96-20533. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing; Technical Amendment to the Section 8 Certificate and Voucher Conforming Rule  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 13, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 42130-42131]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20533]
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 42129]]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part III
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Housing and Urban Development
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    24 CFR Part 982
    
    
    
    Technical Amendments to the Section 8 Certificate and Voucher 
    Conforming Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 157 / Tuesday, August 13, 1996 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 42130]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
    
    24 CFR Part 982
    
    [Docket No. FR-4119-F-01]
    
    
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing; 
    Technical Amendment to the Section 8 Certificate and Voucher Conforming 
    Rule
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
    Housing, HUD.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On July 3, 1995 (60 FR 34660), HUD published a final rule 
    combining and conforming the rules for tenant-based rental assistance 
    under the Section 8 Rental Certificate and Rental Voucher Programs (24 
    CFR part 982). This final rule amends part 982 to provide that HUD may 
    restrict a family's right to lease any unit within the initial Housing 
    Agency's jurisdiction if HUD determines the limitations on a family's 
    opportunity to select among available units in that jurisdiction are 
    appropriate to achieve desegregation goals in accordance with 
    obligations generated by a court order or consent decree. The purpose 
    of this rule is to remove any regulatory barrier that may hinder 
    judicial efforts to address discriminatory racial or economic 
    concentrations.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 12, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Hastings, Deputy Director, 
    Office of Public and Assisted Housing Operations, Office of Public and 
    Indian Housing, Room 4226, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 
    451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-2841. 
    (This is not a toll-free number.) Hearing- or speech-impaired 
    individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free 
    Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On July 3, 1995 (60 FR 34660), HUD published a final rule which 
    combined and conformed the rules for tenant-based Section 8 rental 
    assistance under the Section 8 Certificate and Voucher Rental Programs 
    (42 U.S.C. 1437f). The final rule also amended the requirements for 
    project-based assistance under the Section 8 Rental Certificate 
    Program.
        The July 3, 1995 final rule added a new Sec. 982.353, which 
    describes where a family can lease a unit with tenant-based assistance. 
    Paragraph (a) of Sec. 982.353 states that a family ``may receive 
    tenant-based assistance to lease a unit located anywhere'' in the 
    Housing Agency's (HA's) jurisdiction. Further, 24 CFR 982.353(f) 
    provides that, except under specified circumstances, the HA ``may not 
    directly or indirectly reduce the family's opportunity to select among 
    available units.'' Nevertheless, courts have entered, and may enter in 
    the future, orders which would require HUD and HAs to limit where 
    tenant-based assistance may be used within the HA's jurisdiction. For 
    example, a court may issue such an order to remedy racial or economic 
    concentrations resulting from discriminatory housing practices. HUD is 
    concerned that in such circumstances Sec. 982.353 might conflict with 
    the court mandate.
        This final rule amends Sec. 982.353 to provide that HUD may 
    restrict a family's right to lease any unit within the initial HA's 
    jurisdiction if HUD determines the limitations on a family's 
    opportunity to select among available units in that jurisdiction are 
    appropriate to achieve desegregation goals in accordance with 
    obligations generated by a court order or consent decree. This rule 
    only amends paragraphs (a) and (f) of Sec. 982.353, which concern 
    tenant-based assistance within the jurisdiction of the original HA. 
    This rule does not revise the portability procedures set forth at 24 
    CFR 982.353(b). This final rule, therefore, does not authorize limiting 
    the residential choice of a family renting outside the jurisdiction of 
    the initial HA.
    
    II. Justification for Final Rulemaking
    
        It is HUD's policy to publish rules for public comment before their 
    issuance for effect, in accordance with its own regulations on 
    rulemaking found at 24 CFR part 10. However, part 10 provides that 
    prior public procedure will be omitted if HUD determines that it is 
    ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest'' (24 
    CFR 10.1). HUD finds that in this case prior comment is unnecessary. 
    This final rule amends Sec. 982.353 to remove any potential conflict 
    between the current regulatory language and judicial efforts to address 
    discriminatory racial or economic concentrations. Since the amendment 
    made by this final rule would apply solely to HAs operating under the 
    terms of a court order or consent decree, and therefore not involve all 
    housing authorities and participants in the Section 8 Rental 
    Certificate and Voucher Programs prior public comment is unnecessary.
    
