01-20381. Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations on Certain Federal Indian Reservations and Ceded Lands for the 2001-02 Season  

  • Start Preamble Start Printed Page 42712

    AGENCY:

    Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

    ACTION:

    Proposed rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service or we) proposes special migratory bird hunting regulations for certain tribes on Federal Indian reservations, off-reservation trust lands, and ceded lands for the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting season.

    DATES:

    To comment on these proposed regulations, you must do so by August 24, 2001.

    ADDRESSES:

    Send your comments on these proposals to the Chief, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, room 634-Arlington Square, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, DC 20240. All comments received will become part of the public record. You may inspect comments during normal business hours in room 634, Arlington Square Building, 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Ron W. Kokel, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (703/358-1714).

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    In the April 30, 2001, Federal Register (66 FR 21298), we requested proposals from Indian tribes wishing to establish special migratory bird hunting regulations for the 2001-02 hunting season, under the guidelines described in the June 4, 1985, Federal Register (50 FR 23467). In this supplemental proposed rule, we propose special migratory bird hunting regulations for 29 Indian tribes, based on the input we received in response to the April 30, 2001, proposed rule. As described in that rule, the promulgation of annual migratory bird hunting regulations involves a series of rulemaking actions each year. This proposed rule is part of that series.

    We developed the guidelines for establishing special migratory bird hunting regulations for Indian tribes in response to tribal requests for recognition of their reserved hunting rights and, for some tribes, recognition of their authority to regulate hunting by both tribal and nontribal members on their reservations. The guidelines include possibilities for:

    (1) On-reservation hunting by both tribal and nontribal members, with hunting by nontribal members on some reservations to take place within Federal frameworks but on dates different from those selected by the surrounding State(s);

    (2) on-reservation hunting by tribal members only, outside of the usual Federal frameworks for season dates and length, and for daily bag and possession limits; and

    (3) off-reservation hunting by tribal members on ceded lands, outside of usual framework dates and season length, with some added flexibility in daily bag and possession limits.

    In all cases, the regulations established under the guidelines must be consistent with the March 10 to September 1 closed season mandated by the 1916 Convention Between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada) for the Protection of Migratory Birds (Treaty). The guidelines apply to those tribes having recognized reserved hunting rights on Federal Indian reservations (including off-reservation trust lands) and on ceded lands. They also apply to establishing migratory bird hunting regulations for nontribal members on all lands within the exterior boundaries of reservations where tribes have full wildlife management authority over such hunting or where the tribes and affected States otherwise have reached agreement over hunting by nontribal members on lands owned by non-Indians within the reservation.

    Tribes usually have the authority to regulate migratory bird hunting by nonmembers on Indian-owned reservation lands, subject to Service approval. The question of jurisdiction is more complex on reservations that include lands owned by non-Indians, especially when the surrounding States have established or intend to establish regulations governing hunting by non-Indians on these lands. In such cases, we encourage the tribes and States to reach agreement on regulations that would apply throughout the reservations. When appropriate, we will consult with a tribe and State with the aim of facilitating an accord. We also will consult jointly with tribal and State officials in the affected States where tribes wish to establish special hunting regulations for tribal members on ceded lands.

    Because of past questions regarding interpretation of what events trigger the consultation process, as well as who initiates it, we provide the following clarification. We routinely provide copies of Federal Register publications pertaining to migratory bird management to all State Directors, tribes, and other interested parties. It is the responsibility of the States, tribes, and others to notify us of any concern regarding any feature(s) of any regulations. When we receive such notification, we will initiate consultation.

    Our guidelines provide for the continued harvest of waterfowl and other migratory game birds by tribal members on reservations where such harvest has been a customary practice. We do not oppose this harvest, provided it does not take place during the closed season defined by the Treaty, and does not adversely affect the status of the migratory bird resource.

    Before developing the guidelines, we reviewed available information on the current status of migratory bird populations; reviewed the current status of migratory bird hunting on Federal Indian reservations; and evaluated the potential impact of such guidelines on migratory birds. We concluded that the impact of migratory bird harvest by tribal members hunting on their reservations is minimal.

    One area of interest in Indian migratory bird hunting regulations relates to hunting seasons for nontribal members on dates that are within Federal frameworks, but which are different from those established by the State(s) where the reservation is located. A large influx of nontribal hunters onto a reservation at a time when the season is closed in the surrounding State(s) could result in adverse population impacts on one or more migratory bird species. The guidelines make this unlikely, however, because tribal proposals must include:

    (a) Harvest anticipated under the requested regulations;

    (b) Methods that will be employed to measure or monitor harvest (such as bag checks, mail questionnaires, etc.);

    (c) Steps that will be taken to limit level of harvest, where it could be shown that failure to limit such harvest would adversely impact the migratory bird resource; and

    (d) Tribal capabilities to establish and enforce migratory bird hunting regulations.

    We may modify or establish regulations experimentally, after evaluation and confirmation of harvest information obtained by the tribes.

    We believe the guidelines provide appropriate opportunity to accommodate the reserved hunting rights and management authority of Start Printed Page 42713Indian tribes while ensuring that the migratory bird resource receives necessary protection. The conservation of this important international resource is paramount. The guidelines should not be viewed as inflexible. In this regard, we note that they have been employed successfully since 1985. We believe they have been tested adequately and, therefore, made them final beginning with the 1988-89 hunting season. We should stress here, however, that use of the guidelines is not mandatory and no action is required if a tribe wishes to observe the hunting regulations established by the State(s) in which the reservation is located.

    Population Status

    The following paragraphs provide preliminary information on the status of waterfowl and information on the status and harvest of migratory shore and upland game birds.

    May Breeding Waterfowl and Habitat Survey

    Habitat conditions in the traditional survey area were variable, and the estimate of May ponds (U.S. and Prairie Canada combined) is up (4.6 ± 0.1 million, +18 percent) compared to 2000, and slightly below (−6 percent), but not statistically different from the long-term average. Continued drought produced fair to poor conditions in most of Alberta, central and southern Saskatchewan, and eastern Montana. By contrast, North and South Dakota generally had good to excellent water conditions, with the best conditions in the eastern portions of these States, and drier conditions to the north and west. Nesting cover in the Dakotas was in above-average condition. Southern Manitoba and extreme southeastern Saskatchewan have had higher than normal water conditions for the past 2 years, and this water, along with above-normal precipitation due to an early, snowy winter, produced excellent habitat for breeding ducks. Average to above-average precipitation also made for excellent wetland conditions across northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The northernmost portion of Alberta was the exception to the record drought and poor wetland conditions in the rest of the province, as above-average winter and spring precipitation filled nearly all available wetland basins. Good conditions for breeding ducks prevailed in the Northwest Territories, except for a small northern area that was rated only fair due to late spring ice conditions that reduced available breeding habitat for early-nesting species. Overall, conditions were good in the traditional survey area, and average to above-average waterfowl production is expected.

    In Alaska, breeding conditions depend largely on the timing of spring, as wetland conditions are less variable than on the prairies. Although winter temperatures were mild, spring was late, and waterfowl production will likely be below average to the north and west, and average to the south and east.

    In the eastern survey area, conditions were variable but generally good. Southern Ontario and Northern New York enjoyed an early spring, and with wetland basins nearly full, the outlook for breeding ducks is good. Spring was also early in Quebec, with good to excellent habitat in the central and Northern portions. However, southern Quebec was drier, and conditions there ranged from fair to poor. In Maine and the Maritime provinces spring was late, with lower than normal temperatures, but above-average precipitation, and habitat conditions were rated good throughout the region. Overall, eastern habitats were in good condition, with average to above-average production expected.

    The 2001 total duck population estimate for the traditional survey area was 36.1 ± 0.6 million birds, 14 percent below last year's near-record estimate of 41.8 ± 0.7 million birds, but still 9 percent above the 1955-2000 average. Mallard abundance was 7.9 ± 0.2 million, which is 17 percent below last year's estimate but similar to the 1955-2000 average. Blue-winged teal abundance was estimated at 5.8 ± 0.3 million. This is 23 percent below last year's record estimate of 7.4 million, but 29 percent above the 1955-2000 average. Gadwall (2.7 ± 0.1 million, +66 percent), green-winged teal (2.5 ± 0.2 million, +39 percent) and, northern shovelers (3.3 ± 0.2 million, +60 percent) all remained above their long-term averages, while American wigeon (2.5 + 0.1 million), redheads (0.7 ± 0.07 million), and canvasbacks (0.6 ± 0.05 million) did not differ from their long-term averages. Scaup (3.7 ± 0.2 million, −31 percent) and northern pintail (3.3 ± 0.3 million, −23 percent) were again below the long-term average.

    The 2001 total duck population estimate for the eastern survey area was 3.3 ± 0.2 million birds, similar to last year's total duck estimate of 3.2 ± 0.3 million birds. Abundances of individual species were similar to those of last year, with the exception of ring-necked ducks (353.0 ± 32 thousand, −43 percent) and buffleheads (95.0 ± 44 thousand, +93 percent). Buffleheads, goldeneyes, and lesser scaup were above the 1996-2000 average in the east. Green-winged teal and ring-necked ducks were below the 1996-2000 average, and other species were similar to their long-term averages.

    Sandhill Cranes

    The Mid-Continent Population of sandhill cranes has generally stabilized at comparatively high levels, since increases that were recorded in the 1970-80s. The Central Platte River Valley, Nebraska, spring index for 2001, uncorrected for visibility, was 396,000. The photo-corrected 3-year average for 1998-2000 was 435,283, which is within the established population-objective range of 343,000-465,000 cranes. All Central Flyway States, except Nebraska, allowed crane hunting in portions of their respective States in 2000-01. About 7,500 hunters participated in these seasons, which was 13 percent higher than the number that participated in the previous year's seasons. About 16,850 cranes were harvested in the Central Flyway during 2000-01 seasons, which was similar to estimated harvests for the previous year. Retrieved harvests in the Pacific Flyway, Canada, and Mexico were estimated to be about 13,500 for the 2000-01 period. The total North American sport harvest, including crippling losses, was estimated to be about 34,600 cranes, which was about 2 percent lower than the previous year's estimates. The long-term trend analysis for the Mid-Continent Population during 1982-2000 indicates that harvests have been increasing at a higher rate than the trend in population growth over the same period.

    The fall 2000 pre-migration survey estimate for the Rocky Mountain Population of sandhill cranes was 19,990, which was similar to the previous year's estimate of 19,501. Limited special seasons were held during 2000 in portions of Arizona, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, resulting in a record high harvest of 810 cranes.

