-
Start Preamble
Start Printed Page 43810
AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend its regulations revising the Westinghouse MC-10 cask system listing within the “List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks” terminating Certificate of Compliance Number 1001 as requested by the Westinghouse Government Environmental Services Company.
DATES:
Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before September 20, 2001.
ADDRESSES:
Submit comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
Deliver comments to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
Certain documents related to this rulemaking, as well as all public comments received on this rulemaking, may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the NRC's rulemaking website at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov. You may also provide comments via this website by uploading comments as files (any format) if your web browser supports that function. For information about the interactive rulemaking site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher, (301) 415-5905; e-mail CAG@nrc.gov.
Certain documents related to this rule, including comments received by the NRC, may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. Documents created or received at the NRC after November 1, 1999, are also available electronically at the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html. From this site, the public can gain entry into the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayne McCausland, telephone (301) 415-6219, e-mail, jmm2@nrc.gov of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For additional information see the Direct Final Rule published in the final rules section of this Federal Register.
Procedural Background
This rule is limited to the removal of CoC No. 1001 from § 72.214 and does not include other aspects of the Westinghouse MC-10 cask system design. The NRC is using the “direct final rule procedure” to promulgate this removal because it represents a change to an existing CoC that is expected to be noncontroversial. Adequate protection of public health and safety continues to be ensured.
Because NRC considers this action noncontroversial and routine, we are publishing this proposed rule concurrently with a direct final rule. The direct final rule will become effective on November 5, 2001. However, if the NRC receives significant adverse comments on the direct final rule by September 20, 2001, then the NRC will publish a document to withdraw the direct final rule. A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For example, in a substantive response:
(a) The comment causes the staff to reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a substantive response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously addressed or considered by the staff.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without incorporation of the change or addition.
These comments will be addressed in a subsequent final rule. The NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action.
Start List of SubjectsList of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 72
- Administrative practice and procedure
- Criminal penalties
- Manpower training programs
- Nuclear materials
- Occupational safety and health
- Penalties
- Radiation protection
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Security measures
- Spent fuel
- Whistleblowing
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553; the NRC is proposing to adopt the following amendments to 10 CFR Part 72.
Start PartPART 72—LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE
1. The authority citation for Part 72 continues to read as follows:
Start SignatureDated at Rockville, Maryland, this 6th day of August, 2001.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.William D. Travers,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 01-20994 Filed 8-20-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Document Information
- Published:
- 08/21/2001
- Department:
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Entry Type:
- Proposed Rule
- Action:
- Proposed rule.
- Document Number:
- 01-20994
- Dates:
- Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before September 20, 2001.
- Pages:
- 43810-43811 (2 pages)
- RINs:
- 3150-AG82
- Topics:
- Administrative practice and procedure, Manpower training programs, Nuclear materials, Occupational safety and health, Penalties, Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Whistleblowing
- PDF File:
- 01-20994.pdf
- CFR: (1)
- 10 CFR 72.214