97-22332. Census Designated Place (CDP) Program for Census 2000Final Criteria  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44638-44641]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-22332]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    Bureau of the Census
    [Docket No. 970728183-7183-01]
    
    
    Census Designated Place (CDP) Program for Census 2000--Final 
    Criteria
    
    AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final program.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Census designated places (CDPs) are statistical geographic 
    entities, defined for each decennial census, consisting of a closely 
    settled, locally recognized concentration of population that is 
    identified by name. The Census Bureau uses CDPs to tabulate and publish 
    data for localities that otherwise would not be identified as places in 
    the decennial census data products.
        Although not as numerous as incorporated places, CDPs have been 
    important geographic entities since the Census Bureau first introduced 
    them for the 1950 census. In 1990, more than 29 million people in the 
    United States lived in CDPs. To determine the inventory of CDPs, the 
    Census Bureau offers a program to local participants, such as American 
    Indian tribal officials and locally identified agencies, whereby they 
    can review and update the geographic definition of CDPs defined during 
    the previous census and suggest new CDPs according to criteria 
    developed and promulgated by the Census Bureau. The Census Bureau then 
    reviews the resulting CDP delineations for conformance to these 
    criteria. The Census Bureau does not take into account nor attempt to 
    anticipate any nonstatistical uses that may be made of CDPs, nor will 
    the Census Bureau modify the definition of CDPs to meet the 
    requirements of any nonstatistical program.
        The Census Bureau is publishing final criteria for the delineation 
    of CDPs for Census 2000. These criteria will apply to the 50 states, 
    American Indian and Alaska Native areas, Puerto Rico, and all other 
    Island Areas in Census 2000 except American Samoa.1 The 
    Census Bureau may modify, or, if necessary, reject any CDP that does 
    not meet the criteria announced in this notice. The Census Bureau also 
    may define CDPs in instances where clear evidence of a place exists, 
    but for which local officials did not submit boundaries.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ There are no CDPs in American Samoa because incorporated 
    villages cover its entire territory and population.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition to the criteria, this notice includes a description of 
    the changes from the previous criteria and a list of definitions of key 
    terms used in the criteria.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The CDP criteria for Census 2000 become effective 
    September 22, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Joel Morrison, Chief, Geography 
    Division, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC 20233-7400, telephone 
    (301) 457-1132, or e-mail (jmorrison@geo.census.gov).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CDP delineation criteria have evolved 
    over the decades in response to census practices and the preferences of 
    data users. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau, in 
    consultation with data users, reviews and revises these criteria. Then, 
    before the next decennial census, the Census Bureau offers state, 
    tribal, and local officials an opportunity to correct, update, and 
    otherwise improve the universe of CDPs.
        In July and August 1995, the Census Bureau issued invitations to 
    local groups and agencies to participate in the delineation of 
    statistical geographic entities for Census 2000. These included 
    regional planning agencies, councils of governments, county planning 
    agencies, officials of American Indian tribes, and officials of the 12 
    nonprofit Alaska Native Regional Corporations.
        By early 1998, the Census Bureau will provide program participants 
    with maps and detailed guidelines for delineating CDPs for Census 2000.
    
    Response To Comments
    
        The Census Bureau issued a Notice of Proposed Program and Request 
    for Comments in the Federal Register (61 FR 29524) on Tuesday, June 11, 
    1996. That notice solicited comments on the proposed criteria changes 
    for delineating CDPs for Census 2000. The Census Bureau received 
    comments from eight individuals, including academic geographers; 
    representatives of governmental agencies at the Federal, state, and 
    local levels; a private consultant; and a representative of a public 
    interest group. All comments pertained to the minimum population 
    threshold for qualification as a CDP. Specific recommendations for 
    minimum thresholds varied from 100 to 500 residents, but all agreed 
    that the proposed minimum threshold of 1,000 residents for CDPs located 
    outside urbanized areas (UAs) was too high for most rural communities 
    to qualify for recognition.
        Upon further analysis, the Census Bureau determined that it could 
    no longer conceptually support the maintenance of specific population 
    thresholds for CDP qualification and, accordingly, has eliminated 
    population as a criterion for qualification. This change will enhance 
    the Census Bureau's ability to provide data relating to a wide variety 
    of unincorporated places, especially in small rural communities, 
    throughout the United States, about which previous censuses are mute.
    