    Woodcock

    Singing-ground and Wing Collection surveys were conducted to assess the population status of the American woodcock (Scolopax minor). Singing-ground Survey data from 2001 indicate that the number of displaying woodcock in the Eastern Region was not significantly different (P>0.10) from 2000 levels, although the point estimate of the trend was negative. In the Central Region, there was a 12.9 percent decrease (P<0.05) in the number of woodcock heard displaying, compared to levels observed in 2000. Trends from the Singing-ground Survey during 1991-2001 were negative (−2.6 and Start Printed Page 42714−2.5 percent per year for the Eastern and Central regions, respectively; P<0.01). There were long-term (1968-01) declines (P<0.01) of 2.5 percent per year in the Eastern Region and 1.6 percent per year in the Central Region.

    The 2000 recruitment index for the Eastern Region (1.4 immatures per adult female) was 27 percent higher than the 1999 estimate, but was 18 percent below the long-term regional average. The recruitment index for the Central Region (1.2 immatures per adult females) was similar to 1999, but was 29 percent below the long-term regional average. The index of daily hunting success in the Eastern Region decreased from 2.1 woodcock per successful hunt in 1999 to 2.0 woodcock per successful hunt in 2000, and seasonal hunting success decreased 10 percent, from 9.3 to 8.4 woodcock per successful hunter in 1999 and 2000, respectively. In the Central Region, the daily success index decreased 5 percent from 2.1 woodcock per successful hunt in 1999 to 2.0 in 1998; and seasonal hunting success decreased 2 percent from 10.6 to 10.4 woodcock per successful hunter.

    Band-tailed Pigeons and Doves

    While a significant decline in the Coastal population of band-tailed pigeons occurred between 1968-2000 as indicated by the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), no trend was indicated over the most recent 10 years. Additionally, mineral site counts at 10 selected sites in Oregon indicate a steady increase over the past 10 years. The count in 2000 was 45 percent above the previous 32-year average. Call-count surveys conducted in Washington showed a nonsignificant decline between 1975-2000 and a nonsignificant increase between 1996-2000. Washington has opted not to select a hunting season for bandtails since 1991. The harvest of Coastal pigeons is estimated to be about 17,000 birds out of a population of about 3 million. The Interior band-tailed pigeon population is stable with no trend indicated by the BBS over the short- or long-term periods. The preliminary 2000-01 harvest estimate from the Harvest Information Program was 4,800 birds.

    Analyses of Mourning Dove Call-count Survey data indicated significant declines in doves heard over the most recent 10 years and the entire 36 years of the survey in the Central and Western Management Units. In the Eastern Unit, there was a significant decline over 10 years while no significant decline was noted over 36 years. A project has been funded recently to develop mourning dove population models for each unit to provide guidance in what needs to be done to improve our decision-making process with respect to harvest management.

    White-winged doves in Arizona are maintaining a fairly stable population since the 1970's. Between 2000-01, the average number of doves heard per route decreased from 30.8 to 27.5. A low harvest (123,000 in 2000) is being maintained compared with birds taken several decades ago. In Texas, the phenomenon of the white-winged dove expansion continues. They are found throughout Texas except for a large section in the northeast part of the State in the Piney Woods. Whitewings primarily inhabit urban areas north of their historical range. The population of white-winged doves in the Lower Rio Grande Valley decreased 11 percent in 2001 due to drought conditions to an estimated 453,000 birds; in Upper South Texas, the count increased 7 percent to 1,072,000; and, in West Texas, the count increased 11 percent to 36,700. A more inclusive count of whitewings in San Antonio indicated an estimate of over 1 million birds within the city limits. Whitewings are increasing both in population density and expanding into suburban areas and cities where they have not previously existed. Hunting does not appear to be having any effect upon these northern urban nesters. Whitewing nesting has been documented in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Missouri; they have been reported in Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, Indiana, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ontario, and Newfoundland.

    White-tipped doves are maintaining a relatively stable population in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. They are most abundant in cities and, for the most part, not available to hunting. The count in 2001 was 22 percent below that of 2000.

    Hunting Season Proposals From Indian Tribes and Organizations

    For the 2001-02 hunting season, we received requests from 29 tribes and Indian organizations. We actively solicit regulatory proposals from other tribal groups that are interested in working cooperatively for the benefit of waterfowl and other migratory game birds. We encourage tribes to work with us to develop agreements for management of migratory bird resources on tribal lands. It should be noted that this proposed rule includes generalized regulations for both early- and late-season hunting. A final rule will be published in a late-August 2001 Federal Register that will include tribal regulations for the early-hunting season. The early season begins on September 1 each year and most commonly includes such species as American woodcock, sandhill cranes, mourning doves and white-winged doves. A final rule will also be published in a September 2001 Federal Register that will include regulations for late-season hunting. The late season begins on or around October 1 and most commonly includes waterfowl species.

    In this current rulemaking, because of the compressed timeframe for establishing regulations for Indian tribes and because final frameworks dates and other specific information are not available, the regulations for many tribal hunting seasons are described in relation to the season dates, season length, and limits that will be permitted when final Federal frameworks are announced for early- and late-season regulations. For example, daily bag and possession limits for ducks on some areas are shown as “Same as permitted in Pacific Flyway States under final Federal frameworks,” and limits for geese will be shown as the same permitted by the State(s) in which the tribal hunting area is located.

    The proposed frameworks for early-season regulations were published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2001 (66 FR 38494); early-season final frameworks will be published in mid-August. Proposed late-season frameworks for waterfowl and coots will be published in mid-August, and the final frameworks for the late seasons will be published in mid-September. We will notify affected tribes of season dates, bag limits, etc., as soon as final frameworks are established. As previously discussed, no action is required by tribes wishing to observe migratory bird hunting regulations established by the State(s) where they are located. The proposed regulations for the 29 tribes with proposals that meet the established criteria are shown below.

    (a) Bois Forte Band of Chippewa, Nett Lake, Minnesota (Tribal Members and Non-Tribal Hunters)

    The Bois Forte Band of Chippewa is located in northern Minnesota, as specified in Federal Register 66, No. 83. Bois Forte is a 103,000-acre land area, home to 800 Band members. The reservation includes Nett Lake, a 7,400-acre wild rice lake.

    In their 2001-2002 proposal, dated June 6, 2001, Bois Forte requested the authority to establish a duck season on their reservation. The season would be the same as that established by the State of Minnesota, except that shooting hours on opening day would be one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset for tribal members. We note Start Printed Page 42715that shooting hours for non-tribal members can only go from one-half hour before sunrise to sunset on reservation. Harvest under their proposal would not alter possession limits or species allowances already in place in Minnesota, but would only increase time allowance for hunting on opening day. Bois Forte requests these hours on opening day and for every hunting day for the remainder of the State's official, established season.

    Bag limits for non-tribal hunters will not be changed from current, State of Minnesota established levels. Non-tribal persons hunting on Nett Lake on the first day of the season will be required to complete a survey upon completion of the day's hunting requesting: (1) Name and contact information; (2) hunting permit number (State and tribal); (3) number of hours hunted; (4) location of hunting site; (5) tribal guide name; (6) number and species of waterfowl harvested in possession; and (7) number and species of waterfowl shot but not recovered. Results will be collected and tallied and subsequently compared to previous season data.

    The Band's Conservation Department regulates non-tribal harvest limits under the following regulations: (1) Non-tribal hunters must be accompanied at all times by a Band Member guide; (2) Non-tribal hunters must have in their possession a valid small game hunting license, a Federal migratory waterfowl stamp, and a Minnesota State waterfowl stamp; (3) Non-tribal hunters and Band Members must have only Service-approved non-toxic shot in possession at all times; (4) Non-tribal hunters must conform to possession limits established and regulated by the State on Minnesota and the Bois Forte Band.

    We propose to approve the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa regulations for the 2001-02 hunting season.

    (b) Colorado River Indian Tribes, Colorado River Indian Reservation, Parker, Arizona (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Colorado River Indian Reservation is located in Arizona and California. The tribes own almost all lands on the reservation, and have full wildlife management authority.

    In their 2001-02 proposal, the Colorado River Indian Tribes requested split dove seasons. They propose their early season begin September 1 and end September 15, 2001. Daily bag limits would be 10 mourning or 10 white-winged doves either singly or in the aggregate. The late season for doves is proposed to open November 16, 2001, and close January 13, 2002. The daily bag limit would be 10 mourning doves. The possession limit would be twice the daily bag limit. Shooting hours would be from one-half hour before sunrise to noon in the early season and until sunset in the late season. Other special tribally set regulations would apply.

    The tribes also propose duck hunting seasons. The season would likely open October 6, 2001, and run until January 6, 2002. The tribes propose the same season dates for mergansers, coots and common moorhens. The daily bag limit for ducks, including mergansers, would be the same as that allowed under Pacific Flyway Frameworks, except that the daily bag limits could contain no more than two goldeneye and two cinnamon teal. The possession limit would be twice the daily bag limit. The daily bag and possession limit for coots and common moorhens would be 25, singly or in the aggregate.

    For geese, the Colorado River Indian Tribes propose a season of November 17, 2001, through January 13, 2002. The daily bag limit for geese would be four, but could include no more than three light geese or two dark geese. The possession limit would be eight, but could include no more than six light geese or four dark geese.

    In 1996, the tribe conducted a detailed assessment of dove hunting. Results showed approximately 16,100 mourning doves and 13,600 white-winged doves were harvested by approximately 2,660 hunters who averaged 1.45 hunter-days. Field observations and permit sales indicate that fewer than 200 hunters participate in waterfowl seasons. Under the proposed regulations described here and, based upon past seasons, we and the tribes estimate harvest will be similar.

    Hunters must have a valid Colorado River Indian Reservation hunting permit in their possession while hunting. As in the past, the regulations would apply both to tribal and non-tribal hunters, and nontoxic shot is required for waterfowl hunting.

    We propose to approve the Colorado River Indian Tribes regulations for the 2001-02 hunting season.

    (c) Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Flathead Indian Reservation, Pablo, Montana (Nontribal Hunters)

    For the past several years, the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes and the State of Montana have entered into cooperative agreements for the regulation of hunting on the Flathead Indian Reservation. The State and the tribes are currently operating under a cooperative agreement signed in 1990 that addresses fishing and hunting management and regulation issues of mutual concern. This agreement enables all hunters to utilize waterfowl hunting opportunities on the reservation. The tribe's proposed special regulations for waterfowl hunting were submitted in a May 21, 2001, proposal.

