[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 147 (Monday, August 2, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41944-41945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-19786]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Public
Hearing; Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the draft environmental impact
statement for access to Spruce Creek; Notice of public hearings for
access to inholding, and notice of significant restriction to
subsistence use, Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) and subsistence evaluation
on a request for access to an inholding, Spruce #4, in the Kantishna
Hills of Denali National Park and Preserve. The document describes and
analyzes the environmental effects of the applicants' proposed access
and three other alternatives for access. The no-action alternative also
is evaluated. The subsistence evaluation includes a description and
analysis of impacts on subsistence uses and needs. This notice
announces the dates and locations of public hearings: (1) to solicit
comments on the draft EIS; (2) as required by section 810 of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) for an action that
may significantly restrict subsistence uses, and; (3) as required by
ANILCA Title XI regulations at 43 CFR 36.6 (a) (4) and 36.10 (d).
DATES: Comments on the draft EIS and subsistence evaluation must be
received no later than September 30, 1999. Hearing locations, dates,
and times are listed under Supplementary Information below.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the draft EIS and subsistence evaluation should
be submitted to the Superintendent, Denali National Park and Preserve,
Post Office Box 9, Denali Park, Alaska 99755. Comments also can be sent
by email to: [email protected] Copies of the draft EIS and subsistence
evaluation and a 15-page Executive Summary of the draft EIS are
available by request from the aforementioned address. The documents
also are available on the web at: www.nps.gov/dena/plans/sprucecreek.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bud Rice, EIS Project Leader, National
Park Service, Alaska Support Office, Anchorage, Alaska. Telephone:
(907) 257-2466.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Pub. L. 91-190, as amended),
the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (Pub. L.
96-487, as amended), and 43 CFR 36.6 and
36.10 (d), the National Park Service has prepared a draft EIS and
subsistence evaluation for requested access to an inholding, Spruce #4,
in Denali National Park and Preserve, Alaska. ANILCA requires the
Secretary of Interior shall provide adequate and feasible access for
economic and other purposes to inholdings surrounded by conservation
system units in Alaska, subject to reasonable regulations. The
regulations at 43 CFR part 36, ``Access into Conservation System Units
in Alaska,'' specify that the NPS shall permit the right-of-way
requested by the applicant unless it finds that the route or method of
access would cause significant adverse impacts, jeopardize public
health and safety, be inconsistent with the management plans for and
purposes of the area, or is unnecessary to accomplish the applicant's
land use objective. If the NPS makes one of these
[[Page 41945]]
findings, then another alternative route or method of access shall be
specified that provides adequate and feasible access. The NPS has
analyzed alternatives to the proposal and mitigating measures to
minimize adverse environmental impacts to the park, but no agency-
preferred alternative has been identified in the draft EIS. Section 810
of ANILCA requires an evaluation of ``effect of the proposed permit on
subsistence uses and needs, the availability of other lands for the
purposes sought to be achieved, and other alternatives which would
reduce or eliminate the use, occupancy, or deposition of public lands
needed for subsistence purposes.'' Notice to subsistence committees and
regional councils and a hearing are required steps for authorizing a
federal land use that would significantly restrict subsistence uses.
Two of the draft EIS alternatives would significantly restrict
subsistence uses.
Informational meetings and public hearings on the draft EIS and
subsistence evaluation are scheduled for the locations, dates, and
times indicated below:
Anchorage, AL
August 23, 1999, 7-10 p.m.; University of Alaska--Anchorage, Business
Education Building, Room BEB-101.
Fairbanks, AL
August 24, 1999, 7-10 p.m.; Noel Wien Library Auditorium; 1215 Cowles
Street.
McKinley Village, AL
August 25, 1999, 7-10 p.m.; Community Center; Mile 230 George Parks
Highway.
Kantishna, AL
August 26, 1999, 9-11 p.m.; Kantishna Roadhouse library; Mile 90 Denali
Park Road.
Washington, DC
September 14, 1999, 2-4 p.m.; Main Interior Building Auditorium; 1849 C
Street NW.
The first hour of each meeting will be an open house format.
Representatives of the NPS will be available to provide information
about the access request and the draft EIS and to answer questions in
an informal setting. Public testimony on the draft EIS and subsistence
evaluation will be recorded at the public hearing that will begin at
the second hour.
Background
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Access to Spruce Creek
considers an access proposal and four alternatives to a 20-acre
inholding on Spruce Creek in the Kantishna Hills of Denali National
Park and Preserve. The inholding lies about 10 miles east of mile 88 of
the Denali Park Road. The owners have applied to the NPS for a right-
of-way permit to upgrade and maintain a gravel road and airstrip to
access, construct, and operate a remote lodge with 30 double-occupancy
cabins for overnight visitors. The draft EIS alternatives differ in
terms of route, means, or a combination of both, as well as impact on
subsistence. The requested access and four alternatives are proximate
to but outside of the Denali Wilderness Area.
The proposed Moose Creek Route Alternative (the applicants'
proposed action) would be approximately a 10-mile improved road over an
existing mining access route, where practical, from the Denali Park
Road at mile 88 to the Spruce #4 parcel of land. This alternative
includes a spur road to an extension of the Glen Creek landing strip
for air access in winter and for optional summer access. This route
would cross Moose Creek, Spruce Creek, and other streams a total of 30
times in the form of fords. This alternative would result in a
significant restriction of subsistence uses.
Alternatives to the proposed action are:
North Bench Route Alternative would follow the first three
miles of the Moose Creek route. This 9.7-mile route would cross Moose
Creek with a new bridge and then traverse benches north of Moose Creek
to Spruce #4, crossing Rainy, Dry, and Glen Creeks once each with a
reinforced ford. About 5 miles of new road and extension of the Glen
Creek landing strip would need to be constructed. This alternative
would result in a significant restriction of subsistence uses.
Skyline Drive Alternative would follow a ridge-top mining
access route from mile 91 of the Denali Park Road to Glen Creek and
over a bench to Spruce Creek. This 12-mile route would follow 10 miles
of existing mining access routes, require 2 miles of new road, and ford
Glen Creek 24 times. The existing Kantishna Airstrip would be used as
needed for air access. This alternative would not result in a
significant restriction of subsistence uses.
Air-Access-Only Alternative would require a 2,500-foot new
airstrip adjacent to the Spruce #4 parcel of land with a short spur
road. This alternative would not result in a significant restriction of
subsistence uses.
No-Action Alternative represents no change from the
current management direction. This alternative is included for
comparative purposes. The affirmative requirements of Title XI of
ANILCA and its implementing regulations preclude selection of this
alternative absent a change in circumstances. Those circumstances could
include acquisition of the property by the NPS or withdrawal of the
application. In the meantime, the applicants could apply for access
with no road or airstrip improvements. This alternative would not
result in a significant restriction of subsistence uses.
Facilities common to each action alternative would include a lodge
with 30 cabins and related utility, maintenance, and staff facilities.
Guests would be transported to the lodge by the park Visitor Transport
System buses to Kantishna and from there by two 15-passenger vans or by
single engine aircraft. About 30 guests would be transported in and out
of the lodge each day during the summer season, and in the winter
season about 10 people would be transported in and out of the lodge
once every 3 days. Recreational activities would include hiking,
wildlife viewing, gold panning, sport fishing, dog mushing, skiing, and
snowshoeing. About 13 people would be employed during the winter season
and 17 to 21 people during the summer season.
Paul R. Anderson,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 99-19786 Filed 7-30-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
