95-20405. Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing Corporation; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Establishing the Collateral Management Service  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 159 (Thursday, August 17, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 42931-42932]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20405]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-36091; File No. SR-NSCC-95-06]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing 
    Corporation; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change Establishing the 
    Collateral Management Service
    
    August 10, 1995.
        On May 22, 1995, the National Securities Clearing Corporation 
    (``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``Commission'') a proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-95-06) 
    pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act'').\1\ On June 2, 1995, NSCC filed an amendment to the proposed 
    rule change to clarify which entities may be permitted to participate 
    in the proposed service.\2\ Notice of the proposal was published in the 
    Federal Register on June 12, 1995.\3\ No comment letters were received. 
    For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving the 
    proposed rule change.
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\ Letter from Anthony H. Davidson, Associate Counsel, NSCC, to 
    Peter Geraghty, Division of Market Regulation, Commission (May 26, 
    1995).
        \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 35567 (June 5, 1995), 60 
    FR 30912.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description of the Proposal
    
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish the 
    Collateral Management Service (``CMS'') which will provide access to 
    information regarding participants' clearing fund, margin, and other 
    similar requirements and deposits, including excess or deficit amounts 
    and comprehensive data on underlying collateral, (``CMS data'') at NSCC 
    and other participating clearing entities. Participating clearing 
    entities will include clearing agencies registered pursuant to Section 
    17A of the Act \4\ and clearing organizations affiliated with or 
    designated by contract markets trading specific futures products under 
    the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
    
        \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1 (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Participating clearing entities will be required to sign and 
    execute NSCC's CMS agreement. The CMS agreement sets forth NSCC's 
    authorization from participating clearing entities to collect and 
    provide information relating to participant's clearing fund and margin 
    requirements, and participants' clearing fund and margin deposits as 
    contained in the Securities Clearing Group's (``SCG'') \5\ data base 
    and in the Chicago Board of Trade Clearing Corporation's Pay Collect 
    System (``BOTCC System'') \6\ and additional information provided by 
    the participating clearing entities. The CMS agreement also addresses 
    such matters as the confidentiality of CMS Data, additional parties, 
    costs, and limitation of liability.
    
        \5\ The SCG was established in 1989 as a result of developments 
    surrounding the October Market Break and subsequent studies on the 
    causes of the Market Break. The stated purpose of the SCG is to 
    increase cooperation and coordination among securities clearing 
    entities and to facilitate the sharing of certain clearance and 
    settlement information regarding surveillance and member risk 
    monitoring. For a further description of the SCG, refer to 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 27044 (July 25, 1989), 54 FR 
    30963 [File Nos. SR-DTC-88-20, SR-MCC-88-10, SR-MSTC-88-07, SR-NSCC-
    88-09, SR-OCC-89-02, SR-Philadep-89-01, and SR-SCCP-89-01] (order 
    approving the establishment of the SCG).
        \6\ The Chicago Board of Trade through BOTCC established the 
    Shared Pay Collect System which disseminates the daily pay/collects 
    of all futures clearing firms which are affiliated with 
    participating futures exchanges.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        NSCC will provide CMS data to participating NSCC participants,\7\ 
    to participating clearing entities, and if a participating clearing 
    entity requests to participants of such participating clearing entity. 
    Each participant that desires access to the CMS data will be required 
    to complete a CMS participation application form. A participant's 
    access to CMS data will be limited to the participant's own 
    information. Similarly, a participating clearing entity's access to CMS 
    data will be limited to only the CMS data of participants of such 
    entity. A participant may request that NSCC exclude data relating to 
    such participant 
    
    [[Page 42932]]
    from the CMS by completing a request to exclude data form.
    
        \7\ NSCC Rule 49 currently authorizes NSCC to release clearing 
    data relating to participants' clearance and settlement activity at 
    NSCC.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        At this time, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC''), the MBS 
    Clearing Corporation, the Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia 
    (``SCCP''), the Philadelphia Depository Trust Company (``Philadep'') 
    and the Participants Trust Company have signed CMS agreements. The 
    Options Clearing Corporation has agreed in principle to participate in 
    the CMS.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the rules of a 
    clearing agency be designed to assure the safeguarding of securities 
    and funds in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which 
    it is responsible.\8\ As discussed below, the Commission believes that 
    the proposed rule change is consistent with NSCC's obligation under the 
    Act because the CMS should help clearing agencies and their 
    participants to better monitor clearing fund, margin, and other similar 
    required deposits that protect a clearing agency against loss should a 
    member default on its obligations to the clearing agency. Consequently, 
    the CMS should assist clearing agencies in assuring the safeguarding of 
    securities and funds in their custody or control.
    
