airplanes, since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane, as applicable, or within the compliance time specified in table 2 to paragraph (l)(1) of this AD or table 3 to paragraph (l)(1) of this AD, as applicable, whichever occurs later, except as specified in paragraph (q) of this AD: Do all applicable inspections of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin area of each affected aft cargo door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (l)(1)(i), (l)(1)(ii), or (l)(1)(iii) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative actions and corrective actions before further flight in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (l)(1)(i), (l)(1)(ii), or (l)(1)(iii) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD. Repeat the applicable inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,400 flight cycles.

    Table 2 to Paragraph (l)(1) of This AD—Aft Cargo Door Inspection Compliance Times for Pre-Modified Airplanes

    Airplane condition (on the effective date of this AD)Compliance time
    Inspected only as specified in Airbus AOT A330-52A3084, or AOT A340-52A4091, as applicableWithin 550 flight cycles after the last inspection, but without exceeding 15,800 flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A330-52A3084 and as specified in AOT A330-A52L001-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A330-A52L001-12Within 550 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A330-52A3084.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A330-52A3084 and as specified in AOT A330-A52L001-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A330-52A3084Within 550 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A330-A52L001-12.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A340-52A4091 and as specified in AOT A340-A52L002-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A340-A52L002-12Within 550 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A340-52A4091.
    Inspected as specified in Airbus AOT A340-52A4091 and as specified in AOT A340-A52L002-12, and the last inspection was accomplished as specified in AOT A340-52A4091Within 550 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in AOT A340-A52L002-12.
    Inspected as specified in the original issue of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, as applicableThere is no compliance time for the initial inspection in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified in paragraph (r)(3) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 01 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, as applicableThere is no compliance time for the initial inspection in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified in paragraph (r)(4) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 02 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, as applicableWithin 1,400 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in Revision 02 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, as applicable but without exceeding 4,000 flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane, as applicable.
    Start Printed Page 37365
    Never inspectedWithin 550 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, but without exceeding 4,550 flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane.

    Table 3 to Paragraph (l)(1) of This AD—Aft Cargo Door Inspection Compliance Times for Post-Modified Airplanes and Model A340-500 and -600 Airplanes

    Airplane condition (on the effective date of this AD)Compliance time
    Never inspectedWithin 550 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, but without exceeding 12,550 flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane.
    Inspected as specified in the original issue of Airbus SB A330-52-3095 or SB A340-52-4101, or SB A340-5023, as applicableThere is no compliance time for paragraph (l)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified in paragraph (r)(3) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 01 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, or SB A340-5023, as applicableThere is no compliance time for paragraph (l)(1) of this AD for these airplanes, provided these airplanes comply with the actions specified in paragraph (r)(4) of this AD.
    Inspected as specified in Revision 02 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, or SB A340-5023, as applicableWithin 1,400 flight cycles after the last inspection as specified in Revision 02 of Airbus SB A330-52-3095, or SB A340-52-4101, or SB A340-5023, as applicable, but without exceeding 12,000 flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane.

    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3095, Revision 02, dated February 19, 2016 (“A330-52-3095, R2”).

    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4101, Revision 02, dated November 27, 2015 (“A340-52-4101, R2”).

    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5023, Revision 02, dated November 27, 2015 (“A340-52-5023, R2”).

    (2) Concurrently with the first inspection required by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD: Do a one-time detailed inspection of the hook gaps “U” and “V” of each affected aft cargo door for proper adjustment and, depending on findings, adjust the hook(s) in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraph (l)(2)(i), (l)(2)(ii), or (l)(2)(iii) of this AD. Do all required hook gap adjustments before further flight.

    (i) A330-52-3095, R2.

    (ii) A340-52-4101, R2.

    (iii) A340-52-5023, R2.

    (m) Modification for Pre-Modified Airplanes

    (1) For pre-modified airplanes, except as specified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD: Before exceeding 18,500 total flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane, or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do reinforcement modifications, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) through (m)(1)(vi) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD.

    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3106, dated February 24, 2016 (for certain Model A330-301, -321, -322, -341, and -342 airplanes).

    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3112, dated February 24, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202 and -223 airplanes; and Model A330-301, -322, -341, and -342 airplanes).

    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3113, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A330-223 and -243 airplanes; and Model A330-322 and -342 airplanes).

    (iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3114, dated February 15, 2016 (for certain Model A330-202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, and -243F airplanes; and Model A330-302, -303, -323, -342, and -343 airplanes).

    (v) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4109, dated February 25, 2016 (for certain Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes; and Model A340-311, -312, and -313 airplanes).

    (vi) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4115, dated February 19, 2016 (for certain Model A340-212, -213, and -313 airplanes).

