98-21974. McGiness Oil Company; Notice of Petition for Dispute Resolution and Adjustment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 43920]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-21974]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. SA98-94-000]
    
    
    McGiness Oil Company; Notice of Petition for Dispute Resolution 
    and Adjustment
    
    August 11, 1998.
        Take notice that on July 8, 1998, McGiness Oil Company (McGiness) 
    filed the above-referenced petition, pursuant to section 502(c) of the 
    Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. McGiness' petition rejects the Kansas 
    ad valorem tax refund claims made by Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company 
    (PEPL), because PEPL has failed to demonstrate that the amount received 
    by McGiness, inclusive of Kansas ad valorem tax reimbursement, exceeded 
    an applicable maximum lawful price under the NGPA. If adjustment relief 
    becomes necessary (i.e., if the Commission determines that McGiness 
    owes Kansas ad valorem tax refunds to PEPL), McGiness requests to be 
    relieved from making the refunds attributable to royalties, on the 
    ground that such refunds are now uncollectible. McGiness asserts 
    uncollectability based on the enactment of section 7 of House Bill No. 
    2419, by the State of Kansas. McGiness' petition is on file with the 
    Commission and is open to public inspection.
        The Commission by order issued September 10, 1997, in Docket No. 
    RP97-369-000 et al.,\1\ on remand from the D.C. Circuit Court of 
    Appeals,\2\ directed First Sellers to make Kansas ad valorem tax 
    refunds, with interest, to the appropriate pipelines, for the period 
    from 1983 to 1988. In its January 28, 1998 Order Clarifying Procedures 
    [82 FERC para. 61,059 (1998)], the Commission stated that producers 
    (i.e., First Sellers) could file dispute resolution requests with the 
    Commission, asking the Commission to resolve the dispute with the 
    pipeline over the amount of Kansas ad valorem tax refunds owed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See: 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997); rehearing denied January 
    28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 61.058 (1998).
        \2\ Public Service Company of Colorado v. FERC, 91 F.3d 1478 
    (D.C. 1996), cert. denied, Nos. 96-954 and 96-1230 (65 U.S.L.W. 3751 
    and 3754, May 12, 1997).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to any of these petitions should on or before 15 days after 
    the date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice, file 
    with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
    Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
    accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
    and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214, 385.211, 385.1105, and 385.1106). All 
    protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
    determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
    make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
    become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
    hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
    Commission's Rules.
    David P. Boergers,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-21974 Filed 8-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1998
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-21974
Pages:
43920-43920 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. SA98-94-000
PDF File:
98-21974.pdf