02-19562. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Oklawaha River, Marion County, FL  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Coast Guard, DOT.

    ACTION:

    Final rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Coast Guard is changing the regulations governing the operation of the Muclan Farms swingbridge across the Oklawaha River, mile 63.9, Marion County, Florida by allowing the span to remain permanently in the closed position. The bridge has not received a request for an opening since 1998. This action will accommodate the needs of the bridge owner and provide for the reasonable needs of navigation.

    DATES:

    This rule is effective September 3, 2002.

    Start Printed Page 50350

    ADDRESSES:

    Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket, are part of docket [CGD07-02-008] and are available for inspection or copying at Commander (obr) Seventh Coast Guard District, 909 SE 1st Ave., Miami, FL 33131 between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Mr. Barry Dragon, Project Manager, Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch, (305) 415-6743.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Regulatory Information

    On March 26, 2002 we published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled “Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Oklawaha River, Marion County, Fla” in the Federal Register (67 FR 13736). We did not receive any comments on the proposed rule. No public hearing was requested, and none was held.

    Background and Purpose

    The Muclan Farms swingbridge is located in a rural section of Marion County. The current regulations in 33 CFR 117.319 require the swingbridge to open if three hours advance notice is given to the St. Johns River Water Management District. The Water Management District has not received any requests for an opening since 1998. The Water Management District requested the Coast Guard change the current regulation to allow the bridge to remain closed.

    Discussion of Comments and Changes

    We received no comments on this proposed rule. No changes were made to the proposed rule.

    Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not “significant” under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040, February 26, 1979).

    The economic impact of this rule will be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary because there have been no requests for a bridge opening since 1998.

    Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term “small entities” comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.

    This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels on the Oklawaha River intending to transit through the Muclan Farms swingbridge. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because no one has requested a bridge opening since 1998 and no comments were received in response to the NPRM.

    Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).

    Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

    Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.

    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Although this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

    Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.

    Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

    Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children.

    Environment

    We have considered the environmental impact of this rule and concluded that under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, this rule is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation.

    Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

    Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a “significant Start Printed Page 50351energy action” under that order because it is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It has not been designated by the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

    Start List of Subjects

    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    • Bridges
    End List of Subjects Start Amendment Part

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR Part 117 as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Part

    PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

    End Part Start Amendment Part

    1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part Start Authority

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Section 117.255 also issued under authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.

    End Authority Start Amendment Part

    2. In section § 117.319, revise paragraph (a) and add paragraph (c) to read as follows:

    End Amendment Part
    Oklawaha River.

    (a) The draw of the Sharpes Ferry (SR 40) bridge, mile 55.1 shall open on signal if at least three hours notice is given.

    * * * * *

    (c) The draw of the Muclan Farms bridge, mile 63.9, need not open for the passage of vessels.

    Start Signature

    Dated: July 19, 2002.

    J.S. Carmichael,

    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 02-19562 Filed 8-1-02; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/3/2002
Published:
08/02/2002
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
02-19562
Dates:
This rule is effective September 3, 2002.
Pages:
50349-50351 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD07-02-008
RINs:
2115-AE47: Drawbridge Regulations
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AE47/drawbridge-regulations
Topics:
Bridges
PDF File:
02-19562.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.319