    [[Page 44639]]
    
    Classification
    
        This notice was determined to be not significant for purposes of 
    Executive Order 12866.
        The Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation, 
    Department of Commerce, certified to the Chief Counsel, Small Business 
    Administration, that this notice will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. The notice sets forth 
    the criteria for the delineation of Census Designated Places (CDPs). 
    The criteria will be used to determine geographic boundaries for 
    collecting data for Census 2000. The Census Bureau uses CDPs to 
    tabulate and publish data for localities that otherwise would not be 
    identified as places in the decennial census data products. Thus, 
    because the delineation of CDPs is solely for statistical purposes to 
    enable the Census Bureau to tabulate and publish data for Census 2000, 
    it will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities.
    
    Final Program Requirements
    
    A. Criteria for Delineating CDPs for Census 2000
    
        The Census Bureau announces the following criteria for use in 
    determining the areas which will qualify for designation as CDPs for 
    Census 2000.
    1. General Characteristics
        The purpose of the CDP program is to identify and delineate 
    boundaries for closely settled, named, unincorporated communities that 
    generally contain a mixture of residential, commercial, and retail 
    areas similar to those found in incorporated places of similar sizes. 
    Although the Census Bureau realizes that places of all sizes and levels 
    of functionality exist throughout the United States, it is not the 
    intent of the CDP program to identify apartment complexes and 
    residential subdivisions in densely settled areas or small crossroads 
    in rural areas. The ideal CDP will differ from an incorporated city, 
    town, village, or borough only in regard to legal status and 
    recognition within its respective state. Each CDP will contain an 
    identifiable core area. For the purposes of the CDP criteria, the term 
    ``core area'' is defined as the area that is associated strongly with 
    the CDP name and contains the majority of the CDP's population and 
    housing as well as commercial structures and economic activity.
        In rural areas, the core may be a crossroads around which are found 
    a cluster of houses, commercial structures, and perhaps a post office 
    that provide the place identity for the surrounding countryside. In 
    more urban areas, the core may be a larger area consisting of a mixture 
    of residential and commercial structures focused on a particular point 
    or extending along transportation corridors. We ask that participants 
    in the CDP program consider the level of influence that the community 
    has on surrounding areas; the relationship with, and possible existence 
    within, a larger named place; and the relative importance within the 
    county, town, or township.
    2. Names
        A CDP must have a locally recognized name. A CDP name, however, may 
    not duplicate the name of an adjacent or nearby incorporated place. It 
    is permissible to change the name of a 1990 CDP if the new name 
    provides a better identification of the community.
    3. Geographic Relationships
        a. A CDP may not be located in more than one state or state 
    equivalent, nor may a CDP cross the boundaries of an American Indian 
    reservation (AIR), trust land, or a tribal jurisdiction statistical 
    area (TJSA). A CDP may be located in more than one county.
        b. A CDP may not be located partially or entirely within an 
    incorporated place or another CDP.
        c. A CDP may not be coextensive with an Alaska Native village 
    statistical area (ANVSA). A CDP and an ANVSA, however, may overlap 
    territory provided that the two entities are distinguishable by name.
        d. A CDP may not be coextensive with any higher-level geographic 
    area recognized by the Census Bureau, such as county subdivisions, 
    counties, AIRs, TJSAs, and states. Exceptions will be made for 
    Arlington County, VA, as well as areas such as, but not limited to, 
    towns in the New England states, New York, and Wisconsin and townships 
    in Michigan, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey that generally are 
    perceived of as places, tend to provide municipal-style services, and 
    exhibit urban-type population density patterns over much, if not all, 
    of the land area of the entity.
        e. The Census Bureau will not accept plans that delineate ``wall-
    to-wall'' CDPs within a county. That is, CDPs may not cover all or most 
    of the land area within a county.
    4. Boundaries
        a. A CDP encompasses, as far as possible, all the surrounding, 
    closely settled territory associated with the place name. A CDP must 
    comprise a reasonably compact and continuous land area internally 
    accessible to all points by road; the only exceptions are:
         Where parts of a CDP are separated by a narrow corridor of 
    incorporated territory.
         Where the topography or geographic patterns of settlement 
    are not compact, but are irregularly shaped. Two parts of a CDP, 
    however, may not be separated by a body of water over which there are 
    no bridges or ferry connections, with the exception of small islands 
    located in a lake or river within or adjacent to the main body of the 
    CDP.
        b. The boundaries of a CDP always are census block boundaries. 
    Features chosen to form CDP boundaries must be the nearest acceptable 
    features bounding the core area of the CDP (as defined in Section A.1. 
    above). CDP boundaries should follow visible, perennial natural and 
    cultural features such as roads, rivers, canals, railroads, above-
    ground high-tension power lines, and so forth. In addition to these 
    features, the following also are acceptable as CDP boundaries:
         All incorporated place boundaries.
         All minor civil division (MCD) boundaries (generally towns 
    and townships) in Connecticut, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New 
    Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and 
    Vermont.
         Some MCD boundaries in Illinois (townships only, not 
    election precincts), Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri 
    (governmental townships only), Nebraska (townships only, not election 
    precincts), North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin.
         Barrio, barrio-pueblo, and subbarrio boundaries in Puerto 
    Rico, census subdistrict boundaries in the Virgin Islands, municipal 
    district boundaries in the Northern Mariana Islands, and election 
    district boundaries in Guam.
         AIR and trust land boundaries.
         ANVSA and Alaska Native Regional Corporation boundaries 
    (at the discretion of the Census Bureau insofar as such boundaries are 
    unambiguous for allocating living quarters as part of census 
    activities).
        When features listed above are not available for selection, the 
    Census Bureau, at its discretion, may approve other nonstandard visible 
    features, such as ridge lines, pipelines, intermittent streams, fence 
    lines, and so forth. Additionally, the Census Bureau may accept, on a 
    case-by-case basis, the boundaries of selected nonstandard and 
    potentially nonvisible features, such as the boundaries of National 
    Parks and Forests, military reservations, cemeteries, or other special 
    land-use properties and the straight-line
    
