99-21375. Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Command Representative, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (USCINCPAC REP Guam/ CNMI); Record of Decision for Military Training in the Marianas  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 18, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44904-44909]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-21375]
    
    
    
    [[Page 44904]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    
    Commander in Chief, U.S. Pacific Command Representative, Guam and 
    the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (USCINCPAC REP Guam/
    CNMI); Record of Decision for Military Training in the Marianas
    
    Introduction
    
        The Department of Defense (DOD) through Commander, U.S. Naval 
    Forces Marianas (COMNAVMARIANAS), as the designated USCINCPAC REP GUAM/
    CNMI, pursuant to Section 102 (2) (C) of the National Environmental 
    Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C 4332 (2) (C), and the regulations 
    of the Council on Environmental Quality that implement NEPA procedures, 
    40 CFR Parts 1500-1508, hereby announces its decision to continue to 
    use suitable DOD controlled lands in the Mariana Islands to support 
    various specific military training activities to ensure the readiness 
    of U.S. forces tasked with fulfilling regional readiness and 
    operational contingency missions.
        The Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Command (USCINCPAC) is 
    responsible for an area comprising 105 million square miles (272 
    million square kilometers [km\2\]). The force structure assigned to 
    USCINCPAC is comprised of approximately 100,000 personnel in all of the 
    military services. These military forces include active duty, national 
    guard and reserve organizations stationed on Guam, multi-service forces 
    assigned to the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, the Republic 
    of Korea, Japan, and Okinawa. Forces permanently assigned to Guam, 
    deployed forces in transit to the Western Pacific and Indian oceans, 
    and forces tasked by USCINCPAC to participate in large-scale joint or 
    combined exercises training in the Mariana Islands. The large exercises 
    are designed for each military service to sustain its skills as part of 
    a larger multi-service force. Primary training management 
    responsibility is assigned to Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Marianas 
    (COMNAVMARIANAS) as the USCINCPAC Representative. Commander, 36 Air 
    Base Wing (36 ABW), headquartered at Andersen Air Force Base on Guam, 
    is also responsible for training management and support, which includes 
    the strategic and tactical movement of exercise personnel and 
    equipment.
    
    Record of Decision
    
        This Record of Decision (ROD) addresses the continued use of 
    suitable DoD-controlled lands in the Mariana Islands to support various 
    training activities in a manner that maximizes the use of available 
    training lands giving consideration to environment impacts. This 
    decision ensures the military readiness of the multi-service forces by 
    providing varying terrain for field training, amphibious landings, 
    supporting airfields, amphibious craft and helicopter landing zones, 
    parachute drop zones, live-fire small-arms weapons ranges, and 
    underwater demolition sites. The lands used for specific training 
    activities support day-to-day training requirements, as well as the 
    more infrequent larger-scale exercises. The environmental impacts of 
    activities have been fully evaluated in the Marianas Training Plan 
    (MTP) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
        The areas controlled by COMNAVMARIANAS include military bases on 
    Guam (Waterfront Annex, Ordnance Annex, and two Communications 
    Annexes), the Military Lease Area (MLA) on Tinian, and Farallon de 
    Medinilla (FDM), where the leased island and a three-mile safety radius 
    comprise Navy Training Range 7201. Commander, 36 ABW, manages training 
    lands at Andersen Air Force Base including its Main Base, Northwest 
    Field, and Andersen South. The EIS also evaluated a few smaller 
    nonmilitary properties on Guam, Tinian, and Rota presently used for 
    specific training functions or proposed for new activities with the 
    express permission of the landowners.
        The training lands available for training and applicable to this 
    ROD include the entire island of FDM (206 acres [83 hectares] of leased 
    land); 15,844 acres (6590 hectares) comprising the MLA on Tinian; 
    18,100 acres (7,341 hectares) on Navy bases on Guam, and 17,534 acres 
    (7,100 hectares) of Air Force property on Guam.
    
    Process
    
        USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI analyzed the potential impacts caused by 
    multi-service military training activities in an Environmental Impact 
    Statement (EIS) as required by NEPA. Military training and support 
    activities were evaluated on three islands in CNMI--Farallon de 
    Medinilla (FDM), Tinian and Rota--and the Territory of Guam.
        The Notice of Intent to develop the EIS was published in the 
    Pacific Daily News on November 18, 19 and 20, 1995, and the Federal 
    Register on November 28, 1995. Public scoping meetings were conducted 
    on Tinian, Rota, and Guam in December 1995. Two iterations of the Draft 
    EIS (DEIS) were distributed to federal, state, and local government 
    agencies, elected officials, community groups and business 
    associations, and interested persons in January 1997 and June 1998. 
    During the 45-day review period, oral and written comments were 
    received from between 25 to 30 correspondents. After public 
    notification was provided in the Pacific Daily News and Marianas 
    Variety, USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI conducted eight public hearings on 
    Saipan, Tinian, Rota and Guam to receive additional comments during 
    March 1997. The responses to all public comments were incorporated into 
    the Final EIS (FEIS) which was distributed to the public on June 11, 
    1999 for a 30-day review period and written responses were provided to 
    seven correspondents with comments regarding the preferred alternative 
    and mitigation measures.
    