    As in the past, tribal regulations for nontribal members would be at least as restrictive as those established for the Pacific Flyway portion of Montana. Goose season dates would also be at least as restrictive as those established for the Pacific Flyway portion of Montana. Shooting hours for waterfowl hunting on the Flathead Reservation are sunrise to sunset. Steel, bismuth-tin, or other Federally-approved nontoxic shots are the only legal shotgun loads on the reservation for waterfowl or other game birds.

    The requested season dates and bag limits are similar to past regulations. Harvest levels are not expected to change significantly. Standardized check station data from the 1993-94 and 1994-95 hunting seasons indicated no significant changes in harvest levels and that the large majority of the harvest is by non-tribal hunters.

    We propose to approve the tribes' request for special migratory bird regulations for the 2001-02 hunting season.

    (d) Crow Creek Sioux Tribe, Crow Creek Indian Reservation, Fort Thompson, South Dakota (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Crow Creek Indian Reservation has a checkerboard pattern of land ownership, with much of the land owned by non-Indians. Since the 1993-94 season, the tribe has selected special waterfowl hunting regulations independent of the State of South Dakota. The tribe observes migratory bird hunting regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20.

    In their 2001 proposal, the tribe requested a duck and merganser season of October 6, to December 18, 2001, with a daily bag limit of six ducks, including no more that five mallards (only two of which may be hens), one canvasback, two redheads, two wood ducks, three scaup, and one pintail. The merganser daily bag limit would be five and include no more than one hooded merganser. The daily bag limit for coots would be 15. For Canada geese, the tribe proposes a September 29, 2001, to January 3, 2002, season with a three-bird daily bag limit. For white-fronted geese, the tribe proposes a September 29, to December 23, 2001, season with a daily bag limit of two. For snow geese, the tribe proposes a September 29, 2001, to January 3, 2002 season with a daily bag limit of 20. Similar to the last Start Printed Page 42716several years, the tribe also requests a sandhill crane season from September 15 to October 21, 2001, with a daily bag limit of three. In all cases, except snow geese, the possession limits would be twice the daily bag limit. There would be no possession limit for snow geese. Shooting hours would be from one-half hour before sunrise to sunset.

    The season and bag limits would be essentially the same as last year and as such, the tribe expects similar harvest. In 1994-95, duck harvest was 48 birds, down from 67 in 1993-94. Goose harvest during recent past seasons has been less than 100 geese. Total harvest on the reservation in 2000 was estimated to be 179 ducks and 868 geese.

    We propose to approve the tribe's requested seasons. We also remind the tribe that all sandhill crane hunters are required to obtain a Federal sandhill crane permit. As such, the tribe should contact us for further information on obtaining the needed permits. In addition, as with all other groups, we request the tribe continue to survey and report harvest.

    (e) Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Cloquet, Minnesota (Tribal Members Only)

    Since 1996, the Service and the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians have cooperated to establish special migratory bird hunting regulations for tribal members. The Fond du Lac's May 24, 2001, proposal covers land set apart for the band under the Treaties of 1854 and 1837 in northeast and east-central Minnesota.

    The band's proposal for 2001-02 is essentially the same as that approved last year. Specifically, the Fond du Lac Band proposes a September 15 to December 2, 2001, season on ducks, mergansers, coots and moorhens, and a September 1 to December 17, 2001, season for geese. For sora and Virginia rails, snipe, and woodcock, the Fond du Lac Band proposes a September 1 to December 2, 2001, season. Proposed daily bag limits would consist of the following:

    Ducks: 18 ducks, including no more than 12 mallards (only 6 of which may be hens), 3 black ducks, 9 scaup, 6 wood ducks, 6 redheads, 3 pintails, and 3 canvasbacks.

    Mergansers: 15 mergansers, including no more than 3 hooded mergansers.

    Geese: 12 geese.

    Coots and Common Moorhens (Common Gallinules): 20 coots and common moorhens, singly or in the aggregate.

    Sora and Virginia Rails: 25 sora and Virginia rails, singly or in the aggregate.

    Common Snipe: 8 common snipe.

    Woodcock: 3 woodcock.

    The following general conditions apply:

    1. While hunting waterfowl, a tribal member must carry on his/her person a valid tribal waterfowl hunting permit.

    2. Except as otherwise noted, tribal members will be required to comply with tribal codes that will be no less restrictive than the provisions of Chapter 10 of the Model Off-Reservation Code. Except as modified by the Service rules adopted in response to this proposal, these amended regulations parallel Federal requirements in 50 CFR part 20 as to hunting methods, transportation, sale, exportation, and other conditions generally applicable to migratory bird hunting.

    3. Band members in each zone will comply with State regulations providing for closed and restricted waterfowl hunting areas.

    4. There are no possession limits on any species, unless otherwise noted above. For purposes of enforcing bag limits, all migratory birds in the possession or custody of band members on ceded lands will be considered to have been taken on those lands unless tagged by a tribal or State conservation warden as having been taken on-reservation. All migratory birds that fall on reservation lands will not count as part of any off-reservation bag or possession limit.

    The Band anticipates harvest will be fewer than 500 ducks and geese.

    We propose to approve the request for special migratory bird hunting regulations for the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewas.

    (f) Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Suttons Bay, Michigan (Tribal Members Only)

    In the 1995-96 migratory bird seasons, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians and the Service first cooperated to establish special regulations for waterfowl. The Grand Traverse Band is a self-governing, federally recognized tribe located on the west arm of Grand Traverse Bay in Leelanau County, Michigan. The Grand Traverse Band is a signatory tribe of the Treaty of 1836. We have approved special regulations for tribal members of the 1836 treaty's signatory tribes on ceded lands in Michigan since the 1986-87 hunting season.

    For the 2001-02 season, the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians proposes that the tribal member duck season would run from September 15, 2001, through January 15, 2002. A daily bag limit of 12 would include no more than 2 pintail, 2 canvasback, 1 hooded merganser, 3 black ducks, 3 wood ducks, 3 redheads, and 6 mallards (only 3 of which may be hens). For Canada geese, the tribe proposes a September 1 through November 30, 2001, and a January 1, 2002, through February 8, 2002, season. For white-fronted geese, brant, and snow geese, the tribe proposes a September 20 through November 30, 2001, season. The daily bag limit for all geese (including brant) would be five birds. Based on our information, it is unlikely that any Canada geese from the Southern James Bay Population would be harvested by the tribe.

    For woodcock, snipe, and sora rail, the tribe proposes a September 1 to November 14, 2001, season. The daily bag limit shall not exceed five birds per species.

    For mourning doves, the tribe proposes a September 1 to November 14, 2001, season. The daily bag limit would be 10.

    All other Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20 would apply. The tribe proposes to closely monitor harvest through game bag checks, patrols, and mail surveys. Harvest surveys from the 2000-2001 hunting season indicate that approximately 30 tribal hunters harvested an estimated 275 ducks and 100 Canada geese. This hunter survey represents 8 percent of the Grand Traverse Band license holders.

    We propose to approve the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians' requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (g) Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, Odanah, Wisconsin (Tribal Members Only)

    Since 1985, various bands of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians have exercised judicially recognized off-reservation hunting rights for migratory birds in Wisconsin. The specific regulations were established by the Service in consultation with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission (GLIFWC, which represents the various bands). Beginning in 1986, a tribal season on ceded lands in the western portion of the State's Upper Peninsula was developed in coordination with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, and we have approved special regulations for tribal members in both Michigan and Wisconsin since the 1986-87 hunting season. In 1987, the GLIFWC requested, and we approved, special regulations to permit tribal members to hunt on ceded lands in Minnesota, as well as in Michigan and Start Printed Page 42717Wisconsin. The States of Michigan and Wisconsin concurred with the regulations, although Wisconsin has raised some concerns each year. Minnesota did not concur with the regulations, stressing that the State would not recognize Chippewa Indian hunting rights in Minnesota's treaty area until a court with jurisdiction over the State acknowledges and defines the extent of these rights. We acknowledge the State's concern, but point out that the U.S. Government has recognized the Indian hunting rights decided in the Voigt case, and that acceptable hunting regulations have been negotiated successfully in both Michigan and Wisconsin even though the Voigt decision did not specifically address ceded land outside Wisconsin. We believe this is appropriate because the treaties in question cover ceded lands in Michigan (and Minnesota), as well as in Wisconsin. Consequently, in view of the above, we have approved special regulations since the 1987-88 hunting season on ceded lands in all three States. In fact, this recognition of the principle of reserved treaty rights for band members to hunt and fish was pivotal in our decision to approve a special 1991-92 season for the 1836 ceded area in Michigan.

    In a June 1, 2001, letter, the GLIFWC proposed off-reservation special migratory bird hunting regulations for the 2001-02 seasons on behalf of the member tribes of the Voigt Intertribal Task Force of the GLIFWC (for the 1837 and 1842 Treaty areas) and the Bay Mills Indian Community (for the 1836 Treaty area). Member tribes of the Task Force are: the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians, The Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians, the Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians, the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians, the St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin, the Sokaogon Chippewa Community (Mole Lake Band), the Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians in Minnesota, the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Chippewa Indians and the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community in Michigan. Details of the proposed regulations are shown below. In general, the proposal is essentially the same as the regulations approved for the 2000-01 season.

    Results of 1987-98 hunter survey on off-reservation tribal duck harvest in the Wisconsin/Michigan entire ceded territory ranged from 1,022 to 2,374 with an average of 1,422. Estimated goose harvest has ranged from 72 to 586, with an average of 310. Under the proposed regulations, harvest is expected to remain within these ranges. Tribal harvest in the Minnesota ceded territory is anticipated to be much smaller than in the Wisconsin/Michigan area since waterfowl hunting has been limited to 10 individuals thus far. Due to the limited distribution of doves and dove habitat in the ceded territory, and the relatively small number of tribal off-reservation migratory bird hunters, harvest is expected to be negligible.

    We believe that regulations advanced by the GLIFWC for the 2001-02 hunting season are biologically acceptable and recommend approval. If the regulations are finalized as proposed, we would request that the GLIFWC closely monitor the member band duck harvest and take any actions necessary to reduce harvest if locally nesting populations are being significantly impacted.

    The Commission and the Service are parties to a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) designed to facilitate the ongoing enforcement of Service-approved tribal migratory bird regulations. Its intent is to provide long-term cooperative application.

    Also, as in recent seasons, the proposal contains references to Chapter 10 of the Migratory Bird Harvesting Regulations of the Model Off-Reservation Conservation Code. Chapter 10 regulations parallel State and Federal regulations and, in effect, are not changed by this proposal.

    The GLIFWC's proposed 2001-02 waterfowl hunting season regulations are as follows:

    Ducks

    A. Wisconsin and Minnesota 1837 and 1842 Zones:

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: 20 ducks, including no more than 10 mallards (only 5 of which may be hens), 4 black ducks, 4 redheads, 4 pintails, and 2 canvasbacks.