    [[Page 44640]]
    
    extensions of visible features or other lines of sight.
    5. Population Size
        There are no minimum or maximum population thresholds for 
    recognition as a CDP for Census 2000.
    6. Census Bureau Review and Qualification of CDPs
        The Census Bureau may modify or, if necessary, reject any proposed 
    CDP that does not comply with the general characteristics as outlined 
    in Section A.1. above or with any other criteria as contained in this 
    notice. The Census Bureau also may define CDPs in instances where clear 
    evidence of a place exists, but for which local officials did not 
    submit boundaries. The Census Bureau does not take into account nor 
    attempt to anticipate any nonstatistical uses that may be made of CDPs, 
    nor will the Census Bureau modify the definition of CDPs to meet the 
    requirements of any nonstatistical program.
    
    B. Changes in the Criteria for Census 2000
    
        1. The Census Bureau has eliminated population size as a criterion 
    for CDP qualification. For Census 2000, the Census Bureau will 
    recognize any unincorporated community as a CDP, regardless of 
    population size, provided it meets other criteria as outlined in this 
    notice. This represents a significant change in the CDP criteria. Data 
    users should consider the implications that this change has on the 
    reliability of sample data reported for CDPs, especially those with 
    small populations.
        2. The Census Bureau will simplify its data presentations by 
    eliminating any CDPs that are geographically coextensive with an ANVSA 
    having the same name. This will eliminate duplicate place names and 
    population totals that refer to the same geographic area. In 1990, 64 
    out of 217 ANVSAs were coextensive with a CDP. These ANVSAs can still 
    maintain their status for Census 2000, but not also as CDPs. The Census 
    Bureau will continue to recognize as separate CDPs those communities 
    that overlap the boundaries of ANVSAs, provided that the two entities 
    are distinguishable by name.
    