    Alternatives Considered
    
        Four training land use alternatives represent a spectrum of 
    training possibilities: conducting no training; reducing existing 
    training land uses; taking no (new) action; and increasing training 
    activities and sites to encompass all of the training requirements that 
    are identified in the U.S Pacific Command's ``Marianas Training Plan'' 
    (MTP). The result of the evaluation is a fifth alternative, the 
    Preferred Training Land Use Alternative for the Mariana Islands, which 
    retains ongoing training activities and sites, and adds a few of the 
    new training requirements in the MTP to maximize training land value or 
    to eliminate training deficiencies. The alternatives were based on the 
    need to maintain a high level of operational readiness and joint 
    service operation capabilities among units stationed and operating in 
    the Western Pacific and Indian Ocean.
    
    No Training Land Use Alternative
    
        Land areas presently in use would no longer be used for training. 
    This alternative could be selected for a portion of a training area if 
    it were necessary to protect biological or cultural resources or to 
    ensure public safety by totally restricting access. The No Training 
    Land Use Alternative is the environmentally preferred alternative but 
    is not the preferred alternative since it fails to meet the purpose and 
    need for the proposed action.
    
    Reduced Training Land Use Alternative
    
        Land areas presently in use would be used by fewer personnel or for 
    less intensive training activities. Selection of this alternative was 
    evaluated against ongoing training activities, which comprise about 90 
    percent of the evaluated training land uses. The EIS
    
    [[Page 44905]]
    
    did not determine that there were any environmental impacts of ongoing 
    activities that require reducing training on FDM, the MLA and Guam's 
    military bases as the preferred alternative.
    
    No New Training Land Use Alternative
    
        The ``No Action Alternative'' for this EIS can also be defined as a 
    ``no new action,'' ``ongoing training'' or ``continuing action'' 
    alternative. Training activities within existing sites, existing 
    mitigation measures and training constraints would continue to be 
    performed unchanged.
    
    Maximum Training Land Use Alternative
    
        This alternative would include all of the training activities and 
    training sites that were identified in the MTP, as well as expand or 
    introduce new activities and sites. This alternative proposed expanding 
    range training on FDM by incorporating ground artillery, mortar, and 
    anti-tank rocket firing. On Tinian, this alternative proposed 
    additional landing beaches in the MLA and the development of live-fire 
    weapons ranges and training structures. On Guam, this alternative 
    proposed additional landing beaches and underwater demolition sites at 
    Waterfront Annex, live-fire weapons training ranges modifications at 
    Waterfront Annex, and new weapons range development at Ordnance Annex. 
    Andersen Air Force Base training activities would remain unchanged, but 
    a new, permanent location would be selected for ongoing rapid runway 
    repair training.
    
    Preferred Training Land Use Alternative
    
        The selected alternative is the result of analyzing potential 
    environmental impacts. This alternative encompasses a mitigated/
    constrained set of ongoing training activities and the adoption of a 
    few, but not all, of the new training initiatives to offset some 
    existing training area deficiencies. FDM (Navy Range 7201) will 
    continue to be used for naval and aerial bombardment. Training 
    frequency and amounts of munitions to be expended on an annual basis 
    have been determined. Impact areas have been modified to protect 
    migratory seabird colonies, and Micronesian megapode habitat 
    enhancement is underway on Sarigan Island as compensatory mitigation.
        The MLA on Tinian will continue to be a major field maneuver area, 
    with two beaches suitable for landings by landing craft air-cushioned 
    (LCAC) and additional beaches suitable for small inflatable raiding 
    craft. North Field runways will continue to be used for airborne and 
    airmobile exercises. The shared use of Tinian's municipal airport and 
    harbor continue for exercise support activities planned in concert with 
    civilian and commercial requirements. Live-fire training will be 
    limited to Training in the Urban Environment (TRUE) scenarios using a 
    World War II structure. Logistic activities will continue to be 
    conducted by Naval Special Warfare (NSW) units on Rota to support its 
    special boat team training activities that are conducted between Guam 
    and FDM.
        Full use of Navy and Air Force bases on Guam will continue. The 
    existing live-fire ranges on Orote Peninsula will be modified as 
    proposed in the EIS to provide a fire-and-maneuver capability and 
    stress course. A sniper range and jungle trail range will be 
    constructed in the Ordnance Annex. Additional sites for underwater 
    demolition training, established offshore of Dadi Beach and at the Agat 
    Drop Zone, will be used to ease the frequency of underwater demolition 
    training presently conducted in and near the mouth of Apra Harbor.
    
