94-19976. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Corp., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate Filings  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 16, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-19976]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 16, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. CP94-689-000, et al.]
    
     
    
    Tennessee Gas Pipeline Corp., et al.; Natural Gas Certificate 
    Filings
    
    August 8, 1994.
        Take notice that the following filings have been made with the 
    Commission:
    
    1. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Corporation
    
    [Docket No. CP94-689-000]
    
        Take notice that on July 28, 1994, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
    (Tennessee), P.O. Box 2511, Houston, Texas 77252, filed in Docket No. 
    CP94-689-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
    Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
    157.212) for authorization to construct and operate facilities to 
    upgrade a delivery point to serve East Tennessee Natural Gas Company 
    (East Tennessee) in Perry County, Tennessee, under Tennessee's blanket 
    certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-413-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
    the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
    on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
        Tennessee proposes to upgrade its existing facilities at its 
    Lobelville Meter Station No. 2 by replacing the existing 10-inch meter 
    tubes and appurtenant facilities with 12-inch meter tubes and 
    appurtenant facilities. Tennessee states that the purpose of the 
    proposed upgrade is to facilitate inspections and/or plate changes. It 
    is estimated that the cost of the upgrade would be $214,000. It is 
    asserted that the upgraded facilities will not result in any increase 
    in capacity and that there will be no impact on Tennessee's peak day or 
    annual deliveries. It is further asserted that the replacement of the 
    meter tubes is not prohibited by Tennessee's currently effective tariff 
    and that the replacement can be accomplished without detriment or 
    disadvantage to any of Tennessee's customers.
        Comment date: September 22, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    2. ANR Pipeline Company Southern Natural Gas Company
    
    [Docket No. CP94-697-000]
    
        Take notice that on August 2, 1994, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 500 
    Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, and Southern Natural Gas 
    Company (Southern), P.O. Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563 
    (jointly referred to as Applicants), filed in Docket No. CP94-697-000 
    an abbreviated joint application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the 
    Natural Gas Act, as amended, and Sections 157.7 and 157.18 of the 
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations 
    thereunder, for permission and approval to abandon a natural gas 
    exchange service between ANR and Southern, all as more fully set forth 
    in the application which is on file with the Commission and open to 
    public inspection.
        Applicants state that they propose to abandon an exchange service 
    initiated pursuant to an agreement dated August 15, 1972. Applicants 
    indicate that ANR provides its service under its Rate Schedule X-35, 
    and Southern provides its service under its Rate Schedule X-22. 
    Applicants further state that the service was authorized for ANR and 
    Southern in Docket No. CP73-84 and Docket No. CP73-92, respectively. It 
    is indicated that the agreement provided for the exchange of gas in the 
    event of an emergency on the pipeline system of either party. 
    Applicants state that deliveries and redeliveries would be made through 
    the interconnection between the two systems at Southern's Shadyside 
    Compressor Station in St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. Applicants further 
    indicate that the service was never used; however, the facilities 
    constructed for the service are not proposed to be abandoned.
        Comment date: August 29, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph F at the end of this notice.
    
    3. Columbia Gas Transmission
    
    Docket No. CP94-700-000
    
        Take notice that on August 3, 1994, Columbia Gas Transmission 
    Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
    Virginia 25314-1599, filed in Docket No. CP94-700-000, a request 
    pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's 
    Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for 
    authorization to construct and operate a new point of delivery for firm 
    transportation service to Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. (COH) in Licking 
    County, Ohio, under authorization issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000, all 
    as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
    Commission and open to public inspection.
        Specifically, Columbia proposes to construct and operate an 
    additional point of delivery for firm transportation service and will 
    provide such service pursuant to its blanket certificate issued in 
    Docket No. CP86-240-000 under existing authorized Rate Schedules and 
    within certificated entitlement. Columbia states that service may be 
    provided under firm capacity released by other shippers.
        Columbia states that the additional point of delivery has been 
    requested by COH for firm transportation service for residential 
    service. Columbia states that COH has not requested an increase in its 
    peak day entitlement in conjunction with this request for a new point 
    of delivery. Columbia states that the estimated volumes to be delivered 
    at the proposed new point of delivery will be 22 dth per day--8,030 dth 
    annually. Columbia states that the construction of the new point of 
    delivery will be utilized to serve Roland Estates, a new subdivision. 
    Columbia states that there is no impact on its existing peak day 
    obligation to its other customers as a result of the construction and 
    operation of the proposed new point of delivery.
        Columbia states that the estimated cost to establish this point of 
    delivery will be approximately $14,100 which COH has agreed to 
    reimburse Columbia for the total cost, plus any gross-up for tax 
    purposes. Columbia further states that it will comply with all of the 
    environmental requirements of Section 157.206(d) prior to the 
    construction of any facilities.
        Comment date: September 22, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    4. Equitrans, Inc.
    
    [Docket No. CP94-701-000]
    
        Take notice that on August 4, 1994, Equitrans, Inc. (Equitrans), 
    3500 Park Lane, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15275, filed in Docket No. 
    CP94-701-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
    Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 
    157.212) for authorization to install a new delivery point in the City 
    of Scenery Hill, Washington County, Pennsylvania, for service to 
    Equitable Gas Company, a division of Equitable Resources, Inc. 
    (Equitable), under Equitrans' blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
    CP83-508-000 and transferred to Equitrans in Docket No. CP86-676-000, 
    pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
    forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
    public inspection.
        Equitrans proposes to construct and operate facilities for service 
    to Equitable, which will deliver gas to a retail customer in 
    Pennsylvania. Equitrans estimates that the facilities would be used for 
    the delivery of 1 Mcf of gas on a peak day. It is stated that the 
    estimated volume is within Equitable's existing certificated 
    entitlement from Equitrans. It is further stated that Equitrans' tariff 
    does not prohibit the proposed addition of a delivery point. It is 
    asserted that Equitrans can accomplish the deliveries without detriment 
    to its other customers.
        Comment date: September 22, 1994, in accordance with Standard 
    Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
    
    Standard Paragraphs
    
        F. Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said application should on or before the comment date, 
    file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., 
    20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
    requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
    CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations of the Natural Gas Act (18 
    CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be considered 
    by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not 
    serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
    wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party 
    in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance 
    with the Commission's Rules.
        Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
    and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
    held without further notice before the Commission or its designees on 
    this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
    required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
    finds that a grant of the certificate and/or permission and approval 
    for the proposed abandonment are required by the public convenience and 
    necessity. If a motion for leave is intervene is timely filed, or if 
    the Commission on its own motion believes that a formal hearing is 
    required, further notices of such hearing will be duly given.
        Under the procedure herein provided for, unless otherwise advised, 
    it will be unnecessary for applicant to appear or be represented at the 
    hearing.
    
        G. Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
    issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
    214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
    intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
    the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
    the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, 
    the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
    day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
    and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
    protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
    authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
    
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    
    Acting Secretary.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-19976 Filed 8-15-94; 8:45 am]
    
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/16/1994
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-19976
Dates:
September 22, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph G at the end of this notice.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 16, 1994, Docket No. CP94-689-000, et al.