    B. Michigan 1836 and 1842 Treaty Zones:

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: 10 ducks, including no more than 5 mallards (only 2 of which may be hens), 2 black ducks, 2 redheads, 2 pintails, and 1 canvasback.

    Mergansers: All Ceded Areas.

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: Five mergansers.

    Geese: All Ceded Areas.

    Season Dates: Begin September 1 and end December 2, 2001. In addition, any portion of the ceded territory which is open to State-licensed hunters for goose hunting after December 1 shall also be open concurrently for tribal members.

    Daily Bag Limit: 10 geese.

    Other Migratory Birds: All Ceded Areas

    A. Coots and Common Moorhens (Common Gallinules):

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: 20 coots and common moorhens (common gallinules), singly or in the aggregate.

    B. Sora and Virginia Rails:

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: 25 sora and Virginia rails, singly or in the aggregate.

    C. Common Snipe:

    Season Dates: Begin September 15 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: Eight common snipe.

    D. Woodcock:

    Season Dates: Begin September 4 and end December 2, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: Five woodcock.

    E. Mourning Dove: 1837 and 1842 Ceded Territories.

    Season Dates: Begin September 1 and end October 30, 2001.

    Daily Bag Limit: 15 mourning dove.

    General Conditions

    1. While hunting waterfowl, a tribal member must carry on his/her person a valid tribal waterfowl hunting permit.

    2. Except as otherwise noted, tribal members will be required to comply with tribal codes that will be no less restrictive than the model ceded territory conservation codes approved by federal courts in the Lac Courte Oreilles v. State of Wisconsin (Voigt) and Mille Lacs Band v. State of Minnesota cases. The respective Chapter 10 of these Model Codes regulate territory migratory bird hunting. Except as modified by the Service rules adopted in response to this proposal, these amended regulations parallel Federal requirements in 50 CFR part 20 as to hunting methods, transportation, sale, exportation and other conditions generally applicable to migratory bird hunting.

    3. Particular regulations of note include:

    A. Nontoxic shot will be required for all waterfowl hunting.

    B. Tribal members in each zone will comply with tribal regulations providing for closed and restricted waterfowl hunting areas. These regulations generally incorporate the same restrictions contained in parallel State regulations.

    C. Possession limits for each species are double the daily bag limit, except on the opening day of the season, when the possession limit equals the daily bag limit, unless otherwise noted above. Start Printed Page 42718Possession limits are applicable only to transportation and do not include birds that are cleaned, dressed, and at a member's primary residence. For purposes of enforcing bag and possession limits, all migratory birds in the possession or custody of tribal members on ceded lands will be considered to have been taken on those lands unless tagged by a tribal or State conservation warden as having been taken on-reservation. All migratory birds that fall on reservation lands will not count as part of any off-reservation bag or possession limit.

    D. The tribe proposes that the baiting restrictions included in the respective sections 10.05 (2)(h) of the model ceded territory conservation codes be amended to include language which parallels that in place for non-tribal members as published in 64 FR 29804, June 3, 1999.

    E. They also propose to remove the shell limit restrictions included in the respective sections 10.05 (2)(b) of the model ceded territory conservation codes.

    4. Michigan—Duck Blinds and Decoys. Tribal members hunting in Michigan will comply with tribal codes that contain provisions that parallel applicable Michigan laws concerning duck blinds and/or decoys.

    (h) Jicarilla Apache Tribe, Jicarilla Indian Reservation, Dulce, New Mexico (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Jicarilla Apache Tribe has had special migratory bird hunting regulations for tribal members and nonmembers since the 1986-87 hunting season. The tribe owns all lands on the reservation and has recognized full wildlife management authority. In general, the proposed seasons would be more conservative than allowed by the Federal frameworks of last season and by States in the Pacific Flyway.

    In a May 9, 2001, proposal, the tribe proposed a 2001-02 waterfowl season beginning October 6 and a closing date of November 30, 2001. Daily bag and possession limits for waterfowl would be the same as Pacific Flyway States. The tribe proposes a season on Canada geese with a two-bird daily bag limit. Other regulations specific to the Pacific Flyway guidelines for New Mexico would be in effect.

    The Jicarilla Game and Fish Department's annual estimate of waterfowl harvest is relatively small. In the 2000-01 season, estimated duck harvest was 533, a significant decrease from 1,317 in 1999-2000, but within the historical range. The species composition in the past has included mainly mallards, gadwall, teal, and wigeon. Northern pintail comprised only 1 percent of the total harvest in 2000. The estimated harvest of geese was 10 birds.

    The proposed regulations are essentially the same as were established last year. The tribe anticipates the maximum 2001-02 waterfowl harvest would be around 800 ducks and 20-30 geese.

    We propose to approve the tribe's requested 2001-02 hunting seasons.

    (i) Kalispel Tribe, Kalispel Reservation, Usk, Washington (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Kalispel Reservation was established by Executive Order in 1914, and currently comprises approximately 4,600 acres. The tribe owns all Reservation land and has full management authority. The Kalispel Tribe has a fully developed wildlife program with hunting and fishing codes. The tribe enjoys excellent wildlife management relations with the State. The tribe and the State have an operational Memorandum of Understanding with emphasis on fisheries but also for wildlife. The nontribal member seasons described below pertain to a 176-acre waterfowl management unit. The tribe is utilizing this opportunity to rehabilitate an area that needs protection because of past land use practices, as well as to provide additional waterfowl hunting in the area. Beginning in 1996, the requested regulations also included a proposal for Kalispel-member-only migratory bird hunting on Kalispel-ceded lands within Washington, Montana, and Idaho.

    For the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting seasons, the Kalispel Tribe proposed, in a May 15, 2001, letter, tribal and nontribal member waterfowl seasons. For nontribal members, the tribe requests that the season for ducks begin September 15, 2001, and end January 31, 2002. In that period, nontribal hunters would be allowed to hunt approximately 92 days. Hunters should obtain further information on specific hunt days from the Kalispel Tribe. The tribe also requests the season for geese begin on September 1, to September 16, 2001, and begin on September 28, 2001, to January 31, 2002. Daily bag and possession limits would be the same as those for the State of Washington.

    The tribe reports a 2000-01 nontribal harvest of 175 ducks and 0 geese. Under the proposal, the tribe expects harvest to be similar to last year and less than 100 geese and 200 ducks.

    All other State and Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20, such as use of steel shot and possession of a signed migratory bird hunting stamp, would be required.

    For tribal members on Kalispel-ceded lands, the Kalispel propose outside frameworks for ducks and geese of September 15, 2001, through January 31, 2002. However, during that period, the tribe proposes that the season run continuously. Daily bag and possession limits would be concurrent with the Federal rule.

    The tribe reports that there was no 2000-01 tribal harvest. Under the proposal, the tribe expects harvest to be less than 500 birds for the season with less than 200 geese. Tribal members would be required to possess a signed Federal migratory bird stamp and a tribal ceded lands permit.

    We propose to approve the regulations requested by the Kalispel Tribe provided that the nontribal seasons conform to Treaty limitations and final Federal frameworks for the Pacific Flyway. For the 2001-02 season, outside Federal frameworks for ducks in the Pacific Flyway are September 29, 2001, through January 20, 2002. For geese, frameworks for special early Canada goose seasons are September 1 through September 15, 2001, while regular seasons frameworks are September 29, 2001, through January 20, 2002. All seasons for nontribal hunters must conform with the 107-day maximum season length established by the Treaty.

    (j) Klamath Tribe, Chiloquin, Oregon (Tribal Members Only)

    The Klamath Tribe currently has no reservation, per se. However, the Klamath Tribe has reserved hunting, fishing, and gathering rights within its former reservation boundary. This area of former reservation, granted to the Klamaths by the Treaty of 1864, is over 1 million acres. Tribal natural resource management authority is derived from the Treaty of 1864, and carried out cooperatively under the judicially enforced Consent Decree of 1981. The parties to this Consent Decree are the Federal Government, the State of Oregon, and the Klamaths. The Klamath Indian Game Commission sets the seasons. The tribal biological staff and tribal Regulatory Enforcement Officers monitor tribal harvest by frequent bag checks and hunter interviews.

    In a May 31, 2001, letter, the Klamath Tribe proposed season dates of October 1, 2001, through January 28, 2002. Daily bag limits would be nine for ducks and six for geese, with possession limits twice the daily bag limit. The daily bag and possession limit for coots would be 25. Shooting hours would be one-half Start Printed Page 42719hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. Steel shot is required.

    Based on the number of birds produced in the Klamath Basin, the tribe expects that this year's harvest will be similar to last year's. Information on tribal harvest suggests that more than 70 percent of the annual goose harvest is local birds produced in the Klamath Basin.

    We propose to approve the Klamath Tribe's requested regulations.

    (k) Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe, Cass Lake, Minnesota (Tribal Members Only)

    The Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe is a federally recognized tribe located in Cass Lake, Minnesota. The reservation employs conservation officers to enforce conservation regulations. The Service and the tribe cooperatively established migratory bird hunting regulations for the first time last year.

    For the 2001-02 season, the tribe requests a duck season starting on September 15 and ending December 31, 2001. They request a goose season to run from September 1 through December 31, 2001. Daily bag limits for both ducks and geese would be 10. Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limit. Shooting hours are one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset.

    The annual harvest by tribal members on the Leech Lake Reservation is estimated at 1,000-2,000 birds.

    We propose to approve the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe's requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (l) Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, Manistee, Michigan (Tribal Members Only)

    The Little River Band of Ottawa Indians is a self-governing, federally recognized tribe located in Manistee, Michigan, and a signatory tribe of the Treaty of 1836. We have approved special regulations for tribal members of the 1836 treaty's signatory tribes on ceded lands in Michigan since the 1986-87 hunting season. Ceded lands are located in Lake, Mason, Manistee, and Wexford Counties.

    For the 2001-02 season, the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians proposes regulations to parallel those of the State of Michigan. The tribal member duck, merganser, and coots and common moorhens seasons will run from September 29 through December 5, 2001. A daily bag limit of six ducks would include no more than one pintail, one canvasback, one black duck, two wood ducks, two redheads, three scaup, and four mallards (only one of which may be a hen). The daily bag limit for mergansers would be five, of which only one could be a hooded merganser. Possession limits for mergansers is 10, only 2 of which may be hooded mergansers. The daily bag limit for coots and common moorhens would be 15. Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limit.

