98-22279. Solicitation of Public Comment Regarding U.S. Preparations for the World Trade Organization's Ministerial Meeting, Fourth Quarter 1999  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 160 (Wednesday, August 19, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44500-44502]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-22279]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
    
    
    Solicitation of Public Comment Regarding U.S. Preparations for 
    the World Trade Organization's Ministerial Meeting, Fourth Quarter 1999
    
    SUMMARY: The Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) is providing notice of 
    the U.S. intention to develop proposals and positions concerning the 
    agenda of the third Ministerial Conference of the World Trade 
    Organization (WTO). The TWO General Council has been instructed to 
    prepare recommendations regarding the launch of further trade 
    negotiations and work in the WTO, which will be considered and approved 
    by WTO Members meeting at their next Ministerial to be held in the 
    United States during the fourth quarter of 1999. The TPSC invites 
    public comment regarding the development of the agenda, scope, content 
    and timetables for negotiations or further work in the WTO, including 
    additional consultations with non-governmental stakeholders. The 
    Administration seeks views on the broadcast possible range of issues 
    for considerations, including possible subject matter and approaches to 
    any new negotiations or future work in the WTO. The deadline for 
    written comments is Friday, October 16, 1998.
        The General Council's instructions are contained in WTO Ministerial 
    Declarations WT/MIN(98)/DEC/1 and DEC/2 agreed on May 20, 1998, at the 
    WTO's second ministerial meeting. In September 1998, the General 
    Council will begin holding special sessions to prepare recommendations. 
    Recommendations will be developed on the basis of consensus of WTO 
    Members. The General Council is expected to review issues, at least 
    initially, in the order presented in WT/MIN(98)/DEC/1, as well as to 
    review the results of work carried out in accordance with WT/MIN(98)/
    DEC/2. This solicitation is intended to facilitate the Administration's 
    participation in the General Council's consideration of issues, 
    preparation of U.S. proposals and positions regarding eventual 
    recommendations, and acceptance of such proposals by consensus of WTO 
    Members.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For procedural questions concerning 
    public comments contact Gloria Blue, Executive Secretary, Trade Policy 
    Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 
    (202) 395-3475. General inquiries should be made to the Office of WTO 
    and Multilateral Affairs at (202) 395-6843; calls on individual 
    subjects will be transferred within USTR as appropriate. Information 
    about the WTO can be obtained via the Internet on www.ustr.gov, or the 
    WTO website (www.wto.org). Attention is drawn, in particular, to the 
    Ministerial Declarations (WT/Min(98)/DEC/1 and DEC/2 of May 20, 1998 
    regarding preparation of the WTO's forward agenda and electronic 
    commerce) and the Ministerial Declaration resulting from the WTO's 
    first ministerial meeting held in Singapore in December, 1996 (WT/
    Min(96)/DEC), which are available on the USTR and WTO websites. In 
    addition, a detailed review of the WTO Agreements, the work of the 
    various WTO committees and bodies and the WTO ``built-in agenda'' are 
    contained in
    
    [[Page 44501]]
    
    the ``1998 Trade Policy Agenda and 1997 Annual Report of the President 
    on the Trade Agreements Program,'' also available on the USTR website. 
    On May 26, 1998, the TPSC published a notice in the Federal Register 
    requesting public comments with respect to the review of the WTO's 
    Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 18-20, the World Trade Organization 
    (WTO) held its second ministerial conference in Geneva, Switzerland, 
    along with a commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the post-World 
    War II multilateral trading system. President Clinton and 13 other 
    heads of state or government addressed the gathering, and WTO Members 
    accepted the U.S. invitation to host the third ministerial conference 
    in late 1999. The general Ministerial Declaration, agreed on May 20, 
    1998, instructs the WTO's General Council to begin preparation for the 
    launch of negotiations and consideration of the WTO's forward agenda 
    for approval at its 1999 ministerial meeting. A second Declaration, 
    also agreed on May 20, 1998, commits Members to not impose customs 
    duties on electronic transmissions and calls for the establishment by 
    the General Council of a work program in the WTO on the trade-related 
    aspects of electronic commerce.
        These processes will start officially at a special meeting of the 
    General Council on September 24, 1998. By prior agreement, the post-
    1999 negotiating agenda will, at a minimum, encompass those broad-
    ranging and substantial area where existing WTO Agreements now call for 
    further negotiations an deliberlization, such as in agriculture, 
    services and intellectual property. However, without prejudice to the 
    initiation of negotiations on the above topics already called for the 
    WTO's ``build-in agenda,'' the preparatory process will also examine 
    whether other topics may be ripe for negotiations or further study. 
    This is consistent with U.S. calls for flexibility and creativity in 
    structuring the WTO's future work.\1\ Consideration will be given to 
    various options for structuring the negotiations and work program, 
    including timetables for any negotiations, as well as more effective 
    means of engaging the wide range of non-governmental stakeholders in 
    the preparation of the agenda and subsequent negotiations.
    
