95-20928. Replacement Parts for Self-Propelled Bituminous Paving Equipment from Canada; Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to Revoke Antidumping Duty Finding  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 23, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 43771-43773]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20928]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-122-057]
    
    
    Replacement Parts for Self-Propelled Bituminous Paving Equipment 
    from Canada; Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed 
    Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to 
    Revoke Antidumping Duty Finding
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed 
    Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to 
    Revoke Antidumping Duty Finding.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In response to requests from the Blaw-Knox Construction 
    Equipment Corporation (Blaw-Knox), the petitioner in this proceeding, 
    and the Road Machinery Division of Ingersoll-Rand Company (IR), the 
    only respondent in the administrative reviews covering the periods 
    September 1, 1991 through August 31, 1992 (1991-92) and September 1, 
    1992 through August 31, 1993 (1992-93), the Department of Commerce (the 
    Department) is initiating a changed circumstances antidumping duty 
    administrative review and issuing a notice of intent to revoke the 
    antidumping duty finding. Blaw-Knox has filed a submission stating that 
    it no longer has any interest in the antidumping finding. In addition, 
    the petitioner has consulted with interested parties who are known to 
    them to be involved in the U.S. production of replacement parts, 
    Barber-Greene and Cedarapids, and did not find any opposition to the 
    revocation of the finding. Blaw-Knox and IR also requested that this 
    revocation be retroactive to the beginning of the 1991-92 
    administrative review period, September 1, 1991. Therefore, based on 
    the fact that domestic interested parties 
    
    [[Page 43772]]
    are no longer interested in the antidumping duty finding on self-
    propelled bituminous paving equipment from Canada, we intend to revoke 
    the finding. The revocation will apply to all shipments of subject 
    merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
    after September 1, 1991. We invite interested parties to comment on 
    these preliminary results and our intent to revoke the finding.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: August 23, 1995.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Longest or Kelly Parkhill, 
    Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
    telephone: (202) 482-2786.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Pursuant to section 751(d) and 782(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
    amended (1995) (the Act), the Department may revoke an antidumping duty 
    order based on a review under section 751(b) of the Act (i.e., a 
    changed circumstances review). Section 751(b)(1) of the Act requires a 
    changed circumstances administrative review to be conducted upon 
    receipt of a request containing sufficient information concerning 
    changed circumstances.
        On September 7, 1977, the Department published the antidumping 
    finding on replacement parts for self-propelled bituminous paving 
    equipment from Canada. On August 1, 1995, Blaw-Knox submitted a letter 
    to the Department stating that it has no further interest in the 
    antidumping duty finding on replacement parts for self-propelled 
    bituminous paving equipment from Canada and requested retroactive 
    revocation for all entries of subject merchandise made on or after 
    September 1, 1991. September 1, 1991, is the beginning of the review 
    period for the earliest period for which there is no completed 
    administrative review; there are pending reviews for the 1991-92 and 
    1992-93 review periods. The request is based on changed circumstances 
    in accordance with 19 CFR 353.25(d)(1994). In addition, Blaw-Knox has 
    consulted with the other major U.S. producers of replacement parts, 
    Barber-Greene and Cedarapids, and did not find any opposition to the 
    revocation of the finding. This changed circumstances administrative 
    review covers all producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise 
    and all shipments of this merchandise to the United States.
    
    Scope of the Reviews
    
        Imports covered by this changed circumstances review are 
    replacement parts for self-propelled bituminous paving equipment, 
    excluding attachments and parts for attachments. This merchandise is 
    currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) item 
    numbers 4016.93.10, 7315.11.00, 7315.89.50, 7315.90.00, 8336.50.00, 
    8479.99.00, 8481.20.00, 8482.10.10, 8483.90.90, 8539.29.20, 8544.20.00, 
    8544.41.00, 8544.51.80, 8544.60.20, and 9015.30.40. The HTS item 
    numbers are provided for convenience and Customs purposes. The written 
    description remains dispositive.
    Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping 
    Duty Administrative Review, and Intent To Revoke the Finding
    
