99-19630. DLA Acquisition Directive; Types of Contracts  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 147 (Monday, August 2, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 41834-41835]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-19630]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    Defense Logistics Agency
    
    48 CFR Part 5416
    
    
    DLA Acquisition Directive; Types of Contracts
    
    AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule adds a new part to the Defense Logistics Acquisition 
    Directive (DLAD) affecting regulations on the use of solicitation 
    provisions and contract clauses for Economic Price Adjustments (EPA). 
    The coverage expands the use of EPA based on market price references. 
    It also expands the use of EPA based on indexes, to encompass indexes 
    for products or services that are identical or similar to the end 
    products to be provided under the contract. It authorizes the 
    development and use, subject to established agency review and approval 
    procedures, of clauses using EPA references as described above. The 
    coverage ensures EPA references that more closely follow market prices, 
    are in conformance with commercial practice, and reduce price risk for 
    both the government and the contractor.
    
    DATES: Effective August 2, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Helen Bailey, Procurement Analyst, 
    Defense Logistics Agency, DLSC-PPP, at (703) 767-1374.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    [[Page 41835]]
    
    A. Background
    
        The Defense Energy Support Center (DESC), a major contracting 
    activity of DLA, has historically utilized a method of price adjustment 
    in the bulk petroleum area using price indexes for the same or similar 
    end products and using market price assessments for products published 
    in industry trade journals.
        None of the three EPA types currently encompassed by the FAR are 
    appropriate for many of the competitive procurements undertaken by DESC 
    and other DLA contracting offices. Currently, FAR 16.203 recognizes EPA 
    references based on established market or catalog prices of the 
    individual contractor only. The new DLAD coverage expands this to 
    include industry-wide and geographically specific market price 
    assessments, and authorizes the development and use of clauses on that 
    basis. FAR 16.203 also recognizes EPA references based only on indexes 
    for labor or material costs or indexes of such costs. The DLAD coverage 
    expands this to include indexes for the same or similar supplies, 
    services, or end items and authorizes the development and uses of 
    clauses on that basis.
        The uses of an EPA reference based on an individual contractor's 
    established price or cost of materials is impractical for various 
    competitive procurements. Unique EPA references for each offeror 
    engender relative price variations during the delivery period, making 
    it impossible to determine the most favorable offer at time of award. 
    This creates a significant price risk for the Government in periods 
    where the margins are shrinking and for the contractors in periods 
    where the margins are expanding. such fluctuations can be significant, 
    for example, in petroleum markets. A reference based on the same or 
    similar products as provided under the contract, results in a common 
    EPA reference for competing offerors and minimizes the price risk for 
    both the Government and the contractor.
        A proposed rule with request for comments was published in the 
    Federal Register.. (60 FR 10826, Feb. 28, 1995.) One respondent 
    submitted comments on the proposed rule. The respondent's comments were 
    considered in the development of the final rule. On October 5, 1995, 
    the Director, Defense Procurement, approved a permanent class deviation 
    for DLA to deviate from the requirements of FAR 16.203-1 and 16.203-
    4(a) when using fixed price contracts with economic price adjustments. 
    Under this deviation, DLA was authorized to include conforming language 
    in the DLA supplement.
        The final rule is the same as the proposed rule with one exception. 
    The second sentence in Subpart 5416.203-4, ``Contract clauses' of the 
    proposed rule, which states that ``established prices in such clauses 
    need not be verifiable using the criteria in 48 CFR (FAR) 15.804-3'' 
    was removed in the final rule. The criteria referred to were deleted 
    from the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) (10 U.S.C. 2306a.) when the 
    statute was recently revised. Accordingly, the revised and renumbered 
    FAR Part 15 no longer contains these criteria. Therefore, the language 
    has been removed from the final rule as it is no longer applicable.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The final rule does not have significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. An initial regulatory 
    flexibility analysis was not performed. The final rule does not 
    represent a change for small entities doing business with DLA. Comments 
    were requested concerning the effect of the proposed rule on small 
    entities in accordance with section 612 of the Act. No comments were 
    received.
    
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule does not impose any new reporting or record keeping 
    requirements that require the approval of OMB under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et 
    seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 5416
    
        Government procurement.
    
        For reasons set forth in the preamble, the Defense Logistics Agency 
    amends 48 CFR Chapter 54, by adding part 5416 to read as follows:
    
    PART 5416--TYPES OF CONTRACTS
    
    Subpart 5416.2--Fixed Price Contracts
    
    5416.203  Fixed-Price Contracts with Economic Price Adjustment
    5416.203-1  Description
    5416.203-3  Limitations
    5416.203-4  Contract Clauses
    
        Authority: Fixed Price Contracts
    
    
     4516.203  Fixed Price Contracts with Economic Price Adjustment
    
    
     4516.203-1  Description.
    
        (a)(S-90) Adjustments based on established prices. Established 
    prices may reflect industry-wide and/or geographically based market 
    price fluctuations for commodity groups, specific supplies or services, 
    or contract end items.
        (c)(S-90) Adjustments based on cost indexes of labor or materials. 
    These price adjustments may also be based on increases or decreases in 
    indexes for commodity groups, specific supplies or services, or 
    contract end items.
    
    
     4516.203-3  Limitations.
    
        (S-90) A fixed price contract with economic price adjustment may 
    also be used to provide for price adjustments authorized in this 
    section.
    
    
     4516.203-4  Contract clauses.
    
        (S-90) When the contracting officer determines that an existing EPA 
    clause is not appropriate, the contracting officer may develop and use 
    another EPA clause in accordance with 5416.203-1 (a)(S-90) or (c)(S-
    90). Established prices and cost indexes need not reflect changes in 
    the costs or established prices of a specific contractor. The 
    established price or cost index may be derived from sales prices in the 
    marketplace, quotes, or assessments as reported or made available in a 
    consistent manner in a publication, electronic database, or other form, 
    by an independent trade association, Governmental body, or other third 
    party independent of the contractor. More than one established price or 
    cost index may be combined in a formula for economic price adjustment 
    purposes in the absence of an appropriate single price or cost index.
    
        Dated: July 23, 1999.
    William J. Kenny,
    Executive Director, Procurement Management.
    [FR Doc. 99-19630 Filed 7-30-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3620-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/2/1999
Published:
08/02/1999
Department:
Defense Logistics Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-19630
Dates:
Effective August 2, 1999.
Pages:
41834-41835 (2 pages)
PDF File:
99-19630.pdf
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 5416