95-19796. Deltamethrin; Pesticide Tolerance and Food Additive Regulation  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 42453-42455]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-19796]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    40 CFR Parts 180 and 185
    
    [PP 2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151; FRL-4966-3]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Deltamethrin; Pesticide Tolerance and Food Additive Regulation
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document establishes time-limited tolerances for residues 
    of the pyrethroid deltamethrin in or on the raw agricultural commodity 
    (RAC) cottonseed at 0.04 part per million (ppm) and the processed food 
    cottonseed oil at 0.2 ppm. The Hoechst-Roussel Agri-Vet Co. requested 
    this tolerance and food additive regulation in petitions submitted 
    pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This regulation becomes effective August 16, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151], may be 
    submitted to: Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Fees accompanying 
    objections shall be labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded 
    to: EPA Headquarters Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance 
    Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, Pittsburgh, PA 15251. A copy of any objections 
    and hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be identified 
    by the document control number and submitted to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring copy of objections and hearing 
    requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 
    22202.
        A copy of objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing 
    Clerk may also be submitted electronically by sending electronic mail 
    (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption. Copies of objections and 
    hearing requests will also be accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 
    file format or ASCII file format. All copies of objections and hearing 
    requests in electronic form must be identified by the docket number [PP 
    2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151]. No Confidential Business Information 
    (CBI) should be submitted through e-mail. Electronic copies of 
    objections and hearing requests on this rule may be filed online at 
    many Federal Depository Libraries. Additional information on electronic 
    submissions can be found below in this document.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: George T. LaRocca, Product 
    Manager (PM) 13, Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide 
    Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
    DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 204, CM #2, 1921 
    Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703)-305-6100; e-mail: 
    larocca.george@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice, published in the 
    Federal Register of March 11, 1992 (57 FR 8659), which announced that 
    Hoechst-Roussel Agri-Vet Co. (HRAVC) had submitted pesticide petition 
    (PP) 2F4055 to EPA requesting that the Administrator, pursuant to 
    section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 
    U.S.C. 346a(d), amend 40 CFR part 180 by establishing a regulation to 
    permit residues of the insecticide deltamethrin (S)-alpha-cyano-3-
    phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2-2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethyl-
    cyclopropanecarboxylate and its major metabolites, trans-deltamethrin 
    [(S)-alpha-cyano-m-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3S)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropane-carboxylate] and alpha-R-deltamethrin [(R)-alpha-
    cyano-m-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] in or on cottonseed at 0.02 ppm. After 
    evaluation of metabolism, residue, and cottonseed processing data, EPA 
    concluded that the tolerance proposed for cottonseed should be 
    increased to 0.04 ppm and that a food additive regulation permitting 
    residues of 0.20 ppm in cottonseed oil was necessary. HRAVC submitted a 
    food additive petition to EPA requesting that the Administrator, 
    pursuant to section 409(b) of FFDCA establish a regulation permitting 
    residues of deltamethrin on the food commodity cottonseed oil at 0.2 
    ppm and amended the initial notice of filing to reflect an increase in 
    tolerance for cottonseed to 0.04 ppm. Notice of these changes was 
    published in the Federal Register of March 15, 1995 (60 FR 13979).
        No comments were received in response to the notices of filing.
        Tolerances of 0.2 ppm and 1.0 ppm had been previously established 
    for the combined residues of deltamethrin and its major metabolite 
    trans-deltamethrin on tomatoes imported from Mexico under 40 CFR 
    180.435 and tomato products (concentrated) under 40 CFR 185.1580, 
    respectively. Based upon the review of plant metabolism data, EPA has 
    determined that the residue to be regulated is deltamethrin and its 
    metabolites trans-deltamethrin and alpha-R-deltamethrin. Regulation of 
    this additional metabolite will be reflected in the tolerance 
    expression.
        Because pyrethroids are toxic to fish and other aquatic organisms, 
    the Agency is concerned about adverse impacts on aquatic ecosystems 
    related to this use of the pyrethroids. In November 1990, the Agency 
    and five registrants of pyrethroid cotton insecticides (collectively, 
    the Pyrethroid Working Group (PWG)) in collaboration with the National 
    Cotton Council agreed to interim risk-reduction measures designed to 
    reduce the potential for exposure of aquatic habitats of concern to 
    pyrethroids applied to cotton. The interim risk reduction measures 
    included user surveys to assess current pyrethroid use practices on 
    cotton, label changes aimed at reducing the aquatic environmental 
    exposure to pyrethroids, and a program of data generation to estimate 
    the effectiveness of the steps taken. As part of this interim risk-
    