    Training Constraints
    
        Limitations to training activities to avoid generating significant 
    impacts have been established by COMNAVMARIANAS and Commander, 36 ABW 
    within certain portions of training areas on FDM, Tinian, and Guam. 
    These constraints will continue to be used as the primary means to 
    protect endangered and threatened species and areas of cultural 
    significance from impacts caused by military personnel and equipment 
    being introduced into training areas by landing craft and amphibious 
    vehicles, aircraft, and vehicles for subsequent maneuver, range 
    training, and bivouacs. Constraints are also established to ensure the 
    safety of personnel in or near active training areas. The constraints--
    No Wildlife Disturbance (NWD), No Cultural Resource Disturbance (NCRD), 
    and No Training (NT)--will be published in training orders, directives, 
    and exercise plans as maps and overlays and distributed to the units 
    responsible for day-to-day training and larger exercises. The 
    restrictions on military activities can be summarized as follows:
        Within areas designated as NWD, to protect vegetation and nesting 
    sites, forces are prohibited from conducting cross-country, off-road 
    vehicle travel. During the nesting season of the threatened Tinian 
    monarch (Monarchus takasukasae), field maneuvers cannot be conducted in 
    tangantangan habitat areas. To reduce the potential for field fires and 
    loss of vegetation habitat, the use of pyrotechnics or demolitions 
    (except for emergency signaling) is not authorized. The use of live and 
    blank ammunition is not allowed so that unexpected, disturbing noises 
    are curtailed. Potential loss of habitat is also controlled by allowing 
    no mechanized vegetation clearing and establishing the maximum size of 
    brush suitable as camouflage material. Flight altitude restrictions 
    have been established as necessary to protect endangered species 
    habitat. No flights below 1,000-ft (305-m) above ground level (AGL) are 
    authorized over known endangered Mariana crow habitat at Northwest 
    Field. No helicopter landings are authorized except at designated 
    landing zones.
        NCRD areas are established to protect known or potential cultural 
    resources. Sub-surface disturbances are prohibited in these areas. 
    There will be no cross-country, off-road vehicle travel, and vehicle 
    parking is confined to surfaced areas and cleared road shoulders only. 
    The use of pyrotechnics and demolition charges is also restricted. No 
    digging or excavation is permitted without prior approval of 
    COMNAVMARIANAS or 36 ABW environmental monitors. During major exercises 
    on Tinian, authorized traffic routes through NCRD areas are marked with 
    engineer tape to facilitate movement between the beaches and inland 
    maneuver areas without impact. NCRD constraints maps have been included 
    in a recently developed Programmatic Agreement and a Memorandum of 
    Agreement executed to protect cultural resources in the CNMI and Guam.
        Areas designated as NT are off-limits, meaning that there is 
    absolutely no training allowed in these areas. Entry to some of these 
    areas can be authorized for administrative troop and vehicle movement 
    on designated roads or trails only. NT areas have been established to 
    protect both endangered species habitat and areas of particularly 
    sensitive cultural value. NT areas are also established for safety 
    purposes in the vicinity of the munitions storage areas on Andersen Air 
    Force Base and the Ordnance Annex.
    
    Environmental Impacts
    
        USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI has analyzed the direct, indirect, and 
    cumulative impacts of proposed training in the Mariana Islands across a 
    spectrum of alternatives ranging from no training activities to 
    maximizing training by adopting all of the activities published in the 
    MTP. Each alternative was evaluated for potential effects on the 
    physical environment (climate, geology and hydrology, water quality, 
    air quality, noise, visual setting/aesthetics, and natural hazards and
    
