98-22059. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 1998)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 43898-43900]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-22059]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 300
    
    [FRL-6146-1]
    
    
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; 
    National Priorities List
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent for partial deletion of Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 
    7, 8, 9 and 10 from the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination Superfund 
    Site, Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina, from the National 
    Priorities List.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 
    Region IV, announces its intent to delete Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 
    9, and 10 from the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination (Bypass 601) 
    National Priorities List (NPL) Site, located in Concord, Cabarrus 
    County, North Carolina, and requests public comment on this proposed 
    action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the 
    National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 
    promulgated by EPA, pursuant to section 105 of the Comprehensive 
    Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 
    1980, as amended. EPA and the State of North Carolina Department of 
    Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR) have determined that Source 
    Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 pose no significant threat to public 
    health or the environment and, therefore, additional CERCLA remedial 
    measures are not appropriate.
        This notice of intent to delete pertains to both soil and 
    groundwater at the seven (7) source areas mentioned above. The 
    contamination, which was a result of the disposal practices of the 
    Martin Scrap Recycling (MSR) Facility, has been remediated. The 
    remainder of the source areas are being addressed by ongoing CERCLA 
    activities.
    
    DATES: EPA will accept comments concerning its partial deletion 
    proposal until September 16, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Giezelle S. Bennett, US EPA, 
    Region IV, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, GA 30303.
        Comprehensive information on this Site is available through the EPA 
    Region IV public docket, which is located at EPA's Region IV office and 
    is available for viewing by appointment from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Requests for appointments or 
    copies of the background information from the regional public docket 
    should be directed to the EPA Region IV docket office.
        The address for the regional docket office is Ms. Debbie Jourdan, 
    US EPA, Region IV, 61 Forsyth St, SW, Atlanta, GA 30303. The telephone 
    number is 404-562-8862. Background information from the regional public 
    docket is also available for viewing at the Site information repository 
    located at the Charles A. Cannon Memorial Library, 27 Union Street, 
    North, Concord, NC 28025. The telephone number is 704-788-3167.
    
    FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact either Giezelle Bennett or 
    Diane Barrett at 1-800-435-9233, US EPA Region IV, 61 Forsyth St, SW, 
    Atlanta, GA 30303.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Table of Contents
    
    I. Introduction
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    III. Deletion Procedures
    IV. Basis for Intended Source Area Deletions
    
    I. Introduction
    
        This document is to announce EPA's intent to delete Source Areas 1, 
    2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Bypass 601 Site from the NPL. It also 
    serves to request public comments on the partial deletion proposal.
        EPA identifies sites that appear to present a significant risk to 
    public health, welfare, or environment and maintains the NPL as the 
    list of these sites. Sites on the NPL qualify for remedial responses 
    financed by the Hazardous Substances Response Trust Fund (Fund). As 
    described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL 
    remain eligible for Fund-financed remedial actions in the unlikely 
    event that conditions at the Site warrant such actions. EPA accepts 
    comments on the proposal to delete a Site from the NPL for thirty (30) 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.
    
    II. NPL Deletion Criteria
    
        The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites or 
    delete parts of sites from the NPL. In accordance with Sec. 300.425(e) 
    of the NCP, sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response 
    is appropriate. In making this determination, EPA, in consultation with 
    the State, considers whether the site has met any of the following 
    critieria for site deletion:
        (1) Responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate 
    response actions required.
        (2) All appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been 
    implemented and no further response actions are deemed necessary.
        (3) Remedial investigation has determined that the release poses no 
    significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore, 
    no remedial action is appropriate.
    
    III. Deletion Procedures
    
        EPA Region IV will accept and evaluate public comments before 
    making a final decision to delete. Comments from the local community
    
    [[Page 43899]]
    
    may be the most pertinent to deletion decisions. The following 
    procedures were used for the intended deletion of Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 
    7, 8, 9, and 10 from the Bypass 601 Site:
        (1) EPA Region IV has recommended deletion and has prepared the 
    relevant documents.
        (2) The State has concurred with the decision to delete Source 
    Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10.
        (3) Concurrent with this announcement, a notice has been published 
    in the local newspaper and has been distributed to appropriate federal, 
    state, and local officials announcing the commencement of a 30-day 
    public comment period on the Notice of Intent of Partial Deletion.
        (4) EPA has made all relevant documents available for public review 
    at the information repository and in the Regional Office.
        Partial deletion of a site from the NPL does not itself create, 
    alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations. The NPL is 
    designed primarily for information purposes and to assist EPA 
    management. As mentioned earlier, Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states 
    that deletion of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility of 
    the site for future Fund-financed response actions.
        For the deletion of these Source Areas from the Site, EPA will 
    accept and evaluate public comments on this Notice of Intent of Partial 
    Deletion before finalizing the decision. The Agency will prepare a 
    Responsiveness Summary to address any significant public comments 
    received during the comment period. The deletion is finalized after the 
    Regional Administrator places a Notice of Deletion in the Federal 
    Register.
        The NPL will reflect any deletions in the next publication of the 
    final rule. Public notices and copies of the Responsiveness Summary 
    will be made available to local residents by Region IV.
    