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Many clearing participants currently maintain memberships at 
    multiple clearing entities. The type of clearing entities at which a 
    single firm may maintain memberships can vary a great deal and can 
    include securities clearing corporations and depositories regulated by 
    the Commission and futures clearing entities that are not regulated by 
    the Commission. Whether a securities or futures clearing entity, all 
    such clearing entities require that members post deposit in some form 
    of a participants fund contribution and/or margin requirement to 
    protect the clearing entity from losses should the member default on 
    its obligations to the clearing entity. Consequently, clearing 
    participants generally maintain required deposits at several different 
    clearing entities. The CMS is intended to help clearing participants to 
    more efficiently manage their various clearing fund and/or margin 
    deposits by providing access to such information, including 
    comprehensive data on underlying collateral at such multiple clearing 
    entities, in a consolidated manner through a computer network.
        The CMS also will provide participating clearing entities with the 
    ability to view common members' clearing fund and/or margin deposits at 
    other participating clearing entities. This will be especially 
    beneficial to those participating clearing entities that have executed 
    cross-guaranty agreements \9\ or have other cross-guarantee 
    arrangements.\10\ The Commission supports the use of cross-guaranty 
    agreements and other similar arrangements among clearing agencies as a 
    method of reducing clearing agencies' risk of loss due to a common 
    participant's default.
    
        \9\ Currently, DTC and NSCC are the only clearing agencies 
    registered with the Commission that have executed a cross-guaranty 
    agreement. The agreement provides that in the event of a default of 
    a common member, any resources remaining after the failed common 
    member's obligations to the guaranteeing clearing agency have been 
    satisfied will be made available to the other clearing agency. The 
    guaranty is not absolute but rather is limited to the extent of the 
    resources relative to the failed member remaining at the 
    guaranteeing clearing agency. The principal resources will be 
    settlement net credit balances and the failed member's deposits to 
    the clearing agencies' clearing funds. For a complete description of 
    DTC's and NSCC's agreement, refer to Securities Exchange Act Release 
    No. 33548 (January 31, 1994), 59 FR 5638 [File Nos. SR-DTC-93-08 and 
    SR-NSCC-93-07] (order approving proposed rule change).
        \10\ Pursuant to Section 3, Rule 2, Article VI of the Midwest 
    Securities Trust Company's (``MSTC'') Rules, a defaulting 
    participant's obligations at MSTC or the Midwest Clearing 
    Corporation will be discharged by application of that participant's 
    deposits at either clearing agency if that participant is a common 
    member to both clearing agencies. Similarly, pursuant to Section 4, 
    Rule 4 of SCCP's Rules, SCCP will make available any portion of a 
    defaulting participant's contribution to its participants fund to 
    offset a loss suffering by Philadep by reason of that participant's 
    default. Philadep's Rules contain an identical provision.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Participants' access to CMS information will be limited to a 
    participant's own information, and participants will not have the 
    ability to submit data directly to NSCC. All CMS data will be submitted 
    by participating clearing entities. Consequently, the Commission is 
    satisfied that the confidentiality and accuracy of participant data 
    will be maintained.
        The Commission also believes that the proposed rule change is 
    consistent with Section 17A(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Act which directs the 
    Commission to facilitate linked or coordinated facilities for clearance 
    and settlement of transactions in equities, options, and futures.\11\ 
    Furthermore, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is 
    consistent with the Division of Market Regulation's conclusion in its 
    1987 Market Break Report that information coordination among clearing 
    entities should include commodity futures clearing corporations and 
    other appropriate futures entities to assure complete coordination and 
    dissemination of information on common members.\12\ NSCC's CMS will 
    provide access in a consolidated manner to information regarding 
    clearing fund, margin, and other similar requirements and deposits at 
    both securities and futures clearing entities. Coordination of 
    information among clearing entities concerning common members is a 
    critical element in clearing entities' ability to protect and safeguard 
    funds and securities.
    
        \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(a)(2)(A)(ii) (1988).
        \12\ Division of Market Regulation, The October 1987 Market 
    Break 10-21 (February 1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposal is consistent with the requirements of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of 
    the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-95-06) be, and hereby 
    is, approved.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
    
        \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-20405 Filed 8-16-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-20405
Pages:
42931-42932 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36091, File No. SR-NSCC-95-06
PDF File:
95-20405.pdf