    For Canada geese, the tribe proposes a September 1 through September 15, 2001, early season, a September 16 through December 2, 2001, regular season, and a February 2 through February 17, 2002, late season. Daily bag limits would be five geese in the early and late season and two geese in the regular portion of the season. The possession limit would be twice the daily bag limit. For white-fronted geese, blue geese, and snow geese, the tribe proposes a September 16 through December 2, 2001, season. The daily bag limit for all geese (including brant) would be 10 birds, which could include no more than 2 white-fronted geese or 2 brant. Possession limits would be 30.

    For snipe, woodcock, and rails, the tribe proposes a September 15 to November 14, 2001, season. The daily bag limit would be 8 common snipe, 3 woodcock, and 25 rails. Possession limits for snipe and woodcock would be twice the daily bag limit. The possession limit for rails would be 25.

    The tribe proposes to monitor harvest through mail surveys. General Conditions are as follows:

    A. All tribal members will be required to obtain a valid tribal resource card and 2001-02 hunting license.

    B. Except as modified by the Service rules adopted in response to this proposal, these amended regulations parallel all Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20.

    C. Particular regulations of note include:

    (1) Nontoxic shot will be required for all waterfowl hunting by tribal members.

    (2) Tribal members in each zone will comply with tribal regulations providing for closed and restricted waterfowl hunting areas. These regulations generally incorporate the same restrictions contained in parallels state regulations.

    (3) Possession limits for each species are double the daily bag limit, except on the opening day of the season, when the possession limit equals the daily bag limit, unless otherwise noted above.

    D. Tribal members hunting in Michigan will comply with tribal codes that contain provisions parallel to Michigan law regarding duck blinds and decoys.

    We propose to approve Little River Band of Ottawa Indians' requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (m) The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Petoskey, Michigan (Tribal Members Only)

    The Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians is a self-governing, federally recognized tribe located in Petoskey, Michigan, and a signatory tribe of the Treaty of 1836. We have approved special regulations for tribal members of the 1836 treaty's signatory tribes on ceded lands in Michigan since the 1986-87 hunting season.

    For the 2001-02 season, the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians propose regulations similar to other tribes in the 1836 treaty area. The tribal member duck season would run from September 20, 2001, through January 20, 2002 season. A daily bag limit of 10 would include no more than 1 pintail, 1 canvasback, 1 hooded merganser, 2 black ducks, 2 wood ducks, 2 redheads, and 5 mallards (only 2 of which may be hens). For Canada geese, the tribe proposes a September 1, 2001 through January 20, 2002, season. For white-fronted geese, brant, and snow geese, the tribe proposes an October 1 through November 30, 2001, season. The daily bag limit for all geese (including brant) would be five birds. Based on our information, it is unlikely that any Canada geese from the Southern James Bay Population would be harvested by the tribe. Possession limits are twice the daily bag limit.

    For woodcock, snipe, and sora rail, the tribe proposes a September 1 to November 14, 2001, season. The daily bag limit shall not exceed five birds per species. The possession limit shall not exceed two days bag limit for all birds.

    All other Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20 would apply. The tribe proposes to closely monitor harvest through game bag checks, patrols, and mail surveys. In particular, the tribe proposes monitoring the harvest of Southern James Bay Canada geese to assess any impacts of tribal hunting on the population.

    We propose to approve the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians' requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (n) Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, Lower Brule Reservation, Lower Brule, South Dakota (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Lower Brule Sioux Tribe first established tribal migratory bird hunting regulations for the Lower Brule Reservation in 1994. The Lower Brule Reservation is about 214,000 acres in size and is located on and adjacent to Start Printed Page 42720the Missouri River, south of Pierre. Land ownership on the reservation is mixed, and until recently, the Lower Brule Tribe had full management authority over fish and wildlife via a MOA with the State of South Dakota. The MOA provided the tribe jurisdiction over fish and wildlife on reservation lands, including deeded and Corps of Engineers taken lands. For the 2001-02 season, the two parties have come to an agreement that provides the public a clear understanding of the Lower Brule Sioux Wildlife Department license requirements and hunting season regulations. The Lower Brule Reservation waterfowl season is open to tribal and non-tribal hunters.

    For the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting season, the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe proposes a duck, merganser, and coot season length of 97 days, the same number of days tentatively allowed in the High Plains Management Unit for this season. The tribe's proposed season would run from October 6, 2001, through January 10, 2002. The daily bag limit would be six birds, including no more than five mallards (only one of which may be a hen), one pintail, two redheads, two wood ducks, three scaup, one canvasback, and one mottled duck. The daily bag limit for mergansers would be five, only one of which could be a hooded merganser. The daily bag limit for coots would be 15. Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limits. The tribe also proposes a youth waterfowl hunt on September 29-30, 2001.

    The tribe's proposed Canada goose season would run from October 20, 2001, through January 22, 2002, with a daily bag limit of three Canada geese. The tribe's proposed white-fronted goose season would run from October 20, 2001, through January 13, 2002, with a daily bag limit of two white-fronted geese. The tribe's proposed light goose season would run from October 20, 2001, through January 19, 2002, and February 24 through March 10, 2002. The light goose daily bag limit would be 20. Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limits.

    In the 2000-01 season, hunters harvested an estimated 1,546 geese and 396 ducks. In 2000, duck harvest species composition was primarily mallard (88 percent), gadwall (7 percent), and green-winged teal (3 percent). Goose harvest species composition in 2000 at Mni Sho Sho was approximately 95 percent Canada geese, 4 percent snow geese, and 1 percent white-fronted geese. Harvest of geese harvested by other hunters was approximately 68 percent Canada geese, 31 percent snow geese, and 1 percent white-fronted geese. However, typical harvest is 100 percent Canada geese with less than 1 percent snow geese.

    The tribe anticipates a duck harvest similar to last year and a goose harvest below the target harvest level of 3,000 to 4,000 geese. All basic Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20, including the use of steel shot, Migratory Waterfowl Hunting and Conservation Stamp, etc., would be observed by the tribe's proposed regulations. In addition, the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe has an official Conservation Code that was established by Tribal Council Resolution in June 1982 and updated in 1996.

    We propose to approve the tribe's requested regulations for the Lower Brule Reservation.

    (o) Makah Indian Tribe, Neah Bay, Washington (Tribal Members)

    For the first time, the Makah Indian Tribe and the Service are cooperating to establish special regulations for migratory game birds on the Makah Reservation and traditional hunting land off the Makah Reservation for the 2001-02 hunting season. Lands off the Makah Reservation are those contained within the boundaries of the State of Washington Game Management Units 601-603 and 607.

    The Makah Indian Tribe proposes a duck and coot hunting season from September 15, 2001, to January 13, 2002. The daily bag limit is seven ducks including no more than one canvasback and one redhead. The daily bag limit for coots is 25. The tribe has a year-round closure on wood ducks and harlequin ducks. For geese, the tribe proposes the season open on September 8, 2001, and close January 13, 2002. The daily bag limit for geese is four. The tribe notes that there is a year-round closure on Aleutian and Dusky Canada geese. Shooting hours for all species of waterfowl are one-half hour before sunrise to sunset.

    The tribe anticipates that harvest under this regulation will be relatively low since fewer than 20 hunters are likely to participate at this time. The tribe expects fewer than 70 ducks and 20 geese are expected to be harvested during the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting season.

    All other Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20 would apply. The following restrictions are also proposed by the tribe: (1) As per Makah Ordinace 44, only shotguns may be used to hunt any species of waterfowl. Additionally, shotguns must not be discharged within 0.25 miles of an occupied area; (2) Hunters must be eligible, enrolled Makah tribal members and must carry their Indian Treaty Fishing and Hunting Identification Card while hunting. No tags or permits are required to hunt waterfowl; (3) The Cape Flattery area is open to waterfowl hunting, except in designated wilderness areas, or within one mile of Cape Flattery Trail, or in any area that is closed to hunting by another ordinance or regulation; (4) The use of live decoys and/or baiting to pursue any species of waterfowl is prohibited; (5) Steel or bismuth shot only for waterfowl is allowed; the use of lead shot is prohibited; (6) The use of dogs is permitted to hunt waterfowl.

    We propose to approve the Makah Indian Tribe's requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (p) Navajo Nation, Navajo Indian Reservation, Window Rock, Arizona (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    Since 1985, we have established uniform migratory bird hunting regulations for tribal members and nonmembers on the Navajo Indian Reservation (in parts of Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah). The Navajo Nation owns almost all lands on the reservation and has full wildlife management authority.

    The tribe requests special migratory bird hunting regulations on the reservation for both tribal and nontribal members for the 2001-02 hunting season for ducks (including mergansers), Canada geese, coots, band-tailed pigeons, and mourning doves. For waterfowl, the Navajo Nation requests the earliest opening dates and longest seasons, and the same daily bag and possession limits permitted Pacific Flyway States under final Federal frameworks.

    For both mourning dove and band-tailed pigeons, the Navajo Nation proposes seasons of September 1 through 30, 2001, with daily bag limits of 10 and 5 for mourning dove and band-tailed pigeon, respectively. Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limits.

    The Nation requires tribal members and nonmembers to comply with all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations in 50 CFR part 20 pertaining to shooting hours and manner of taking. In addition, each waterfowl hunter 16 years of age or over must carry on his/her person a valid Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp (Duck Stamp) signed in ink across the face of the stamp. Special regulations established by the Navajo Nation also apply on the reservation.

    The tribe anticipates a total harvest of less than 300 mourning doves, 50 band-Start Printed Page 42721tailed pigeons, 500 ducks, coots, and mergansers, and 300 Canada geese for the 2001-02 season. Harvest will be measured by mail survey forms. The tribe will take action to close the season, reduce bag limits, or take other appropriative actions if the harvest is detrimental to the migratory bird resource through the established Tribal Nation Code, Title 17 and 18 U.S.C. 1165.

    We propose to approve the Navajo Nation's request for these special regulations for the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting seasons.

    (q) Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Oneida, Wisconsin (Tribal Members Only)

    Since 1991-92, the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin and the Service have cooperated to establish uniform regulations for migratory bird hunting by tribal and non-tribal hunters within the original Oneida Reservation boundaries. Since 1985, the Oneida Tribe's Conservation Department has enforced their own hunting regulations within those original reservation limits. The Oneida Tribe also has a good working relationship with the State of Wisconsin and the majority of the seasons and limits are the same for the tribe and Wisconsin.

    In a May 11, 2001, letter, the tribe proposed special migratory bird hunting regulations. For ducks, the tribe described the general “outside dates” as being September 29 through November 30, 2001, inclusive. The tribe proposes a daily bag limit of six birds, which could include no more than six mallards (three hen mallards), five wood ducks, one canvasback, one redhead, two pintails, and one hooded merganser.