    C. Reliability and Confidentiality of Sample Data for CDPs
    
        Statistical Areas Program participants responsible for delineating 
    CDP boundaries, as well as users of Census 2000 data, should be aware 
    that data reported for CDPs with small population and housing unit 
    totals are subject to disclosure avoidance techniques designed to 
    maintain confidentiality of individual responses. In the past, minimum 
    population thresholds for most CDPs were high enough to provide 
    reasonably reliable data for the CDP. With the elimination of 
    population thresholds as a criterion for recognition, program 
    participants and data users must recognize that the population and 
    housing characteristics reported for small CDPs may be affected to a 
    greater extent by disclosure avoidance techniques and increased 
    variability compared to larger CDPs.
        The potential pitfalls of very small (<1000 people)="" cdps="" include:="" 1.="" title="" 13,="" united="" states="" code,="" requires="" the="" census="" bureau="" to="" ensure="" the="" confidentiality="" of="" all="" individual="" responses.="" the="" census="" bureau="" will="" apply="" a="" confidentiality="" edit="" to="" meet="" this="" legal="" mandate.="" a="" small="" amount="" of="" uncertainty="" is="" added="" to="" the="" estimates="" of="" demographic="" characteristics="" as="" a="" result.="" small="" populations="" require="" more="" protection,="" so="" there="" will="" likely="" be="" more="" uncertainty="" added="" to="" the="" census="" data.="" (the="" edit="" maintains="" the="" basic="" demographic="" structure="" of="" the="" data.)="" 2.="" sample="" data="" are="" subject="" to="" variability="" within="" geographic="" areas="" of="" any="" population="" size,="" but="" greater="" variability="" occurs="" with="" smaller="" populations.="" this="" is="" because="" the="" number="" of="" sample="" cases="" is="" smaller.="" 3.="" if="" a="" small="" cdp="" is="" formed="" and="" the="" characteristics="" of="" the="" housing="" or="" demographics="" are="" homogeneous,="" the="" estimates="" may="" be="" fairly="" reliable.="" to="" the="" extent="" that="" characteristics="" vary="" from="" house="" to="" house="" or="" person="" to="" person,="" the="" data="" reliability="" is="" diminished.="" d.="" relationship="" between="" cdps="" and="" the="" urban/rural="" classification="" for="" previous="" censuses,="" the="" census="" bureau="" classified="" as="" urban="" any="" cdp="" included="" within="" a="" ua="" as="" well="" as="" any="" cdp="" that="" contained="" 2,500="" or="" more="" residents="" and="" was="" located="" outside="" of="" a="" ua.="" as="" a="" result,="" some="" cdps="" (as="" well="" as="" some="" incorporated="" places)="" that="" had="" very="" low="" population="" densities="" were="" classified="" as="" urban="" simply="" because="" their="" boundaries="" encompassed="" at="" least="" 2,500="" people.="" the="" census="" bureau's="" urban/rural="" classification="" contains="" criteria="" for="" defining="" ``extended="" cities''--="" incorporated="" places="" that="" are="" divided="" into="" sparsely="" settled="" (defined="" as="" fewer="" than="" 100="" people="" per="" square="" mile)="" rural="" portions="" and="" more="" densely="" settled="" urban="" portions.="" no="" such="" provisions,="" however,="" existed="" for="" cdps="" that="" contained="" extensive="" areas="" of="" sparse="" settlement.="" the="" census="" bureau="" currently="" is="" reviewing="" its="" urban/rural="" classification="" for="" census="" 2000.="" the="" definitions="" and="" criteria="" used="" for="" the="" 1990="" census="" are="" subject="" to="" change,="" although="" at="" this="" time="" no="" decisions="" have="" been="" reached="" regarding="" urban/rural="" definitions="" and="" criteria="" for="" census="" 2000.="" statistical="" areas="" program="" participants="" defining="" cdps="" should="" be="" aware,="" however,="" of="" the="" possibility="" that="" the="" census="" bureau="" may="" adopt="" urban/rural="" criteria="" under="" which="" all="" incorporated="" places="" and="" cdps="" could="" be="" divided="" between="" densely="" settled="" (urban)="" portions="" and="" sparsely="" settled="" (rural)="" portions.="" there="" is="" no="" guarantee="" at="" this="" time="" that="" all="" land="" area="" included="" in="" a="" cdp="" for="" census="" 2000="" will="" be="" classified="" as="" urban="" (or="" rural)="" by="" the="" census="" bureau.="" e.="" data="" access="" and="" dissemination="" system="" the="" census="" bureau="" is="" developing="" the="" data="" access="" and="" dissemination="" system="" (dads)="" as="" a="" part="" of="" its="" efforts="" to="" facilitate="" access="" to="" and="" dissemination="" of="" official="" demographic="" and="" economic="" information.