96-20726. Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposal for Approval of Bismuth-Tin Shot as a Nontoxic  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 159 (Thursday, August 15, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 42495-42497]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-20726]
    
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 159 / Thursday, August 15, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 42495]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    50 CFR Part 20
    
    RIN 1018-AD41
    
    
    Migratory Bird Hunting; Proposal for Approval of Bismuth-Tin Shot 
    as a Nontoxic
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) proposes to amend 
    Section 20.21(j) by approving bismuth-tin shot as nontoxic for hunting 
    waterfowl and coots. Acute, chronic, and reproductive toxicity studies, 
    undertaken for the Bismuth Cartridge Company, indicate that bismuth-tin 
    shot is nontoxic when ingested by waterfowl (captive-reared mallards).
    
    DATES: Comments on this proposal must be received by August 15, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Chief, Office of 
    Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department 
    of the Interior, ms 634--ARLSQ, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, D.C. 
    20240
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Schmidt, Chief, or Cyndi 
    Perry, Wildlife Biologist, Office of Migratory Bird Management (MBMO), 
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (703/358-1714).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since the mid-1970s, the Service has sought 
    to identify shot that, when spent, does not pose a significant toxic 
    hazard to migratory birds and other wildlife. Currently, only steel 
    shot is approved by the Service as nontoxic. The Service believes 
    approval for other suitable candidate shot materials as nontoxic is 
    feasible. The Service is eager to consider these other materials for 
    approval as nontoxic shot.
        The requirement to use nontoxic shot for hunting waterfowl and 
    coots created resistance among some hunters with only steel shot 
    available. With the resistance came an unknown level of noncompliance. 
    Although compliance with the use of nontoxic shot has increased over 
    the last few years, the Service believes that this level of compliance 
    will escalate with the availability and approval of other nontoxic shot 
    types.
        On October 21, 1993, the Bismuth Cartridge Company petitioned the 
    Service to approve bismuth-tin shot for hunting waterfowl and coots. At 
    that time the company had not undertaken the studies necessary to 
    demonstrate that bismuth-tin shot is nontoxic to waterfowl and the 
    Service did not approve their petition. On June 24, 1994, the Bismuth 
    Cartridge Company petitioned the Service to modify provisions of 50 CFR 
    20.21(j), to legalize the use of bismuth-tin shot on an interim, 
    conditional basis for the 1994-95 and 1995-96 hunting seasons while 
    conducting toxicity tests. The petitioner's supporting rationale was: 
    1) bismuth is nontoxic; 2) the rule is conditional; and 3) the evidence 
    presented in the record, i.e., the application from the Bismuth 
    Cartridge Company. The petition acknowledged responsibility of the 
    Bismuth Cartridge Company to complete all the nontoxic shot approval 
    tests outlined in 50 CFR 20.134. Final regulations published in the 
    Federal Register (January 3, 1995, [60 FR 61] and August 18, 1995 [60 
    FR 43314]) provided for conditional approval of bismuth-tin shot 
    (nominally, 97 parts bismuth and 3 parts tin) as nontoxic for hunting 
    waterfowl and coots during the 1994-95 and 1995-96 seasons, 
    respectively. Final regulations published elsewhere in today's Federal 
    Register extends this temporary approval for the 1996-97 season. A 
    complete review of the bismuth-tin shot application and review process 
    is in the January 3, 1995, Federal Register.
        Aside from recently completed toxicity studies there are several 
    other works that support the Service's decision. Sanderson et al. 
    (1994), Ringelman et al. (1992), and Sanderson et al. (1992) saw no 
    adverse effects when bismuth alloy shot was ingested by captive-reared 
    mallards. In Grandy et al. (1968), there were no deaths associated with 
    mallards dosed with tin shot.
        The Service saw completion of several conditions prior to this 
    proposal to approve bismuth-tin shot as nontoxic. First, a series of 
    toxicity tests demonstrating that bismuth-tin was nontoxic to waterfowl 
    is necessary. The Service reviewed and approved the employed testing 
    protocol with technical assistance provided by the National Biological 
    Service (NBS).
