98-22083. Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 43968-43969]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-22083]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-309]
    
    
    Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company, Maine Yankee Atomic Power 
    Station; Environmental Assessment and Finding of no Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its 
    regulations to Facility Operating License No. DPR-36, a license held by 
    the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company (MYAPCo or the licensee). The 
    exemption would apply to the Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station, a 
    permanently shutdown plant located at the MYAPCo site in Lincoln 
    County, Maine.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed exemption would modify emergency response plan 
    requirements due to the permanently shutdown and defueled status of the 
    Maine Yankee facility.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application dated November 6, 1997, as supplemented by letter dated 
    June 29, 1998. The requested action would grant an exemption from 
    certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q) to discontinue offsite planning 
    activities and reduce the scope of onsite emergency planning.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        Maine Yankee was shut down in December 1996. By letter dated August 
    7, 1997, the licensee informed the Commission that it had decided to 
    permanently cease operations at Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station and 
    that all fuel had been permanently removed from the reactor. In 
    accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2), upon docketing of the 
    certifications in the letter of August 7, 1997, the facility operating 
    license no longer authorizes MYAPCo to operate the reactor and to load 
    fuel in the reactor vessel. In this permanently shutdown condition, the 
    facility poses a reduced risk to public health and safety. Because of 
    this reduced risk, certain requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(q) are no 
    longer required. An exemption is required from portions of 10 CFR 
    50.54(q) to allow the licensee to implement a revised Defueled 
    Emergency Plan that is appropriate for the permanently shutdown and 
    defueled reactor facility.
    
    Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has concluded that the granting of the exemption 
    will not increase the probability or consequences of accidents, no 
    changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released 
    offsite, and there is no significant increase in the allowable 
    individual or cumulative occupational exposure. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant radiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no 
    other environmental impact. Therefore, the Commission concludes that 
    there are no significant non-radiological impacts associated with the 
    proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded that there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternative with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. The
    
    [[Page 43969]]
    
    principal alternative to the action would be to deny the request (no-
    action alternative). Denial of the exemption request would result in no 
    change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of 
    the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of resources not previously 
    considered in the Final Environmental Statement related to Operation of 
    Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station (July 1972).
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on July 31, 1998, the NRC 
    staff consulted with Mr. Patrick Dostie of the State of Maine, 
    Department of Human Services, regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's 
    letters, dated November 6, 1997, and June 29, 1998, which are available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., and at the Local Public 
    Document Room at the Wiscasset Public Library, High Street, Post Office 
    Box 367, Wiscasset, Maine 04578.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of August 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Seymour H. Weiss,
    Director, Non-Power Reactors and Decommissioning Project Directorate, 
    Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-22083 Filed 8-14-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/17/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-22083
Pages:
43968-43969 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-309
PDF File:
98-22083.pdf