99-20907. Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Amendment of Materials License No. SNM-928, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Cimarron Fuel Fabrication Site, Crescent, Oklahoma  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 155 (Thursday, August 12, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44059-44061]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-20907]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 070-0925]
    
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact Related to Amendment of 
    Materials License No. SNM-928, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Cimarron Fuel 
    Fabrication Site, Crescent, Oklahoma
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (hereafter referred to as 
    NRC) is considering issuing a license amendment to Materials License 
    No. SNM-923, held by the Kerr-McGee Cimarron Corporation (Cimarron or 
    the licensee), to incorporate the licensee's proposed decommissioning 
    plan (DP) for its Cimarron Fuel Fabrication Site (Cimarron site) 
    located in Crescent, Oklahoma. Other proposals being considered 
    include: (1) Establishment of a cleanup standard for the site; (2) 
    revision of Cimarron's Radiation Protection Plan (RPP) that summarizes 
    the overall radiation protection program for the Cimarron facility; and 
    (3) revision of Cimarron's organizational structure.
    
    Summary of Environmental Assessment
    
    Background
    
        Cimarron has environmental responsibility for a fuel fabrication 
    facility site near the city of Crescent, Oklahoma. The Kerr-McGee 
    Corporation (KMC) operated two plants at the Cimarron facility between 
    1965 and 1975, each under its own separate Atomic Energy Commission 
    license. Radioactive Materials License SNM-928 was issued under 10 CFR 
    Part 70 for the Uranium Fuel Fabrication Facility and Radioactive 
    Materials License SNM-1174 was issued for the Mixed Oxide Fuel 
    Fabrication Facility. In 1983, when KMC was divided into Sequoyah Fuels 
    Corporation (SFC) and Quivera Mining Corporation, SFC became the owner 
    of the Cimarron facility. Subsequently, in 1988, Cimarron Corporation, 
    a subsidiary of KMC, became responsible for the Cimarron facility. 
    Although the Cimarron facility poses no immediate threat to public 
    health and safety, it is listed in the Site Decommissioning Management 
    Plan to ensure timely decommissioning.
    
    Proposed Action
    
        The objectives of the proposed actions are to decontaminate and 
    decommission the Cimarron site to permit release for unrestricted use 
    and to terminate the Radioactive Materials License SNM-928. In 
    accordance with 10 CFR 70.38(g), Cimarron submitted a proposed DP. In 
    conjunction with this proposal, Cimarron has also proposed revisions to 
    the Radioactive Materials License SNM-928, changes to its RPP, and 
    changes to its organizational structure.
        Decommissioning activities have been ongoing since 1976 when 
    production activities were terminated. Many of the decommissioning 
    activities at the site have been completed under existing license 
    conditions. Decommissioning activities remaining to be performed at the 
    Cimarron facility include: decontamination and decommissioning of 
    facility structures; onsite disposal of contaminated soil meeting the 
    Option 2 criteria of NRC's 1981 Branch Technical Position (BTP) 
    1, ``Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium Wastes 
    from Past Operations;'' offsite disposal of soil or material exceeding 
    the BTP Option 2 criteria; and groundwater remediation.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ ``Disposal or Onsite Storage of Thorium or Uranium Waste 
    from Past Operations'' (46 FR 52061, October 23, 1981).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        As previously noted, Cimarron proposed other related revisions to 
    its license:
        (1) Amending its license to add a new license condition 
    specifically establishing the BTP Option 1 unrestricted-use, residual-
    contamination criteria as the cleanup standard for the Cimarron site;
    
    [[Page 44060]]
    
        (2) Amending license conditions to better delineate the handling of 
    various classifications of contaminated material at the site, and 
    revising License Condition 10 to only reference licensee commitments 
    that pertain to Cimarron's current decommissioning status;
        (3) Amending the RPP to clarify statements made in the RPP; 
    incorporate references to a Quality Assurance Plan, and revise its 
    Environmental Sampling Schedule; and
        (4) Amending the license to incorporate changes in its 
    organizational structure. These changes were and will continue to be 
    caused by downsizing of staff at the Cimarron site as decommissioning 
    activities are completed.
    
    The Need for Proposed Action
    
        The proposed actions are necessary for Cimarron to complete the 
    remaining decommissioning activities needed for NRC to release the 
    Cimarron site for unrestricted use and to terminate Radioactive 
    Materials License SNM-928. License termination is a separate action 
    that requires an NRC finding that the premises are suitable for 
    release.
    
    Alternative to Proposed Action
    
        The only alternative considered in the Environmental Assessment 
    (EA) was the no-action alternative. No action would mean that: (1) The 
    site would not be approved to remediate now; (2) obsolete license 
    conditions would continue to be in License SNM-928; (3) changes to the 
    RPP would not be effective; and (4) Cimarron's organizational structure 
    would be outdated.
        NRC staff has evaluated the no-action alternative and determined 
    that the no-action alternative would conflict with NRC's requirement, 
    10 CFR 70.38, for timely remediation at sites that have ceased 
    operation. Although there is no immediate threat to the public health 
    and safety from this site, not undertaking remediation at this time 
    does not solve the regulatory and potential long-term health and safety 
    problems associated with storing this waste. No action now would delay 
    remediation until some time in the future, when costs could be much 
    higher than they are today. It is even possible that no disposal option 
    will be available in the future if the current low level waste disposal 
    facilities are closed and no new ones are opened. Therefore, the no-
    action alternative is not acceptable.
    