        The short-term (30 day) acute toxicity test entails dosing ducks 
    with shot and feeding them commercially available duck food. 
    Researchers record survival, body weight, blood hematocrit, and organ 
    analysis. Survival to 30 days post dosing, hematocrit values, body 
    weight, mean weight of kidney, liver, gonad, and gizzard were similar 
    in game-farm mallards dosed with either six No. 4 bismuth-tin shot, six 
    No. 4 steel shot, or a placebo (control)(Sanderson et al. 1995).
        The 14-week chronic toxicity test entails dosing ducks with either 
    lead shot, steel shot, bismuth-tin shot, or a placebo (control group), 
    during cold weather using a nutritionally deficient diet. Researchers 
    record the results of the survival, body weight, retention and 
    dissolution of shot, blood and tissue analysis, and histopathology. 
    Sixty-five male and sixty-five female mallards underwent doses of 
    either No. 4 lead, or steel or bismuth-tin shot, or a placebo (control 
    group) on Days 0, 30, 60, and 90. All lead-dosed ducks died within 14 
    days of initial dosing. All steel- and placebo-dosed ducks survived 
    until sacrificing. All bismuth-tin dosed ducks survived until 
    sacrificing except one female who died of undetermined causes 131 days 
    post dosing after laying 16 eggs. In general, the chronic test 
    documents the absence of any deleterious effects of these bismuth-tin 
    doses on captive-reared mallards (Sanderson et al. 1996).
        The reproductive toxicity test is a chronic dosage study which 
    includes assessment of reproduction, fertility rates, and egg 
    hatchability. For eggs, researchers record weight, shell thickness, and 
    content analysis, and for ducklings record body weight, sex ratios, 
    blood and organ analysis. This test runs concurrently with the chronic 
    study. Results confirmed no significant differences in the time 
    required for either control, steel, or bismuth-tin-dosed ducks to lay 
    21 eggs, and no differences in the dates when the three dosed groups 
    began to lay. Similarly, no significant differences among doses in the 
    fertility rates, hatchability rates, or chemical content of the eggs 
    arose. In ducklings, no significant differences among doses in the mean 
    body weight (by day 7), sex ratios, hematocrit, mean weights of kidney 
    and liver, mean amounts of elements in organs, or in the histopathology 
    results arose(Sanderson et al. 1996).
        As a result of these toxicity tests, the Service concludes that 
    bismuth-tin shot composed of 97 parts bismuth and 3 parts tin with <1 percent="" residual="" lead="" does="" not="" impose="" significant="" danger="" to="" migratory="" birds="" and="" other="" wildlife="" and="" their="" habitats.="" the="" second="" condition="" of="" approval="" was="" residual="" lead="" levels.="" the="" service="" considers="" any="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" manufactured="" with="" lead="" levels="" equal="" to="" or="" exceeding="" 1="" percent="" to="" be="" toxic="" and="" therefore,="" illegal.="" bismuth="" may="" occur="" as="" a="" by-product="" of="" iron,="" copper,="" and="" tin="" smelting="" and="" often="" contains="" lead.="" in="" the="" august="" 18,="" 1995,="" federal="" register,="" the="" service="" indicated="" that="" it="" would="" establish="" a="" maximum="" level="" for="" residual="" lead.="" the="" service,="" in="" consultation="" with="" the="" nbs,="" [[page="" 42496]]="" determined="" the="" maximum="" environmentally="" acceptable="" level="" of="" lead="" in="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" is="" trace="" amounts="" or=""><1 percent="" and="" is="" incorporating="" that="" requirement="" into="" the="" final="" rule.