    [[Page 44906]]
    
    constraints), biological environment (terrestrial and marine), cultural 
    resources (archaeological and historical), infrastructure, utilities 
    and public services, and the socioeconomic environment on the affected 
    islands.
        The alternatives were also evaluated with respect to their 
    consistency with policies established by Executive Orders for Federal 
    Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority and Low-Income 
    Populations, Coral Reef Protection, Protection of Wetlands, Protection 
    of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks, and 
    Invasive Species.
        From the outset, three training activities were identified as 
    environmentally controversial and potentially significant. One was the 
    potential for damage to nearshore coral caused by contact with landing 
    craft utility (LCU) and tracked assault amphibian vehicles (AAVs) on 
    Tinian and Guam. Beaches free of nearshore coral and suitable for 
    landing craft and AAVs were identified at the Waterfront Annex. No 
    suitable site for displacement hull LCUs and AAVs was found in the MLA 
    on Tinian, and therefore, LCU/AAV landings will remain confined to 
    Tinian Harbor. Potential impacts to coral in shallow nearshore waters 
    and reefs by landing craft, air-cushion (LCAC) were evaluated in a 
    marine biological survey at Unai Chulu, Tinian. No significant impacts 
    are caused by the LCAC when operated within acceptable parameters. A 
    similar marine biological survey will be conducted to revalidate the 
    lack of impacts to shallow coral by LCAC landings at Unai Dankulo, 
    Tinian and Dadi Beach, Guam. Potentially significant damage to 
    nearshore coral has been eliminated by identifying the suitable types 
    of craft that will be allowed to use each landing beach on Tinian and 
    Guam.
        The second issue was underwater demolition training by Explosive 
    Ordnance Disposal (EOD) and NSW units that cause portions of Apra 
    Harbor to be temporarily closed to other uses and may have a 
    significant impact on marine species. Closure of the harbor, which 
    interferes with commercial boating and diving activities, will be 
    minimized by use of additional underwater training sites in open ocean 
    waters to lessen the frequency of use of Apra Harbor. Training site 
    selection will favor the ocean sites unless weather conditions dictate 
    otherwise. USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI continues to work with Guam 
    Environmental Protection Agency (Guam EPA) and Division of Aquatic and 
    Wildlife Resources (DAWR) to select additional sites and to continue 
    using demolition training protocol that minimizes potential impacts to 
    marine biota and provides advance coordination with affected commercial 
    enterprises. Although potentially significant impacts are not 
    anticipated, the activity may remain controversial with respect to the 
    commercial ocean recreation sector and government agencies responsible 
    for protection of endangered and threatened marine species.
        The continued use of FDM as a naval gunfire and aerial bombardment 
    range is the third issue. Used as a bombardment range since at least 
    1971, the island has been the subject of a series of biological 
    evaluations by federal, commonwealth, and military experts. Although 
    the bombardment of FDM may significantly impact endangered species and 
    habitat vegetation, no alternative bombardment range sites are 
    available to USCINCPAC forces for this training requirement. Therefore, 
    compensatory mitigation measures have been enacted in cooperation with 
    U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and 
    CNMI Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) to enhance the population of 
    the endangered Micronesian megapode on Sarigan, another uninhabited 
    island in the CNMI. Mitigation measures include controlling the types 
    and amounts of ordnance to be dropped and confining the impact areas to 
    minimize impacts on biological resources. The Navy will conduct aerial 
    evaluations of vegetation habitat and birds in conjunction with major 
    bombardment activities. The condition of nearshore coral and the 
    effects of bombardment on the marine environment will be surveyed 
    annually for the next three years by USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI in 
    cooperation with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), USFWS, and 
    CNMI DFW.
    
    Environmental Mitigation
    
        COMNAVMARIANAS analyzed the potential impacts of the selected 
    action on the following: natural or biological resources, cultural 
    resources, environmental quality, infrastructure deficiencies on 
    Tinian, public safety, and socioeconomic quality.
    
