94-20125. Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) and Environmental Assessment (EA) for Realignment of Fort Monmouth, NJ  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-20125]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 17, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    Department of the Army
    
     
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) and Environmental 
    Assessment (EA) for Realignment of Fort Monmouth, NJ
    
    AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
    
    ACTION: Finding of No Significant Impact.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The proposed action implements the July 1993 Defense Base 
    Closure and Realignment Commission's (BRAC 93) decision to realign all 
    Department of Army personnel and missions out of the leased U.S. Army 
    Communications-Electronics Command (CECOM) Office Building (Tinton 
    Falls, New Jersey) and the Evans subpost (which is closing) onto the 
    main post or Charles Wood subpost of Fort Monmouth. Personnel and 
    missions from Vint Hill Farms Station (VHFS) in Warrenton, Virginia, 
    will also be moved onto the main post or Charles Wood subpost as part 
    of this action.
        Since not all personnel can be accommodated in existing buildings, 
    new facilities will be constructed. Actions to implement this 
    realignment include the construction of up to 7 new buildings, 
    demolition of 5 buildings, and renovation of 15 buildings.
        Alternatives considered in the EA included:
        Alternative 1: Consists of the following projects:
    
    --Construction of a 16,000-square foot Intelligence and Electronic 
    Warfare Directorate (IEWD) complex at main post.
    --Construction of a 3,250-square foot calibration range laboratory at 
    the Charles Wood subpost.
    --Construction of a 2,600-square foot high bay facility at the Charles 
    Wood subpost.
    --Renovation of 14 main post buildings.
    --Renovation of portions of the Myer Center (Building 2700) at the 
    Charles Wood subpost.
    
        Alternative 2: Alternative construction sites were identified on 
    the Charles Wood subpost for the IEWD complex, the calibration range 
    laboratory, and the high bay facility. No reasonable alternative to the 
    building renovations at main post and the Charles Wood subpost of Fort 
    Monmouth were identified.
        Alternative 3: The No-Action Alternative. This alternative is the 
    continuation of existing conditions without the implementation of, or 
    in absence of, the proposed actions. The proposed actions are required 
    by BRAC law and must be implemented. Therefore, the No-Action 
    Alternative is being evaluated to provide a baseline for the other 
    alternatives.
        Alternative 2 was not selected for implementation based on the 
    potential for significant environmental, biological and cultural 
    resources impacts.
        Implementation of the preferred alternative (Alternative 1) will 
    not substantially alter baseline environmental conditions. Biological, 
    physical, and cultural resources will not be impacted by the preferred 
    alternative because construction sites for new buildings are located in 
    previously disturbed areas. The increase in the workforce at Fort 
    Monmouth will be largely off-set by the workforce decreases that will 
    result from scheduled non-BRAC realignments and Department of Defense 
    downsizing. This workforce decrease offsets potential impacts on 
    infrastructure such as water, wastewater, solid waste and energy.
        The proposed realignment is expected to have an insignificant 
    impact on the socioeconomic environment, including total sales, 
    employment, population and income.
        Based on the EA, which is incorporated into the FNSI, it has been 
    determined that implementation of the proposed action would have no 
    significant individual or cumulative impacts on the quality of the 
    natural or human environment. Because there will be no significant 
    environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the proposed 
    action, an Environmental Impact Statement is not required.
    
    DATES: The Army plans to initiate the proposed action on or before 
    September 16, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of this EA may be obtained by writing to the U.S. 
    Army Corps of Engineers, Mobile District, ATTN: CESAM-PD-E (Dr. Neil 
    Robinson), P.O. Box 2288, Mobile, Alabama 36628-0001 or by calling 
    (205) 441-5103 within 30 days of the date of publication of this 
    notice.
    
        Dated: August 9, 1994.
    Raymond J. Fatz,
    Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Environment, Safety & 
    Occupational Health) OASA (IL&E).
    [FR Doc. 94-20125 Filed 8-16-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1994
Department:
Army Department
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Document Number:
94-20125
Dates:
The Army plans to initiate the proposed action on or before September 16, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 17, 1994