97-21448. Migratory Bird Hunting; Temporary Conditional Approval of Tungsten-Iron Shot as Nontoxic for the 1997-98 Season  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 43444-43447]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-21448]
    
    
          
    
    [[Page 43443]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part III
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of the Interior
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    
    
    Migratory Bird Hunting; Temporary Conditional Approval of Tungsten-Iron 
    Shot as Nontoxic for the 1996-98 Season; Final Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 156 / Wednesday, August 13, 1997 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 43444]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    RIN 1018-AE09
    
    
    Migratory Bird Hunting; Temporary Conditional Approval of 
    Tungsten-Iron Shot as Nontoxic for the 1997-98 Season
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) amends Section 
    20.21(j) and temporarily approves tungsten-iron shot as nontoxic for 
    the 1997-98 migratory bird hunting season. The toxicological report and 
    extensive literature search and analysis suggests that tungsten and 
    tungsten-iron are nontoxic under conditions for the proposed shot 
    configuration. Analysis of the toxicity study reveals no adverse 
    effects over a 30-day period when dosing mallards with 8 BB-size 
    tungsten-iron shot.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 1, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Schmidt, Chief, or Carol 
    Anderson, Wildlife Biologist, Office of Migratory Bird Management 
    (MBMO), (703) 358-1714.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since the mid-1970s, the Service has sought 
    to identify shot that, when spent, does not pose a significant toxic 
    hazard to migratory birds and other wildlife. Currently, steel shot and 
    bismuth-tin shot are approved by the Service as nontoxic. The Service 
    believes approval for other suitable candidate shot materials as 
    nontoxic is feasible. Compliance with the use of nontoxic shot is 
    increasing over the last few years. The Service believes that this 
    level of compliance will continue to increase with the availability and 
    approval of other nontoxic shot types. The Service is eager to consider 
    these other materials for approval as nontoxic shot.
        Federal Cartridge Company's (Anoka, MN) candidate shot is made from 
    sintering tungsten and iron, which forms a two-phase alloy. Shot made 
    from this material has a density of approximately 10.3 gm/cc, or 94 
    percent of the density of lead. The tested shot will contain nominally 
    55 percent tungsten and 45 percent iron, by weight; whereas, the 
    marketed shot will contain nominally 40 percent tungsten and 60 percent 
    iron, by weight. The pellet will have sufficient iron to attract a 
    magnet. The Service, in consultation with the U.S. Geological Service, 
    Biological Resources Division, considers the higher tungsten ratio of 
    the tested shot more potentially toxic and that the lower ratio of the 
    marketed shot poses significantly less risk.
        Federal's application includes a description of the new tungsten-
    iron shot, a toxicological report, and results of a 30-day dosing study 
    (Test 1) to assess the toxicity of this shot in game-farm mallards as 
    outlined in 50 CFR 20.134(c)(2). The toxicological report incorporates 
    toxicity information (a synopsis of acute and chronic toxicity data for 
    birds, acute effects on mammals, potential for environmental concern, 
    toxicity to aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates, amphibians and 
    reptiles), and information on environmental fate and transport (shot 
    alteration, environmental half-life, and environmental concentration). 
    The toxicity study is a 30-day dosing test to determine if the 
    candidate shot poses any deleterious effects to game-farm mallards.
        Toxicity Information: There is considerable difference in the 
    toxicity of soluble and insoluble compounds of tungsten and iron. 
    Elemental tungsten and iron are virtually insoluble and, therefore, are 
    expected to be nontoxic. After completion of the literature review, 
    there appears to be no basis for concern of toxicity to wildlife for 
    the candidate shot material (metallic tungsten and iron) via ingestion 
    by fish, birds, or mammals (Bursian et al. 1996; Gigiena 1983; Patty 
    1981; Industrial Medicine 1946; Karantassis 1924).
        Environmental Fate and Transport: Tungsten is insoluble in water 
    and, therefore, not mobile in hypergenic environments. Tungsten is very 
    stable with acids and does not easily complex. Preferential uptake by 
    plants in acid soil suggests uptake of tungsten in the anionic form 
    associated with tungsten minerals rather than elemental tungsten 
    (Kabata-Peddias 1984).
        Environmental Concentration: The expected environmental 
    concentration (EEC) is defined as the concentration of a chemical in a 
    particular environmental compartment that is based on an estimate or 
    modeling simulation of use, disposal, transport, and fate of a 
    chemical. Calculation of the EEC for a terrestrial ecosystem is on 
    69,000 shot per hectare (Pain 1990), assuming complete erosion of 
    material in 5 cm of soil. The EEC for tungsten in soil is 32.9 mg/kg of 
    shot material left in the soil after the initial degradation of the 
    shot. This calculated amount is based on shot composed of 62.9 percent 
    tungsten-iron alloy, 11.87 percent tungsten, and 25.31 percent iron. 
    Adverse effects on biota are not expected to occur for shot components, 
    given the Hazard Quotients (HQs).
        Calculation of the expected environmental concentration (EEC) for 
    an aquatic ecosystem assumes complete erosion of the shot in one cubic 
    foot of water. The EEC in water for tungsten was 10.5 mg/L left in the 
    water after the initial degredation of the shot. This calculated amount 
    is based on shot composed of 62.9 percent tungsten-iron alloy, 11.87 
    percent tungsten, and 25.31 percent iron. Given these HQs, adverse 
    effects on biota are not expected to occur for shot components.
        An extensive literature search and review provides information on 
    the toxicity of elemental tungsten to waterfowl and other birds. 
    Ringelman et al.'s (1993) investigation of the effects of ingested 
    tungsten-bismuth-tin (TBT) shot on captive mallards found no acute 
    toxicity. Orally dosing 28-week old game-farm mallards with 12 to 17 
    pellets (1.03g) of TBT shot revealed no evidence of intoxication over a 
    period of 32 days. No birds died during the trial. Gross lesions were 
    not observed during the postmortem examination. Histopathological 
    examination did not reveal any evidence of toxicity or tissue damage. 
    Tungsten was not detectable in kidney or liver samples. The authors 
    concluded that TBT shot presents virtually no potential for acute 
    intoxication in mallards.
        A study by Kraabel et al. (1996) assessed the effects of embedded 
    tungsten-bismuth-tin shot on mallards. The authors' conclusion was that 
    TBT is not acutely toxic when implanted in mallard muscle tissue. 
    Inflammatory reactions to TBT shot were localized, and had no 
    detectable systemic effects on mallard health.
        Nell (1981) fed laying hens 0.4 or 1g/kg tungsten in a commercial 
    mash for five months to assess the reproductive performance. Weekly egg 
    production was normal and hatchability of fertile eggs was not 
    affected.
        Large doses of tungsten given to chickens either through injection 
    or by feeding saw an increase in tissue concentration of tungsten and a 
    decreased tissue concentration of molybdenum (Nell 1981). The loss rate 
    of tungsten from the liver occurred in an exponential manner with a 
    half-life of 27 hours. The alterations in molybdenum metabolism seem to 
    identify with tungsten and not of molybdenum deficiency. Death due to 
    tungsten occurred when tissue concentrations were increased to 
    25g/g liver. At this concentration, the
    