    Natural Resources
    
        In addition to identifying areas subject to NWD or NT constraints, 
    mitigation measures to reduce training impacts to nonsignificant levels 
    include adhering to operational requirements for beach landing craft to 
    minimize impacts to shallow reefs and nearshore coral, requiring 
    qualified biologists to conduct pre-training surveys to ensure that 
    training will not impact sea turtle nesting, and adhering to updated 
    brown tree snake (Boigus irregularis) control and interdiction methods 
    to prevent the introduction and proliferation of the BTS from Guam to 
    other locations. These and other mitigation measures identified in the 
    FEIS are now in effect and will be published in Navy and Air Force 
    training orders, directives, and plans. The BTS Control and 
    Interdiction Plan will be updated and published as a COMNAVMARIANAS 
    directive to regulate routine as well as training material/cargo 
    movement from Guam.
        With the exception of the continued use of FDM as a naval gunfire 
    and aerial bombardment range, the Preferred Training Land Use 
    Alternative does not significantly impact listed threatened or 
    endangered species. Impacts are reduced to nonsignificant levels by 
    establishing training area boundaries, implementing mitigation measures 
    and training constraints, and conducting environmental monitoring and 
    evaluation. Particular attention has focused on enhancing endangered 
    Micronesian megapode (Megapodius laperous) habitat in the CNMI, 
    protecting the threatened Tinian monarch (Monarcha takasukasae) during 
    nesting seasons, restricting maneuver in areas of Mariana common 
    moorhen (Gallinula chloropus guami) habitat, causing little or no 
    disturbance to the island swiflet (Aerodramus vanikorensis bartschi) 
    and three species of federal and Guam endangered fruit bats, and 
    restricting maneuver in areas of Ordnance Annex recently identified as 
    habitat of tree snails being considered for federal listing. Mariana 
    crow (Corvus kubaryi) nests at Northwest Field will continue to be 
    monitored by Guam Division of Aquatics and Wildlife Resources (DAWR). 
    As nesting activities are found, this information will be made known to 
    Flight Operations to ensure no overflights at unauthorized altitudes. 
    Protective measures for hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) and 
    green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) are in place to minimize or avoid 
    impacts on these species that may enter training beaches and open 
    waters during amphibious training and underwater demolitions.
        On FDM, migratory seabirds, federally endangered Micronesian 
    megapodes and Mariana fruit bats may be killed by ordnance or displaced 
    by a loss of habitat. These impacts are mitigated by avoiding certain 
    munitions and by relocating targets so that the majority of ordnance 
    delivered will avoid the most sensitive areas for nesting and roosting 
    birds. Formal consultation in accordance with Section 7 of the
    
    [[Page 44907]]
    
    Endangered Species Act has been completed and the protective measures 
    recommended in the biological opinions of USFWS and NMFS have been 
    adopted.
        Due to the increased danger of field fires being caused by training 
    during periods of drought and high winds, fire prevention and response 
    plans will be enforced at all ranges and maneuver areas. During periods 
    of high risk, training activities with potential fire-causing effects 
    will be suspended as necessary. Crash-fire-rescue (CFR) vehicles will 
    be available during flight operations in case of a crash and resulting 
    fire.
    
    Cultural Resources
    
        The Preferred Training Land Use Alternative would not significantly 
    impact sites listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of 
    Historic Places (NRHP). Such sites located on land and off-shore could 
    be damaged by off-road vehicles, construction, rapid runway repair, 
    excavation, vandalism, small arms and mortar fire, and shock waves 
    generated by deepwater explosives. These impacts will be mitigated to 
    nonsignificant levels by designating areas with listed or eligible NRHP 
    sites as ``No Training'' or ``No Cultural Resources Disturbance'' 
    areas, which would prohibit digging within three feet of historic 
    structures with concrete walls or in any cave, require pre-training 
    archaeological surveys in historic structures used for urban warfare 
    scenarios, and require post-training evaluation for evidence of impacts 
    that would require additional mitigation. The consultation process with 
    the CNMI and Guam Historic Preservation Offices has been completed in 
    accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act 
    of 1966, 16 U.S.C. 470f (1994). A Programmatic Agreement has been 
    signed by the USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI, CNMI Historic Preservation 
    Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) 
    regarding the conduct of military training on Tinian. The agreement 
    (signed in June 1999), provides direction in the identification of 
    historic properties, establishment of constrained areas, instructions 
    to training participants, field mitigation and monitoring, coordination 
    of training program revisions, response to public objections, reporting 
    requirements and proposed long-term site protection at Unai Chulu, 
    Tinian. A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) signed in June 1999 by the 
    USCINCPACREP GUAM/CNMI, COMNAVMARIANAS, 36th ABW, Guam Historic 
    Preservation Officer, and the ACHP identifies protective measures to be 
    carried out while developing live-fire weapons ranges in the Ordnance 
    Annex and activities on Northwest Field. The MOA also addresses the 
    continued use of constraints maps as one means to protect cultural 
    resources from training impacts.
    
    Environmental Quality
    
        The Preferred Training Land Use Alternative would not have a 
    significant impact on air quality, climate, geology, surface water 
    quality, flooding, or groundwater. Existing military standing operating 
    procedures (SOPs) and regulations prevent significant impacts on these 
    resources. Major construction projects once proposed on Tinian that 
    could have impacted groundwater quality will not be conducted at this 
    time. If any construction is proposed in the future, appropriate 
    environmental evaluations would be conducted. The concern that live-
    fire ranges could cause lead contamination in groundwater has been 
    eliminated since there will be no small arms range development. The 
    military is also developing lead-free small-arms ordnance for all range 
    training.
    