    III. Other Matters
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Secretary, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
    U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed and approved this final rule, and in so 
    doing certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule 
    amends Sec. 982.353 to eliminate any possible conflict between the 
    existing regulatory language and judicial desegregation goals, and is 
    limited to housing authorities operating under court orders or consent 
    decrees that address such goals. The rule will have no adverse or 
    disproportionate economic impact on small entities.
    
    Environmental Impact
    
        A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to the 
    environment was made in accordance with HUD regulations in 24 CFR part 
    50 that implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) at the time of development of the 
    July 3, 1995 final rule. That finding remains applicable to this rule 
    which merely makes a technical amendment to the July 3, 1995 final 
    rule. The FONSI is available for public inspection between 7:30 a.m. 
    and 5:30 p.m. weekdays in the Office of the Rules Docket Clerk, Office 
    of General Counsel, Room 10276, Department of Housing and Urban 
    Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC.
    
    Executive Order 12612, Federalism
    
        The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under section 6(a) 
    of Executive Order 12612, Federalism, has determined that this rule 
    will not have substantial direct effects on States or their political 
    subdivisions, or the relationship between the Federal government and 
    the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among 
    the various levels of government. This purpose of this rule is to 
    address any possible conflict between HUD's regulation at Sec. 982.353 
    and judicial efforts to remedy discriminatory racial or economic 
    concentrations. This rule will assist to facilitate the actions of 
    courts, and will not affect the relationship between the Federal 
    Government and State and local governments.
    
    Executive Order 12606, The Family
    
        The General Counsel, as the Designated Official under Executive 
    Order 12606, The Family, has determined that this rule will not have 
    the potential for significant impact on family formation, maintenance, 
    or
    
    [[Page 42131]]
    
    general well-being, and thus is not subject to review under the Order. 
    This rule removes any potential conflict between 24 CFR 982.353 and 
    nondiscrimination obligations generated by a court order or consent 
    decree. No significant change in existing HUD policies or programs will 
    result from promulgation of this rule.
    
    List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 982
    
        Grant programs--housing and community development, Housing, Rent 
    subsidies, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Accordingly, 24 CFR part 982 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 982--SECTION 8 TENANT-BASED ASSISTANCE: UNIFIED RULE FOR 
    TENANT-BASED ASSISTANCE UNDER THE SECTION 8 RENTAL CERTIFICATE 
    PROGRAM AND THE SECTION 8 RENTAL VOUCHER PROGRAM
    
        1. The authority citation for 24 CFR part 982 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1437f and 3535(d).
    
        2. Section 982.353 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (f) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.353  Where family can lease a unit with tenant-based 
    assistance.
    
        (a) Assistance in the initial HA jurisdiction. The family may 
    receive tenant-based assistance to lease a unit located anywhere in the 
    jurisdiction (as determined by State and local law) of the initial HA. 
    HUD may nevertheless restrict the family's right to lease such a unit 
    anywhere in such jurisdiction if HUD determines that limitations on a 
    family's opportunity to select among available units in that 
    jurisdiction are appropriate to achieve desegregation goals in 
    accordance with obligations generated by a court order or consent 
    decree.
    * * * * *
        (f) Freedom of choice. The HA may not directly or indirectly reduce 
    the family's opportunity to select among available units except as 
    provided in paragraph (a) of this section, or elsewhere in this part 
    982 (e.g. prohibition on use of ineligible housing, housing not meeting 
    HQS, or housing for which the contract rent (certificate program) or 
    rent to owner (voucher program) exceeds a reasonable rent).
    
        Dated: August 6, 1996.
    Michael B. Janis,
    General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
    [FR Doc. 96-20533 Filed 8-12-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4210-33-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/12/1996
Published:
08/13/1996
Department:
Housing and Urban Development Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-20533
Dates:
September 12, 1996.
Pages:
42130-42131 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FR-4119-F-01
PDF File:
96-20533.pdf
CFR: (1)
24 CFR 982.353