    [[Page 43445]]
    
    activity of xanthine dehydrogenase was zero.
        In Federal's dosing study, eight male and 8 female adult mallards 
    were given 8 #4 steel shot, 8 #4 lead shot, or 8 BB's of tungsten-iron 
    and observed over a 30-day period. An additional 8 males and 8 females 
    were given no shot. All tungsten-iron birds survived the test with a 
    slight increase in body weight. There were no changes in hematocrit, 
    hemoglobin concentration, and ALAD activity, as well as 25 plasma 
    chemistry parameters. Five of the 16 tungsten-iron birds had a mild 
    hepatocellular biliary stasis, but the authors felt this was not 
    remarkable. No other histopathological lesions were found. There was 
    some absorption of tungsten in the femur, kidney, and liver, with some 
    effect on the bile. In general,however, no adverse effects were seen 
    when mallards were given 8 BB-size tungsten-iron shot and monitored 
    over a 30-day period. Fifty percent of the lead-dosed birds (5 males 
    and 3 females) died during the 30-day test while there were no 
    mortalities in the other groups. Lead-dosed birds were the only ones to 
    display green excreta, lethargy, and ataxia. Alteration of body weights 
    was not significant in any of the treatments, although lead-dosed birds 
    which died during the trial lost an average of 30 percent of their body 
    weight. Hematocrit, hemoglobin concentrations, and ALAD activity were 
    significantly depressed at day 15 in the lead-dose females, while lead-
    dose males had significantly depressed hematocrit and hemoglobin 
    concentration in comparison to the other three groups. There were no 
    significant differences in these whole-blood parameters at day 30.
        As a result of the toxicological report and toxicity test the 
    Service concludes that tungsten-iron shot, nominally 40-55 percent 
    tungsten and 60-45 percent iron, by weight with <1 percent="" residual="" lead,="" does="" not="" impose="" significant="" danger="" to="" migratory="" birds="" and="" other="" wildlife="" and="" their="" habitats.="" the="" service="" has="" some="" concern="" that="" the="" absorption="" of="" tungsten="" into="" the="" femur,="" kidney,="" and="" liver="" may="" have="" some="" potential="" effect="" on="" the="" spectacled="" eider="" (somateria="" fischeri),="" a="" species="" already="" subject="" to="" adverse="" weather,="" predation,="" and="" lead="" poisoning="" when="" waterfowl="" are="" harvested="" in="" its="" yukon-kuskokwim="" delta="" (y-="" k="" delta)="" habitat="" in="" alaska.="" until="" the="" results="" of="" reproductive/chronic="" toxicity="" tests,="" which="" includes="" the="" assessment="" of="" reproduction,="" fertility="" rates,="" and="" egg="" hatchability="" (egg="" weight,="" shell="" thickness,="" and="" content="" analysis)="" have="" been="" completed="" and="" the="" service="" has="" reviewed="" the="" results,="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" cannot="" be="" conditionally="" approved="" for="" the="" y-="" k="" delta="" habitat="" in="" alaska.="" the="" first="" condition="" of="" final="" unconditional="" approval="" is="" the="" concurrent="" running="" of="" an="" adverse="" condition="" test="" (test="" 2)="" and="" a="" reproductive/chronic="" toxicity="" test="" (test="" 3)="" on="" game-farm="" mallards="" as="" outlined="" in="" 50="" cfr="" 20.134="" (c)(2)="" and="" in="" consultation="" with="" the="" service's="" office="" of="" migratory="" bird="" management="" and="" the="" u.s.="" geological="" survey's="" division="" of="" biological="" resources.="" this="" study="" includes="" assessment="" of="" reproduction,="" fertility="" rates,="" and="" egg="" hatchability="" (egg="" weight,="" shell="" thickness,="" and="" content="" analysis).="" the="" test="" requires="" the="" applicant="" to="" demonstrate="" that="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" is="" nontoxic="" to="" waterfowl="" and="" their="" offspring.="" the="" second="" condition="" of="" final="" unconditional="" approval="" is="" testing="" for="" residual="" lead="" levels.