    IV. Basis for Intended Source Area Deletions
    
        The following Site summary provides the Agency's rationale for the 
    proposed intent for partial deletion of specific source areas of this 
    Site from the NPL.
        The Bypass 601 Site is defined as an area located on the western 
    edge of Concord, North Carolina in which groundwater is contaminated by 
    multiple sources. The Martin Scrap Recycling (MSR) facility, which 
    operated as a battery salvage and recycling facility from approximately 
    1966 to 1986, is one of the major sources of contamination. Ten other 
    source areas of contamination related to battery disposal were 
    identified in the area. They are:
         Source Area 1 is located adjacent to Unnamed Stream #1, 
    west of Bypass 601. This area is located in a heavily wooded steep 
    terrain behind an auto sales dealership (proposed for deletion). All 
    soil and debris containing contaminants above the soil cleanup levels 
    (SCLs) has been removed from this Source Area. Groundwater is not 
    contaminated.
         Source Area 2 is located south of Montford Avenue and west 
    of Bypass 601. A mobile trailer is currently on this property (proposed 
    for deletion). All soil and debris containing contaminants above the 
    SCLs has been removed from this Source Area. Groundwater is not 
    contaminated.
         Source Area 3 is located at 72 Sumner Avenue. A mobile 
    trailer is currently on the property (proposed for deletion). All soil 
    and debris containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from 
    this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
         Source Area 4 consists of the commercial property occupied 
    by an abandoned flea market and is located north and adjacent to the 
    MSR facility (not proposed for deletion). Contaminants at this Source 
    Area are being addressed through an ongoing remedial action.
         Source Area 5 is located at a private landfill along the 
    eastern boundary of the MSR facility (not proposed for deletion). 
    Contaminants at this Source Area are being addressed through an ongoing 
    remedial action.
         Source Area 6 is located behind a tire store on the corner 
    of McGill and Bypass 601 (not proposed for deletion). Contaminants at 
    this Source Area will be addressed through institutional controls.
         Source Area 7 is the radio tower site located 
    approximately \1/4\-mile north of the MSR facility (proposed for 
    deletion). No soil or debris containing contaminants above the SCLs 
    were found at this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
         Source Area 8 consists of the floodplain area south of 
    Unnamed Stream #1 (proposed for deletion). All soil and debris 
    containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from this 
    Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
         Source Area 9 is located south of Montford Avenue and lies 
    southeast of Source Area 2 (proposed for deletion). All soil and debris 
    containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed from this 
    Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
         Source Area 10, located adjacent to Unnamed Stream #2, is 
    bordered to the north, west, and south by Barnhardt Avenue, Groff 
    Street, and Montford Avenue, respectively (proposed for deletion). All 
    soil and debris containing contaminants above the SCLs has been removed 
    from this Source Area. Groundwater is not contaminated.
        The MSR facility dealt in the recovery of scrap metal, most notably 
    lead, which was recovered from scrap vehicle batteries. The batteries 
    were ``cracked'' by sawing off the tops with an electric saw. Lead 
    plates were then removed from the batteries for reclamation. The waste 
    from this operation consisted of the sulfuric acid (contaminated with 
    lead) from the batteries, and battery casings. Lead and other heavy 
    metals were found in the soil; lead and three volatile organic 
    compounds (VOCs) (1,2-dichloroethene, carbon tetrachloride, and 
    benzene) were found in the groundwater at some of the Source Areas. The 
    facility reportedly operated from 1966 to 1986. The ten other source 
    areas were discovered during the Remedial Investigation. Source Areas 2 
    and 6 were also reported to have been used for reclamation operations 
    by Mr. Martin prior to the MSR's present location.
        The Bypass 601 Site was added to the National Priorities List (NPL) 
    in June 1986.
        A Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) completed in 
    1990, identified metal contamination of soils throughout the MSR 
    facility (Operable Unit #1). A second RI/FS was completed in 1993 on 
    the ten source areas and the groundwater (Operable Unit #2). During the 
    second RI/FS, a removal was conducted by EPA on four of the Source 
    Areas (1, 2, 9, and 10) that presented an immediate risk to human 
    health. Approximately 14,000 cubic yards of contaminated soil and 
    debris were excavated from these source areas and then stockpiled at 
    the MSR facility. This material was subsequently covered with a 20-mil 
    liner.
        In the April 1993 Record of Decision (ROD), contaminated soil and 
    debris found in Source Areas 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 were slated for removal. 
    These source areas are located in residential areas and the residents 
    expressed a desire for the cleanup to occur as soon as possible. 
    Therefore, in September 1996, during the Remedial Design phase, the 
    Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) initiated the removal of soil 
    from these outlying areas. An estimated 16, 750 cubic yards of 
    contaminated soil and debris were removed. Post-excavation sampling 
    confirmed that all contaminants remaining in the Source
    
    [[Page 43900]]
    
    Area soils were below the SCLs identified in the ROD. The soils were 
    transported to the MSR facility and stockpiled. The MSR facility, and 
    Source Areas 4 and 5 are currently being capped with a multi-layer cap.
        Currently, all stockpiled materials (from both removals) have been 
    solidified/stabilized as part of the ongoing remedial action. In 
    addition, as a result of the ongoing remedial action, monitoring wells 
    were removed from the outlying source areas in June 1998.
        There are no institutional controls for Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 
    9, and 10. A five-year review will not be conducted at these Source 
    Areas due to the fact that soil and groundwater contaminants are below 
    the SCLs. The concentrations found in the samples taken do not present 
    a current or future threat to public health or the environment.
        EPA, with concurrence of the State of North Carolina, has 
    determined that all appropriate responses under CERCLA for Source Areas 
    1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10 have been completed, and that no further 
    activities by responsible parties are deemed necessary. Therefore, EPA 
    proposes to delete these Source Areas from the NPL.
    
        Dated: August 5, 1998.
    A. Stanley Meiburg,
    Deputy Regional Adminstrator, Region IV.
    [FR Doc. 98-22059 Filed 8-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1998
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of intent for partial deletion of Source Areas 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 from the Bypass 601 Groundwater Contamination Superfund Site, Concord, Cabarrus County, North Carolina, from the National Priorities List.
Document Number:
98-22059
Dates:
EPA will accept comments concerning its partial deletion proposal until September 16, 1998.
Pages:
43898-43900 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6146-1
PDF File:
98-22059.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 300