="" finally,="" enforcement="" is="" an="" important="" component="" in="" the="" approval="" of="" any="" alternative="" shot="" material.="" in="" the="" august="" 18,="" 1995,="" federal="" register,="" the="" service="" indicates="" that="" final="" unconditional="" approval="" would="" be="" contingent="" upon="" the="" development="" and="" availability="" of="" a="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" device.="" several="" noninvasive="" field="" testing="" devices="" are="" available.="" service="" law="" enforcement="" personnel="" assessed="" these="" devices="" determining="" them="" to="" be="" accurate="" and="" useful.="" this="" proposed="" rule="" would="" amend="" 50="" cfr="" 20.21(j)="" by="" approving="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" for="" use="" in="" hunting="" waterfowl="" and="" coots.="" it="" is="" based="" on="" the="" original="" request="" made="" to="" the="" service="" by="" the="" bismuth="" cartridge="" company="" on="" october="" 21,="" 1993.="" results="" of="" the="" acute,="" chronic,="" and="" reproductive="" toxicity="" tests="" undertaken="" for="" the="" bismuth="" cartridge="" company="" document="" the="" apparent="" absence="" of="" any="" deleterious="" effects="" of="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" when="" ingested="" by="" captive-reared="" mallards.="" references="" grandy,="" j.w.,="" l.n.="" locke="" and="" g.e.="" bagley.="" 1968.="" relative="" toxicity="" of="" lead="" and="" five="" proposed="" substitute="" shot="" types="" to="" pen-reared="" mallards.="" j.wildl.="" manage.="" 32(3):483-488.="" ringelman,="" j.k.,="" m.w.="" miller="" and="" w.f.="" andelt.="" 1992.="" effects="" of="" ingested="" tungsten-bismuth-tin="" shot="" on="" mallards.="" co="" div.="" wildl.,="" fort="" collins,="" 24="" pp.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" w.l.="" anderson,="" g.l.="" foley,="" l.m.="" skowron="" and="" j.w.="" seets.="" 1994.="" toxicity="" and="" reproductive="" effects="" of="" ingested="" bismuth="" alloy="" shot="" and="" effects="" of="" embedded="" bismuth="" alloy,="" lead,="" and="" iron="" shot="" on="" game-farm="" mallards.="" final="" report.="" ill.="" nat.="" hist="" survey.="" champaign,="" il.="" 64pp.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" s.g.="" wood,="" g.l.="" foley="" and="" j.d.="" brawn.="" 1992.="" toxicity="" of="" bismuth="" shot="" compared="" with="" lead="" and="" steel="" shot="" in="" game-farm="" mallards.="" trans.="" 57th="" n.a.="" wildl.="" nat.="" res.="" conf.,="" 57:526-540.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" w.l.="" anderson,="" g.l.="" foley,="" l.m.="" skowron,="" j.d.="" brawn="" and="" j.w.="" seets.="" 1995.="" toxicity="" of="" ingested="" bismuth="" alloy="" shot="" on="" game-farm="" mallards="" (revised="" final="" report).="" report="" to="" peterson="" publishing="" company="" by="" the="" univ.="" of="" illinois,="" ill.="" nat.="" hist.="" survey.="" champaign,="" il.="" 69pp.="" sanderson,="" g.c.,="" w.l.="" anderson,="" g.l.="" foley,="" k.l.="" duncan,="" l.m.="" skowron,="" j.d.="" brawn="" and="" j.w.="" seets.="" 1996.="" toxicity="" and="" reproductive="" test="" including="" chronic="" health="" effects="" of="" ingested="" bismuth="" alloy="" shot="" on="" game-farm="" mallards="" (revised="" final="" report).="" report="" to="" peterson="" publishing="" company="" by="" the="" univ.="" illinois,="" ill.="" nat.="" hist.="" survey.="" champaign,="" il.="" 113pp.="" comment="" procedure="" it="" is="" the="" policy="" of="" the="" department="" of="" the="" interior="" to="" afford="" the="" public="" an="" opportunity="" to="" participate="" in="" the="" rulemaking="" process,="" whenever="" practical.