    [[Page 42454]]
    reduction program, the Agency agreed to extend the registration and 
    tolerances of these cotton pyrethroids to November 15, 1993, and 
    November 15, 1994, respectively. The registrations and time-limited 
    tolerances on cottonseed were extended once again to November 15, 1996, 
    and November 15, 1997, respectively (see the Federal Register of 
    February 22, 1995 (60 FR 9784)). These extensions were granted to allow 
    time for submission and evaluation of additional environmental effects 
    data. In order to evaluate effects of pyrethroid on fish and aquatic 
    organisms and its fate in the environment, additional data were 
    required to be collected and submitted during the period of conditional 
    registration. Such requirements included a sediment bioavailability and 
    toxicity study and a small-plot runoff study that must be submitted to 
    the Agency by July 1, 1996.
        To be consistent with the conditional registration and extension of 
    pyrethroids on cottonseed, the Agency is issuing a conditional 
    registration for deltamethrin on cotton with an expiration date of 
    November 15, 1996, and establish a time-limited tolerance on cottonseed 
    and cottonseed oil with an expiration date of November 15, 1997, to 
    cover residues expected to result from use during the period of 
    conditional registration.
        With respect to the use of deltamethrin on cotton, the Agency 
    concluded that use of deltamethrin would not cause a significant 
    increase in the risk of adverse effects to the environment. This 
    conclusion was premised mainly on the following:
        1. The short period of time the registration would be in effect 
    before the Agency completes its final regulatory and risk reviews of 
    cotton use of the pyrethroids.
        2. HRAVC's commitment to agree to the terms and conditions 
    stipulated by the Agency for continued registration of current cotton 
    pyrethroid products. These conditions include aquatic risk mitigation 
    language for the cotton use labeling and conditional registration 
    subject to an Agency determination of aquatic risk.
        3. The total number of treated acres of cotton is essentially the 
    same and the registration of new pyrethroid on cotton, such as 
    deltamethrin, would result in no significant increase in the number of 
    acres treated. Instead, it would result in only changes in market 
    share, i.e., the percentage of acres that are treated with any 
    particular cotton pyrethroid.
        Residues remaining in or on the above commodities after expiration 
    of these tolerances will not be considered actionable if the pesticide 
    is legally applied during the term of and in accordance with provisions 
    of conditional registration.
        The scientific data submitted in support of these petitions and 
    other relevant material have been evaluated. The toxicology data 
    considered in support of these tolerances include:
        1. Chronic 2-year feeding in dogs with a systemic NOEL greater than 
    40 ppm (highest does treated (HDT)).
        2. A 24-month chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study in rats with a 
    systemic NOEL of 20 ppm (1 mg/kg/day) and LEL of 50 mg/kg/day based on 
    decreased body weight. No carcinogenic effects were observed in the 
    study.
        3. A carcinogenicity study in mice in which no evidence of 
    carcinogenicity was noted up to and including 100 ppm (HDT).
        4. An oral development toxicity study in rats with a developmental 
    NOEL of 11 mg/kg/day (highest dose tested). The maternal NOEL was 3.3 
    mg/kg/day with the LEL of 7 mg/kg/day based on one death and excessive 
    salivation. An oral developmental toxicity study in rabbits with a 
    maternal NOEL of 10 mg/kg/day and a maternal LEL of 25 mg/kg/day based 
    on decreased defecation. The developmental NOEL was 25 mg/kg/day with a 
    developmental LEL of 100 mg/kg/day based on statistically significant 
    increase in fetal incidence of unossification of pubic bone and tail 
    bone. These skeletal variations were not considered to be statistically 
    significant.
        5. A three-generation reproduction study in rats noted no parental 
    or fetal effects up to and including 50 ppm (HDT).
        6. A metabolism study in rats demonstrates that deltamethrin is 
    relatively well absorbed and excreted. Urine and fecal excretions were 
    almost complete at 48 hours post dose.
        7. Mutagenicity tests included a reverse mutation Ames assay, a 
    structural chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) 
    cells, and an unscheduled DNA synthesis assay in rat hepatocytes. All 
    tests were negative for genotoxicity.
        A chronic dietary exposure/risk assessment was performed for 
    deltamethrin using a reference dose (RfD) of 0.01 mg/kg bwt/day based 
    on a NOEL of 1.00 mg/kg bwt/day from a 2-year rat feeding study with an 
    uncertainty factor of 100. The end-point effect of concern was 
    decreased body weight. The Theoretical Maximum Residue Contribution 
    from established tolerances utilizes 3.7% of the RfD for the U.S. 
    population and 7.3% in children ages 1 to 6 years old, the subgroup 
    with the highest estimated exposure to deltamethrin residues. The use 
    on cotton does not contribute any more to the dietary exposure for the 
    general population of children ages 1 to 6 years. Generally speaking, 
    EPA has no cause for concern if total residue contribution for 
    published tolerances is less than the RfD. EPA concludes that the 
    chronic dietary risk of deltamethrin, as estimated by the dietary risk 
    assessment, does not appear to be of concern.
        The nature of the deltamethrin residue in plants and animals for 
    this use is adequately understood. The residues of concern are combined 
    residues of deltamethrin and its metabolites trans-deltamethrin and 
    alpha-R-deltamethrin. There is no reasonable expectation of secondary 
    residues in eggs, meat, milk, or poultry from the proposed use as 
    delineated in 40 CFR 180.6(a)(3).
        An adequate analytical method involving gas-liquid chromatography 
    is available for enforcement purposes. The enforcement methodology has 
    been submitted to the Food and Drug Administration, and published in 
    the Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. II (PAM II).
        There are currently no actions pending against the continued 
    registration of this chemical.
        The pesticide is considered useful for the purposes for which it is 
    sought and capable of achieving its intended physical or technical 
    effect. Based on the information and data considered, the Agency has 
    determined that the tolerances established by amending 40 CFR part 180 
    would protect the public health and that use of the pesticide in 
    accordance with the tolerance established by amending 40 CFR part 185 
    would be safe. Therefore, the tolerances and food additive regulations 
    are established as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections to the regulation and may also request a hearing on 
    those objections. Objections and hearing requests must be filed with 
    the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above (40 CFR 178.20). A copy 
    of the objections and/or hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk 
    should be submitted to the OPP docket for this rulemaking. The 
    objections submitted must specify the provisions of the regulation 
    deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections (40 CFR 
    178.25). Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed by 40 
    CFR 180.33(i). If a hearing is requested, the objections must include a 
    statement of the factual issue(s) on which a hearing is requested, the 
    
