96-19610. Oklahoma Regulatory Program  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 150 (Friday, August 2, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 40369-40371]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-19610]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
    
    30 CFR Part 936
    
    [SPATS No. OK-019-FOR]
    
    
    Oklahoma Regulatory Program
    
    AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 
    Interior.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public 
    hearing on proposed amendment.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the 
    Oklahoma regulatory program (hereinafter, the ``Oklahoma program'') 
    under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). 
    The proposed amendment consists of additions and revisions to 
    Oklahoma's regulations pertaining to repair or compensation for 
    material damage resulting from subsidence caused by underground coal 
    mining operations and to replacement of water supplies adversely 
    impacted by underground coal mining operations. The amendment is 
    intended to revise the Oklahoma program to be consistent with the 
    corresponding Federal regulations.
    
    DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t., 
    September 3, 1996. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed 
    amendment will be held on August 27, 1996. Requests to present oral 
    testimony at the hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on 
    August 19, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed or hand delivered to Jack 
    R. Carson, Acting Director, Tulsa Field Office at the address listed 
    below.
        Copies of the Oklahoma program, the proposed amendment, and all 
    written comments received in response to this document will be 
    available for public review at the addresses listed below during normal 
    business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Each 
    requester may receive on free copy of the proposed amendment by 
    contacting OSM's Tulsa Field Office.
    
    Jack R. Carson, Acting Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface 
    Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 470, 
    Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135-6547, Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
    Oklahoma Department of Mines, 4040 N. Lincoln Blvd., Suite 107, 
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105, Telephone: (404) 521-3859.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Jack R. Carson, Telephone (918) 581-6430.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background on the Oklahoma Program
    
        On January 19, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally 
    approved the Oklahoma program. General background information on the 
    Oklahoma program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition 
    of comments, and the conditions of approval of the Oklahoma program can 
    be found in the January 19, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 4902). 
    Subsequent actions concerning Oklahoma's program and program amendments 
    can be found at 30 CFR 936.15 and 936.16.
    
    II. Proposed Amendment
    
        By letter dated July 17, 1996, Oklahoma submitted a proposed 
    amendment to its program pursuant to SMCRA (Administrative Record No. 
    OK-975). Oklahoma submitted the proposed amendment in response to a May 
    20, 1996, letter that OSM sent to Oklahoma in accordance with 30 CFR 
    732.17(c). Oklahoma proposed to revise the Oklahoma Coal Rules and 
    Regulations at Oklahoma Administrative Code (OAC) 460:20-3-5, 
    definitions; OAC 460:20-31-7, hydrologic information; OAC 460:20-31-13, 
    subsidence control plan; OAC 460:20-45-8, hydrologic-balance 
    protection; and OAC 460:20-45-47, subsidence control. Specifically, 
    Oklahoma proposes the following additions and revisions to its 
    regulations.
    
    1. OAC 460:20-3-5  Definitions
    
        Oklahoma proposes to add definitions for the terms ``drinking, 
    domestic or residential water supply''; ``material damage''; ``non-
    commercial building''; and ``replacement of water supply.''
    
    2. OAC 460:20-31-7  Hydrologic Information
    
        Oklahoma proposes to add a new provision at OAC 460:20-31-
    7(e)(3)(D) that requires the PHC determination to include findings on 
    ``whether the underground mining activities conducted after October 24, 
    1992 may result in contamination, diminution or interruption of a well 
    or spring in existence at the time the permit application is submitted 
    and used for domestic, drinking, or residential purposes within the 
    permit or adjacent areas.''
    
    3. OAC 460:20-31-13  Subsidence Control Plan
    
        Oklahoma proposes to remove the existing introductory paragraph and 
    to replace it with new subsections (a) and (b). Paragraphs (a) (1) 
    through (3) contain requirements for an application to include a map, a 
    narrative, and a pre-subsidence survey indicating the location, type, 
    and condition of structures and renewable resource lands that 
    subsidence may materially damage or diminish in value and of drinking, 
    domestic, and residential water supplies that subsidence may 
    contaminate, diminish, or interrupt.
        Subsection (b) contains revised requirements for a subsidence 
    control plan. A new introductory paragraph provides that no further 
    information need be provided in the application if the survey conducted 
    under paragraph (a) shows that no structures; drinking,
    
    [[Page 40370]]
    
    domestic, or residential water supplies; or renewable resource lands 
    exist or that no material damage or diminution in value or reasonably 
    foreseeable use of such structures or lands and no contamination, 
    diminution, or interruption of such water supplies would occur as a 
    result of mine subsidence. The Department must agree with the 
    conclusion of the survey. A subsidence control plan is required if the 
    survey identifies the existence of structures, renewable resource 
    lands, or water supplies; if subsidence could cause material damage or 
    diminution in value or foreseeable use, or contamination, diminution, 
    or interruption of protected water supplies; or if the Department 
    determines that such damage or diminution could occur.
        The language in existing paragraph (7) was removed and new language 
    was added to require operators conducting operations that result in 
    planned and controlled subsidence to describe the subsidence control 
    measures they will use to minimize subsidence and subsidence-related 
    material damage to non-commercial buildings and occupied residential 
    dwellings and related structures; or to submit the written consent of 
    the owner of the structure or facility that minimization measures need 
    not be taken; or to demonstrate that the costs of minimizing damage to 
    these structures exceed the anticipated cost of repair and are not 
    needed to prevent a threat to health or safety.
        Existing paragraph (8) was redesignated paragraph (b)(9) and new 
    paragraph (b)(8) requires a description of the measures to be taken to 
    replace adversely affected protected water supplies or to mitigate or 
    remedy any subsidence-related material damage to protected land and 
    structures.
    