="" this="" interactive="" electronic="" system="" will="" be="" designed="" to="" allow="" timely="" access="" to="" data="" generated="" by="" the="" various="" areas="" of="" the="" census="" bureau.="" users="" of="" the="" dads="" will="" be="" able="" to="" view="" or="" download="" predefined="" data="" products="" or="" to="" extract="" and="" tabulate="" data="" from="" existing="" databases.="" the="" dads="" also="" will="" provide="" the="" opportunity="" for="" data="" users="" to="" view="" and="" map="" features="" contained="" within="" the="" census="" bureau's="" tiger="" database.="" the="" dads="" will="" enable="" users="" to="" select="" unique="" user-defined="" geographic="" areas="" from="" an="" on-screen="" map="" image="" by="" drawing="" polygons="" or="" circles="" or="" selecting="" predefined="" census="" areas="" such="" as="" census="" blocks,="" block="" groups,="" or="" census="" tracts.="" users="" will="" be="" able="" to="" define="" as="" well="" as="" tabulate="" and="" download="" data="" for="" a="" variety="" of="" geographic="" areas,="" provided="" the="" selections="" conform="" to="" title="" 13="" requirements="" protecting="" the="" confidentiality="" of="" individual="" responses="" (see="" section="" c.="" above).="" user-="" defined="" selections="" may="" consist="" of="" (but="" are="" not="" limited="" to)="" geographic="" areas,="" such="" as="" neighborhoods,="" housing="" subdivisions,="" soil="" conservation="" districts,="" special="" taxation="" districts,="" central="" business="" districts,="" and="" so="" forth,="" that="" are="" not="" part="" of="" the="" census="" bureau's="" standard="" geographic="" hierarchy.="" the="" dads="" will="" offer="" flexibility="" in="" defining="" these="" geographic="" areas="" interactively="" by="" allowing="" data="" users="" to="" choose="" and="" modify="" boundaries="" for="" unincorporated="" places="" as="" desired,="" rather="" than="" having="" to="" conform="" to="" a="" predefined="" census="" geographic="" area.="" the="" census="" bureau="" recommends="" the="" use="" of="" this="" user-defined="" functionality="" within="" dads="" to="" create="" geographic="" entities,="" such="" as="" neighborhoods,="" or="" to="" obtain="" census="" data="" for="" housing="" subdivisions.="" many="" planned="" communities="" have="" component="" parts="" [[page="" 44641]]="" known="" locally="" by="" name="" for="" which="" data="" users="" need="" census="" data.="" the="" census="" bureau="" has="" developed="" the="" dads="" to="" fulfill="" this="" need,="" allowing="" the="" cdp="" program="" to="" continue="" to="" recognize="" the="" larger="" unincorporated="" community.="" definitions="" of="" key="" terms="" alaska="" native="" village="" statistical="" area="" (anvsa)--the="" densely="" settled="" extent="" of="" an="" alaska="" native="" village="" (anv).="" the="" anv="" is="" a="" type="" of="" local="" governmental="" unit="" that="" constitutes="" an="" association,="" band,="" clan,="" community,="" tribe,="" or="" village="" recognized="" pursuant="" to="" the="" alaska="" native="" claims="" settlement="" act="" of="" 1972.="" american="" indian="" reservation="" (air)--an="" american="" indian="" entity="" with="" boundaries="" established="" by="" treaty,="" statute,="" and/or="" executive="" or="" court="" order="" and="" over="" which="" american="" indians="" have="" governmental="" jurisdiction.="" designations="" such="" as="" colonies,="" communities,="" pueblos,="" rancherias,="" reservations,="" and="" reserves="" apply="" to="" airs.="" census="" block--a="" small="" area="" bounded="" by="" visible="" features="" such="" as="" streets,="" roads,="" streams,="" and="" railroad="" tracks="" and="" by="" nonvisible="" boundaries="" such="" as="" city,="" town,="" township,="" and="" county="" limits,="" property="" lines,="" and="" short,="" imaginary="" extensions="" of="" streets="" and="" roads.="" coextensive--descriptive="" of="" two="" or="" more="" geographic="" entities="" that="" cover="" exactly="" the="" same="" area,="" with="" all="" boundaries="" conjoint.="" housing="" unit--a="" housing="" unit="" is="" a="" house,="" an="" apartment,="" a="" mobile="" home="" or="" trailer,="" a="" group="" of="" rooms,="" or="" a="" single="" room="" occupied="" as="" a="" separate="" living="" quarter="" or,="" if="" vacant,="" intended="" for="" occupancy="" as="" a="" separate="" living="" quarter.