2024-18740. Prevailing Rate Systems; Abolishment of Frederick, Maryland, as a Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area  

  • ( print page 67829)

    AGENCY:

    Office of Personnel Management.

    ACTION:

    Final rule.

    SUMMARY:

    The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to abolish the Frederick, Maryland, nonappropriated fund (NAF) Federal Wage System (FWS) wage area and define Frederick County, MD, to the Anne Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage area, and Berkeley County, West Virginia, to the Washington, DC, NAF FWS wage area. These changes are necessary because NAF FWS employment in the survey area is now below the minimum criterion of 26 wage employees to maintain a wage area, and the local activities no longer have the capability to conduct local wage surveys.

    DATES:

    Effective date: This regulation is effective September 23, 2024.

    Applicability date: This change applies on the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or after September 23, 2024.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Ana Paunoiu, by telephone at (202) 606-2858 or by email at paypolicy@opm.gov.

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    On April 10, 2024, OPM issued a proposed rule (89 FR 25186) to abolish the Frederick, MD, NAF FWS wage area and define Frederick County, MD, to the Anne Arundel, MD, NAF FWS wage area, and Berkeley County, WV, to the Washington, DC, NAF FWS wage area. The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, the national labor-management committee responsible for advising OPM on matters concerning the pay of FWS employees, reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus.

    The proposed rule had a 30-day comment period, during which OPM received no comments. Therefore, this final rule adopts the proposed rule at 89 FR 25186 without change.

    Expected Impact of This Rule

    Section 5343 of title 5, U.S. Code, provides OPM with the authority and responsibility to define the boundaries of NAF FWS wage areas. Any changes in wage area definitions can have the long-term effect of increasing pay for Federal employees in affected locations. OPM expects this final rule to impact approximately 20 NAF FWS employees. Considering the small number of employees affected, OPM does not anticipate this rule will substantially impact local economies or have a large impact in local labor markets. As this and future wage area changes may impact higher volumes of employees in geographical areas and could rise to the level of impacting local labor markets, OPM will continue to study the implications of such impacts in future rules as needed.

    Regulatory Review

    Executive Orders 13563, 12866, and 14094 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). This rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under the provisions of Executive Order 14094 and, therefore, was not reviewed by OMB.

    Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Director of OPM certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

    Federalism

    OPM has examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and has determined that this rule will not have any negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State, local, or tribal governments.

    Civil Justice Reform

    This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in Executive Order 12988.

    Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

    Congressional Review Act

    OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined this rule does not satisfy the criteria listed in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). OPM will submit to Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States a report regarding the issuance of this rule before its effective date.

    Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not impose any reporting or record-keeping requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

    List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532

    • Administrative practice and procedure
    • Freedom of information
    • Government employees
    • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
    • Wages

    Office of Personnel Management.

    Kayyonne Marston,

    Federal Register Liaison.

    Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR part 532 as follows:

    PART 532—PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS

    1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707 also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.

    2. In appendix D to subpart B, amend the table by revising the wage area listings for the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland to read as follows: ( print page 67830)

    Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 532—Nonappropriated Fund Wage and Survey Areas

    * * * * *

    Definitions of Wage Areas and Wage Area Survey Areas

    * * * * *

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    Washington, DC

    Survey Area

    District of Columbia:

    Washington, DC

    Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

    West Virginia:

    Berkeley

    * * * * *

    MARYLAND

    Anne Arundel

    Survey Area

    Maryland:

    Anne Arundel

    Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

    Maryland (city):

    Baltimore

    Maryland (counties):

    Baltimore

    Frederick

    Charles-St. Mary's

    Survey Area

    Maryland:

    Charles

    St. Mary's

    Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

    Maryland:

    Calvert

    Virginia:

    King George

    Harford

    Survey Area

    Maryland:

    Harford

    Area of Application. Survey Area Plus:

    Maryland:

    Cecil

    Montgomery-Prince George's

    Survey Area

    Maryland:

    Montgomery

    Prince George's

    Area of Application. Survey Area.

    * * * * *

    [FR Doc. 2024-18740 Filed 8-21-24; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 6325-39-P

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/23/2024
Published:
08/22/2024
Department:
Personnel Management Office
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
2024-18740
Dates:
Effective date: This regulation is effective September 23, 2024.
Pages:
67829-67830 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket ID: OPM-2024-0006
RINs:
3206-AO68: Prevailing Rate Systems: Abolishment of Frederick, Maryland, As A Nonappropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Area
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/3206-AO68/prevailing-rate-systems-abolishment-of-frederick-maryland-as-a-nonappropriated-fund-federal-wage-sys
Topics:
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information, Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages
PDF File:
2024-18740.pdf
CFR: (1)
5 CFR 532