94-20122. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating To Disclosure of Pending Formal Exchange Disciplinary Proceedings to the Central Registration Depository  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-20122]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 17, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-34516; File No. SR-CHX-94-12]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
    Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating To Disclosure of Pending 
    Formal Exchange Disciplinary Proceedings to the Central Registration 
    Depository
    
    August 10, 1994.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On May 6, 1994, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or 
    ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'' or ``SEC''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to authorize the Exchange to 
    provide information to the Central Registration Depository (``CDR'') 
    concerning pending formal, Exchange disciplinary proceedings for 
    disclosure to the public.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\17 CFR 240.19b-4 (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed rule change was noticed in Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 34268 (June 28, 1994), 59 FR 34459 (July 5, 1994). No 
    comments were received on the proposal. This order approves the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    II. Description of the Proposal
    
        The CHX is adopting Rule 9 to Article XII of the Exchange's Rules 
    to authorize the CHX to provide information to the CRD\3\ concerning 
    pending formal Exchange disciplinary proceedings for disclosure to the 
    public. According to the Exchange, a formal disciplinary proceeding is 
    considered to be pending from the time charges are issued\4\ until the 
    proceeding is completed.\5\ Currently, the Exchange discloses 
    information only on final Exchange disciplinary actions to the CRD.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\The CRD is an automated industry database containing 
    employment and disciplinary history of members and associated 
    persons registered with self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') and 
    state securities agencies. The CRD is operated by the National 
    Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'') with input on 
    policy and other matters from federal and state agencies and other 
    SROs, including the Exchange.
        \4\CHX Article XII, Rule 1(b) provides, in part, that if in the 
    judgment of the President it shall appear that an accused has 
    committed a default or other offense in violation of the 
    Constitution or Rules of the Exchange the President shall, except as 
    hereinafter provided, direct the staff to prefer written charges 
    against the accused. A copy of such charges shall be served upon the 
    accused. The accused shall also be served with written notice of 
    when and where the charges will be heard.
        \5\See CHX Article XII, Rule 7.
        \6\Information concerning final disciplinary actions taken by 
    the Exchange, the NASD and other self-regulatory and regulatory 
    organizations, as well as information concerning certain criminal 
    convictions contained in the CRD, has been disclosed to the public 
    pursuant to the NASD's 800 number service since October 1991. The 
    Commission subsequently approved the NASD's procedures for operating 
    its 800 number service in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30629 
    (April 23, 1992), 57 FR 18535 (April 30, 1992) (File No. SR-NASD-91-
    39) (``800 Number Service Plan Approved Order''). On July 1, 1993, 
    the SEC approved an NASD rule change to make more information 
    available to the general public regarding pending disciplinary 
    proceedings or actions taken by federal or state securities agencies 
    and SROs that relate to securities or commodities transactions, and 
    regarding criminal indictments and information. See Securities 
    Exchange Act Release No. 32568 (July 1, 1993), 58 FR 36723 (July 8, 
    1993) (File No. SR-NASD-93-26) (``Pending Event Disclosure Approval 
    Order'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Information on pending formal SRO disciplinary proceedings, among 
    other events, is currently in the CRD, but only to the extent that 
    reports are made by members, member organizations and associated 
    persons pursuant to their reporting obligations on the Uniform 
    Application for Securities Industry Registration or Transfer (Form U-4) 
    and Form BD, the uniform application form for broker-dealer 
    registration. The proposal would expand the information available on 
    pending disciplinary actions by requiring the Exchange to report such 
    cases to the CRD.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\On March 31, 1994, the Commission approved a similar proposal 
    by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'') which authorized the 
    NYSE to provide information to the CRD concerning pending formal 
    NYSE disciplinary proceedings, for disclosure to the public. See 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33844 (March 31, 1994), 59 FR 
    16669 (April 7, 1994) (order approving File No. SR-NYSE-94-11).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it is designed to promote just 
    and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments and to perfect 
    the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system, 
    and in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
    