="" accordingly,="" interested="" persons="" may="" participate="" by="" submitting="" written="" comments="" to="" the="" chief,="" mbmo,="" at="" the="" address="" listed="" under="" the="" caption="" addresses.="" the="" public="" may="" inspect="" comments="" during="" normal="" business="" hours="" at="" the="" service's="" office="" address="" listed="" under="" the="" caption="" addresses.="" the="" service="" will="" consider="" all="" relevant="" comments="" received="" and="" will="" try="" to="" acknowledge="" received="" comments,="" but="" may="" not="" provide="" an="" individual="" response="" to="" each="" commenter.="" nepa="" consideration="" in="" compliance="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" section="" 102(2)(c)="" of="" the="" national="" environmental="" policy="" act="" of="" 1969="" (nepa)="" (42="" u.s.c.="" 4332(c),="" and="" the="" council="" on="" environmental="" quality's="" regulation="" for="" implementing="" nepa="" (40="" cfr="" 1500-1508),="" the="" service="" prepared="" an="" environmental="" assessment="" (ea)="" in="" july="" 1996.="" copies="" of="" this="" ea="" are="" available="" to="" the="" public="" by="" writing="" to="" the="" office="" of="" migratory="" bird="" management="" at="" the="" address="" indicated="" under="" the="" caption="" addresses.="" after="" review="" and="" evaluation="" of="" the="" information="" in="" the="" environmental="" assessment,="" the="" service="" determined="" that="" the="" proposed="" action="" to="" amend="" 50="" cfr="" 20.21(j)="" to="" allow="" use="" of="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" as="" nontoxic="" for="" hunting="" waterfowl="" and="" coots="" would="" not="" be="" a="" major="" federal="" action="" that="" would="" significantly="" affect="" the="" quality="" of="" the="" human="" environment.="" endangered="" species="" act="" considerations="" section="" 7="" of="" the="" endangered="" species="" act="" (esa)="" of="" 1972,="" as="" amended="" (16="" u.s.c.="" 1531="" et="" seq.),="" provides="" that,="" ``the="" secretary="" shall="" review="" other="" programs="" administered="" by="" him="" and="" utilize="" such="" programs="" in="" furtherance="" of="" the="" purposes="" of="" this="" act''="" (and)="" shall="" ``insure="" that="" any="" action="" authorized,="" funded="" or="" carried="" out="" ...="" is="" not="" likely="" to="" jeopardize="" the="" continued="" existence="" of="" any="" endangered="" species="" or="" threatened="" species="" or="" result="" in="" the="" destruction="" or="" adverse="" modification="" of="" (critical)="" habitat="" ...''="" the="" service="" completed="" a="" section="" 7="" consultation="" under="" the="" esa="" for="" this="" proposed="" rule.="" the="" result="" of="" the="" service's="" consultation="" under="" section="" 7="" of="" the="" esa="" are="" public="" documents="" and="" are="" available="" for="" public="" inspection="" in="" the="" division="" of="" endangered="" species="" and="" the="" office="" of="" migratory="" bird="" management,="" u.s.="" fish="" and="" wildlife="" service,="" arlington="" square,="" 4401="" n.="" fairfax="" drive,="" arlington,="" virginia.="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act,="" executive="" order="" 12866,="" and="" the="" paperwork="" reduction="" act="" the="" regulatory="" flexibility="" act="" of="" 1980="" (5="" u.s.c.="" 601="" et="" seq.)="" requires="" the="" preparation="" of="" flexibility="" analyses="" for="" rules="" that="" will="" have="" a="" significant="" effect="" on="" a="" substantial="" number="" of="" small="" entities,="" which="" includes="" small="" businesses,="" organizations="" or="" governmental="" jurisdictions.