[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 155 (Friday, August 11, 1995)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40993-40994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-19655]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 95-NM-104-AD; Amendment 39-9262; AD 95-12-12]
Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland Model DHC-8-102, -103, and
-106, Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects a typographical error that appeared in
airworthiness directive (AD) 95-12-12 that was published in the Federal
Register on June 13, 1995 (60 FR 31063). The typographical error
resulted in a reference to a part number that does not exist. This AD
is applicable to certain de Havilland Models DHC-8-102, -103, and -106
series airplanes and requires repetitive operational testing of the
stall warning computers.
DATES: Effective June 28, 1995.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations was previously approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of June 28, 1995 (60 FR 31063, June 13, 1995).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Cuneo, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth
Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581, telephone (516)
256-7506; fax (516) 568-2716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Airworthiness Directive (AD) 95-12-12,
amendment 39-9262, applicable to certain de Havilland Model DHC-8-102,
-103, and -106 series airplanes, was published in the Federal Register
on June 13, 1995 (60 FR 31063). That AD requires repetitive operational
testing of the stall warning computers and replacement of non-
operational stall warning computers with new or serviceable units. That
AD also provides an optional terminating action for the repetitive
operational tests.
As published, that AD contained a typographical error in paragraph
(b), which describes the optional terminating action. That paragraph
stated that replacement of stall warning computers having part number
(P/N) ``3605-5, -6, or -7'' with new stall warning computers having P/N
3605-8 would constitute terminating action. However, ``P/N 3605-7'' was
inadvertently indicated in that paragraph instead of the correct part
number of ``P/N 3605-4.'' (In fact, P/N 3605-7 does not exist.) In all
other parts of the published AD and its preamble, these part numbers
were correctly cited as ``P/N 3605-4, -5, and -6.''
Since no other part of the regulatory information has been changed,
the final rule is not being republished.
[[Page 40994]]
The effective date of the AD remains June 28, 1995.
Sec. 39.13 [Corrected]
On page 31065, in the first column, paragraph (b) of AD 95-12-12 is
corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
(b) Replacement of stall warning computers having part number (P/N)
3605-4, -5, or -6 with new stall warning computers having P/N 3605-8,
in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-27-76, dated
October 31, 1994, constitutes terminating action for the repetitive
operational test requirements of this AD.
* * * * *
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 3, 1995.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 95-19655 Filed 8-10-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