    Tinian Infrastructure
    
        Wastewater disposal has been a major logistic issue for all large-
    scale exercises. Tinian presently has no large-scale municipal 
    wastewater treatment facility and there has been concern that temporary 
    overuse of the systems would impact groundwater resources, air quality, 
    and public health. Leasing portable toilets, contracting pumping 
    services and disposing wastes in municipal systems was the standard 
    practice to handle large quantities of black-water wastes. The shared 
    use of municipal septic tanks during major exercises is no longer 
    necessary. Navy Public Works constructed a septic tank and leach field 
    based on the requirement to support up to 2,500 exercise personnel. 
    This tank was first available during Tandem Thrust 99 (March-April 
    1999). Its availability has eliminated concerns about cumulative 
    impacts on the island's municipal system capacity.
        Tinian has no EPA-approved solid waste landfill and no hazardous 
    waste or hazardous material handling facility. Training activities 
    routinely generate varying amounts of solid waste (primarily cardboard 
    and paper) and may generate very small amounts of hazardous materials 
    and used oil. Collecting, compacting, and transporting solid wastes off 
    Tinian will continue as a requirement for any military exercise on 
    Tinian. The Tinian municipal landfill will not be used. Hazardous 
    materials, used oils and expended lithium batteries will be handled as 
    stipulated in exercise plans for removal from the island of Tinian to 
    authorized waste streams. Maintenance activities that could generate 
    hazardous materials will be minimized while on Tinian, with scheduled 
    maintenance conducted on military bases or while aboard ship.
    
    Public Safety
    
        The Preferred Training Land Use Alternative would not have a 
    significant impact on public health and safety. The COMNAVMARIANAS 
    policy limiting access to FDM remains in effect, allowing only active 
    duty, DoD-trained explosive-qualified personnel responsible for range 
    operations and maintenance. The proposal to expand the range for firing 
    ground weapons such as artillery, mortars, and anti-tank missiles is 
    not approved due to the existence of unexploded ordnance throughout the 
    island. Biological surveys will continue to be conducted from the air 
    by helicopter.
        Range safety and control measures are presently in place on Guam at 
    Orote Peninsula, the Communications Annex at Finegayan, and Andersen 
    Air Force Base. Risks to public safety from projectiles from small arms 
    and rifle ranges will be avoided by adhering to range regulations, 
    conducting required range area sweeps and surveillance during training 
    on affected land and water areas, installing and maintaining coastal 
    warning devices of the presence of ranges, and temporarily restricting 
    range access when necessary. Prior to the activation of new and 
    modified live-fire training ranges on Guam, the ranges will be 
    evaluated and certified by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. At 
    the Ordnance Annex, the design will also be reviewed and approved by 
    the Naval Ordnance Command. The orientation of the sniper firing range 
    at Ordnance Annex has been modified to avoid intersection of the 
    range's Surface Danger Zone and a public hiking trail that infringes 
    Navy property.
        The proposed small arms fire and maneuver range will not be 
    constructed on Tinian at this time. An alternative fire-and-maneuver 
    range site is being developed on a former small arms range at Orote 
    Point on Guam. This decision eliminates potential safety impacts to 
    civilians or non-training personnel who could encroach on the range 
    training area.
        The proposed 60mm mortar range will not be developed on Tinian. 
    This eliminates potential safety risks due to unexploded ordnance 
    remaining in
    
    [[Page 44908]]
    
    areas that could be encroached by the public and difficult to control 
    access restrictions to 100 percent certainty.
        Proposed construction of a permanent shooting house or breacher 
    trainer will not be undertaken on Tinian at this time. Whenever the 
    former World War Two Japanese Command Center is in use as a shooting 
    house, area access will be restricted. Alternative urban training 
    facilities are also available on Guam.
        Notice to Airmen (NOTAMS) and Notice to Mariners (NOTMARS) will be 
    published and broadcast to forewarn of naval gunfire and aerial 
    bombardment at FDM. The island range and its three-mile radius surface 
    danger zone will be surveyed prior to commencing training to ensure 
    that the area is clear of all non-training related activity.
        Potential impacts between civilian and military aircraft will be 
    avoided through the coordinated efforts of military and FAA air traffic 
    controllers in accordance with military SOPs and FAA regulations. 
    NOTAMS will be published in advance of training that involves the use 
    of airspace over FDM, Tinian and Guam.
        There will be no hazards to ordnance, fuel storage, and personnel 
    from electromagnetic radiation during training. Required clearance 
    distances are maintained between field emitter sites and ordnance, 
    fuel, and personnel. There would be no risk to public health caused by 
    transmissions from the International Broadcasting Bureau's site 
    recently constructed in the MLA on Tinian. The acreage has been removed 
    from the areas in the MLA used for training.
        Impacts to boaters and divers from shallow and deepwater mines will 
    be avoided by continuing to clear and patrol demolition sites and 
    exclusion zones prior to all exercises. To avoid potential sympathetic 
    detonation of depth charges located on the Tokai Maru, a sunken 
    Japanese World War II vessel in Outer Apra Harbor, the present 
    demolition site will remain unchanged and the size of the explosive 
    charge limited to ten pounds.
        Civilian ports of entry will not be significantly impacted. On 
    Tinian and Rota, approval from civilian authorities will be obtained 30 
    days prior to any exercise. To avoid significant impacts on customs and 
    immigration services, local authorities will be notified 30 days prior 
    to large exercises. Noise impacts from training at Tipalao and Dadi 
    beaches will be temporary. To eliminate potentially significant 
    impacts, training will be conducted during the day.
        The Preferred Training Land Use Alternative will not have a 
    significant impact on roadways and traffic. Military traffic control 
    will be used as necessary to move military convoys through Tinian town. 
    AAVs using public roads will have track pads installed to avoid 
    damaging road surfaces.
    