    [[Page 42455]]
    requestor's contentions on such issues, and a summary of any evidence 
    relied upon by the objector (40 CFR 178.27). A request for a hearing 
    will be granted if the Administrator determines that the material 
    submitted shows the following: There is genuine and substantial issue 
    of fact; there is a reasonable possibility that available evidence 
    identified by the requestor would, if established, resolve one or more 
    of such issues in favor of the requestor, taking into account 
    uncontested claims or facts to the contrary; and resolution of the 
    factual issue(s) in the manner sought by the requestor would be 
    adequate to justify the action requested (40 CFR 178.32).
         A record has been established for this rulemaking under docket 
    number [PP 2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151] (including objections and 
    hearing requests submitted electronically as described below). A public 
    version of this record, including printed, paper versions of electronic 
    comments, which does not include any information claimed as CBI, is 
    available for inspection from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday, excluding legal holidays. The public record is located in Room 
    1132 of the Public Response and Program Resources Branch, Field 
    Operations Division (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis 
    Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the document 
    control number [PP 2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151], may be submitted to 
    the Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 3708, 
    401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460.
        A copy of electronic objections and hearing requests filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-Docket@epamail.epa.gov
    
    
        A copy of electronic objections and hearing requests filed with the 
    Hearing Clerk must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of 
    special characters and any form of encryption.
        The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public 
    version, as described above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, 
    EPA will transfer any objections and hearing requests received 
    electronically into printed, paper form as they are received and will 
    place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record which will 
    also include all objections and hearing requests submitted directly in 
    writing. The official rulemaking record is the paper record maintained 
    at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance 
    requirements, or establishing or raising food additive regulations do 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. A certification statement to this effect was published in the 
    Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 180 and 185
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Food additives, Pesticides and pests, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: July 27, 1995.
    
    Daniel M. Barolo,
    Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, chapter I of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
    is amended as follows:
    
    PART 180--[AMENDED]
    
        1. In part 180:
        a. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        b. By revising Sec. 180.435, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 180.435  Deltamethrin; tolerances for residues.
    
        A tolerance is established for residues of the insecticide 
    deltamethrin [(S)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2,2-
    dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] and its major 
    metabolites, trans-deltamethrin [(S)-alpha-cyano-m-
    phenoxybenzyl(1R,3S)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] and alpha-R-deltamethrin [(R)-alpha-
    cyano-m-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] in or on the following raw 
    agricultural commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Parts per    Expiration
                       Commodity                      million        date   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
    Cottonseed....................................         0.04     Nov. 15,
                                                                        1997
    Tomatoes......................................          0.2         None
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    PART 185--[AMENDED]
    
        2. In part 185:
        a. The authority citation for part 185 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 348.
    
        b. By revising Sec. 185.1580, to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 185.1580   Deltamethrin.
    
        Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide 
    deltamethrin [(S)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2,2-
    dibromovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] and its major 
    metabolites, trans-deltamethrin [(S)-alpha-cyano-m-
    phenoxybenzyl(1R,3S)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] and alpha-R-deltamethrin [(R)-alpha-
    cyano-m-phenoxybenzyl-(1R,3R)-3-(2,2-dibromovinyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate] in or on the following food 
    commodities:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Parts per    Expiration
                       Commodity                      million        date   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
    Cottonseed oil................................          0.2     Nov. 15,
                                                                        1997
    Tomato (products) concentrated................          1.0         None
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    [FR Doc. 95-19796 Filed 8-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/16/1995
Published:
08/16/1995
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-19796
Dates:
This regulation becomes effective August 16, 1995.
Pages:
42453-42455 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 2F4055 and FAP 5H5719/R2151, FRL-4966-3
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-19796.pdf
CFR: (2)
40 CFR 180.435
40 CFR 185.1580