97-21525. Almonds Grown in California; Amended Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 43459-43461]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-21525]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 981
    
    [Docket No. FV97-981-4 FR]
    
    
    Almonds Grown in California; Amended Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This final rule increases the assessment rate for the Almond 
    Board of California (Board) under Marketing Order No. 981 for the 1997-
    98 and subsequent crop years. The Board is responsible for local 
    administration of the marketing order which regulates the handling of 
    almonds grown in California. Authorization to assess almond handlers 
    enables the Board to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary 
    to administer the program.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 1, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Engeler, Assistant Regional 
    Manager, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Division, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, 
    California 93721; Telephone: (209) 487-5901, Fax: (209) 487-5906; or 
    George Kelhart, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and 
    Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, 
    DC 20090-6456; Telephone: (202) 690-3919, Fax: (202) 720-5698. Small 
    businesses may request information on compliance with this regulation 
    by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Division, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-
    5698.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order 
    No. 981, as amended (7 CFR part 981), regulating the handling of 
    almonds grown in California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' 
    The marketing order is effective under the Agricultural Marketing 
    Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter 
    referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, 
    California almond handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to 
    administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is intended 
    that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable to all 
    assessable almonds beginning August 1, 1997, and continuing until 
    amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule will not preempt any State 
    or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
    irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. Such handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on 
    the petition. After the hearing the Secretary would rule on the 
    petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States 
    in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or 
    her principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
    
    [[Page 43460]]
    
        This final rule increases the assessment rate established for the 
    Board for the 1997-98 and subsequent crop years from 1 cent to 2 cents 
    per pound of almonds received by handlers.
        The almond marketing order provides authority for the Board, with 
    the approval of the Department, to formulate an annual budget of 
    expenses and collect assessments from handlers to administer the 
    program. The members of the Board are producers and handlers of 
    California almonds.
        They are familiar with the Board's needs and with the costs for 
    goods and services in their local area and are thus in a position to 
    formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The assessment 
    rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all 
    directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and 
    provide input.
        The Board met on May 9, 1997, and recommended 1997-98 expenditures 
    of $11,333,876.49 and an assessment rate of 2 cents per pound of 
    almonds received by handlers. In comparison, last year's budgeted 
    expenditures were $6,426,500. The primary reason for the increase for 
    the upcoming crop year is the inclusion of funding for a generic paid 
    advertising program. The assessment rate is higher than last year's 
    established rate of 1 cent per pound; however, the Board also 
    recommended a credit-back program whereby handlers can receive credit 
    for their own promotional activities of up to 1 cent per pound against 
    their assessment obligation. Handlers not participating in this program 
    will remit the entire 2 cents to the Board. For administrative 
    purposes, the Board will separate the assessment into two portions when 
    billing handlers; an administrative portion of 1 cent per pound and an 
    advertising portion of 1 cent per pound. The Board's initial 
    recommendation indicated that implementation of the advertising portion 
    of the assessment and the generic advertising program may be impacted 
    by the outcome of litigation relative to advertising and promotion 
    conducted under marketing orders. The Board recommended not 
    implementing the advertising portion of the assessment until further 
    action of the Board is taken. At a meeting held on July 1, 1997, the 
    Board took action to implement the advertising portion of the 
    assessment, after it is established. The Board also confirmed its 
    intent to implement a generic paid advertising program.
        The Board recommended that the major expenditures for the 1997-98 
    fiscal period should include $4,084,000 for information and research 
    programs, $3,408,000 for paid generic advertising, $881,534 for 
    salaries, $794,043 for international programs, $568,679 for production 
    research, $95,400 for crop estimates, and $90,000 for travel. Budgeted 
    expenses for major items in 1996-97 were $3,333,500 for information and 
    research, $731,534 for salaries, $660,500 for international programs, 
    $558,131 for production research, $91,160 for crop estimates, and 
    $97,470 for travel.
        The assessment rate recommended by the Board was derived by 
    considering anticipated expenses and production levels of California 
    almonds, and additional pertinent factors. In its recommendation, the 
    Board utilized a production estimate of 681,600,000 pounds of edible 
    almonds for the year. If realized, this will provide revenue of 
    $6,816,000 from administrative assessments (681,600,000 pounds at 1 
    cent per pound). In addition, it is anticipated that $3,408,000 will be 
    derived from the portion of assessments eligible for credit-back but 
    received by the Board from handlers who do not obtain credit for their 
    own promotional activities. Estimates of marketable production of 
    almonds have been revised downward to 652,800,000 pounds since the 
    Board's recommendation, which would result in administrative 
    assessments of $6,528,000 and estimated credit-back revenue of 
    $3,264,000. However, if assessment revenues fall short of initial 
    projections due to a smaller crop, the Board maintains sufficient 
    financial reserves to compensate for any such shortage. Income derived 
    from handler assessments, along with interest income, Market Access 
    Program reimbursement for international promotion activities, research 
    conference revenue, miscellaneous income, and funds derived from the 
    Board's authorized monetary reserve will be adequate to cover budgeted 
    expenses. Any unexpended funds from the 1997-98 crop year may be 
    carried over to cover expenses during the first four months of the 
    1998-99 crop year.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the Board or 
    other available information.
        Although this assessment rate is effective for an indefinite 
    period, the Board will continue to meet prior to or during each fiscal 
    period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider recommendations 
    for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and times of Board 
    meetings are open to the public and interested persons may express 
    their views at these meetings. The Department will evaluate Board 
    recommendations and other available information to determine whether 
    modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will 
    be undertaken as necessary. The Board's 1997-98 budget and those for 
    subsequent crop years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by 
    the Department.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 97 handlers of California almonds who are 
    subject to regulation under the marketing order and approximately 7,000 
    almond producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service 
    firms have been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 
    121.601) as those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and 
    small agricultural producers are defined as those having annual 
    receipts of less than $500,000.
        Currently, about 58 percent of the handlers ship under $5,000,000 
    worth of almonds and 42 percent ship over $5,000,000 worth of almonds 
    on an annual basis. In addition, based on acreage, production, and 
    grower prices reported by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, 
    and the total number of almond growers, the average annual grower 
    revenue is approximately $156,000. In view of the foregoing, it can be 
    concluded that the majority of handlers and producers of California 
    almonds may be classified as small entities.
        This final rule will increase the assessment rate established for 
    the Board for the 1997-98 and subsequent crop years from 1 cent to 2 
    cents per pound of almonds, of which up to 1 cent will be credited to 
    handlers for their own promotional activities. The Board unanimously 
    recommended 1997-98 expenditures of $11,333,876.49 and an assessment 
    rate of 2 cents per pound of almonds. The assessment rate
    
