95-20746. Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2); Exemption  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 22, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 43622-43624]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20746]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353]
    
    
    Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (Susquehanna Steam Electric 
    Station, Units 1 and 2); Exemption
    
    I
    
        Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (the licensee), is the holder 
    of Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-14 and NPF-22, which authorize 
    operation of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 
    2. The licenses provide, among other things, that the licensee is 
    subject to all rules, regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission (the Commission) now and hereafter in effect. The facilities 
    consist of two boiling water reactors located in Luzerne County, 
    Pennsylvania.
    
    II
    
        Section 50.54(o) of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that primary reactor 
    containments for water cooled power reactors be subject to the 
    requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50. Appendix J contains the 
    leakage test requirements, schedules, and acceptance criteria for tests 
    of the leak tight integrity of the primary reactor containment and 
    systems and components which penetrate the containment. Sections II.H.4 
    and III.C.2(a) of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50 require leak rate 
    testing of Main Steam Isolation Valves (MSIVs) at the calculated peak 
    containment pressure related to the design basis accident, and Section 
    III.C.3 requires that the measured leak rates be included in the 
    combined local leak rate test results. The proposed deletion of the 
    MSIV Leakage Control System (LCS), and proposed use of an alternate 
    leakage pathway affects the description of an existing exemption which 
    allows the leak rate testing of the MSIVs at a reduced pressure and the 
    exclusion of 
    
    [[Page 43623]]
    the measured leakage from the combined local leak rate test results. 
    The original exemption is contained in the SSES Safety Evaluation 
    Report (SER) (NUREG-0776).
        By letter dated February 21, 1995, the licensee requested an 
    exemption from the Commission's regulations. The subject exemption is 
    from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, ``Primary Reactor 
    Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors,'' Sections 
    II.H.4, III.C.2(a), and III.C.3, to allow alternative testing pressure 
    and leakage limits for the MSIVs and to exclude MSIV leakage from the 
    combined local leak rate test results after deletion of the LCS.
        The staff issued for SSES, Units 1 and 2, the current exemption 
    from 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix J, Sections II.H.4, III.C.2(a), and 
    III.C.3, based on the conclusion that the SSES, Units 1 and 2, MSIV 
    leak testing methods were acceptable alternatives to the requirements. 
    This conclusion was included in the SSES SER (NUREG-0776). The SER also 
    described that in the event of a loss-of-coolant-accident (LOCA), the 
    MSIV LCS will maintain a negative pressure between the MSIV and the 
    effluent will be discharged into a volume where it will be processed by 
    the standby gas treatment system before being released to the 
    environment. The licensee had performed a radiological analysis based 
    on an assumed leak rate limit of 11.5 standard cubic feet per hour 
    (scfh), and the MSIVs were planned to be periodically tested to ensure 
    the validity of the radiological analysis. The staff concluded that the 
    current SSES testing procedure, where two valves on one steam line are 
    tested simultaneously, between the valves, utilizing a reduced test 
    pressure (i.e., half the peak containment pressure of 22.5 psig applied 
    between the MSIVs) was acceptable. Also, the staff excluded the MSIV 
    test leakage rate from the combined local leak rate because the MSIV 
    leakage had been accounted for separately in the radiological analysis 
    of the site.
        By letter dated November 21, 1994, the licensee submitted a 
    Technical Specifications (TS) amendment request for SSES, Units 1 and 
    2, which supports the planned modification to eliminate the MSIV LCS 
    and utilize an alternate leakage pathway (main steam lines and 
    condenser). This proposal is based on the Boiling Water Reactor Owners 
    Group (BWROG) method summarized in General Electric Report NEDC-31858P, 
    Revision 2, ``BWROG Report for increasing MSIV Leakage Rate Limits and 
    Elimination of Leakage Control System.'' Therefore, the description of 
    the MSIV LCS and the assumed MSIV leak rate are no longer accurate once 
    the proposed TS modification is performed and implemented.
        The licensee's November 21, 1994, TS (amendment) request states 
    that a plant-specific radiological analysis has been performed in 
    accordance with NEDC-31858P, Revision 2, to assess the effects of the 
    proposed increase to the allowable MSIV leakage rate in terms of Main 
    Control Room (MCR) and off-site doses following a postulated design 
    basis LOCA. This analysis utilizes the hold-up volume of the main steam 
    piping and condenser as an alternate method for treating MSIV leakage. 
    The radiological analysis uses standard conservative assumptions for 
    the radiological source term consistent with Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.3, 
    ``Assumptions Used for Evaluating the Potential Radiological 
    Consequences of a Loss-of-Coolant-Accident for Boiling Water 
    Reactors,'' Revision 2, dated June 1974. The analysis results 
    demonstrate that dose contributions from the proposed MSIV leakage rate 
    limit of 100 scfh per MSIV, not to exceed 300 scfh for all four main 
    steam lines, and considering the proposed deletion of the MSIV LCS, 
    result in an acceptable increase to the LOCA doses previously evaluated 
    against the regulatory limits for the off-site doses and MCR doses 
    contained in 10 CFR Part 100, and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General 
    Design Criteria (GDC) 19, respectively. The proposed calculated off-
    site and MCR doses resulting from a LOCA are the sum of the LOCA doses 
    previously evaluated (currently described in the Updated Final Safety 
    Analysis Report), and the additional doses calculated using the 
    alternate MSIV leakage treatment method. The method of calculating the 
    revised doses is conservative, since the LOCA doses previously 
    evaluated already include dose contributions from MSIV leakage at the 
    maximum leakage rate currently permitted by the TS. Appendix 2 of 
    Attachment 3 of the January 14, 1994, submittal shows the previously 
    calculated doses and the new calculated doses resulting from the 
    proposed changes.
        The staff concluded that the current exemption was acceptable based 
    on: the method of MSIV testing (i.e., 22.5 psig test pressure when 
    applied between MSIVs on a single steam line); a radiological analysis 
    that assumed a 11.5 scfh MSIV leak rate, and the licensee's commitment 
    that the MSIVs would be periodically tested to ensure the validity of 
    the radiological analysis (i.e., verify that the MSIV leakage rate 
    during testing is accounted for separately in the radiological analysis 
    of the site). The proposed changes do not affect the bases for the 
    current exemption. The modification and implementing TS change request: 
    will not alter the procedure method of MSIV testing (i.e., test 
    pressure will remain at 22.5 psig when applied between MSIVs) and are 
    based on the results of a radiological analysis where the proposed 
    leakage rate and the resulting doses are still within regulatory 
    limits. Also, the MSIVs will be periodically tested to assure the 
    validity of the analysis (i.e., verify that the proposed MSIV leakage 
    rate assumed in the radiological analysis is not exceeded per proposed 
    TS 3.6.1.2.c), and the MSIV leakage will still be accounted for 
    separately in the radiological analysis of the site.
        For the reasons set forth above, the NRC staff concludes that there 
    is reasonable assurance that: the current MSIV leak testing method 
    (i.e., test pressure of 22.5 psig when applied between MSIV) is an 
    acceptable method; the proposed alternate MSIV leakage pathway (main 
    steam lines and condenser), and the calculated doses obtained by 
    performing radiological analysis (calculated using an MSIV leakage rate 
    limit of 100 scfh per MSIV not to exceed 300 scfh for all four main 
    steam lines) are within the limits of 10 CFR Part 100 and GDC-19. The 
    staff finds it acceptable to continue to exclude the measured MSIV 
    leakage rate from the combined local rate, since the leakage is 
    accounted for separately and continues to meet the underlying purpose 
    of the rule. Therefore, the staff finds the requested exemption 
    presented in the licensee's February 21, 1995, submittal acceptable.
    
