97-21458. Executive Office for Immigration Review; Periods of Lawful Temporary Resident Status and Lawful Permanent Resident Status to Establish Seven Years of Lawful Domicile  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 43466-43467]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-21458]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    
    Immigration and Naturalization Service
    
    8 CFR Part 212
    
    [INS No. 1748-96; AG Order No. 2104-97]
    RIN 1115-AE27
    
    
    Executive Office for Immigration Review; Periods of Lawful 
    Temporary Resident Status and Lawful Permanent Resident Status to 
    Establish Seven Years of Lawful Domicile
    
    AGENCY: Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Executive Office 
    for Immigration Review (EOIR), Justice.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule adopts without change an interim rule published in 
    the Federal Register by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and 
    the Executive Office for Immigration Review on November 25, 1996, which 
    amended Department of Justice regulations that limit discretion to 
    grant an application for relief under section 212(c) of the Immigration 
    and Nationality Act (the Act) by expanding the class of aliens eligible 
    for section 212(c) relief. Although Congress recently limited the 
    availability of section 212(c) relief, certain classes of aliens remain 
    eligible. This rule allows a 212(c) eligible alien who has adjusted to 
    lawful permanent resident status, pursuant to sections 245A or 210 of 
    the Act, to use the combined period of his or her status as a lawful 
    temporary resident and lawful permanent resident to establish seven (7) 
    years of lawful domicile in the United States for purposes of 
    eligibility for section 212(c) relief. This rule will provide 
    uniformity between the regulation and case law.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective August 14, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Margaret M. Philbin, General Counsel, Executive Office for Immigration 
    Review, Suite 2400, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, 
    telephone (703) 305-0470; David M. Dixon, Chief Appellate Counsel, 
    Immigration and Naturalization Service, Suite 309, 5113 Leesburg Pike, 
    Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone (703) 756-6257.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Two recent enactments affect the 
    availability of relief under section 212(c). The Antiterrorism and 
    Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) restricts the classes of 
    alien criminals eligible for section 212(c) relief. The Illegal 
    Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 repeals and 
    replaces section 212(c), but only for proceedings commenced on or after 
    April 1, 1997. This rule only affects the cases not covered by these 
    new restrictions, i.e., those commenced before April 1, 1997, and not 
    barred by AEDPA.
        Under recent 212(c) case law, an alien who has acquired lawful 
    permanent resident status under section 245A of the Act may accrue the 
    seven (7) years of lawful domicile required for purposes of section 
    212(c) relief from the date of his or her application for temporary 
    resident status. See Robles v. INS, 58 F.3d 1355 (9th Cir. 1995); 
    Avelar-Cruz v. INS, 58 F.3d 338 (7th Cir. 1995); Castellon-Contreras v. 
    INS, 45 F.3d 149 (7th Cir. 1995). The current regulation allows an 
    alien to apply for section 212(c) relief only if he or she has 
    established at least seven consecutive years of lawful permanent 
    resident status immediately prior to filing the application. See 8 CFR 
    212.3(f)(2). The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) has determined 
    that, in cases arising in the Ninth Circuit, an alien may use the 
    period of temporary resident status to establish the requisite seven 
    years. See In re Carlos Cazares-Alvarez, Interim Decision 3262 (BIA 
    1996). However, in cases arising in circuits without such a temporary 
    resident status rule, the BIA has determined that the current 
    regulation requires seven years of lawful permanent resident status. 
    See In re Hector Ponce de Leon-Ruiz, Interim Decision 3261 (BIA 1996). 
    The BIA has referred these cases to the Attorney General pursuant to 8 
    CFR 3.1(h)(1)(ii) to resolve the issue. The issue raised in White v. 
    INS, 75 F.3d 213 (5th Cir. 1996) (whether 8 CFR 212.3(f)(2) is 
    consistent with 8 U.S.C. 1182(c) and therefore is entitled to 
    deference), has been addressed and rendered moot by section 304 of the 
    Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 
    Public Law 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (September 30, 1996) (repealing 
    section 212(c) and substituting other relief), effective April 1, 1997, 
    codified at section 240A of the Immigration and Nationality Act as 
    amended. The White court computed the years of lawful unrelinquished 
    domicile (including the years of lawful temporary resident status) 
    rather than lawful permanent residence in determining eligibility for 
    relief.
        The Service published an interim rule with request for comments in 
    the Federal Register on November 25, 1996, at 61 FR 59824. The interim 
    rule permitted an alien to demonstrate lawful domicile for section 
    212(c) relief purposes by combining his or her status as a lawful 
    temporary resident and as a lawful permanent resident under sections 
    245A or 210 of the Act. Since no comments were received, the Service 
    and EOIR are adopting the interim rule as final without changes.
    
    Effective Date
    
        Since there are no changes between the interim rule and this final 
    rule, the Service believes that ``good cause'' exists to implement this 
    rule effective upon date of publication in the Federal Register.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Attorney General, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 605(b) has 
    reviewed this regulation and, by approving it, certifies that this rule 
    will not have a significant adverse economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. The affected parties are individuals not 
    small entities, and the impact of the regulation is not an economic 
    one.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and 
    tribunal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
    $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or 
    uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
    necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
    1995.
    
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
    
        This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996. This rule will not 
    result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a 
    major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on 
    competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on 
    the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-
    based companies in domestic and export markets.
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is not considered by the Department of Justice, 
    Immigration and
    
    [[Page 43467]]
    
    Naturalization Service and the Executive Office for Immigration Review, 
    to be a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, 
    section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and the Office of 
    Management and Budget has waived its review process under section 
    6(a)(3)(A).
    
    Executive Order 12612
    
        The regulation adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the National 
    Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. In accordance 
    with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this rule does not 
    have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a 
    Federalism Assessment.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This final rule meets the applicable standards set forth in 
    sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
    
    List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 212
    
        Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Immigration, 
    Passports and visas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
        Accordingly, the interim rule amending 8 CFR part 212 which was 
    published at 61 FR 59824 on November 25, 1996, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: August 7, 1997.
    Janet Reno,
    Attorney General.
    [FR Doc. 97-21458 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/14/1997
Published:
08/14/1997
Department:
Immigration and Naturalization Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-21458
Dates:
This final rule is effective August 14, 1997.
Pages:
43466-43467 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
INS No. 1748-96, AG Order No. 2104-97
RINs:
1115-AE27: Periods of Lawful Temporary Residents Status and Lawful Permanent Resident Status to Establish Seven Years of Lawful Domicile
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1115-AE27/periods-of-lawful-temporary-residents-status-and-lawful-permanent-resident-status-to-establish-seven
PDF File:
97-21458.pdf
CFR: (1)
8 CFR 212