    4. OAC 460:20-45-8  Hydrologic-balance protection
    
        Oklahoma proposes to add new subsection (j) that requires the 
    permittee to replace any drinking, domestic or residential water supply 
    that is contaminated, diminished or interrupted by underground mining 
    activities conducted after October 24, 1992.
    
    5. OAC 460:20-45-47  Subsidence Control
    
        Oklahoma proposes to revise subsection (a) by adding the title 
    ``Operator measures to prevent or minimize damage''; by numbering the 
    existing provision (1); and by adding two new provisions. Paragraph 
    (a)(2) provides that if planned subsidence is used, the operator must 
    minimize material damage to the extent technologically and economically 
    feasible unless he has the written consent of the owners or the costs 
    would exceed the anticipated costs of repair. Paragraph (a)(3) provides 
    that the standard method of room-and-pillar mining is not prohibited.
        Oklahoma proposes to revise subsection (b) by adding the title 
    ``Operator compliance.''
        Oklahoma proposes to revise subsection (c) by adding the title 
    ``Repair of damage to surface lands''; by deleting the existing 
    language and adding new language in paragraph (2); and by adding new 
    paragraphs (3), (4), and (5). New paragraph (c)(2) requires the 
    operator to repair or compensate the owner for subsidence-related 
    material damage to non-commercial buildings or occupied residential 
    dwellings that existed at the time of mining.
        New paragraph (c)(3) provides for repair or compensation for 
    subsidence-related material damage to structures or facilities not 
    protected by paragraph (c)(2).
        New paragraph (c)(4)(A) provides that if damage to non-commercial 
    buildings or occupied residential dwellings and related structures 
    occurs as a result of earth movement within the area determined by 
    projecting a specified angle of draw from underground mine workings to 
    the surface, a rebuttable presumption exists that the permittee caused 
    the damage. The presumption will normally apply to a 30-degree angle of 
    draw. New paragraph (c)(4)(B) provides that the operator may request 
    that the presumption apply to a different site-specific angle of draw 
    based on a site-specific geotechnical analysis of the potential surface 
    impact of the mining operation that demonstrates that the proposed 
    angle of draw has a more reasonable basis than the one established in 
    the Oklahoma program. New paragraph (c)(4)(C) provides that no 
    rebuttable presumption will exist if the operator is denied access to 
    the land or property for the purpose of conducting a pre-subsidence 
    survey. New paragraph (c)(4)(D) provides for a rebuttal of presumption 
    under specified circumstances. New paragraph (c)(4)(E) provides that 
    all relevant and reasonably available information will be considered in 
    determining whether damage to protected structures was caused by 
    subsidence. New paragraph (c)(5) provides for an adjustment of bond 
    amount for subsidence-related material damage to protected land, 
    structures, or facilities and for contamination, diminution, or 
    interruption to a water supply. No additional bond is required if 
    repairs, compensation or replacement is completed within 90 days of the 
    occurrence of damage. Oklahoma may extend the 90-day time frame, not to 
    exceed one year, under specified circumstances.
    
    III. Public Comment Procedures
    
        In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is 
    seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the 
    applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment 
    is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Oklahoma program.
    
    Written Comments
    
        Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues 
    proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the 
    cementer's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated 
    under DATES or at locations other than the Tulsa Field Office will not 
    necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included in the 
    administrative record.
    
    Public Hearing
    
        Persons wishing to testify at the public hearing should contact the 
    person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., 
    c.d.t. on August 19, 1996. The location and time of the hearing will be 
    arranged with those persons requesting the hearing. Any disabled 
    individual who has need for a special accommodation to attend a public 
    hearing should contact the individual listed under FOR FURTHER 
    INFORMATION CONTACT. If no one requests an opportunity to testify at 
    the public hearing, the hearing will not be held.
        Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is 
    requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of 
    written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials 
    to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.
        The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all 
    persons scheduled to testify have been heard. Persons in the audience 
    who have not been scheduled to testify, and who wish to do so, will be 
    heard following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end 
    after all persons scheduled to testify and persons present in the 
    audience who wish to testify have been heard.
    
    Public Meeting
    
        If only one person requests an opportunity to testify at a hearing, 
    a public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons 
    wishing to meet with OSM representatives to
    
    [[Page 40371]]
    
    discuss the proposed amendment may request a meeting by contacting the 
    person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings 
    will be open to the public and, if possible, notices of meetings will 
    be posted at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. A written summary of 
    each meeting will be made a part of the administrative record.
    
    IV. Procedural Determinations
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and 
    Review).
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required 
    by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has 
    determined that this rule meets the applicable standards of subsections 
    (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are not 
    applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and 
    program amendments since each such program is drafted and promulgated 
    by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA 
    (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 
    732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory 
    programs and program amendments submitted by the States must be based 
    solely on a determination of whether the submittal is consistent with 
    SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and whether the other 
    requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since 
    section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency 
    decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not 
    constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section 
    102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
    4332(2)(C)).
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not contain information collection requirements that 
    require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
    3507 et seq.).
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    The State submittal that is the subject of this rule is based upon 
    counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was 
    prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a 
    significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small 
    entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements 
    previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In 
    making the determination as to whether this rule would have a 
    significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and 
    assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any 
    given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 936
    
        Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
    
        Dated: July 25, 1996.
    Deborah Watford,
    Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
    [FR Doc. 96-19610 Filed 8-1-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/02/1996
Department:
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Office
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public hearing on proposed amendment.
Document Number:
96-19610
Dates:
Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t., September 3, 1996. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed amendment will be held on August 27, 1996. Requests to present oral testimony at the hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m., c.d.t. on August 19, 1996.
Pages:
40369-40371 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
SPATS No. OK-019-FOR
PDF File:
96-19610.pdf
CFR: (1)
30 CFR 936