="" in="" the="" federal="" register="" of="" august="" 18,="" 1995="" (60="" fr="" 43314),="" the="" service="" indicated="" it="" would="" establish="" a="" maximum="" level="" for="" residual="" lead.="" the="" service,="" in="" consultation="" with="" the="" usgs--division="" of="" biological="" resources,="" determined="" the="" maximum="" environmentally="" acceptable="" level="" of="" lead="" in="" any="" nontoxic="" shot="" is="" trace="" amounts="" or=""><1 percent="" and="" is="" incorporating="" this="" requirement="" into="" this="" rule="" and="" will="" incorporate="" it="" into="" any="" subsequent="" final="" rule="" that="" may="" be="" promulgated.="" federal="" documented="" that="" the="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" had="" no="" residual="" lead="" levels="" equal="" to="" or="" exceeding="" 1="" percent.="" the="" third="" condition="" of="" final="" unconditional="" approval="" involves="" enforcement.="" in="" the="" august="" 18,="" 1995,="" federal="" register="" (60="" fr="" 43314),="" the="" service="" indicated="" that="" final="" unconditional="" approval="" of="" any="" nontoxic="" shot="" would="" be="" contingent="" upon="" the="" development="" and="" availability="" of="" a="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" device.="" several="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" devices="" are="" under="" development="" to="" separate="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" from="" lead="" shot.="" furthermore,="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" can="" be="" drawn="" to="" a="" magnet="" as="" a="" simple="" field="" detection="" method.="" this="" rule="" amends="" 50="" cfr="" 20.21(j)="" by="" temporarily="" approving="" tungsten-="" iron="" shot="" as="" nontoxic="" for="" the="" 1997-98="" migratory="" bird="" hunting="" season="" throughout="" the="" united="" states="" except="" for="" the="" y-k="" delta="" habitat="" in="" alaska.="" it="" is="" based="" on="" the="" original="" request="" made="" to="" the="" service="" by="" federal="" cartridge="" company="" on="" august="" 20,="" 1996,="" the="" toxicological="" report,="" and="" acute="" toxicity="" study.="" results="" of="" the="" toxicological="" report="" and="" 30-="" day="" toxicity="" test="" undertaken="" for="" federal="" cartridge="" company="" indicate="" the="" apparent="" absence="" of="" any="" deleterious="" effects="" of="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" when="" ingested="" by="" captive-reared="" mallards="" or="" to="" the="" ecosystem.="" public="" comments="" and="" responses="" the="" january="" 31,="" 1997,="" proposed="" rule="" published="" in="" the="" federal="" register="" (62="" fr="" 4877)="" invited="" public="" comments="" from="" interested="" parties.="" the="" closing="" date="" for="" receipt="" of="" all="" comments="" was="" april="" 1,="" 1997.="" during="" this="" 60-day="" comment="" period,="" the="" service="" received="" five="" comment="" letters.="" of="" these="" comment="" letters,="" three="" were="" from="" individuals="" and="" two="" from="" industry="" organizations.="" individuals="" expressed="" support="" for="" the="" temporary="" approval="" of="" tungsten-iron="" shot.="" individuals="" ``.="" .="" .="" would="" love="" the="" opportunity="" to="" try="" the="" new="" shot''="" and="" believed="" that="" ``.="" .="" .="" any="" nontoxic="" alternative="" that="" approaches="" the="" effectiveness="" of="" lead="" should="" be="" explored.''="" the="" bismuth="" cartridge="" company="" (bismuth)="" is="" concerned="" that="" the="" service="" should="" ensure="" that="" all="" applicants="" for="" non-toxic="" shot="" approval="" are="" subject="" to="" comparable="" requirements="" and="" conditions.="" the="" service="" does="" ensure="" that="" any="" candidate="" nontoxic="" material="" will="" comply="" with="" current="" regulations="" set="" forth="" in="" 50="" cfr="" 20.134="" for="" nontoxic="" shot="" approval.