97-22052. Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determinations Concerning Federal Circuit Remand Question and Respondents' Motion To Show Cause and Petition for Rescission of Limited Exclusion Order  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44291-44292]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-22052]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
    
    [Inv. No. 337-TA-376]
    
    
    Certain Variable Speed Wind Turbines and Components Thereof; 
    Notice of Commission Determinations Concerning Federal Circuit Remand 
    Question and Respondents' Motion To Show Cause and Petition for 
    Rescission of Limited Exclusion Order
    
    AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, in response to an order issued by 
    the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``the Federal 
    Circuit'') on April 24, 1997 (the ``remand order''), the U.S. 
    International Trade Commission determined that the requirement of 
    section 337(a)(3), 19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337(a)(3), regarding the presence of 
    a domestic industry is satisfied by the domestic activities of Zond and 
    the domestic activities of the companies licensed by Zond to practice 
    the invention of claim 131 of U.S. Letters Patent 5,083,039.
    
    [[Page 44292]]
    
    Thus, the Commission determined that, by virtue of its ownership of the 
    `039 patent and its licensing of significant domestic activities 
    practicing that patent, Zond is part of the domestic industry. The 
    Commission also determined that further proceedings are not necessary 
    to resolve any factual issues presented by the question posed by the 
    Court on remand, and to deny respondents' motion to show cause and 
    their petition to rescind the limited exclusion order. The Commission 
    will issue an opinion shortly concerning these issues.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of the 
    GeneralCounsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202-205-
    3116.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This patent-based section 337 investigation 
    was conducted by the Commission in 1995 and 1996 based on a complaint 
    filed by Kenetech Windpower, Inc., of Livermore, California 
    (``Kenetech'') to determine whether there was a violation of section 
    337 in the importation, sale for importation, and/or the sale within 
    the United States after importation, of certain variable speed wind 
    turbines and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 131 
    of U.S. Letters Patent 5,083,039 (``the `039 patent'') and claim 51 of 
    U.S. Letters Patent 5,225,712 (``the `712 patent''), both owned by 
    Kenetech. Enercon GmbH of Aurich, Germany (``Enercon'') and The New 
    World Power Corporation of Lime Rock, Connecticut were named as 
    respondents (collectively ``respondents''). The Commission found a 
    violation of section 337 had occurred and issued a limited exclusion 
    order. Because Kenetech had filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of 
    theU.S. Bankruptcy Act by the time the exclusion order was issued, and 
    had by then ceased manufacturing wind turbines, the Commission required 
    Kenetech to submit quarterly reports detailing its domestic activities 
    exploiting the `039 patent.
        After the President declined to disapprove the Commission's 
    determination, Enercon appealed to the Federal Circuit. Subsequently, 
    in its March 31, 1997, quarterly report, Kenetech informed the 
    Commission that it had sold the `039 patent to Zond Energy Systems, 
    Incorporated (``Zond''). That quarterly report states that Kenetech 
    continues to exploit the `039 patent, apparently under license from 
    Zond.
        Before any briefs were submitted in the appeal, but after the time 
    for filing a motion to intervene had expired, Zond moved to intervene, 
    asserting that it had standing to intervene based on its ownership of 
    the patent in issue. Enercon opposed Zond's intervention, arguing that 
    Zond must first show that it qualifies as a domestic industry under 
    section 337 in order to enter an appearance in the appeal, and that 
    Zond had failed to show it had the requisite standing to participate in 
    the appeal. On April 24, 1997, the Federal Circuit issued an order 
    remanding the case to the Commission for the Commission to determine in 
    the first instance: (1) ``whether Zond should be substituted for 
    Kenetech;'' and (2) ``whether Zond qualifies as a domestic industry.''
        The Commission reopened this investigation, reinstated the 
    protective order issued in this investigation, and requested comments 
    from the parties' counsel on the questions posed by the Federal Circuit 
    remand. On June 12, 1997, Zond filed a motion to intervene in this 
    investigation. On July 8, 1997, the Commission issued an order 
    permitting Zond to intervene in the remand proceeding as a co-
    complainant. Zond's motion effectively presented the Commission with 
    the same issue posed by the Federal Circuit's first remand question. 
    The Commission has concluded that its decision on the motion to 
    intervene is equally applicable to the first remand issue. Thus, in 
    response to the first of the Federal Circuit's remand questions, the 
    Commission has determined that, rather than substituting Zond for 
    Kenetech, Zond should be permitted to intervene as a co-complainant. 
    See Order Granting Motion to Intervene of Patent Owner Zond Energy 
    Systems, Inc. (July 8, 1997).
        On June 16, 1997, respondents and the Commission investigative 
    attorney (``IA'') filed comments on the remand issues, and on June 23, 
    1997, all parties filed reply comments.
        On June 27, 1997, respondents filed a motion for an order to show 
    cause why the law firm of Howrey & Simon should not be deemed 
    continuing counsel to Kenetech. Howrey & Simon and the IA subsequently 
    responded to that motion. On July 9, 1997, Howrey & Simon filed a 
    notice of withdrawal as counsel to Kenetech.
        On July 2, 1997, respondents filed a petition under Commission rule 
    210.76(a)(2) seeking rescission of the exclusion order issued by the 
    Commission on August 30, 1996. Both Zond and the IA filed responses in 
    opposition to that petition.
        Copies of the Commission's order, the public version of the opinion 
    in support of that order and all other nonconfidential documents filed 
    in connection with this investigation are or will be available for 
    inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in 
    the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
    Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-
    impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be 
    obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810.
        This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
    Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 1337), and section 
    210.76 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 C.F.R. 
    Sec. 210.76).
    
        Issued: August 11, 1997.
    
        By order of the Commission.
    Donna R. Koehnke,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 97-22052 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/20/1997
Department:
International Trade Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
97-22052
Pages:
44291-44292 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Inv. No. 337-TA-376
PDF File:
97-22052.pdf