        \1\ On the future agenda, pursuant to the Declaration, the 
    Council is to make* * * ``(a) recommendations concerning: (i) the 
    issues, including those brought forward by Members, relating to 
    implementation of existing agreements and decisions; (ii) the 
    negotiations already mandated at Marrakesh, to ensure that such 
    negotiations begin on schedule; (iii) future work already provided 
    for under other existing agreements and decisions taken at 
    Marrakesh; (b) recommendations concerning other possible future work 
    on the basis of the work programme initiated at Singapore; (c) 
    recommendations on the follow-up to the High-Level Meeting on Least-
    Developed Countries; (d) recommendations arising from consideration 
    of other matters proposed and agreed to by Members concerning their 
    multilateral trade relations* * *.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    PUBLIC COMMENTS REQUESTED: To prepare for U.S. participation in the 
    General Council meetings, the TPSC invites written comments on U.S. 
    objectives with respect to the various categories of issues identified 
    in the two Declarations mentioned above, including the agenda, scope, 
    content and timetables for work and negotiations. Comments submitted 
    should clearly indicate the category or categories of issues outlined 
    in the submission. USTR will seek additional public comment later in 
    the year on details of certain agenda items (e.g., market access and 
    agriculture, involving product-specific concerns). For purposes of this 
    notice, comments should address the following issue areas:
    
    I. Implementation of Existing Agreements and Work Programs
    
        Comments are requested with respect to experience in 
    implementation, including where the Agreements have been successful in 
    addressing U.S. interests, and in areas where changes would facilitate 
    better enforcement and adherence to rules and commitments, or otherwise 
    advance U.S. policy objectives. Particular attention is drawn to the 
    various rule encompassed in the GATT 1994 (all GATT Articles), the 
    Marrakesh Protocol to the General Agreement, the Agreements on 
    Agriculture, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Textiles and 
    Clothing, Technical Barriers to Trade, Trade-Related Investment 
    Measures (TRIMS), Antidumping Practices, Customs Valuation, Preshipment 
    Inspection, Import Licensing, Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, 
    Agreement on Safeguards, General Agreement on Trade in Services, Trade-
    Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), the 
    Understanding on the Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of 
    Disputes, Trade Policy Review Mechanism and Ministerial Decisions and 
    Declarations, including those undertaken at Marrakesh.
    
    II. Mandated Negotiations
    
        Comments are requested regarding U.S. priorities for the Agreements 
    concluded as part of the Uruguay Round that contain express agreement 
    to conduct further negotiations. The Agreement on Agriculture contains 
    provisions for further negotiations and identifies issues for 
    consideration, including market access, domestic support and export 
    subsidies. The General Agreement on Trade in Services provides for 
    further negotiations on specific commitments to liberalize trade in 
    services. The Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights 
    (TRIPS) provides for negotiations in certain areas. For all of these 
    mandated negotiations, particular attention should be given to the 
    range of additional issues not mentioned in the Agreements that should 
    be considered, and the modalities for conducting further negotiations.
    
    III. Reviews of Existing Agreements and Work Programs
    
        Comments are requested regarding U.S. priorities pursuant to the 
    Agreements from the Uruguay Round that specifically provide for reviews 
    and other work as part of their individual work programs: Agriculture, 
    Antidumping, Customs Valuation, Dispute Settlement Understanding, 
    Import Licensing, Preshipment Inspection, Rules of Origin, Trade and 
    the Environment, Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, Safeguards, 
    Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Technical Barriers to Trade, 
    Textiles and Clothing, Trade Policy Review Mechanism, Trade-Related 
    Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Trade-Related 
    Investment Measures (TRIMS), and the General Agreement on Trade in 
    Services. The Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) and the Agreement 
    on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, for example, contain review 
    provisions as a first step in taking further decisions with respect to 
    the Agreements. Particular attention should be given to the 
    improvements, if any, that might be sought as a result of the reviews 
    or conclusions of the work programs.
    
    IV. Singapore Ministerial Work Program
    
        Comments are requested on what, if any, next steps should be taken 
    with respect to the issues raised in the context of the work of the 
    working groups established on trade and investment, trade and 
    competition policy, transparency in government procurement and the 
    exploratory work undertaken by the WTO regarding trade facilitation. 
    Particularly relevant are next steps in the above-mentioned areas, 
    including the nature and scope of any
    
    [[Page 44502]]
    
    future work. In the case of procurement, these has already been 
    agreement to identify the elements for a multilateral transparency 
    agreement. With respect to the work on investment and competition, 
    attention is drawn to the fact the both working groups are to complete 
    reports to the General Council before the end of 1998.
    
    V. Integration of Least-Developed Countries
    
        Comments are requested on ways to facilitate the participation of 
    least developed countries in the WTO, taking into account work that has 
    been conducted to integrate the technical assistance provided by 
    various international organizations, including the WTO. Areas for 
    comment could include provision of additional capacity building and 
    market access opportunities, and the possible graduation of countries 
    from preferences.
    