        The Department's regulations at 19 CFR 353.25(d)(2) require the 
    Department to conduct a changed circumstances administrative review 
    under section 353.22(f) based upon an affirmative statement of no 
    interest from the petitioner in the proceeding. Section 353.25(d)(1)(i) 
    further provides that the Department may revoke an order or revoke an 
    order in part if it determines that the order under review is no longer 
    of interest to interested parties. In addition, in the event that the 
    Department concludes that expedited action is warranted, section 
    353.22(f)(4) of the regulations permit the Department to combine the 
    notices of initiation and preliminary results.
        Therefore, in accordance with sections 751(d) and 782(h) of the Act 
    and 19 CFR 353.25(d) and 353.22(f), based on an affirmative statement 
    of no interest in the proceeding by the petitioner Blaw-Knox, we are 
    initiating this changed circumstances administrative review. Further, 
    based on the petitioner's affirmative statement of no further interest 
    in these proceedings, not opposed by statements of interest by other 
    domestic interested parties, we determine that expedited action is 
    warranted, and we preliminarily determine that the finding on 
    replacement parts for self-propelled bituminous paving equipment from 
    Canada is no longer of interest to domestic interested parties. Because 
    we have concluded that expedited action is warranted, we are combining 
    the notice of initiation and preliminary results.
        We are hereby notifying the public of our preliminary determination 
    to revoke this antidumping duty finding. If this preliminary 
    determination to revoke this finding is made final, the effective date 
    of the revocation will be September 1, 1991, the beginning of the 
    currently pending 1991-92 administrative review.
        If final revocation occurs, we intend to instruct the U.S. Customs 
    Service (Customs) to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties all 
    entries of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
    warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective date of revocation 
    in accordance with 19 CFR 353.25(d)(5). We also intend to instruct 
    Customs to refund with interest any estimated antidumping duties 
    collected with respect to entries made on or after September 1, 1991, 
    in accordance with section 778 of the Act. The current requirement for 
    a cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties will continue until 
    publication of the final results of this changed circumstances 
    administrative review.
    
    Public Comment
    
        Interested parties may request a hearing within 10 days of the date 
    of publication of this notice. Case briefs and/or other written 
    comments from interested parties may be submitted not later than 14 
    days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, 
    limited to arguments raised in case briefs, may be submitted seven days 
    after the time limit for filing case briefs. Copies of case briefs and 
    rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties in accordance with 
    section 353.31(e) of the Department's regulations (1994). Persons 
    interested in attending the hearing should contact the Department for 
    the date and time of the hearing.
        Representatives of parties to the proceeding may request disclosure 
    of proprietary information under administrative protective order no 
    later than 10 days after the representative's client or employer 
    becomes a party to the proceeding, but in no event later than the date 
    the case briefs, under 19 CFR 353.38(c)(1994), are due. The Department 
    will publish the final results of this changed circumstances 
    administrative review and its decision on revocation of this 
    antidumping duty finding, as well as the results of its analysis of 
    issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief.
        This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to parties 
    subject to administrative protective orders (APOs) of their 
    responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information 
    disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 353.34(d). Timely written 
    notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion 
    to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
    
    [[Page 43773]]
    comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
    violation.
        This notice of changed circumstances administrative review and 
    intent to revoke are in accordance with sections 751 (b)(1) and (d) of 
    the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675 (b)(1) and (d) (1995)) and 19 CFR 353.22(f) and 
    353.25(d) (1994).
    
        Dated: August 16, 1995.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 95-20928 Filed 8-22-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/23/1995
Published:
08/23/1995
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, and Intent to Revoke Antidumping Duty Finding.
Document Number:
95-20928
Dates:
August 23, 1995.
Pages:
43771-43773 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-122-057
PDF File:
95-20928.pdf