    For geese, the tribe requests a season between September 1 and December 31, 2001, with a daily bag limit of three Canada geese. Hunters will be issued three tribal tags for geese in order to monitor goose harvest. An additional three tags will be issued each time birds are registered. The tribe will close the season November 17 to 25, 2001. If a quota of 150 geese is attained before the season concludes, the tribe will recommend closing the season early.

    For woodcock, the tribe proposes a season between September 1 and November 12, 2001, with a daily bag and possession limit of 5 and 10, respectively.

    The tribe proposes shooting hours be one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. Nontribal members hunting on the Reservation or on lands under the jurisdiction of the tribe must comply to all State of Wisconsin regulations. Tribal members and nontribal members hunting on the Reservation or on lands under the jurisdiction of the tribe will observe all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations found in 50 CFR part 20, with the following exceptions: Indian hunters would be exempt from the purchase of the Migratory Waterfowl Hunting and Conservation Stamp (Duck Stamp); and shotgun capacity is not limited to three shells.

    The Service proposes to approve the request for special migratory bird hunting regulations for the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin.

    (r) Point No Point Treaty Tribes, Kingston, Washington (Tribal Members Only)

    Since 1996, the Service and the Point No Point Treaty Tribes, consisting of the Skokomish, Port Gamble S'klallam, Jamestown S'klallam, and Elwha S'klallam tribes, have cooperated to establish special regulations for migratory bird hunting. The four tribes have reservations located on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington. All four tribes have successfully administered tribal hunting regulations since 1985, and each tribe has a comprehensive hunting ordinance.

    For the 2001-02 season, we have not yet heard from the tribe regarding this season's proposal. Based on last year, we assume the tribe would request seasons for ducks, geese, brant, coots, snipe, and mourning doves. For ducks, coots, geese, brant, and snipe, the season would run from September 15, 2001, to January 15, 2002, with a daily bag limit of 7 ducks, 25 coots, 4 geese (including no more than 3 light geese), 2 brant, and 8 snipe. The duck daily bag limit would include mergansers and could include no more than two hen mallards, two pintails, one canvasback, and two redheads. The season is closed on harlequin ducks and Aleutian Canada geese. All possession limits would be twice the daily bag limit. For mourning doves, the season would start September 1, 2001, and end January 15, 2002, with a daily bag limit of 10.

    The tribes require that all hunters authorized to hunt migratory birds on the reservation obtain a tribal hunting permit from the respective tribe. Hunters are also required to adhere to a number of special regulations available at the tribal office. Tribal harvest in 1999 under similar regulations was approximately 185 ducks, 22 geese, and 15 coots.

    We propose to approve the Point No Point Treaty Tribe's 2001-02 regulations provided the tribe provides the appropriate confirmation for the seasons.

    (s) Seminole Tribe of Florida, Big Cypress Seminole Reservation, Clewiston, Florida (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Seminole Tribe of Florida and the Service have cooperated since 1995 to establish regulations for the 70,000-acre Big Cypress Seminole Reservation. Located northwest of Miami, the Big Cypress Seminole Reservation is totally tribally owned, and the tribe has full wildlife management authority.

    For the 2001-02 season, the Seminole Tribe proposes establishing a mourning dove season from September 16, 2001, through January 20, 2002. Hunting would be allowed for tribal and non-tribal members, but would be on Sundays only. Daily bag limits would be the same as those allowed within the Federal frameworks for the State of Florida. All other Federal regulations contained in 50 CFR part 20 would apply. In 1997, under identical regulations, hunters harvested 2,078 doves on the reservation. The anticipated harvest of doves taken during the 2001 season would be limited to 12,000 birds. The tribe controls all entry to the hunt area.

    We propose to approve the Seminole Tribe's requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (t) Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Fort Hall, Idaho (Nontribal Hunters)

    Almost all of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation is tribally owned. The tribes claim full wildlife management authority throughout the reservation, but the Idaho Fish and Game Department has disputed tribal jurisdiction, especially for hunting by non-tribal members on reservation lands owned by non-Indians. As a compromise, since 1985, we have established the same waterfowl hunting regulations on the reservation and in a surrounding off-reservation State zone. The regulations were requested by the tribes and provided for different season dates than in the remainder of the State. We agreed to the season dates because they seemed to provide additional protection to mallards and pintails. The State of Idaho concurred with the zoning arrangement. We have no objection to the State's use of this zone again in the 2001-02 hunting season, provided the duck and goose hunting season dates are the same as on the reservation.

    In a May 30, 2001, proposal for the 2001-02 hunting season, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes requested a continuous duck (including mergansers) season with the maximum number of days and Start Printed Page 42722the same daily bag and possession limits permitted Pacific Flyway States, under final Federal frameworks. The tribes propose that, if the same number of hunting days are permitted as last year, the season would have an opening date of October 4, 2001, and a closing date of January 4, 2002. Coot and snipe season dates would be the same as for ducks, with the same daily bag and possession limits permitted Pacific Flyway States. The tribes anticipate harvest will be between 2,000 and 5,000 ducks.

    The tribes also requested a continuous goose season with the maximum number of days and the same daily bag and possession limits permitted in Idaho under Federal frameworks. The tribes propose that, if the same number of hunting days are permitted as in previous years, the season would have an opening date of October 4, 2001, and a closing date of January 11, 2002. The tribes anticipate harvest will be between 4,000 and 6,000 geese.

    Nontribal hunters must comply with all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations in 50 CFR part 20 pertaining to shooting hours, use of steel shot, and manner of taking. Special regulations established by the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes also apply on the reservation.

    We note that the requested regulations are nearly identical to those of last year and propose they be approved for the 2001-02 hunting season.

    (u) Squaxin Island Tribe, Squaxin Island Reservation, Shelton, Washington (Tribal Members Only)

    The Squaxin Island Tribe of Washington and the Service have cooperated since 1995 to establish special tribal migratory bird hunting regulations. These special regulations apply to tribal members on the Squaxin Island Reservation, located in western Washington near Olympia, and all lands within the traditional hunting grounds of the Squaxin Island Tribe.

    For 2001-02, the tribe requested to establish duck and coot seasons that would run from September 15, 2001, through January 15, 2002. The daily bag limit for ducks would be five per day and could include only one canvasback. The season on harlequin ducks would be closed. For coots the daily bag limit would be 25. For snipe, the tribe proposes the season start on September 15, 2001, and end on January 15, 2002. The daily bag limit for snipe would be eight. For geese, the tribe proposes establishing a season that would run from September 15, 2001, through January 15, 2002. The daily bag limit for geese would be four and could include only two snow geese and one dusky Canada goose. The season on Aleutian and cackling Canada geese would be closed. For brant, the tribe proposes to establish a September 15 to December 31, 2001, season with a daily bag limit of two. The tribe also propose a September 1 to December 31, 2001, season for band-tailed pigeons with a daily bag limit of five.

    In all cases, the possession limit would be twice the daily bag limit. Shooting hours would be from one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset, and steel shot would be required for migratory bird hunting. Further, the tribe requires that all harvest be reported to their Natural Resources Office within 72 hours.

    In 1995, the tribe reported no harvest of any species. Tribal regulations are enforced by the tribe's Law Enforcement Department.

    We propose to approve the Squaxin Island Tribe's 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (v) Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Arlington, Washington (Tribal Members Only)

    For the first time, the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians and the Service are cooperating to establish special regulations for migratory game birds. The Tribe is proposing regulations to hunt all open and unclaimed lands under the Treaty of Point Elliott of January 22, 1855, including their main hunting grounds around Camano Island, Skagit Flats, Port Susan to the border of the Tulalip Tribe's Reservation. Ceded lands are located in Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, and Kings Counties, and a portion of Pierce County, Washington. The Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians is a federally recognized tribe and reserves the Treaty Right to hunt (U.S. v. Washington).

    The tribe proposes that duck (including mergansers, sea ducks, and coots), goose, and snipe seasons run from October 1, 2001 to January 31, 2002. The daily bag limit on ducks (including sea ducks and mergansers) is 10 and allows 3 more of each species than permitted in the State of Washington under final Federal frameworks. The daily bag limit for coot is 25. For geese, the daily bag limit is six. The season on brant is closed for conservation measures. The daily bag limit for snipe is ten. Possession limits are totals of two daily bag limits.

    Harvest is regulated by a punch card system. Tribal members hunting on lands under this proposal will observe all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations found in 50 CFR part 20, which will be enforced by the Stillaguamish Tribal Law Enforcement. Tribal members are required to use steel shot or a non-toxic shot as required by Federal regulations.

    The tribe anticipates a total harvest of 200 ducks, 100 geese, 50 mergansers, 100 coots, and 100 snipe. Anticipated harvest needs include subsistence and ceremonial needs. Certain species may be closed to hunting for conservation purposes, and consideration for the needs of certain species will be addressed.

    The Service proposes to approve the request for special migratory bird hunting regulations for the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians.

    (w) Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, LaConner, Washington (Tribal Members Only)

    In 1996, the Service and the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community began cooperating to establish special regulations for migratory bird hunting. The Swinomish Indian Tribal Community is a Federally recognized Indian tribe consisting of the Suiattle, Skagit, and Kikialos. The Swinomish Reservation was established by the Treaty of Point Elliott of January 22, 1855, and lies in the Puget Sound area north of Seattle, Washington.

    The tribe proposes to establish a migratory bird hunting season on all areas that are open and unclaimed and consistent with the meaning of the treaty. The tribe requests to establish duck, merganser, Canada goose, brant, and coot seasons opening on the earliest possible date allowed by the final Federal frameworks for the Pacific Flyway and closing 30 days after the State of Washington closes its season. Daily bag and possession limits would be the same as those allowed by the State except that the Swinomish request an additional three birds of each species over that allowed by the State.

    The Community normally anticipates that the regulations will result in the harvest of approximately 300 ducks, 50 Canada geese, 75 mergansers, 100 brant, and 50 coot. The Swinomish utilize a report card and permit system to monitor harvest and will implement steps to limit harvest where conservation is needed. All tribal regulations will be enforced by tribal fish and game officers.

    On reservation, the Tribal Community would propose a hunting season for the above-mentioned species beginning on the earliest possible opening date and closing March 9, 2002. The Swinomish manage harvest by a report card permit system and anticipate harvest will be similar to that expected off reservation.

    We believe the estimated harvest by the Swinomish will be minimal and will Start Printed Page 42723not adversely affect migratory bird populations. We propose to approve the Tribal Community's regulations for the 2001-02 season.