    VI. Other Trade Matters of Interest
    
        Consistent with the Ministerial Declaration, comments are also 
    solicited with respect to the range of issues where the United States 
    might choose to seek, or be asked to join a consensus, to add 
    additional items to the WTO's post-1999 agenda for negotiations or 
    further work. The Administration is interested in considering the 
    broadest range of issues as the agenda for the next century is 
    developed. The issues identified thus far include:
        (a) Industrial market access: comments are requested with respect 
    to the overall desirability of conducting further tariff negotiations 
    and possible modalities for such negotiations (e.g., pursuit of 
    additional sectoral initiatives to reduce or harmonize duties, the 
    application of formula or request/offer approaches and related issues). 
    It should be noted that further negotiations on market access are 
    already envisioned for products covered by the Agricultural Agreement.
        (b) Consultations with Non-Governmental Stakeholders: comments are 
    requested as to possible approaches that the WTO could undertake. In 
    his speech to the WTO, President Clinton challenged the WTO to consider 
    improving the opportunities for the public to participate in the 
    development of the WTO's forward agenda, and to develop a more regular 
    mechanism for consultation. The WTO has begun to take steps to broaden 
    the interaction with non-governmental organizations in this regard, 
    including the dissemination of information received from such 
    organizations to the WTO's membership. Similarly, a number of steps 
    have been taken by the United States to promote greater transparency in 
    the operation of the WTO that would be of benefit to stakeholders 
    (e.g., with respect to making WTO documents more available to the 
    public).
        (c) Relationship Between Trade and Labor: comments are requested 
    regarding various approaches to be considered in developing a consensus 
    for further consideration of this issue on the WTO's forward agenda. 
    WTO Ministers at Singapore renewed their commitment to the observance 
    of internationally recognized core labor standards, noting that 
    economic growth and development fostered by increased trade and further 
    trade liberalization contribute to the promotion of core labor 
    standards. At the same time, they recognized the important role of the 
    International Labor Organization (ILO) in this area and rejected the 
    use of labor standards for protectionist purposes, and agreed that the 
    comparative advantages of countries, particularly low-wage developing 
    countries, must not be put into question. Attention is drawn to Section 
    131 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, addressing U.S. activity in 
    the WTO in this area.
        (d) Institutional Issues: comments are invited on the general 
    institutional improvements that the United States should be 
    contemplating for the WTO, particularly as its membership expands to 
    nearly 160 early in the next century. Achieving greater transparency in 
    the WTO's operation has already been identified as a priority issue for 
    the Administration. The United States has consistently sought to expand 
    the range of WTO documents available to the public, and is continuing 
    to promote broader derestriction of documents in a more timely fashion, 
    including in the area of access to dispute settlement panel reports. 
    Similarly, as the membership expands to include Members with less 
    experience operating as market economies, new challenges arise to the 
    WTO's system of operations and its decision-making process. As a result 
    of the Uruguay Round, the WTO entered into cooperation agreements with 
    the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to ensure 
    greater coherence in international economic policy; further cooperation 
    may be desirable.
    
    VII. Electronic Commerce
    
        Consistent with the Declaration issued at the May 1998 WTO 
    Ministerial Conference, comments are also solicited with respect to the 
    commitment by WTO Members not to impose customs duties on electronic 
    commerce and agreement to establish a work program for further 
    consideration of the relationship between trade and electronic 
    commerce. The initial work program will be put in place by the General 
    Council's special session in September 1998. The United States has 
    proposed that the work program require the Councils on Goods, Services, 
    and the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property and the 
    Committee on Trade and Development, and request the Committee on 
    Government Procurement, to undertake work on electronic commerce. (The 
    U.S. proposal is available in the ``What's New'' section of USTR's 
    website, ``www.ustr.gov.'')
        Submission of Written Comments: Those persons wishing to submit 
    written comments should provide twenty (20) copies (in English) no 
    later than October 16, 1998, to Gloria Blue, Executive Secretary, Trade 
    Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade 
    Representative, Room 501, 600 17th Street Northwest, Washington, DC., 
    20508. Comments should state clearly the position taken and should 
    describe the specific information supporting that information.
        It the submission contains business confidential information, 
    twenty copies of a confidential version, and twenty copies of a public 
    version that does not contain confidential information, must be 
    submitted. A justification as to why the information contained in the 
    submission should be treated confidentially must be included in the 
    submission. In addition, any submissions containing business 
    confidential information must be clearly marked ``Confidential'' at the 
    top and bottom of the cover page (or letter) and each succeeding page 
    of the submission. The version that does not contain confidential 
    information should also be clearly marked, at the top and bottom of 
    each page, ``public version'' or ``non-confidential.''
        Written comments submitted in connection with this request, except 
    for information granted ``business confidential'' status pursuant to 15 
    CFR 2003.6, will be available for public inspection in the USTR Reading 
    Room, Room 101, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 
    17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. An appointment to review the file may 
    be made by calling Brenda Webb at (202) 395-6186. The Reading Room is 
    open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 12 noon, and from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. 
    Monday through Friday.
    Frederick L. Montgomery,
    Chairman, Trade Policy Staff Committee.
    [FR Doc. 98-22279 Filed 8-18-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/19/1998
Department:
Trade Representative, Office of United States
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-22279
Pages:
44500-44502 (3 pages)
PDF File:
98-22279.pdf