    III. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b).\8\ In particular, 
    the Commission believes the proposal is consistent with the Section 
    6(b)(5)\9\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to 
    promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent 
    and manipulative acts and, in general, to protect investors and the 
    public interest.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\15 U.S.C. 78f (1988).
        \9\25 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act 
    of 1990 (``Penny Stock Reform Act''), Congress mandated that the NASD 
    establish a toll-free telephone number (`800 number service'') for the 
    purpose of receiving and responding to inquiries from the public 
    regarding the background of NASD members and their associated persons. 
    The NASD began operating its 800 number service on October 1, 1991. 
    Upon the request of a caller, the NASD may disclose, in the form of a 
    written report, the following information contained in the CRD: \10\ 
    past and present employment history of NASD members and their 
    associated persons; all final disciplinary actions,\11\ taken by 
    federal and state regulatory agencies and SROs, that relate to 
    securities or commodities transactions; and all criminal convictions 
    reported on Form BD or Form U-4.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\Under NASD procedures, the 800 number service operator does 
    not provide any information over the telephone. Instead, a written 
    copy of the information requested is sent to the caller and to the 
    NASD member and/or associated person who is the subject of the 
    inquiry. The identity of the caller remains confidential. See 800 
    Number Service Plan Approval Order, supra, note 6.
        \11\The NASD's 800 number service plan does not define the term 
    ``disciplinary action.'' According to the NASD, however, the term 
    includes, but is not limited to, information provided in response to 
    question 7 on Form BD and question 22 on Form U-4. See Pending Event 
    Disclosure Approval Order, supra, note 6.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In 1993, the Commission approved a rule change by the NASD to 
    expand the scope of information that is reportable through its 800 
    number service.\12\ Thus, in addition to the information set forth 
    above, the NASD may disclose to the public such events as pending 
    formal disciplinary actions initiated by federal and state regulatory 
    agencies and SROs; criminal indictments or informations; civil 
    judgments; and certain arbitration awards in securities and commodities 
    disputes involving public customers. Currently, the NASD relies on 
    members and associated persons to report these events to the CRD on 
    Form BD or Form U-4, respectively. Because this represents the only 
    means by which the NASD can obtain data about pending disciplinary 
    actions (other than its own), the quality of the CRD database, and thus 
    of the 800 number service, depends on complete and timely reporting by 
    members and associated persons.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \12\See Pending Event Disclosure Approval Order, supra, note 6. 
    The Commission notes that, in 1992, Congress requested that the 
    General Accounting Office (``GAO'') conduct a review of various 
    aspects of the Penny Stock Reform Act, including the NASD's 800 
    number service. Among other things, the GAO recommended that 
    information about final arbitration awards be reported. Accordingly, 
    the NASD submitted, and the Commission approved, a rule change 
    authorizing the NASD to disclose certain arbitration awards, as well 
    as pending formal disciplinary actions, through its 800 number 
    service. In this context, the Commission notes that it has requested 
    all SROs to coordinate with the NASD the transfer of information 
    about awards rendered in each exchange's arbitration program.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In the Commission's opinion, Rule 9 to Article XII should help fill 
    a potential gap in the NASD's 800 number service, by authorizing the 
    Exchange to report the initiation of a formal CHX disciplinary 
    proceeding\13\ involving an Exchange member, member organization or 
    associated person, and significant changes in the status thereof,\14\ 
    directly to the CRD. As a result, that information will be available to 
    the public whether or not it is voluntarily reported by the member or 
    associated person. The Commission therefore finds that the proposed 
    rule change should enhance the fairness and accuracy of the CRD 
    database and, accordingly, of information released to the public 
    through the 800 number service.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\For purposes of reporting to the CRD, the CHX considers a 
    formal disciplinary proceeding to be pending from the time charges 
    are issued until completion of the proceeding. See supra, notes 4 
    and 5.
        \14\CHX Rule 9 provides the following examples of significant 
    changes in the status of a pending formal disciplinary proceeding 
    which would require disclosure: the issuance of a decision by the 
    President; and the filing of an appeal to and/or the issuance of a 
    decision by, a Judiciary Committee, the Exchange's Executive 
    Committee or Board of Governors.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission has long believed that investors need access to 
    reliable information in order to protect themselves against potential 
    fraud and abuse. In this respect, Rule 9 to Article XII should help 
    customers make an informed decision about whether they should conduct 
    or continue to conduct business with particular securities 
    professionals. In sum, the Commission has concluded that the rule 
    change should increase the flow of information to the public and thus 
    should ultimately strengthen investor protection.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)\15\ that the 
    proposed rule change (SR-CHX-94-12) is hereby approved.
    
        \15\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \16\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-20122 Filed 8-16-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-20122
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 17, 1994, Release No. 34-34516, File No. SR-CHX-94-12