    Environmental Impacts of Proposed Action
    
        Radiological impacts on members of the public may result from 
    inhalation and ingestion of releases of radioactivity in air and in 
    water during the remediation operations, direct exposure to radiation 
    from radioactive material at the site during remediation operations, 
    and transport for disposal. Decommissioning workers may receive doses 
    primarily by ingestion, inhalation, and direct exposure during the 
    decommissioning activities. In addition to impacts from routine 
    operations, the potential radiological consequences of accidents were 
    considered.
        NRC staff has reviewed the potential impacts of the proposed 
    decommissioning, both beneficial and adverse. NRC staff's conclusions 
    are summarized as follows:
        a. Radiation exposures of persons living or traveling near the site 
    because of onsite operations and waste transportation will be well 
    within limits contained in 10 CFR Part 20.
        b. The potential radiological impacts off-site of potential onsite 
    accidents are well below the radiation dose limit of 1 mSv/yr (100 
    mrem/yr) to the public and the radiation dose limit of 0.50 mSv/yr (5 
    rem/yr) to workers in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20.
        c. The potential non-radiological impacts, such as socioeconomic, 
    air quality, land and water use, etc., from decommissioning activities 
    at Cimarron are negligible.
        d. For conservatism, the site use is assumed to be equivalent to 
    the resident farmer scenario described in the NRC Policy and Guidance 
    Directive PG-8-08, ``Scenarios for Assessing Potential Doses Associated 
    with Residual Radioactivity.'' Under this scenario, the maximum 
    radiation doses to a hypothetical resident farmer, who might establish 
    a residence on the site, grow and consume food from the site, and 
    consume drinking water from an onsite groundwater well, over a 1000-
    year period, were calculated assuming both with a cover and without a 
    cover over the disposal cell. The predicted doses for both scenarios 
    are less than 0.09 mSv/yr (9 mrem/yr), which is below NRC's Part 20 
    radiation dose for the public of 1 mSv/yr (100 mrem/yr).
        e. Radiation doses to a remediation worker onsite from direct 
    exposure are estimated to be less than 0.01 mSv (1 mrem) for a 2000-
    hour exposure period. Inhalation doses from a 2000-hour exposure would 
    be less than 0.03 Sv (3 mrem). These predicted doses are substantially 
    less than the occupation exposure limit of 0.50 mSv/yr (5 rem/yr) in 10 
    CFR Part 20.
        f. The impacts from the transportation of radioactive materials are 
    low and within NRC and Department of Transportation requirements. The 
    potential consequences and probability of a transportation accident are 
    low.
        g. The licensee has a radiation protection program that will 
    maintain radiation exposures and effluent releases within the limits of 
    10 CFR Part 20 and will maintain exposures as low as is reasonably 
    achievable.
        h. The population within a 6.5 kilometer (4 mile) radius of the 
    licensee facility has minority and senior citizen populations lower 
    than the county and the State averages, and has a median household 
    income above that of the county and the State. Based on these 
    statistics, there are no significant minorities and low-income 
    households that will be exposed to impacts from the proposed activities 
    at Cimarron. Because there are no significant impacts from the proposed 
    activities, there will be no environmental justice impacts.
        i. No reasonably available alternative to the licensee's proposed 
    plan is obviously superior.
    
    Conclusions
    
        On the basis of its EA, NRC staff has concluded that the proposed 
    action would not have any significant effect on the quality of the 
    human environment and does not warrant the preparation of an 
    environmental impact statement (EIS). The action called for, under NEPA 
    and 10 CFR Part 51, is the issuance of a license amendment authorizing 
    the licensee to perform decommissioning of the Cimarron site as 
    proposed by the licensee and make the proposed revisions to the 
    license.
        In accordance with the requirements of Subpart L of 10 CFR part 2, 
    an Opportunity for a Hearing 2 was offered on September 6, 
    1995. No requests for a hearing were received.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ 60 FR 46315 (September 6, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Pursuant to 10 CFR part 51, NRC has prepared an EA related to the 
    issuance of a license amendment to Materials License SNM-928, 
    authorizing decommissioning of the Cimarron Site. On the basis of this 
    EA, NRC has concluded that this licensing action would not have any 
    significant effect on the quality of the human environment and does not 
    warrant the preparation of an EIS. Accordingly, it has been determined 
    that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate.
    
    Further Information
    
        For further details with respect to this action, the EA and other 
    documents related to this proposed action are available for public 
    inspection and copying at NRC's Public Document
    
    [[Page 44061]]
    
    Room at the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of August 1999.
    
        For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Larry W. Camper,
    Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of 
    Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
    [FR Doc. 99-20907 Filed 8-11-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/12/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-20907
Pages:
44059-44061 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 070-0925
PDF File:
99-20907.pdf