="" applications="" for="" approval="" must="" include="" a="" description="" of="" the="" candidate="" shot,="" a="" toxicological="" report="" on="" the="" candidate="" shot,="" and="" a="" 30-day="" dosing="" test="" with="" mallards.="" as="" new="" information="" becomes="" available,="" applications="" may="" be="" revised="" to="" include="" this="" information,="" which="" will="" assist="" the="" service="" in="" evaluating="" the="" candidate="" material.="" furthermore,="" bismuth="" stated="" that="" ``...no="" testing="" of="" reproductive="" tissues="" (i.e.,="" gonads)="" was="" conducted="" in="" association="" with="" federal's="" 30-="" day="" toxicity="" testing.''="" the="" current="" regulations="" do="" not="" require="" that="" gonads="" be="" chemically="" analyzed="" for="" metals="" in="" test="" 1.="" the="" service="" notified="" federal="" that="" this="" would="" not="" be="" a="" requirement="" during="" the="" test="" 1="" phase="" because="" federal="" demonstrated="" that="" there="" was="" existing="" data="" on="" the="" effects="" of="" tungsten="" and="" iron="" on="" the="" reproductive="" tissues="" in="" the="" scientific="" literature.="" once="" the="" shot="" is="" conditionally="" approved,="" guidance="" for="" further="" testing="" is="" provided="" to="" the="" applicant.="" following="" satisfactory="" completion="" of="" tests="" 1,="" 2,="" and="" 3,="" or="" their="" equivalent,="" and="" publication="" of="" a="" summary="" of="" these="" results="" in="" the="" federal="" register="" for="" public="" comment,="" the="" candidate="" material="" is="" concomitantly="" proposed="" for="" inclusion="" in="" 50="" cfr="" 20.21(j).="" bismuth="" is="" also="" concerned="" that="" federal="" is="" not="" being="" held="" to="" as="" strict="" a="" requirement="" as="" they="" were="" during="" their="" application="" process="" for="" approval="" of="" bismuth-tin.="" bismuth="" states="" that="" they="" [[page="" 43446]]="" conducted="" additional="" assays="" to="" demonstrate="" that="" bismuth-tin="" shot's="" residual="" lead="" levels="" were="" at="" levels="" well="" below="" the=""><1 percent="" standard.="" their="" concern="" lies="" in="" the="" fact="" that="" the="" proposed="" rule="" does="" not="" state="" that="" the="" applicant="" will="" need="" to="" provide="" data="" demonstrating="" the="" absence="" of="" any="" carcinogenic="" materials="" in="" its="" shot.="" the="" service="" required="" the="" applicant="" to="" demonstrate="" that="" the="" candidate="" shot="" contains="" no="" significant="" trace="" levels="" of="" lead="" or="" other="" toxic="" or="" carcinogenic="" materials.="" the="" service="" indicated="" in="" the="" august="" 18,="" 1995,="" federal="" register,="" that="" a="" maximum="" level="" of="" residual="" lead="" would="" be="" established.="" the="" service,="" in="" consultation="" with="" the="" usgs--division="" of="" biological="" resources="" (formerly="" the="" national="" biological="" service),="" determined="" the="" maximum="" environmentally="" acceptable="" level="" of="" lead="" in="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" is="" trace="" amounts="" or=""><1 percent.="" this="" requirement="" was="" incorporated="" in="" the="" final="" rule="" approving="" bismuth-tin="" shot.="" this="" same="" requirement="" applies="" to="" tungsten-iron="" shot.="" winchester="" states="" ``the="" shot="" sample="" submitted="" for="" the="" acute="" toxicity="" portion="" of="" the="" required="" testing="" was="" significantly="" different="" from="" the="" shot="" that="" is="" being="" marketed="" and="" requested="" for="" approval.''="" winchester="" analyzed="" samples="" of="" shot="" they="" obtained="" at="" retail="" and="" found="" that="" the="" tungsten-iron="" alloy="" phases="" varied.="" ``since="" the="" application="" indicates="" that="" the="" shot="" is="" heated="" to="" thermal="" equilibrium="" and="" not="" chemical="" equilibrium,="" this="" is="" not="" surprising.''="" furthermore,="" two="" different="" phases="" of="" intermetallic="" compound="">2W and FeW) 
    and pure tungsten were also present in the marketed shot. The Service 