    (x) The Tulalip Tribes of Washington, Tulalip Indian Reservation, Marysville, Washington (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The Tulalip Tribes are the successors in interest to the tribes and bands signatory to the Treaty of Point Elliott of January 22, 1855. The Tulalip Tribes' government is located on the Tulalip Indian Reservation just north of the City of Everett in Snohomish County, Washington. The tribes or individual tribal members own all of the land on the reservation, and they have full wildlife management authority. All lands within the boundaries of the Tulalip Tribes Reservation are closed to nonmember hunting unless opened by Tulalip Tribal regulations.

    In a June 1, 2001, letter, the Tulalip Tribes proposed tribal and nontribal hunting regulations for the 2001-02 season. Migratory waterfowl hunting by Tulalip Tribal members is authorized by Tulalip Tribal Ordinance No. 67. All lands within the boundaries of the Tulalip Tribes Reservation are closed to non-members hunting unless opened by Tulalip Tribal regulations. For ducks, mergansers, coot, and snipe, the proposed season for tribal members would be from September 15, 2001, through February 1, 2002. In the case of nontribal hunters hunting on the reservation, the season would be the latest closing date and the longest period of time allowed for the State of Washington under final Pacific Flyway Federal frameworks. Daily bag and possession limits for Tulalip Tribal members would be 6 and 12 ducks, respectively, except that for blue-winged teal, canvasback, harlequin, pintail, and wood duck, the bag and possession limits would be the same as those established for the State of Washington in accordance with final Federal frameworks. For nontribal hunters, bag and possession limits would be the same as those permitted the State of Washington under final Federal frameworks. Nontribal members should check with the Tulalip tribal authorities regarding additional conservation measures which may apply to specific species managed within the region. Ceremonial hunting may be authorized by the Department of Natural Resources at any time upon application of a qualified tribal member. Such a hunt shall have a bag limit designed to limit harvest only to those birds necessary to provide for the ceremony.

    For geese, tribal members are proposed to be allowed to hunt from September 15, 2001, through February 1, 2002. Non-tribal hunters would be allowed the longest season and the latest closing date permitted for the State of Washington under final Federal frameworks. For tribal hunters, the goose daily bag and possession limits would be 6 and 12, respectively, except that the bag limits for brant, cackling Canada geese, and dusky Canada geese would be those established for the Pacific Flyway in accordance with final Federal frameworks. For nontribal hunters hunting on reservation lands, the daily bag and possession limits would be those established in accordance with final Federal frameworks for the State of Washington. The Tulalip Tribes also set a maximum annual bag limit for those tribal members who engage in subsistence hunting of 365 ducks and 365 geese.

    All hunters on Tulalip Tribal lands are required to adhere to shooting hour regulations set at one-half hour before sunrise to sunset, special tribal permit requirements, and a number of other tribal regulations enforced by the tribe. Nontribal hunters 16 years of age and older, hunting pursuant to Tulalip Tribes' Ordinance No. 67, must possess a valid Federal Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp and a valid State of Washington Migratory Waterfowl Stamp. Both stamps must be validated by signing across the face of the stamp.

    Although the season length requested by the Tulalip Tribes appears to be quite liberal, harvest information indicates a total take by tribal and nontribal hunters under 1,000 ducks and 500 geese, annually.

    We propose approval of the Tulalip Tribe's request for the above seasons. We request that harvest be monitored closely and regulations be reevaluated for future years if harvest becomes too great in relation to population numbers.

    (y) Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, Sedro Woolley, Washington (Tribal Members Only)

    For the first time, the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and the Service are cooperating to establish special regulations for migratory game birds. The tribe has jurisdiction over lands within Skagit and Whatcom Counties, Washington. Migratory bird hunting would take place in Washington State Game Units 407, 437, and 418, which comprises the northern portion of the lands under tribal jurisdiction. Tribal hunters are issued a harvest report card that will be shared with the State of Washington.

    For the 2001-02 season, the tribe proposes a duck season, which includes coots, starting on November 1, 2001, and ending February 8, 2002. The tribe proposes a daily bag limit of 15 with a possession limit of 20. The coot daily bag limit is 20 with a possession limit of 30. The tribe proposes a goose season from November 1, 2001, to February 8, 2002 with a daily bag limit of seven geese and five brant. The possession limit for geese and brant are 10 and 7, respectively.

    The tribe proposes a mourning dove season between September 1, to December 31, 2001, with a daily bag limit of 12.

    The anticipated migratory bird harvest under this proposal would be 100 ducks, 5 geese, 2 brant, and 10 coots. Tribal members must have the tribal identification and harvest report card on their person to hunt. Tribal members hunting on the Reservation will observe all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations found in 50 CFR.

    The Service proposes to approve the request for special migratory bird hunting regulations for the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and requests that the tribe closely monitor harvest in this first season of establishing special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (z) Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, Aquinnah, Massachusetts (Tribal Members Only)

    The Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head is a federally-recognized tribe located on the island of Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts. The tribe has approximately 560 acres of land, which it manages for wildlife through its natural resources department. The tribe also enforces its own wildlife laws and regulations through the natural resources department.

    For the 2001-02 season, the tribe proposes a duck season of October 27, 2001, to February 23, 2002. The tribe proposes a daily bag limit of six birds, which could include no more than two hen mallards, two black ducks, two mottled ducks, one fulvous whistling duck, four mergansers, three scaup, one hooded merganser, two wood ducks, one canvasback, two redheads, one pintail, and one hen eider. The season for harlequins would be closed. A daily bag limit of six teal would be in addition to the daily bag limit for ducks.

    For sea ducks, the tribe proposes a season between October 27, 2001, and February 23, 2002, with a daily bag limit of seven, which could include no more than four of any one species unless otherwise noted above. Start Printed Page 42724

    For geese, the tribe requests a season between September 15, to September 22, 2001, and November 3, 2001, to February 23, 2002, with a daily bag limit of 5 Canada geese during the first period and three Canada geese during the second period. They propose a daily bag limit of 15 snow geese.

    For woodcock, the tribe proposes a season between October 13 and November 17, 2001, with a daily bag limit of three.

    The tribe currently has 20 registered tribal hunters and estimates harvest to be no more than 40 geese, 50 mallards, 50 teal, 50 black ducks, and 50 of all other species combined. Tribal members hunting on the Reservation will observe all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations found in 50 CFR.

    The Service proposes to approve the request for special migratory bird hunting regulations for the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head and requests that the tribe closely monitor harvest in this first season of establishing special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (aa) White Earth Band of Ojibwe, White Earth, Minnesota (Tribal Members Only)

    The White Earth Band of Ojibwe is a federally-recognized tribe located in northwest Minnesota and encompasses all of Mahnomen County and parts of Becker and Clearwater Counties. The reservation employs conservation officers to enforce conservation regulations. The tribe and the Service first cooperated to establish special tribal regulations in 1999.

    For the 2001-02 migratory bird hunting season, the White Earth Band of Ojibwe request a duck, merganser, and coot season to start September 15 and end December 16, 2001. For ducks, they request a daily bag limit of 10 including no more than 2 mallards and 2 canvasback. The merganser daily bag limit would be 5 with no more than 2 hooded mergansers, and the coot daily bag limit would be 20. For geese, the tribe proposes a September 1 to December 16, 2001, season with a daily bag limit of five geese.

    For dove, rail, woodcock, and snipe, the tribe would propose a September 8 to December 31, 2001, season with daily bag limits of 25 doves, 25 rails, 10 woodcock, and 10 snipe. Shooting hours are one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. Nontoxic shot is required.

    Based on past harvest surveys, the tribe anticipates harvest of 1,000 to 2,000 Canada geese and 1,000 to 1,500 ducks. White Earth Reservation Tribal Council employs 4 full-time Conservation Officers to enforce migratory bird regulations.

    We propose to approve the White Earth Band of Ojibwe requested 2001-02 special migratory bird hunting regulations.

    (bb) White Mountain Apache Tribe, Fort Apache Indian Reservation, Whiteriver, Arizona (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    The White Mountain Apache Tribe owns all reservation lands, and the tribe has recognized full wildlife management authority. The White Mountain Apache Tribe has requested regulations that are essentially unchanged from those agreed to since the 1997-98 hunting year.

    The hunting zone for waterfowl is restricted and is described as: the entire length of the Black River west of the Bonito Creek and Black River confluence and the entire length of the Salt River forming the southern boundary of the reservation; the White River, extending from the Canyon Day Stockman Station to the Salt River; and all stock ponds located within Wildlife Management Units 4, 5, 6, and 7. Tanks located below the Mogollon Rim, within Wildlife Management Units 2 and 3 will be open to waterfowl hunting during the 2001-02 season. The length of the Black River east of the Black River/Bonito Creek confluence is closed to waterfowl hunting. All other waters of the reservation would be closed to waterfowl hunting for the 2001-02 season.

    For nontribal and tribal hunters, the tribe proposes a continuous duck, coot, merganser, gallinule and moorhen hunting season, with an opening date of October 20, 2001, and a closing date of January 20, 2002. The tribe proposes a daily duck (including mergansers) bag limit of four, which may include no more than two redheads or one canvasback and one redhead, one pintail, and three mallards (including no more than one hen mallard). The daily bag limit for coots, gallinules, and moorhens would be 25, singly or in the aggregate. For geese, the tribe is proposing a season from October 20, 2001, through January 20, 2002. Hunting would be limited to Canada geese, and the daily bag limit would be three.

    Season dates for band-tailed pigeons and mourning doves would run concurrently from September 5 through September 19, 2001, in Wildlife Management Unit 10 and all areas south of Y-70 in Wildlife Management Unit 7, only. Proposed daily bag limits for band-tailed pigeons and mourning doves would be 3 and 10, respectively.

    Possession limits for the above species are twice the daily bag limits. Shooting hours would be from one-half hour before sunrise to sunset. There would be no open season for sandhill cranes, rails, and snipe on the White Mountain Apache lands under this proposal. A number of special regulations apply to tribal and nontribal hunters, which may be obtained from the White Mountain Apache Tribe Game and Fish Department.

    We propose to approve the regulations requested by the tribe for 2001-02 season.

    (cc) Yankton Sioux Tribe, Marty, South Dakota (Tribal Members and Nontribal Hunters)

    On May 16, 2001, the Yankton Sioux Tribe submitted a waterfowl hunting proposal for the 2001-02 season. The Yankton Sioux tribal waterfowl hunting season would be open to both tribal members and nontribal hunters. The waterfowl hunting regulations would apply to tribal and trust lands within the external boundaries of the reservation.

