95-20274. Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation 90, 99, 100, and 200 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 16, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 42479-42481]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20274]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Beech Aircraft Corporation 90, 99, 100, 
    and 200 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain Beech Aircraft Corporation (Beech) 90, 
    99, 100, and 200 series airplanes. The proposed action would require 
    inspecting the main landing gear drag leg lock link to ensure that the 
    hole for the roll pin is drilled completely through both walls of the 
    main landing gear drag leg lock link and, if not drilled completely 
    through both link walls, replacing any main landing gear drag leg lock 
    link. An incident where the left main landing gear collapsed on one of 
    the affected airplanes prompted the proposed action. Investigation 
    revealed that the roll pin hole was not completely drilled through both 
    walls of the drag leg lock link. The actions specified by the proposed 
    AD are intended to prevent main landing gear collapse caused by drag 
    leg lock link failure, which, if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in loss of control of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 20, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from the Beech Aircraft Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 
    67201-0085. This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket 
    at the address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mr. Steve Potter, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita Aircraft Certification 
    Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 
    67209; telephone (316) 946-4124; facsimile (316) 946-4407.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The FAA received a report of an incident where the left main 
    landing gear collapsed on a Beech Model 99 airplane. Investigation of 
    this incident revealed that the hole for the roll pin was not 
    completely drilled through both walls of the drag leg lock link.
        Further investigation shows that spare drag leg lock links were 
    delivered to the field with the roll pin hole only drilled halfway 
    through the link. When drilled only halfway through the link, the roll 
    
    [[Page 42480]]
    pin will not hold the pivot pin secure in the drag leg lock link. In 
    this scenario, the drag leg lock link does not hold the landing gear in 
    the down position, which could cause main landing gear collapse. These 
    drag leg lock links may be installed on certain Beech 90, 99, 100, and 
    200 series airplanes.
        Beech has issued Service Bulletin No. 2607, Revision 1, dated April 
    1995, which specifies procedures for inspecting the main landing gear 
    drag leg lock link on Beech 90, 99, 100, and 200 series airplanes to 
    ensure that the roll pin hole is drilled through both walls of the 
    link.
        After examining the circumstances and reviewing all available 
    information related to the incident described above, the FAA has 
    determined that AD action should be taken to prevent main landing gear 
    collapse caused by drag leg lock link failure, which, if not detected 
    and corrected, could result in loss of control of the airplane.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Beech 90, 99, 100, and 200 series airplanes 
    of the same type design, the proposed AD would require inspecting the 
    main landing gear drag leg lock link to ensure that the hole for the 
    roll pin is drilled through both walls of the link and, if not drilled 
    completely through both link walls, replacing any main landing gear 
    lock link. Accomplishment of the proposed inspection would be in 
    accordance with Beech Service Bulletin No. 2607, Revision 1, dated 
    April 1995. The possible replacement would be accomplished in 
    accordance with the applicable maintenance manual.
        The FAA estimates that 2,229 airplanes in the U.S. registry would 
    be affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximtely 5 work 
    hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed action, and that the 
    average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts cost 
    approximately $100 per airplane. Based on these figures, the total cost 
    impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $891,600. This figure is based on the assumption that all of the 
    affected airplanes have incorrectly drilled drag leg lock links and 
    that none of the owners/operators of the affected airplanes have 
    replaced the incorrectly drilled links.
        Beech has informed the FAA that parts have been distributed to 
    equip approximately 648 airplanes. Assuming that these distributed 
    parts are incorporated on the affected airplanes, the cost of the 
    proposed AD would be reduced by $259,200 from $891,600 to $632,400. In 
    addition, the FAA believes that a majority of the affected airplanes 
    will not have incorrectly drilled links, thereby further reducing the 
    cost impact of the proposed AD upon the public.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new AD to read as follows:
    
    Beech Aircraft Corporation: Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD.
    
        Applicability: The following airplane models and serial numbers, 
    certificated in any category:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Models                            Serial Nos.            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    F90................................  LA-2 through LA-236                
    99, 99A, A99A, B99, and C99........  U-1 through U-239                  
    100 and A100.......................  B-1 through B-94 and B-100 through 
                                          B-247                             
    B100...............................  BE-1 through BE-137                
    200 and B200.......................  BB-2, BB-6 through BB-1157, BB-1159
                                          through BB-1166, and BB-1168      
                                          through BB-1192                   
    200T and B200T.....................  BT-1 through BT-30                 
    200C and B200C.....................  BL-1 through BL-72                 
    200CT and B200CT...................  BN-1 through BN-4                  
    65-A90-2(RU-21B)...................  LS-1 through LS-3                  
    65-A90-3(RU-21C)...................  LT-1 through LT-2                  
    200 (A100-1).......................  BB-3 through BB-5                  
    A100 (U-21F).......................  B-95 through B-99                  
    A200 (C-12A and C-12C).............  BC-1 through BC-75, and BD-1       
                                          through BD-30                     
    A200C (UC-12B).....................  BJ-1 through BJ-66                 
    A200CT (C-12D).....................  BP-1, BP-22, and BP-24 through BP- 
                                          45                                
    A200CT (FWC-12D)...................  BP-7 through BP-11                 
    A200CT (RC-12D)....................  GR-1 through GR-13                 
    A200CT (RC-12H)....................  GR-14 through GR-19                
    A200CT (RC-12G)....................  FC-1 through FC-3                  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (d) of this AD to request approval from the 
    FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current 
    configuration eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions 
    necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such 
    a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any aircraft from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance. Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already 
    accomplished.
        To prevent main landing gear collapse caused by drag leg lock 
    link failure, which, if not detected and corrected, could result in 
    loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect the main landing gear drag leg lock link to ensure 
    that the hole for the roll pin is drilled completely through both 
    walls of the link in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS 
    section of Beech Service Bulletin No. 2607, Revision 1, dated April 
    1995.
        (b) Prior to further flight, replace any drag leg lock link that 
    does not have the roll pin hole drilled through both walls of the 
    link. Accomplish this replacement in accordance with the applicable 
    maintenance manual
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    section 21.197 and 21.199 of 
    
    [[Page 42481]]
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate 
    the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be 
    accomplished.
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an equivalent level of safety may be 
    approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office 
    (ACO), 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, 
    Kansas 67209. The request shall be forwarded through an appropriate 
    FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to 
    the Manager, Wichita ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Wichita ACO.
    
        (e) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the document referred to herein upon request to the Beech Aircraft 
    Corporation, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; or may examine 
    this document at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 
    64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 10, 1995.
    Gerald W. Pierce,
    Acting Manger, Small Airplane, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-20274 Filed 8-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/16/1995
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
95-20274
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before October 20, 1995.
Pages:
42479-42481 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-CE-32-AD
PDF File:
95-20274.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13