98-21759. Leland H. Brooks; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 156 (Thursday, August 13, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 43431-43432]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-21759]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [IA 98-024]
    
    
    Leland H. Brooks; Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed 
    Activities (Effective Immediately)
    
    I
    
        Leland H. Brooks was an employee of Westinghouse a contractor to 
    Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) at the Diablo Canyon Nuclear 
    Power Plant (Diablo Canyon). PG&E holds NRC license Nos. DPR-80 and 
    DPR-82, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) 
    pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50. The licenses authorize the operation of 
    Units 1 and 2 of the Diablo Canyon facility in accordance with the 
    conditions specified therein.
    
    II
    
        On April 16, 1997, Mr. Brooks, a millwright, was granted temporary 
    unescorted access to Diablo Canyon as an employee of Westinghouse. PG&E 
    terminated Mr. Brooks access to Diablo Canyon on May 21, 1997, upon 
    completion of the work Mr. Brooks was hired to perform. PG&E's decision 
    to grant Mr. Brooks unescorted access was based on the information Mr. 
    Brooks provided in a signed Personnel Access Questionnaire dated April 
    7, 1997, including information Mr. Brooks provided about his arrest 
    record. In addition to requesting information about any arrests, this 
    questionnaire clearly stated, ``For all arrests and/or convictions that 
    occurred in the last five years, a copy of your court orders must be 
    provided with this application.'' Mr. Brooks wrote ``None'' next to 
    this statement. On July 22, 1997, approximately two months after Mr. 
    Brooks' access to Diablo Canyon had been terminated, PG&E received 
    information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) which 
    indicated that Mr. Brooks had failed to inform PG&E of several arrests 
    and convictions, including a 1995 felony charge which was still 
    pending. PG&E conducted an investigation and determined that Mr. Brooks 
    knowingly withheld and/or falsified information on the Personnel Access 
    Questionnaire. On August 6, 1997, PG&E issued Mr. Brooks a letter 
    informing Mr. Brooks of this conclusion and denying Mr. Brooks future 
    access to Diablo Canyon.
        The deliberately false information that Mr. Brooks provided to the 
    licensee, as well as the failure to provide copies of the required 
    court records, were violations of 10 CFR 50.5, ``Deliberate 
    Misconduct.'' Specifically, Section 50.5(a)(2) provides, in part, that 
    an employee of a contractor to a licensee may not deliberately submit 
    to a licensee information that the person submitting the information 
    knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the 
    NRC. The false and incomplete information that Mr. Brooks submitted was 
    material because PG&E is required to consider criminal history in 
    making a determination as to whether to grant unescorted access in 
    accordance with 10 CFR 73.56.
        On April 27, 1998, the NRC issued a letter to Mr. Brooks, informing 
    Mr. Brooks that the NRC was considering escalated enforcement action 
    against him and providing Mr. Brooks a choice of requesting a 
    predecisional enforcement conference or submitting a written response. 
    Although Mr. Brooks telephoned the NRC regional office and stated that 
    he didn't recall ever working at the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant, 
    he has not submitted a written response or requested a predecisional 
    enforcement conference, and he has not provided any evidence to support 
    his claim. The NRC's letter to Mr. Brooks informed him that in the 
    absence of a response, we would proceed with enforcement action.
        Based on the above, the NRC has concluded that Mr. Brooks engaged 
    in deliberate misconduct by deliberately omitting criminal history 
    information when completing a Personnel Access Questionnaire to gain 
    unescorted access to the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plants. The NRC 
    must be able to rely on employees of licensees and their contractors to 
    comply with NRC requirements, including the requirement to provide 
    information that is complete and accurate in all material respects. Mr. 
    Brooks' action in deliberately providing false information to the 
    licensee raises serious doubt about his trustworthiness and reliability 
    and particularly whether he can be relied upon to comply with NRC 
    requirements and to provide complete and accurate information to NRC 
    licensees in the future.
        Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that 
    licensed activities can be conducted in compliance with the 
    Commission's requirements and that the health and safety of the public 
    would be protected if Mr. Brooks were permitted to be involved in NRC-
    licensed activities. Therefore, the public health, safety and interest 
    require that Mr. Brooks be prohibited from any involvement in NRC-
    licensed activities for a period of five years from the date of this 
    Order. Additionally, Mr. Brooks is required to notify the NRC of his 
    first employment in NRC-licensed activities for the five year period 
    after the above prohibition period. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    2.202, based on the significance of Mr. Brooks' conduct described above 
    and the fact that he could seek and obtain employment and unescorted 
    access at other nuclear facilities, and engage in licensed activities 
    before his criminal history became known to the licensee, I find that 
    the public health, safety and interest require that this Order be 
    effective immediately.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 103, 161b, 161i, 161o, and 186 of 
    the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR Part 50.5, and 10 CFR 150.20, It is 
    hereby ordered, effective immediately, that:
    
