99-20962. Information Collections Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44232-44234]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-20962]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Information Collections Submitted to the Office of Management and 
    Budget for Approval Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of information collection; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has sent the 
    collection of information described below to the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB) for approval under the provisions of the Paperwork 
    Reduction
    
    [[Page 44233]]
    
    Act of 1995. The public may obtain copies of the specific information 
    collection requirements, related guidelines and explanatory material by 
    contacting the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer at the 
    address provided below.
    
    DATES: We will consider all comments received on or before September 
    13, 1999. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the 
    information collection but may respond after 30 days. Therefore, to 
    ensure maximum consideration, you must send your comments to OMB by the 
    above referenced date.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send your comments and suggestions on the requirement to 
    Rebecca A. Mullin, Service Information Collection Clearance Officer, 
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS 222--ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW, 
    Washington, DC 20240.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To receive a copy of the information 
    collection request, explanatory information and related forms, contact 
    Rebecca A. Mullin at 703/358-2287, or electronically to 
    rmullin@fws.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, 
    which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
    L. 104-13), require that interested members of the public and affected 
    agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and 
    recordkeeping activities (see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). We are seeking 
    clearance from the OMB to collect information in conjunction with a new 
    Evaluation Grants Pilot Program to be conducted under the North 
    American Wetlands Conservation Act (NAWCA) (Pub. L. 101-233, as 
    amended; December 13, 1989). The Act, Section 19 (Assessment of 
    Progress in Wetlands Conservation), requires the Secretary of the 
    Interior, in cooperation with the North American Wetlands Conservation 
    Council, to: ``* * * 1) develop and implement a strategy to assist in 
    the implementation of this Act in conserving the full complement of 
    North American wetlands systems and species dependent on those systems, 
    that incorporates information existing on the date of the issuance of 
    the strategy in final form on types of wetlands habitats and species 
    dependent on the habitats; and (2) develop and implement procedures to 
    monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of wetlands conservation 
    projects completed under this Act.'' To meet this requirement, we are 
    embarking upon an Evaluation Grants Pilot Program initative that 
    requires selected prospective grantees to submit pre-proposals and 
    proposals that are geared specifically to project approaches that will 
    readily provide data for monitoring and evaluation purposes. Current 
    NAWCA projects do not, and cannot, provide the data and information 
    necessary to meet the monitoring and evaluation requirements of Section 
    19. We are developing a unique set of evaluation grants guidelines, or 
    instructions, that will provide the basis for information collection 
    and this request. We do have available for review and comment the 
    ``Strategy For Implementing and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Wetland 
    Conservation Projects Completed Under the NAWCA'' (Sect. 19, part 1) 
    and the ``NAWCA Evaluation Grant Proposal Development and Review'' 
    outline (Sect. 19, part 2). Both of these documents are approved by the 
    NAWCA Council and will be used to develop the guidelines. The Service 
    is requesting a 3-year term of approval for this information collection 
    activity. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
    required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
    a currently valid OMB control number.
        The Service previously published a 60-day notice on the information 
    collections associated with this evaluation grants program (64 FR 6908) 
    on Thursday, February 11, 1999. The comment period expired April 12, 
    1999. The Service, in this notice, is requesting comment for the 30-day 
    period following its date of publication in the Federal Register. No 
    comments were provided to the Service Information Collection Officer as 
    a result of the February 11 notice.
        We invite your comments on: (1) Whether the collection of 
    information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
    the agency, including whether the information will have practical 
    utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
    collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and 
    clarity of the information to be collected; and, (4) ways to minimize 
    the burden of the collection of information on respondents.
        Title: Information Collection In Support of Grant Programs 
    Authorized by the North American Wetlands Conservation Act of 1989 
    (NAWCA).
        Approval Number: 1018-0104. OMB emergency approval granted June 4, 
    1999.
        Service Form Number(s): N/A.
        Description and Use: The North American Waterfowl Management Plan 
    (NAWMP), first signed in 1986, is a tripartite agreement among Canada, 
    Mexico and the United States to enhance, restore and otherwise protect 
    continental wetlands to benefit waterfowl and other wetland associated 
    wildlife through partnerships between and among the private and public 
    sectors. Because the 1986 NAWMP did not carry with it a mechanism to 
    provide for broadly-based and sustained financial support for wetland 
    conservation activities, Congress passed and the President signed into 
    law the NAWCA to partially fill that funding need. The purpose of NAWCA 
    is to use partnerships to promote long-term conservation of North 
    American wetland ecosystems and the waterfowl and other migratory 
    birds, fish and wildlife that depend upon such habitat. Principal 
    conservation actions supported by NAWCA are acquisition, enhancement 
    and restoration of wetlands and wetlands-associated habitat.
        As well as providing for a continuing and stable funding base, 
    NAWCA establishes an administrative body made up of a State 
    representative from each of the four Flyways, three representatives 
    from wetlands conservation organizations, the Secretary of the Board of 
    the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, and the Director of the 
    Service. This administrative body is chartered, under the Federal 
    Advisory Committee Act, by the U.S. Department of the Interior as the 
    North American Wetlands Conservation Council (Council). As such, the 
    purpose of the Council is to periodically recommend wetlands 
    conservation project proposals to the Migratory Bird Conservation 
    Commission (MBCC) for funding.
        Subsection (c) of Section 5 (Council Procedures) provides that the 
    ``* * * Council shall establish practices and procedures for the 
    carrying out of its functions under subsections (a) and (b) of this 
    section * * *'' which are consideration of projects and recommendations 
    to the MBCC, respectively. The means by which the Council decides which 
    project proposals are important to recommend to the MBCC is through 
    grants programs that are coordinated through the Council Coordinator's 
    office (NAWWO) within the Service.
        Applications from partnerships competing for grant funds must 
    describe in substantial detail project locations and other 
    characteristics that will meet standards established by the Council and 
    requirements of NAWCA. The Evaluation Grants Pilot Program will differ 
    in that it will be a two-stage process wherein successful applicants 
    will have submitted both a pre-proposal and a proposal. Pre-proposals 
    are intended to allow screening such that
    
