99-21046. Self-Regulatory Organizations; MBS Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to MBSCC's Risk Management Rules and Procedures  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 156 (Friday, August 13, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44251-44252]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-21046]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-41714; File No. SR-MBSCC-99-02]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; MBS Clearing Corporation; Order 
    Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to MBSCC's Risk Management 
    Rules and Procedures
    
    August 6, 1999.
        On April 15, 1999, the MBS Clearing Corporation (``MBSCC'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed 
    rule change (File No. SR-MBSCC-99-02) pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of proposal 
    was published in the Federal Register on June 21, 1999.\2\ No comment 
    letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission 
    is approving the rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 41516 (June 10, 1999), 
    64 FR 33125.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description
    
        The rule change makes several modifications to MBSCC's risk 
    management rules. Specifically, the rule change: (i) Implements a net-
    out report, (ii) modifies financial reporting by participants, (iii) 
    modifies certain special provisions applicable to nondomestic 
    participants, (iv) adds a provision for additional assurances, and (v) 
    clarifies MBSCC's role as agent in a liquidation.
        The specific objectives of the rule change and the corresponding 
    modifications to MBSCC's rules are described below.
    
    1. Net-Out Report
    
        The rule change modifies Article II, Rule 4 of MBSCC's rules to add 
    a provision for a daily net-out report that will list all of a 
    participant's open net-out obligations. Article I, Rule 1 of MBSCC's 
    rules is also being modified to add a definition of the term ``net-out 
    report.''
    
    2. Financing Reporting
    
        The rule change modifies Article III, Rule 1, Section 10 of MBSCC's 
    rules to replace the general requirement for quarterly unaudited 
    financial statements with a requirement that a participant must file 
    unaudited financial statements as frequently as required by the 
    participant's appropriate regulator. If a participant is not regulated 
    or is a nondomestic participant, the participant must file monthly 
    unaudited financial statements.
    
    3. Non-Domestic Participants
    
        The rule change modifies Article III, Rule 1, Section 13 of MBSCC's 
    rules to codify the existing practice of requiring non-U.S. 
    participants to: (i) Execute and deliver to MSBCC a master agreement, 
    (ii) provide MBSCC with an opinion of counsel, and (iii) confirm the 
    master agreement and opinion of counsel as MBSCC's may require. The 
    master agreement and the opinion of counsel generally address the 
    enforceability of MBSCC's rules. Article I, Rule 1 of MBSCC'S rules is 
    also being modified to add definitions of the terms ``master 
    agreement'' and ``opinion of counsel.''
    
    4. Additional Assurances
    
        The rule change modifies Article III, Rule 1 of MBSCC's rules by 
    adding a new Section 16. The new section provides that any participant 
    that contemplates it no longer will be in compliance with MBSCC's rules 
    and procedures or will no longer be able to perform its contracts or 
    satisfy its obligations to MBSCC or MBSCC participants must immediately 
    notify MBSCC. If MBSCC has reasonable grounds to believe that a 
    participant no longer will be in compliance with MBSCC's rules and 
    procedures or no longer will be able to perform its contracts or 
    satisfy its obligations to MBSCC or MBSCC participants, MBSCC may 
    require additional information from such participant relating to its 
    ability to comply with the rules and procedures, perform its contracts, 
    and satisfy its obligations to MBSCC or MBSCC participants. MBSCC may 
    also increase a participant's minimum required deposits to the 
    participants fund if MBSCC has reasonable grounds to believe such 
    conditions may exist. The new section also states that it does not 
    restrict MBSCC from exercising its right at any time to cease to act 
    for the participant pursuant to MBSCC's rules.
        The new section providing for additional assurances is designed to 
    enable MBSCC to better determine a participant's potential inability to 
    meet its obligations and to increase the likelihood that a 
    participant's collateral will be sufficient to satisfy its obligations.
    
    5. MBSCC as Agent
    
        The proposed rule change modifies Article III, Rule 3, Section 5(f) 
    to make explicit that any distribution of funds relating to a 
    participant for which MBSCC has ceased to act is made by MBSCC as 
    agent. MBSCC's role as an agent in the distribution of funds is 
    currently implied in MBSCC's rules
    
    [[Page 44252]]
    
    because MBSCC does not guarantee its participant's obligations.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        Section 17A(b)(3)(F) \3\ of the Act requires that the rules of a 
    clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of funds which 
    are in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is 
    responsible. The Commission finds that each of MBSCC's rule changes is 
    consistent with its obligations under the Act. The net-out report 
    should provide participants with timely information regarding their 
    open net-out obligations to enable them to better monitor potential 
    risk exposure with original contra sides. This information is important 
    because MBSCC's rules generally provide that if a defaulting 
    participant's fund contribution is insufficient to cover the losses of 
    the defaulting participant's non original contra sides, the deficiency 
    is assessed against the defaulting participant's original contra sides. 
    Therefore, the original contra sides remain liable for potential 
    assessments even if as a result of MBSCC's netting process they net-out 
    of transactions. This should help reduce the potential that the default 
    of one participant will cause other participants to default on their 
    obligations at MBSCC because of unexpected risk exposure.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Requiring participants to provide MBSCC with financial information 
    as frequently as required by the participant's appropriate regulator 
    and requiring participants to notify MBSCC in situations where the 
    participant contemplates that it will be unable to meet its obligations 
    will provide MBSCC with more timely information on the financial 
    condition of certain participants.
        The additional master agreement, opinion of counsel, and periodic 
    confirmation requirements applicable to non-U.S. participants should 
    better enable MBSCC to evaluate and to lesson or eliminate any negative 
    effects that jurisdictional issues could have on MBSCC's exercise of 
    its rights and remedies against a non-U.S. participant.
        Requiring a participant to give notice of potential problems in 
    meeting MBSCC's rules or in satisfying its obligations to MBSCC and 
    other participants and MBSCC's right to require additional assurances 
    and participants fund contributions as needed should better enable 
    MBSCC to determine participants' continuing ability to meet their 
    obligations and to have sufficient collateral on hand.
        Because MBSCC does not guaranty its participants' transactions, 
    clarifying that MBSCC is acting as an agent when it ceases to act for a 
    participant should eliminate any potential confusion and potential 
    liability with respect to MBSCC's role.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in 
    particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act and the 
    rules and regulations thereunder.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-MBSCC-99-02) be, and hereby 
    is, approved.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-21046 Filed 8-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/13/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-21046
Pages:
44251-44252 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-41714, File No. SR-MBSCC-99-02
PDF File:
99-21046.pdf