    (2) Accomplishment of the reinforcement modifications required by paragraph (m)(1) of this AD may be deferred provided that before exceeding 18,500 total flight cycles since first installation of the aft cargo door on an airplane, or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, but not earlier than 14,500 total flight cycles, cold working is accomplished on the frame structure of each affected aft cargo door, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3115, dated April 20, 2016; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4118, dated April 20, 2016; as applicable. Modification of an airplane by accomplishment of the cold working specified in this paragraph does not constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

    (3) For an airplane on which the cold working on the cargo door frame structure is accomplished, as specified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD: Within 18,500 flight cycles after the application of cold working, do reinforcement modifications, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the service information specified in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) through (m)(1)(vi) of this AD, as applicable, or using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA.

    (n) Aft Cargo Door Terminating Action

    Modification of an airplane by reinforcement of the cargo door frame structure required by paragraph (m)(1) or (m)(3) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD for that airplane.

    (o) Optional Terminating Action Modification for Post-Modified Airplanes

    For post-modified airplanes, modification of an airplane by reinforcement of the cargo door frame structure, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information specified in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) through (m)(1)(vi) of this AD, or using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA, constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

    (p) Exception to Service Information

    Where the service information specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (i)(1), (i)(2), (l)(1), and (m) of this AD specifies to contact Airbus for instructions or repair, before further flight, accomplish corrective actions in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s)(2) of this AD.Start Printed Page 37366

    (q) Exception to Initial Inspection Compliance Time

    For the purposes of table 1 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, table 2 to paragraph (l)(1) of this AD, and table 3 to paragraph (l)(1) of this AD: As soon as a cargo door is inspected using any applicable service information specified in this AD, the previous inspections accomplished in accordance with any alert operator transmission can be disregarded for the determination of the compliance time for the initial inspection required by this AD.

    (r) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) This paragraph provides credit for the initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, if that inspection was performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3087, dated August 29, 2013; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4095, dated August 29, 2013; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5020, dated August 29, 2013; as applicable; provided that the actions identified as “additional work” in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3087, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4095, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5020, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014; as applicable; are accomplished within 1,100 flight cycles after that inspection; and provided the next inspection of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin area of each affected forward cargo door is accomplished within 1,100 flight cycles after that inspection, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of A330-52-3087, R2; A330-52-3095, R2; or A340-52-5020, R2, as applicable.

    (2) This paragraph provides credit for the initial inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, if that inspection was performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3087, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4095, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5020, Revision 01, dated July 9, 2014; as applicable; provided that the next inspection of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin area of each affected forward cargo door, is accomplished within 1,100 flight cycles after that inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of A330-52-3087, R2; A330-52-3095, R2; or A340-52-5020, R2, as applicable.

    (3) This paragraph provides credit for the initial inspection required by paragraph (l) of this AD, if that inspection was performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3095, dated August 29, 2013; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4101, dated August 29, 2013; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5023, dated August 29, 2013; provided that the actions identified as “additional work” in the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3095, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4101, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5023, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; as applicable; are accomplished within 550 flight cycles after that inspection, and provided the next inspection of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin area of each affected aft cargo door is accomplished within 550 flight cycles after that inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of A330-52-3095, R2; A340-52-4101, R2; or A340-52-5023, R2, as applicable.

    (4) This paragraph provides credit for the initial inspection required by paragraph (l) of this AD, if that inspection was performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-52-3095, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-4101, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-52-5023, Revision 01, dated July 28, 2014; as applicable; provided that the next inspection of all frame fork areas, frame head areas, and outer skin area of each affected aft cargo door is accomplished within 550 flight cycles after that inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of A330-52-3095, R2; A340-52-4101, R2; or A340-52-5023, R2, as applicable.

    (s) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (t)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.

    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by paragraph (p) of this AD: If any service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

    (t) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0188, dated September 21, 2016; corrected September 22, 2016, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0713.

    (2) For more information about this AD, contact, Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-1138; fax: 425-227-1149.

    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 45 80; email: airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.

    Start Signature

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 19, 2017.

    Michael Kaszycki,

    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2017-16051 Filed 8-9-17; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Document Information

Published:
08/10/2017
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
2017-16051
Dates:
We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 25, 2017.
Pages:
37360-37366 (7 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FAA-2017-0713, Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-199-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
Topics:
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety
PDF File:
2017-16051.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» A330-52-3105 R00
» A330-52-3106 R00
» A330-52-3110 R00
» A330-52-3111 R00
» A330-52-3112 R00
» A340-52-4108 R00
» A340-52-4109 R00
» A340-52-4113 R00
» A340-52-4114 R00
» A340-52-4115 R00
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13