    Socioeconomic Environment
    
        Tinian's relatively small population is isolated from many economic 
    opportunities that are available to Saipan residents. Training 
    activities offer potential economic benefits through the purchase of 
    local goods and services. Temporary exclusion of tours from active 
    training sites in the EMUA could have a negative effect. One casino 
    hotel has opened and another is planned, and cumulative socioeconomic 
    impacts may result from the combination of military training and 
    increased tourism.
        USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI will continue to provide advance 
    information to CNMI agencies and affected commercial enterprises 
    whenever military training safety considerations require temporary 
    restrictions to areas on Tinian normally open to the public. Affected 
    agencies and firms have requested at least a 30-day notice, which in 
    almost all instances can be accommodated. This interaction will include 
    the CNMI and Tinian municipal governments, the Commonwealth Port 
    Authority, and tourist agencies in advance of all training on Tinian 
    that may interfere with tourist activities in the MLA, nearshore waters 
    or the harbor. Whenever active training is not taking place in portions 
    of the MLA, these areas will be opened to visitors.
        Underwater demolition by EOD and NSW units in Guam's Outer Apra 
    Harbor requires certain areas of the harbor (including a number of 
    popular dive sites) to be closed to civilian activities once a month 
    for approximately four hours. This public safety measure may cause loss 
    of income to commercial boat and dive operators. SOPs practiced by EOD 
    and NSW units will continue to provide advance information to affected 
    commercial firms so that they can seek alternative dive, boating and 
    fishing sites during the temporary closures. This process will continue 
    along with the use of NOTMARs and coordination with GEPA and DAWR to 
    actively observe and monitor training.
    
    Executive Orders
    
        The FEIS considered federal policies under Executive Orders 
    pertaining to Environmental Justice, Protection of Children from 
    Environmental Health and Safety Risks, Protection of Wetlands, Coral 
    Reef Protection, and Invasive Species, to ensure that training will be 
    conducted in compliance with said policies and that appropriate 
    mitigation actions will be taken to eliminate or reduce potentially 
    significant impacts.
        Preventive practices to address the potentially significant impacts 
    that could be caused by brown tree snakes have been addressed and 
    remain a subject of periodic review and updates to ensure that the 
    latest proven methods have been incorporated. Appendix E of the FEIS 
    compiles the measures taken to prevent BTS impacts to date. An updated 
    order defining BTS control/interdiction protocols will be published by 
    COMNAVMARIANAS.
        The prevention of coral damage or destruction was a primary 
    criterion in selecting beaches for landings by displacement hull 
    landing craft and tracked amphibious assault vehicles. The lack of 
    impact to shallow coral by LCACs was demonstrated at Unai Chulu, 
    Tinian, and similar studies will be conducted at Unai Dankulo, Tinian, 
    and Dadi Beach, Guam, prior to final approval as LCAC landing sites.
    
    Marianas Training Management Regulations
    
        Implementation of the Preferred Training Land Use Alternative 
    requires the COMNAVMARIANAS and 36th ABW to implement mitigation 
    measures and training constraints for their respective areas of 
    responsibility and to cooperate in monitoring and corrective measures. 
    The mitigation and constraints identified in the FEIS will be 
    incorporated into training orders and directives. Compliance with these 
    directives is the responsibility of each military organization involved 
    in Marianas training. The military will conduct advance coordination as 
    needed with agencies of the territorial and commonwealth governments 
    and affected commercial enterprises to avoid training area use 
    conflicts.
    