="" separate="" living="" quarters="" are="" those="" in="" which="" the="" occupants="" live="" separately="" from="" any="" other="" individuals="" in="" the="" building="" and="" which="" have="" direct="" access="" from="" outside="" the="" building="" or="" through="" a="" common="" hall.="" for="" vacant="" units,="" the="" criteria="" of="" separateness="" and="" direct="" access="" are="" applied="" to="" the="" intended="" occupants="" whenever="" possible.="" if="" that="" information="" cannot="" be="" obtained,="" the="" criteria="" are="" applied="" to="" the="" previous="" occupants.="" incorporated="" place--a="" type="" of="" governmental="" unit,="" incorporated="" under="" state="" law="" as="" a="" city,="" town="" (except="" in="" new="" england,="" new="" york,="" and="" wisconsin),="" borough="" (except="" in="" alaska="" and="" new="" york),="" or="" village,="" having="" legally="" prescribed="" limits,="" powers,="" and="" functions.="" island="" area--an="" entity,="" other="" than="" a="" state="" or="" the="" district="" of="" columbia,="" under="" the="" jurisdiction="" of="" the="" united="" states.="" for="" census="" 2000,="" this="" will="" include="" american="" samoa,="" guam,="" the="" northern="" mariana="" islands,="" puerto="" rico,="" the="" virgin="" islands="" of="" the="" united="" states,="" and="" several="" small="" islands="" in="" the="" caribbean="" sea="" and="" the="" pacific="" ocean.="" the="" census="" bureau="" treats="" each="" island="" area="" as="" the="" statistical="" equivalent="" of="" a="" state.="" minor="" civil="" division="" (mcd)--the="" primary="" governmental="" or="" administrative="" division="" of="" a="" county="" in="" 28="" states,="" puerto="" rico="" and="" the="" island="" areas="" having="" legal="" boundaries,="" names,="" and="" descriptions.="" the="" several="" types="" of="" mcds="" are="" identified="" by="" a="" variety="" of="" terms,="" such="" as="" town,="" township,="" and="" district,="" and="" include="" both="" functioning="" and="" nonfunctioning="" governmental="" units.="" in="" some="" states,="" some="" or="" all="" of="" the="" incorporated="" places="" also="" constitute="" mcds.="" nonvisible="" feature--a="" map="" feature="" that="" is="" not="" visible,="" such="" as="" a="" city="" or="" county="" boundary,="" a="" property="" line="" running="" through="" space,="" a="" short="" imaginary="" extension="" of="" a="" street="" or="" road,="" or="" a="" point-to-point="" line.="" statistical="" geographic="" entity--any="" specially="" defined="" geographic="" entity="" or="" combination="" of="" entities,="" such="" as="" a="" block="" group,="" cdp,="" or="" census="" tract,="" for="" which="" the="" census="" bureau="" tabulates="" data.="" statistical="" entity="" boundaries="" are="" not="" legally="" defined="" and="" the="" entities="" have="" no="" governmental="" standing.="" tribal="" jurisdiction="" statistical="" area="" (tjsa)--a="" statistical="" entity="" delineated="" for="" the="" decennial="" census="" by="" american="" indian="" tribal="" officials="" in="" oklahoma.="" a="" tjsa="" encompasses="" the="" area="" that="" includes="" the="" american="" indian="" population="" over="" which="" a="" tribe="" has="" jurisdiction.="" urbanized="" area="" (ua)--an="" area="" consisting="" of="" a="" central="" place(s)="" and="" adjacent="" urban="" fringe="" that="" together="" have="" a="" minimum="" residential="" population="" of="" at="" least="" 50,000="" people="" and="" generally="" an="" overall="" population="" density="" of="" at="" least="" 1,000="" persons="" per="" square="" mile.="" the="" census="" bureau="" uses="" published="" criteria="" to="" determine="" the="" qualification="" and="" boundaries="" of="" uas="" at="" the="" time="" of="" each="" decennial="" census="" or="" from="" the="" results="" of="" a="" special="" census="" during="" the="" intercensal="" period.="" visible="" feature--a="" map="" feature="" that="" can="" be="" seen="" on="" the="" ground,="" such="" as="" a="" street="" or="" road,="" railroad="" track,="" power="" line,="" stream,="" shoreline,="" fence,="" ridge,="" or="" cliff.="" dated:="" august="" 1,="" 1997.="" martha="" farnsworth="" riche,="" director,="" bureau="" of="" the="" census.="" [fr="" doc.="" 97-22332="" filed="" 8-21-97;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 3510-07-p="">

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/22/1997
Published:
08/22/1997
Department:
Census Bureau
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final program.
Document Number:
97-22332
Dates:
The CDP criteria for Census 2000 become effective September 22, 1997.
Pages:
44638-44641 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 970728183-7183-01
PDF File:
97-22332.pdf