="" the="" service="" determined,="" however,="" that="" this="" proposed="" rule="" will="" have="" no="" effect="" on="" small="" entities="" since="" the="" approved="" shot="" merely="" will="" supplement="" nontoxic="" shot="" already="" in="" commerce="" and="" available="" throughout="" the="" retail="" and="" wholesale="" distribution="" systems.="" the="" service="" anticipates="" no="" dislocation="" or="" other="" local="" effects,="" with="" regard="" to="" hunters="" and="" others.="" this="" rule="" was="" not="" subject="" to="" office="" of="" management="" and="" budget="" (omb)="" review="" under="" executive="" order="" 12866.="" the="" service="" has="" examined="" this="" regulation="" under="" the="" paperwork="" reduction="" act="" of="" 1995="" and="" found="" it="" to="" contain="" no="" information="" collection="" requirements.="" unfunded="" mandates="" the="" service="" has="" determined="" and="" certifies="" in="" compliance="" with="" the="" requirements="" of="" the="" unfunded="" mandates="" act,="" 2="" u.s.c.="" 1502="" et="" seq.,="" that="" this="" rulemaking="" will="" not="" impose="" a="" cost="" of="" $100="" million="" or="" more="" in="" any="" given="" year="" on="" local="" or="" state="" government="" or="" private="" entities.="" civil="" justice="" reform="" -="" executive="" order="" 12988="" the="" service,="" in="" promulgating="" this="" proposed="" rule,="" has="" determined="" that="" these="" regulations="" meet="" the="" applicable="" standards="" provided="" in="" sections="" 3(a)="" and="" 3(b)(2)="" of="" executive="" order="" 12988.="" authorship="" the="" primary="" author="" of="" this="" proposed="" rule="" is="" cynthia="" m.="" perry,="" office="" of="" migratory="" bird="" management.="" list="" of="" subjects="" in="" 50="" cfr="" part="" 20="" exports,="" hunting,="" imports,="" reporting="" and="" record="" keeping="" requirements,="" transportation,="" wildlife.="" accordingly,="" part="" 20,="" subchapter="" b,="" chapter="" i="" of="" title="" 50="" of="" the="" code="" of="" federal="" regulations="" is="" proposed="" to="" be="" amended="" as="" follows:="" [[page="" 42497]]="" part="" 20--[amended]="" 1.="" the="" authority="" citation="" for="" part="" 20="" continues="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" authority:="" 16="" u.s.c.="" 703-711;="" 16="" u.s.c.="" 712="" and="" 16="" u.s.c.="" 742="" a-="" j.="" 2.="" section="" 20.21="" is="" amended="" by="" revising="" the="" introductory="" text="" of="" paragraph="" (j)="" and="" paragraph="" (j)(2)="" to="" read="" as="" follows:="" sec.="" 20.21="" hunting="" methods.="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (j)="" while="" possessing="" shot="" (either="" in="" shotshells="" or="" as="" loose="" shot="" for="" muzzleloading)="" other="" than="" steel="" shot,="" bismuth-tin="" (97="" parts="" bismuth:="" 3="" parts="" tin="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" shot="" or="" such="" shot="" approved="" as="" nontoxic="" by="" the="" director="" pursuant="" to="" procedures="" set="" forth="" in="" sec.="" 20.134.="" provided="" that:="" *="" *="" *="" *="" *="" (2)="" bismuth-tin="" shot="" (97="" parts="" bismuth:="" 3="" parts="" tin="" with=""><1 percent="" residual="" lead)="" is="" legal="" as="" nontoxic="" shot.="" dated:="" august="" 1,="" 1996="" george="" t.="" frampton,="" jr.,="" assistant="" secretary="" for="" fish="" and="" wildlife="" and="" parks.="" [fr="" doc.="" 96-20726="" filed="" 8-14-96;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 4310-55-f="">

Document Information

Published:
08/15/1996
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
96-20726
Dates:
Comments on this proposal must be received by August 15, 1996.
Pages:
42495-42497 (3 pages)
RINs:
1018-AD41
PDF File:
96-20726.pdf
CFR: (1)
50 CFR 20.21