    III
    
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the Commission may, upon application by 
    any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from 
    the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 when (1) the exemptions are 
    authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to public health and 
    safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; and 
    (2) when special circumstances are present. Special circumstances are 
    present whenever, according to 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii), ``Application of 
    the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the 
    underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the 
    underlying purpose of the rule * * *.''
        The underlying purpose of the rule is to assure that the total 
    valve leakage is within the limits of 10 CFR Part 100 and 
    
    [[Page 43624]]
    GDC-19. The licensee's analysis has demonstrated that an adequate 
    margin can be maintained even if leakage from the MSIV is considered 
    separately and subject to a leakage restriction of 100 scfh per MSIV, 
    not to exceed a total of 300 scfh for all four main steam lines.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
    Part 50.12, an exemption is authorized by law and will not present an 
    undue risk to the public health and safety, and that there are special 
    circumstances present, as specified in 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2). An exemption 
    is hereby granted from the requirements of Sections II.H.4, III.C.2(a), 
    and III.C.3 of Appendix J to 10 CFR Part 50. The exemption allows (1) 
    leakage testing of the MSIVs after deletion of the LCS, using a test 
    pressure of 22.5 psig applied between MSIVs and a leakage rate limit of 
    100 scfh per MSIV, not to exceed 300 scfh for all main steam lines, and 
    (2) exclusion of the measured MSIV leakage rate from the combined local 
    leak rate.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the Commission has determined that the 
    granting of this exemption will have no significant impact on the 
    quality of the human environment (60 FR 42192).
        This exemption is effective upon issuance and will be implemented 
    prior to startup of Cycle 7 for SSES, Unit 2, and prior to startup of 
    Cycle 9 for SSES, Unit 1.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 15th day of August 1995.
    
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Steven A. Varga,
    Director, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 95-20746 Filed 8-21-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/22/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-20746
Pages:
43622-43624 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353
PDF File:
95-20746.pdf