    requested additional information from Federal regarding the details of 
    the manufacturing process of the tungsten-iron shot. Federal states the 
    tungsten-iron shot is sintered at 1520 deg.C under a tight time and 
    temperature tolerance. The Fe7W6 compound is 
    formed at thermal equilibrium, which takes into account all energy 
    factors, unlike chemical equilibrium. The shot is then quickly cooled 
    to ambient temperatures much like quenching steel. High cooling rates 
    of the tungsten-iron shot, in part due to the small size of the 
    tungsten-iron shot, preclude the formation of compounds other than 
    Fe7W6. The Fe7W6 that forms 
    at the 1520 deg.C sintering temperature is cooled too quickly to change 
    to other compounds. Transformation to other compounds is sluggish; x-
    ray diffraction analysis confirms the absence of the other 
    intermetallic compounds. The Toxicity Test 1, and subsequent Toxicity 
    Tests 2 and 3, will be conducted using tungsten-iron shot representing 
    a ``worst-case'' scenario, i.e., the shot being tested has a higher 
    concentration of the Fe7W6 compound than the shot 
    Federal plans to manufacture for public use.
        Winchester also raised their concern about the fact that the 
    ``soft'' matrix of this tungsten-iron shot is as hard or harder than 
    current gun barrels which have been designed for steel shot. The 
    Service agrees that this should be a concern for the consumer. Federal 
    recognized that the hardness of the tungsten-iron shot would require a 
    new wad to protect shotgun bores from scouring. Federal designed a wad 
    made of high-density polyethylene which features three inner petals 
    overlapped by three outer petals so there are no exposed wad slits to 
    allow the shot to contact the barrel or chokes. The wad's outer petals 
    are designed to shear back or off once it exits the barrel. 
    Additionally, tungsten-iron shot is not recommended for use with older 
    shotguns or for fine double guns not designed to handle steel. Federal 
    advises that these tungsten loads should only be shot through barrels 
    and chokes approved for use with steel shot.
        Furthermore, Winchester is concerned that the payloads and/or 
    pellet counts in the marketed shot have generally not been found to be 
    effective, efficient harvesters of game at anything but very modest 
    ranges. The primary shortcoming is insufficient pattern density to 
    ensure the necessary number of pellet strikes for consistent, clean 
    bagging of game. It is reasonable to expect the possibility of a high 
    crippling rate for either of these very low pellet count loads. 
    Previous uses of low pellet count, relatively high energy pellets have 
    generally not yielded satisfactory results. Federal recognized that 
    tungsten-iron shot has different ballistic properties than that of 
    steel and bismuth-tin shot. Consequently, they conducted ballistic 
    tests using ballistic software modeling and test-firing the tungsten 
    shot. Their research indicated that a relatively light payload with a 
    high velocity was the best alternative. Tests show that the new loads 
    shot tight patterns like steel; offered ballistic advantages of high 
    velocity; had better downrange energy than steel, bismuth, or lead; and 
    produced better penetration than the other pellet materials. The 
    Service expects that crippling rates may increase slightly with the 
    advent of any new nontoxic shot; however, continued education and 
    training of waterfowl hunters will help keep crippling loss to a 
    minimum. The effectiveness of any shot is a function of the shooter's 
    ability to place the pellets on the bird, the pellet's energy at point-
    of-contact, and the pellet's ability to penetrate. Hunters should test 
    different loads with their guns before hunting with any new shot so 
    that adjustments can be made to their technique in order to reduce 
    crippling losses. Initial field testing in Canada has shown that the 
    tungsten-iron shot performed exceptionally well.
    