    [[Page 43432]]
    
        1. Leland H. Brooks is prohibited for five years from the date of 
    this order from engaging in NRC licensed activities. NRC-licensed 
    activities are those that are conducted pursuant to a specific or 
    general license issued by the NRC, including, but not limited to, those 
    activities of Agreement State licensees conducted pursuant to the 
    authority granted by 10 CFR 150.20.
        2. If Leland H. Brooks is currently involved with another employer 
    in NRC-licensed activities, he must immediately cease such activities, 
    and inform the NRC of the name, address and telephone number of the 
    employer, and provide a copy of this Order to the employer.
        3. For the five-year period after the above prohibition period has 
    expired, Mr. Brooks shall notify the Director, Office of Enforcement, 
    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 20555, within 20 
    days of the first time he accepts an offer for employment in NRC-
    licensed activities, as defined in Paragraph IV.1 above. In the 
    notification, he will include a statement of his commitment to comply 
    with regulatory requirements and address why the NRC should have 
    confidence that he will comply with regulatory requirements, and the 
    name, address and telephone number of his employer or entity where he 
    will be involved in licensed activities.
        The Director, Office of Enforcement, may relax or rescind, in 
    writing, any of the above conditions upon a showing by Mr. Brooks of 
    good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr. Brooks must, and any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this 
    Order, and may request a hearing on this order within 20 days of its 
    issuance. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to 
    extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of 
    time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, 
    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and include 
    a statement of good cause for the extension. The answer may consent to 
    this Order. Unless the answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, 
    in writing and under oath or affirmation, specifically admit or deny 
    each allegation or charge made in this Order and shall set forth the 
    matters of fact and law on which Mr. Brooks, or any other such person 
    adversely affected, relies and the reasons as to why the Order should 
    not have been issued. Any answer or request for a hearing shall be 
    submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Attn.: 
    Chief, Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff, Washington, D.C. 20555. 
    Copies also shall be sent to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Deputy 
    Assistant General Counsel for Enforcement at the same address, to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, 
    Arlington, Texas 76011, and to Mr. Brooks if the answer or hearing 
    request is by a person other than Mr. Brooks. If a person other than 
    Mr. Brooks requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with 
    particularity the manner in which his or her interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d).
        If a hearing is requested by Mr. Brooks or a person whose interest 
    is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an Order designating 
    the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is held, the issue to 
    be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Order should be 
    sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i)I Mr. Brooks may, in addition to 
    demanding a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move 
    the presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the 
    Order, on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for a hearing, or written approval of 
    an extension of time in which to request a hearing, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of 
    this Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of 
    time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions 
    specified in Section IV shall be final when the extension expires if a 
    hearing request has not been received. AN ANSWER OR A REQUEST FOR 
    HEARING SHALL NOT STAY THE IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS ORDER.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 24th day of July 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    William D. Travers,
    Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory Effectiveness.
    [FR Doc. 98-21759 Filed 8-12-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/13/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-21759
Pages:
43431-43432 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IA 98-024
PDF File:
98-21759.pdf