    [[Page 43461]]
    
    of 2 cents is 1 cent more than the rate currently in effect. The 
    primary reason for the increase for the upcoming crop year is the 
    inclusion of funding for a generic paid advertising program.
        The Board recommended that the major expenditures for the 1997-98 
    crop year should include $4,084,000 for information and research 
    programs, $3,408,000 for paid generic advertising, $881,534 for 
    salaries, $794,043 for international programs, $568,679 for production 
    research, $95,400 for crop estimates, and $90,000 for travel. 
    Alternative rates of assessment were considered during the budgeting 
    process. Keeping the assessment rate at 1 cent was considered but not 
    recommended because it would not generate the income necessary to 
    administer the program. In order to fund the programs recommended by 
    the Board for the 1997-98 season, it was determined that the assessment 
    rate recommended by the Board, when applied to the preliminary crop 
    estimate, would be necessary to generate sufficient revenue. Costs of 
    various programs, desired and overall spending levels, and desired 
    levels of monetary reserve were considered during the budgeting 
    process.
        Handlers' receipts of assessable almonds for the year were 
    originally estimated at 681,600,000 pounds which would provide 
    $10,224,000 in assessment income. The crop estimate was subsequently 
    reduced to 652,800,000 pounds which if realized, would provide 
    assessment revenue of $9,792,000. However, in either scenario, income 
    derived from handler assessments, along with interest income, Market 
    Access Program reimbursement, research conference revenue, 
    miscellaneous income, and funds derived from the Board's authorized 
    reserve will be adequate to cover budgeted expenses. Funds in the 
    reserve will be kept within the maximum permitted by the order.
        A review of historical information and preliminary information 
    pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates that the grower price 
    for the 1997-98 season could range between $1.00 and $1.50 per pound of 
    almonds. Therefore, the estimated assessment revenue for the 1997-98 
    crop year as a percentage of total grower revenue could range between 1 
    and 1.5 percent.
        While this rule will impose some additional costs on handlers, the 
    costs would be minimal and in the form of uniform assessments on all 
    handlers. Some of the additional costs may be passed on to producers.
        However, these costs will be offset by the benefits derived by the 
    operation of the marketing order. In addition, the Board's meeting was 
    widely publicized throughout the California almond industry and all 
    interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and participate 
    in Board deliberations on all issues. Like all Board meetings, the May 
    9, 1997, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and 
    small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally, interested 
    persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and 
    informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
        This final rule will not impose any additional reporting or 
    recordkeeping requirements on either small or large California almond 
    handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and 
    forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and 
    duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
        The Department has not identified any relevant Federal rules that 
    duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
        A proposed rule concerning this action was issued by the Department 
    on July 3, 1997, and published in the Federal Register on July 7, 1997 
    (62 FR 36233). Copies of the proposed rule were also mailed or sent via 
    facsimile to all almond handlers. Finally, the proposal was made 
    available through the Internet by the Office of the Federal Register.
        A 15-day comment period was provided to allow interested persons to 
    respond to the proposal. Fifteen days was deemed appropriate because: 
    (1) The Board needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses which 
    are incurred on a continuous basis; (2) the 1997-98 crop year began on 
    August 1, 1997, and the marketing order requires that the rate of 
    assessment for the crop year apply to all assessable California almonds 
    handled during the crop year; and (3) handlers are aware of this action 
    which was unanimously recommended by the Board at a public meeting and 
    is similar to other budget actions issued in past years. No comments to 
    the proposed rule were received.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the information and recommendation submitted by the Board and other 
    available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as 
    hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of 
    the Act.
        It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because handlers are already receiving 
    1997-98 crop almonds from growers, the crop year began August 1, and 
    the assessment rate applies to all almonds received during the 1997-98 
    and subsequent seasons. Further, handlers are aware of this rule, which 
    was recommended at a public meeting. Also, A 15-day comment period was 
    provided for in the proposed rule, and no comments were received.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 981
    
        Almonds, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 981 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 981--ALMONDS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 981 continues to read as 
    follows:
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
    
    Sec. 981.343  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 981.343 is amended by removing ``July 1, 1996,'' and 
    adding in its place ``August 1, 1997,'', by removing ``$0.01 cent'' and 
    adding in its place ``2 cents,'' and by adding as the last sentence 
    ``Of the 2 cent assessment rate, 1 cent per assessable pound is 
    available for handler credit-back.''
    
        Dated: August 8, 1997.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.
    [FR Doc. 97-21525 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/1/1997
Published:
08/14/1997
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-21525
Dates:
August 1, 1997.
Pages:
43459-43461 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV97-981-4 FR
PDF File:
97-21525.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 981.343