95-19012. Iron Construction Castings from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 148 (Wednesday, August 2, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 39359-39360]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-19012]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-570-502]
    
    
    Iron Construction Castings from the People's Republic of China: 
    Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
    Administrative Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In response to a request by the Municipal Castings Fair Trade 
    Counsel and its individually-named members, Alhambra Foundry, Inc., 
    Allegheny Foundry Co., Bingham & Taylor Division, Virginia Industries, 
    Inc., Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., 
    Inland Foundry Company, Inc., LeBaron Foundry Inc., Municipal Castings, 
    Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Opelika Foundry Co., Tyler Pipe Industries 
    Inc., U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., and Vulcan Foundry, Inc., the 
    Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative 
    review of the antidumping duty order on iron construction castings from 
    the People's Republic of China (PRC). The review covers one producer/
    exporter, the Liaoning Branch of the China National Machinery Import 
    and Export Corporation (MACHIMPEX, Liaoning) 
    
    [[Page 39360]]
    and entries of the subject merchandise into the United States during 
    the period May 1, 1993, through April 30, 1994. We have preliminarily 
    determined that a dumping margin exists for MACHIMPEX, Liaoning. The 
    Department based this margin on the best information available (BIA).
        Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
    results.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 2, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Maureen Flannery, 
    Office of Antidumping Compliance, Import Administration, International 
    Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
    4733.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On May 4, 1994, the Department published in the Federal Register 
    (59 FR 23051) a notice of ``Opportunity to Request an Administrative 
    Review'' of the antidumping duty order on iron construction castings 
    from the PRC (51 FR 17222 (May 9, 1986)). In accordance with 19 CFR 
    353.22(a)(1), the petitioner requested an administrative review for 
    MACHIMPEX, Liaoning. On June 15, 1994, the Department published a 
    notice of initiation of this review (59 FR 30770), covering the period 
    May 1, 1993, through April 30, 1994. The Department has now conducted 
    this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
    as amended (the Act).
    Scope of the Review
    
        The products covered by this review are iron construction castings, 
    limited to manhole covers, rings and frames; catch basin grates and 
    frames; cleanout covers and frames used for drainage or access purposes 
    for public utility, water, and sanitary systems; valve, service, and 
    meter boxes which are placed below ground to encase water, gas, or 
    other valves, or water or gas meters. These articles must be of cast 
    iron, not alloyed, and not malleable. Certain iron construction 
    castings are currently classifiable under numbers 7352.10.00.00 and 
    7325.10.00.50 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). The HTSUS item numbers are provided for convenience and 
    Customs purposes only. The written description remains dispositive as 
    to the scope of the order.
        This review covers sales of the subject merchandise manufactured by 
    MACHIMPEX, Liaoning and entered into the United States during the 
    period May 1, 1993, through April 30, 1994.
    
    Use of Best Information Available
    
        On July 27, 1994, the Department sent to the respondent, MACHIMPEX, 
    Liaoning, a questionnaire to determine whether it was eligible for a 
    separate rate in this review. On October 11, 1994, the Department sent 
    to the respondent a general antidumping questionnaire. Although we 
    established that the respondent received both questionnaires, 
    MACHIMPEX, Liaoning failed to respond to either questionnaire. The 
    Department therefore determines that MACHIMPEX, Liaoning is an 
    uncooperative respondent, and that the use of BIA is appropriate, in 
    accordance with section 776(c) of the Act. Whenever, as here, a company 
    refuses to cooperate with the Department, or otherwise significantly 
    impedes an antidumping proceeding, we use as BIA the higher of (1) the 
    highest of the rates found for any firm for the same class or kind of 
    merchandise in the same country of origin in the less-than-fair-value 
    (LTFV) investigation or in prior administrative reviews; or (2) the 
    highest rate found in this review for any firm for the same class or 
    kind of merchandise. (See Antifriction Bearings from France, et. al; 
    Final Results of Review, 58 FR 39729 (July 26, 1993).) As BIA, we have 
    assigned the rate of 92.74 percent, which is the highest rate found for 
    any iron construction casting producer from the prior reviews and the 
    LTFV investigation. Since MACHIMPEX, Liaoning did not respond to our 
    separate rates questionnaire, we have determined that we will not give 
    a separate rate to MACHIMPEX, Liaoning.
    
    Preliminary Results of Review
    
        We preliminarily determine that a margin of 92.74 percent exists 
    for MACHIMPEX, Liaoning for the period May 1, 1993 through April 30, 
    1994.
        Any interested party may request a hearing within 10 days of 
    publication of this notice. Any hearing will be held 44 days after the 
    date of publication of this notice, or the first workday thereafter. 
    Interested parties may submit case briefs within 30 days of the 
    publication date of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues 
    raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than 37 days after 
    the date of publication of this notice. The Department will publish a 
    notice of the final results of this administrative review, which will 
    include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any such case 
    briefs.
        The following deposit requirements shall be effective for all 
    shipments of the subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn 
    from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
    final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
    751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the reviewed 
    company, MACHIMPEX, Liaoning, shall be the rate established in the 
    final results of this review; (2) for Minmetals Guangdong, which 
    received a separate rate for the most recent period for which it was 
    reviewed, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
    specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all other 
    PRC exporters, the cash deposit rate will be 92.74 percent, the PRC 
    country-wide rate; and (4) for non-PRC exporters of the subject 
    merchandise from the PRC, the cash deposit rate will be the rate 
    applicable to the PRC supplier of that exporter.
        These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
    until publication of the final results of the next administrative 
    review.
        This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
    responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to file a certificate regarding the 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
    relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
    requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
    reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
    assessment of double antidumping duties.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and section 353.22 
    of the Department's regulations.
    
        Dated: July 26, 1995.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 95-19012 Filed 8-1-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/2/1995
Published:
08/02/1995
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
95-19012
Dates:
August 2, 1995.
Pages:
39359-39360 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-570-502
PDF File:
95-19012.pdf