    [[Page 44234]]
    
    only the projects that have the greatest potential for contributing to 
    the evaluation program will be continued into the proposal stage. The 
    Council Coordinator's office currently publishes and distributes 
    Standard and Small Grants instructional booklets that assist applicants 
    in formulating project proposals for Council consideration. The 
    guidelines for this new grants evaluation initiative, to be contained 
    in the request for proposal, is an additional information collection 
    instrument. The guidelines and instructions and other instruments, 
    e.g., Federal Register notices on request for proposals, are the basis 
    for this information collection request for OMB clearance. Information 
    collected under this program is used to respond to such needs as: 
    audits, program planning and management, program evaluation, Government 
    Performance and Results Act reporting, Standard Form 424 (Application 
    For Federal Assistance), grant agreements, budget reports and 
    justifications, public and private requests for information, data 
    provided to other programs for databases on similar programs, 
    Congressional inquiries and reports required by NAWCA, etc. In the case 
    of the additional Evaluation Grants Pilot Program guidelines, the 
    request responds also to the statutory requirements of the Act.
        In summary, information collection under this program is required 
    to obtain a benefit, i.e., a cash reimbursable grant that will be given 
    competitively to selected applicants based on eligibility and the 
    relative value of their projects to contribute to meaningful technical 
    evaluation of the success of the grants programs. The information 
    collection is subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act requirements for 
    such activity, which includes soliciting comments from the general 
    public regarding the nature and burden imposed by the collection.
        Frequency of Collection: Occasional. We intend the Evaluation Grant 
    Pilot Program to have one project proposal submissions window per year.
        Description of Respondents: Households and/or individuals; business 
    and/or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; farms; Federal 
    Government; and State, local and/or Tribal governments.
        Estimated Completion Time: We estimate the reporting burden, or 
    time involved in writing project submissions, to be 8 hours for a pre-
    proposal and 40 hours for a proposal.
        Number of Respondents: We estimate that 30 pre-proposals and 10 
    proposals will be submitted each year for the grants evaluation pilot 
    program.
    
        Dated: May 25, 1999.
    Jamie Rappaport Clark,
    Director, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-20962 Filed 8-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/13/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of information collection; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-20962
Dates:
We will consider all comments received on or before September 13, 1999. OMB has up to 60 days to approve or disapprove the information collection but may respond after 30 days. Therefore, to ensure maximum consideration, you must send your comments to OMB by the above referenced date.
Pages:
44232-44234 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-20962.pdf