96-20500. Pure Magnesium From Canada; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 156 (Monday, August 12, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41771-41773]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20500]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-122-814]
    
    
    Pure Magnesium From Canada; Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    
    [[Page 41772]]
    
    
    ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
    Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On June 10, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    published the preliminary results of administrative review of the 
    antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from Canada (61 FR 29343). The 
    review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise to 
    the United States for the period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 1995. 
    We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on our preliminary 
    results. Based on our analysis of the comments and rebuttal comments 
    received, we have corrected certain clerical errors in the margin 
    calculations. The final weighted-average dumping margin for the 
    reviewed firm is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results 
    of the Review.''
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 12, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Rausher or Richard Rimlinger, 
    Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
    Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4733.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    The Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
    1930, as amended (the Act), are references to the provisions effective 
    January 1, 1995, the effective date of the amendments made to the Act 
    by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA). In addition, unless 
    otherwise indicated, all citations to the Department's regulations are 
    to the current regulations, as amended by the interim regulations 
    published in the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).
    
    Background
    
        On June 10, 1996, the Department published the preliminary results 
    of administrative review of the antidumping duty order on pure 
    magnesium from Canada (61 FR 29343). We gave interested parties an 
    opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. There was no request 
    for a hearing. The Department has now conducted this review in 
    accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
    Tariff Act).
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The product covered by this review is pure magnesium. Pure 
    unwrought magnesium contains at least 99.8 percent magnesium by weight 
    and is sold in various slab and ingot forms and sizes. Granular and 
    secondary magnesium are excluded from the scope currently classified 
    under subheading 8104.11.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). 
    The HTS item numbers are provided for convenience and for Customs 
    purposes. The written description remains dispositive.
        The review covers one Canadian manufacturer/exporter, Norsk Hydro 
    Canada Inc. (NHCI), and the period August 1, 1994 through July 31, 
    1995.
    
    Analysis of Comments Received
    
        We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the 
    preliminary results. We received a case brief from the petitioner, 
    Magnesium Corporation of America (Magcorp), and we received a case 
    brief and rebuttal brief from the respondent, NHCI.
        Comment 1: NHCI argues that the Department's methodology in 
    deducting from NHCI's gross unit price the amounts reported for 
    antidumping and countervailing duty cash deposits is contrary to the 
    antidumping statute and the Department's consistent practice which has 
    been upheld by the Court of International Trade. Respondent claims that 
    only ordinary ad valorem import duties, not antidumping and 
    countervailing duty cash deposits, should be deducted from the gross 
    unit price in calculating export price and requests that the Department 
    amend its calculations accordingly.
        Department's Position: We agree with NHCI that we incorrectly 
    deducted antidumping and countervailing duty cash deposits from the 
    gross unit price of the U.S. transactions. For these final results, we 
    have deducted only import duties from the gross unit price.
        Comment 2: Magcorp claims that the Department appears to have made 
    a clerical error in the margin calculations with respect to currency 
    conversion. Petitioner argues that a currency conversion is not 
    necessary in the calculation of home market price, because there are 
    several instances in the respondent's questionnaire response which 
    indicate that a currency conversion is not necessary in order to 
    calculate the dumping margin. Therefore, petitioner requests that the 
    Department correct its calculations for the final results of review.
        NHCI agrees with Magcorp that the Department's margin calculations 
    contain a currency conversion clerical error.
        Department's Position: For these final results, we converted into 
    U.S. dollars only those home market price and expense amounts that NHCI 
    reported in Canadian dollars.
    
    Final Results of the Review
    
        As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
    weighted-average dumping margin exists:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Margin 
               Manufacturer/exporter                  Period       (percent)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc....................    8/1/94-7/31/95       0.00
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Department shall determine, and Customs shall assess, 
    antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department will 
    issue appraisement instructions directly to Customs.
        Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective 
    for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these 
    final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
    751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for NHCI will be the 
    rate established above; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers 
    or exporters not covered in this review but covered in the original 
    less than fair value (LTFV) investigation or a previous review, the 
    cash deposit will continue to be the most recent rate published in the 
    final determination or final results for which the manufacturer or 
    exporter received a company-specific rate; (3) if the exporter is not a 
    firm covered in this review, or the original investigation, but the 
    manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the 
    manufacturer of the merchandise in these final results of review or the 
    LTFV investigation; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the 
    manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash 
    deposit rate will be 21 percent, the ``all others'' rate established in 
    Pure Magnesium From Canada: Amendment of Final Determination of Sales 
    At Less Than Fair Value and Order in Accordance With Decision on 
    Remand, 58 FR 62643, November 29, 1993.
        These deposit requirements shall remain in effect until publication 
    of the final results of the next administrative review.
        This notice also serves as final reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of 
    antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during 
    this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could 
    result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping 
    duties
    
    [[Page 41773]]
    
    occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
        This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
    disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Failure to 
    comply is a violation of the APO.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 353.22.
    
        Dated: August 2, 1996.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 96-20500 Filed 8-09-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/12/1996
Published:
08/12/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
96-20500
Dates:
August 12, 1996.
Pages:
41771-41773 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-122-814
PDF File:
96-20500.pdf