    For ducks (including mergansers) and coots, the Yankton Sioux Tribe proposes a season starting October 13, 2001, and running for the maximum amount of days allowed under the final Federal frameworks. Daily bag and possession limits would be 6 ducks, which may include no more than 5 mallards (no more than 2 hens), 1 canvasback, 2 redheads, 3 scaup, 1 pintail, or 2 wood ducks. The bag limit for mergansers is 5, which would include no more than 1 hooded merganser. The coot daily bag limit is 15. For geese, the tribe has requested a dark geese (Canada geese, brant, white-fronts) season starting October 27, 2001, and closing January 31, 2002. The daily bag limit would be three geese (including no more than one whitefront or brant). Possession limits would be twice the daily bag limit. For white geese, the proposed hunting season would start October 27, 2001, and run for the maximum amount of days allowed under the final Federal frameworks. Daily bag and possession limits would be the same as those adopted by the State of South Dakota.

    All hunters would have to be in possession of a valid tribal license while hunting on Yankton Sioux trust lands. Tribal and nontribal hunters must comply with all basic Federal migratory bird hunting regulations in 50 CFR part 20 pertaining to shooting hours and the manner of taking. Special regulations established by the Yankton Sioux Tribe also apply on the reservation.

    During the 2000-01 hunting season, the tribe reported that 73 nontribal hunters took 302 Canada geese, 10 light geese, and 79 ducks. Thirty tribal Start Printed Page 42725members harvested less than 50 geese and 50 ducks.

    We concur with the Yankton Sioux proposal for the 2001-02 hunting season.

    Public Comment Invited

    We intend that adopted final rules be as responsive as possible to all concerned interests and, therefore, desire to obtain the comments and suggestions of the public, other governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and other private interests on these proposals. However, special circumstances are involved in the establishment of these regulations, which limit the amount of time that we can allow for public comment. Specifically, two considerations compress the time in which the rulemaking process must operate: (1) the need to establish final rules at a point early enough in the summer to allow affected State agencies to appropriately adjust their licensing and regulatory mechanisms; and (2) the unavailability, before mid-June, of specific, reliable data on this year's status of some waterfowl and migratory shore and upland game bird populations. Therefore, we believe that to allow the comment period past the date specified is contrary to the public interest.

    The Department of the Interior's policy is, whenever practicable, to afford the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process. Accordingly, we invite interested persons to submit written comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the proposed regulations. Before promulgation of final migratory game bird hunting regulations, we will take into consideration all comments received. Such comments, and any additional information received, may lead to final regulations that differ from these proposals. We invite interested persons to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments to the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES. You may inspect comments received on the proposed annual regulations during normal business hours at the Service's office in room 634, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.

    Our practice is to make comments, including names and addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. In some circumstances, we would withhold from the rulemaking record a respondent's identity, as allowable by law. If you wish for us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.

    For each series of proposed rulemakings, we will establish specific comment periods. We will consider, but possibly may not respond in detail to, each comment. As in the past, we will summarize all comments received during the comment period and respond to them after the closing date in the final rules.

    NEPA Consideration

    Pursuant to the requirements of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), the “Final Environmental Statement for the Issuance of Annual Regulations Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (FES-75-74)” was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on June 6, 1975, and notice of availability was published in the Federal Register on June 13, 1975 (40 FR 25241). A supplement to the final environmental statement, the “Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Issuance of Annual Regulations Permitting the Sport Hunting of Migratory Birds (SEIS 88-14)” was filed on June 9, 1988, and notice of availability was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 1988 (53 FR 22582), and June 17, 1988 (53 FR 22727). Copies of these documents are available from us at the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES. In addition, an August 1985 Environmental Assessment titled “Guidelines for Migratory Bird Hunting Regulations on Federal Indian Reservations and Ceded Lands” is available from the same address.

    Endangered Species Act Considerations

    Prior to issuance of the 2001-02 migratory game bird hunting regulations, we will consider provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543; hereinafter the Act) to ensure that hunting is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any species designated as endangered or threatened or modify or destroy its critical habitat and that the proposed action is consistent with conservation programs for those species. Consultations under Section 7 of this Act may cause us to change proposals in this and future supplemental proposed rulemakings.

    We will include findings from these consultations in a biological opinion and may cause modification of some regulatory measures proposed in this document. The final rule will reflect any modifications. Our biological opinion resulting from the Section 7 consultation is a public document available for public inspection in the Service's Division of Endangered Species and Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, at the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    These regulations have a significant economic impact on substantial numbers of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). We analyzed the economic impacts of the annual hunting regulations on small business entities in detail and issued a Small Entity Flexibility Analysis (Analysis) in 1998. The Analysis documented the significant beneficial economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. The primary source of information about hunter expenditures for migratory game bird hunting is the National Hunting and Fishing Survey, which is conducted at 5-year intervals. The Analysis was based on the 1996 National Hunting and Fishing Survey and the U.S. Department of Commerce's County Business Patterns, from which it was estimated that migratory bird hunters would spend between $429 million and $1.084 billion at small businesses in 1998. Copies of the Analysis are available upon request from the address indicated under the caption ADDRESSES.

    Executive Order (E.O.) 12866

    While this individual supplemental rule was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the migratory bird hunting regulations are economically significant and are annually reviewed by OMB under E.O. 12866.

    E.O. 12866 requires each agency to write regulations that are easy to understand. We invite comments on how to make this rule easier to understand, including answers to questions such as the following: (1) Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? (2) Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that interferes with its clarity? (3) Does the format of the rule (grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce its Start Printed Page 42726clarity? (4) Would the rule be easier to understand if it were divided into more (but shorter) sections? (5) Is the description of the rule in the Supplementary Information section of the preamble helpful in understanding the rule? What else could we do to make the rule easier to understand?

    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act

    This rule is a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. For the reasons outlined above, this rule has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. However, because this rule establishes hunting seasons, we do not plan to defer the effective date under the exemption contained in 5 U.S.C. 808 (1) .

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    We examined these regulations under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. We utilize the various recordkeeping and reporting requirements imposed under regulations established in 50 CFR part 20, Subpart K, in the formulation of migratory game bird hunting regulations. Specifically, OMB has approved the information collection requirements of the Migratory Bird Harvest Information Program and assigned clearance number 1018-0015 (expires 9/30/2001). This information is used to provide a sampling frame for voluntary national surveys to improve our harvest estimates for all migratory game birds in order to better manage these populations. OMB has also approved the information collection requirements of the Sandhill Crane Harvest Questionnaire and assigned clearance number 1018-0023 (expires 07/31/2003). The information from this survey is used to estimate the magnitude and the geographical and temporal distribution of harvest, and the portion it constitutes of the total population. A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    We have determined and certify, in compliance with the requirements of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this rulemaking will not “significantly or uniquely” affect small governments, and will not produce a Federal mandate of $100 million or more in any given year on local or State government or private entities. Therefore, this proposed rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

    Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order 12988

    The Department, in promulgating this proposed rule, has determined that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.

    Takings Implication Assessment

    In accordance with Executive Order 12630, this proposed rule, authorized by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not have significant takings implications and does not affect any constitutionally protected property rights. This rule will not result in the physical occupancy of property, the physical invasion of property, or the regulatory taking of any property. In fact, this rule will allow hunters to exercise otherwise unavailable privileges and, therefore, reduces restrictions on the use of private and public property.

    Federalism Effects

    Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. We annually prescribe frameworks from which the States make selections and employ guidelines to establish special regulations on Federal Indian reservations and ceded lands. This process preserves the ability of the States and Tribes to determine which seasons meet their individual needs. Any State or Tribe may be more restrictive than the Federal frameworks at any time. The frameworks are developed in a cooperative process with the States and the Flyway Councils. This process allows States to participate in the development of frameworks from which they will make selections, thereby having an influence on their own regulations. These rules do not have a substantial direct effect on fiscal capacity, change the roles or responsibilities of Federal or State governments, or intrude on State policy or administration. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 13132, these regulations do not have significant federalism effects and do not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

    Government-to-Government Relationship With Tribes

    Due to the migratory nature of certain species of birds, the Federal Government has been given responsibility over these species by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Thus, in accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994, “Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal Governments” (59 FR 22951), E.O. 13175, and 512 DM 2, we have evaluated possible effects on Federally recognized Indian tribes and have determined that there are no effects on Indian trust resources. However, by virtue of the tribal proposals contained in this proposed rule, we have consulted with all the tribes affected by this rule.

    Energy Effects—E.O. 13211

    On May 18, 2001, the President issued an Executive Order (E.O. 13211) on regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. As this supplemental proposed rule is not expected to significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use, this proposed action is not a significant energy action and no Statement of Energy Effects is required.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20

    • Exports
    • Hunting
    • Imports
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Transportation
    • Wildlife
    End List of Subjects

    Based on the results of soon-to-be-completed migratory game bird studies, and having due consideration for any data or views submitted by interested parties, this proposed rulemaking may result in the adoption of special hunting regulations for migratory birds beginning as early as September 1, 2001, on certain Federal Indian reservations, off-reservation trust lands, and ceded lands. Taking into account both reserved hunting rights and the degree to which tribes have full wildlife management authority, the regulations only for tribal members or for both tribal and nontribal members may differ from those established by States in which the reservations, off-reservation trust lands, and ceded lands are located. The regulations will specify open seasons, shooting hours, and bag and possession limits for rails, coot, gallinules (including moorhen), woodcock, common snipe, band-tailed pigeons, mourning doves, white-winged doves, ducks (including mergansers), and geese.

    The rules that eventually will be promulgated for the 2001-02 hunting season are authorized under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of July 3, 1918 (40 Stat. 755; 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.), as amended. The MBTA Start Printed Page 42727authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Interior, having due regard for the zones of temperature and for the distribution, abundance, economic value, breeding habits, and times and lines of flight of migratory game birds, to determine when, to what extent, and by what means such birds or any part, nest, or egg thereof may be taken, hunted, captured, killed, possessed, sold, purchased, shipped, carried, exported, or transported.

    Start Signature

    Dated: August 7, 2001.

    Joseph E. Doddridge,

    Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 01-20381 Filed 8-13-01; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P

Document Information

Published:
08/14/2001
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
01-20381
Dates:
To comment on these proposed regulations, you must do so by August 24, 2001.
Pages:
42711-42727 (17 pages)
RINs:
1018-AH79: Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposed 2001-2002 Migratory Game Bird Hunting Regulations (Preliminary) With Requests for Indian Tribal Proposals
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1018-AH79/migratory-bird-hunting-proposed-2001-2002-migratory-game-bird-hunting-regulations-preliminary-with-r
Topics:
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation, Wildlife
PDF File:
01-20381.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 20