    References
    
        A list of references is available and will be provided upon 
    request.
    
    NEPA Consideration
    
        In compliance with the requirements of section 102(2)(C) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 
    and the Council on Environmental Quality's regulation for implementing 
    NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), the Service prepared an Environmental 
    Assessment (EA) in December, 1996. This EA is available to the public 
    at the Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, ms 634--ARLSQ, 1849 C Street NW., Washington D.C. 20240. Based 
    on review and evaluation of the information in the EA, the Service 
    determined the action to amend 50 CFR 20.21(j) to extend temporary 
    conditional approval of tungsten-iron shot as nontoxic for 1997-98 and 
    1998-99 migratory bird hunting seasons would not be a major Federal 
    action that would significantly affect the quality of the human 
    environment.
    
    Endangered Species Act Considerations
    
        Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1972, as amended 
    (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), provides that, ``The Secretary shall review 
    other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in 
    furtherance of the purposes of this Act'' (and) shall ``insure that any 
    action authorized, funded or carried out ... is not likely to 
    jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or 
    threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification 
    of (critical) habitat ...'' Pursuant to section 7 of the ESA, MBMO 
    sought review and concurrence that this action is not likely 
    to adversely affect threatened, endangered, proposed, and 
    category 1 species. Based on review and evaluation of the toxicity 
    testing and available information, the Service determined that no 
    adverse impact on endangered and threatened species would result from 
    the proposed action. The results of this review may be inspected by the 
    public in, and will be available to the public from, the Office of 
    Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, ms 634--
    