    Comments Received on FEIS
    
        The CNMI Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) identified an 
    additional cultural resource site in the vicinity of Unai Dankulo, 
    Tinian. The training constraints map for Tinian training will be 
    modified to incorporate an additional NCRD area south of the landing 
    beach site. The HPO also expressed concern regarding the lack of an 
    archaeological survey on FDM. Conducting such a survey is not feasible 
    due to potential danger to the surveyors since the island is an impact 
    area and replete with unexploded ordnance.
        CNMI Department of Lands and Natural Resources (DLNR) commented
    
    [[Page 44909]]
    
    on the need to follow LCAC operational protocols to protect the beach 
    environment. The lessons learned during LCAC operations at Unai Chulu, 
    Tinian during Tandem Thrust 99 will be incorporated into COMNAVMARIANAS 
    training orders. The department's Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) 
    suggested a change in the timing for setting up portable BTS barriers 
    at cargo points on Guam and Tinian. When updating the BTS Control/
    Interdiction protocols, the process for using portable snake barriers 
    at ports of entry and shipment will be defined by military 
    representatives and CNMI, Guam, and federal regulators.
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX commented on the 
    BTS Control/Interdiction Plan update requirement, compensatory 
    mitigation measures for impacted biological resources, and prevention 
    of impacts by amphibious landings during coral spawning. COMNAVMARIANAS 
    will continue to monitor and mitigate these concerns as necessary.
        Guam Environmental Protection Agency has concerns regarding 
    training at the Waterfront Annex's Dadi Beach and instead, favors the 
    use of the beach and waters at Tipalao for amphibious landings and 
    underwater demolition training. Site surveys and evaluations between 
    the Navy and GEPA will continue in regard to any activities at either 
    beach.
        U.S. Department of Agriculture, APHIS, Wildlife Services provided a 
    list of lessons learned from Tandem Thrust 99 that will be incorporated 
    in the updated BTS Control/Interdiction directive.
        U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife also identified 
    the need to update the COMNAVMARIANAS BTS Control/Interdiction Plan, 
    initiate compensatory mitigation for impacts to migratory seabirds on 
    FDM, and to initiate a Section 7 Endangered Species Act consultation 
    for target placement on FDM. This agency participated in the 
    development of the 1996 BTS Control/Interdiction Plan and will be asked 
    to participate in the process to update the plan as a COMNAVMARIANAS 
    BTS Control/Interdiction directive. Compensatory mitigation measures 
    will continue for endangered and threatened species. Target material 
    selection and placement is an ongoing action, which will be 
    incorporated in the update of the BTS Control/Interdiction directive.
    
    Conclusion
    
        USCINCPACREP GUAM/CNMI, in cooperation with federal, territorial 
    and commonwealth regulatory agencies, will conduct all necessary steps 
    to avoid or minimize environmental harm that could be caused by 
    military training.
        The Preferred Training Land Use meets the purpose and need to train 
    in the Mariana Islands while avoiding or minimizing impacts on the 
    existing environment. The preferred alternative and its mitigation and 
    constraints are fully responsive to the concerns expressed by 
    regulatory agencies and members of the public, local economic 
    conditions, and required levels of public safety. Although the ``No 
    Training Alternative'' may be perceived as causing no significant 
    environmental impacts, it does not necessarily foster continued 
    stewardship in areas that will remain free of development, and does not 
    meet the stated purpose and need for maintaining the operational 
    readiness of USCINCPAC forces.
        The EIS evaluated a mix of activities with variable schedules of 
    activities at each site, training event duration, and numbers and types 
    of participating units. The findings of the EIS reflect this dynamic 
    training environment and potential changes to military training 
    missions that require continuous environmental monitoring and 
    evaluation of direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts. Training 
    management measures will be modified whenever (1) it is discovered that 
    the environmental effects of ongoing activities are significantly and 
    qualitatively different or more severe than predicted, and (2) a new 
    training activity represents a substantial change from existing 
    activities and has the potential for generating significant 
    environmental impacts. Under these circumstances, USCINCPAC REP GUAM/
    CNMI will review the issues with appropriate regulatory agency 
    representatives to determine and implement appropriate mitigation 
    measures.
        Accordingly, training in the Mariana Islands will be conducted in a 
    manner that is consistent with the Preferred Training Land Use 
    Alternative as identified in the Marianas Training Environmental Impact 
    Statement.
    
        Dated: July 28, 1999.
    Rear Admiral J.W. Greenert,
    USCINCPAC REP GUAM/CNMI.
    [FR Doc. 99-21375 Filed 8-17-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 5001-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/18/1999
Department:
Defense Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-21375
Pages:
44904-44909 (6 pages)
PDF File:
99-21375.pdf