    [[Page 43447]]
    
     ARLSQ, 1849 C Street NW, Washington D.C. 20240.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 12866, and the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) 
    requires the preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will 
    have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities, 
    which includes small businesses, organizations or governmental 
    jurisdictions. The economic impacts of annual hunting on small business 
    entities were analyzed in detail and a Small Entity Flexibility 
    Analysis (Analysis), was issued by the Service in 1995. The Analysis 
    documented the significant beneficial economic effect on a substantial 
    number of small entities. The primary source of information about 
    hunter expenditures for migratory game bird hunting is the National 
    Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted at 5-year intervals. The 
    Analysis utilized the 1991 National Hunting and Fishing Survey and the 
    U.S. Department of Commerce's County Business Patterns from which it 
    was estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend between $10 and 
    $59 million at small businesses in 1995. The approval of tungsten-iron 
    as an alternative shot to steel and bismuth-tin will have a minor 
    positive impact on small businesses by allowing them to sell a third 
    nontoxic shot to the hunting public. However, the overall effect to 
    hunting expenditures in general would be minor. Therefore, the Service 
    determined this rule will have no effect on small entities since the 
    approved shot merely will supplement nontoxic shot already in commerce 
    and available throughout the retail and wholesale distribution systems. 
    The Service anticipates no dislocation or other local effects, with 
    regard to hunters and others. This rule was not subject to Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) review under Executive Order 12866. The 
    Service has examined this regulation under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    of 1995 and found it to contain no information collection requirements.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform
    
        The Service has determined and certifies pursuant to the Unfunded 
    Mandates Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this rulemaking will not 
    impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local or 
    State government or private entities.
    
    Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988
    
        The Service, in promulgating this rule, determines that these 
    regulations meet the applicable standards provided in Sections 3(a) and 
    3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
    
    Authorship
    
        The primary author of this final rule is Carol Anderson, Office of 
    Migratory Bird Management.
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20
    
        Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Transportation, Wildlife.
        Accordingly, Part 20, Subchapter B, Chapter 1 of Title 50 of the 
    Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
    
    PART 20--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 20 continues to read as follows:
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712 and 16 U.S.C. 742 a--j.
        2. Section 20.21 is amended by revising paragraph (j), introductory 
    text, and adding paragraph (j)(2) to read as follows:
    
    Sec. 20.21  Hunting methods.
    
    * * * * *
        (j) While possessing shot (either in shotshells or as loose shot 
    for muzzleloading) other than steel shot, or bismuth-tin (97 parts 
    bismuth: 3 parts tin with <1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot,="" or="" tungsten-="" iron="" (nominally="" 40="" parts="" tungsten:="" 60="" parts="" iron="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot="" or="" such="" shot="" approved="" as="" nontoxic="" by="" the="" director="" pursuant="" to="" procedures="" set="" forth="" in="" 20.134,="" provided="" that:="" (1)="" *="" *="" *="" (2)="" tungsten-iron="" shot="" (nominally="" 40="" parts="" tungsten:="" 60="" parts="" iron="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" is="" legal="" as="" nontoxic="" shot="" for="" the="" 1997-="" 98="" migratory="" bird="" hunting="" season,="" except="" for="" the="" yukon-kuskokwim="" delta="" habitat="" in="" alaska.="" dated:="" august="" 7,="" 1997.="" donald="" j.="" barry,="" acting="" assistant="" secretary="" for="" fish="" and="" wildlife="" and="" parks.="" [fr="" doc.="" 97-21448="" filed="" 8-12-97;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 4310-55-f="">

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/1/1997
Published:
08/13/1997
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-21448
Dates:
September 1, 1997.
Pages:
43444-43447 (4 pages)
RINs:
1018-AE09: Migratory Bird Hunting: Conditional Approval of Tungsten-Iron Shot as Nontoxic for 1997-98 and 1998-99 Seasons
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1018-AE09/migratory-bird-hunting-conditional-approval-of-tungsten-iron-shot-as-nontoxic-for-1997-98-and-1998-9
PDF File:
97-21448.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 20.21