95-21046. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, et al.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 164 (Thursday, August 24, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 44103-44104]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-21046]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Rel. No. IC-21314; 812-9520]
    
    
    Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, et al.
    
    August 18, 1995.
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'').
    
    ACTION: Notice of application for exemption under the Investment 
    Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    APPLICANTS: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated 
    (``Merrill Lynch''), Smith Barney Inc., Prudential Securities 
    Incorporated, Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., and PaineWebber Incorporated 
    (the ``Sponsors''); and Defined Asset Funds--Municipal Investment Trust 
    Fund, Liberty Street Trust Municipal Monthly Payment Series, Defined 
    Asset Funds--Municipal Income Fund (``DAF-MIF''), and Municipal 
    Investment Trust Fund (the ``Trusts'').
    
    RELEVANT ACT SECTIONS: Order requested under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of 
    the Act that would exempt applicants from section 17(a) of the Act.
    
    SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order to permit the 
    trustees of certain unit investment trusts to place orders to sell 
    municipal bond portfolio securities of the trusts with the trust 
    sponsors, who then will serve as introducing dealers. As introducing 
    dealers, the sponsors will retain a clearing broker to sell the 
    securities for the trusts through a wire service.
    
    FILING DATE: The application was filed on March 13, 1995 and amended on 
    July 20, 1995 and August 17, 1995.
    
    HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An order granting the application 
    will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing. Interested persons may 
    request a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary and serving 
    applicants with a copy of the request, personally or by mail. Hearing 
    requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on September 12, 
    1995 and should be accompanied by proof of service on the applicants, 
    in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. 
    Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, the 
    reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons may request 
    notification of a hearing by writing to the SEC's Secretary.
    
    ADDRESSES: Secretary, SEC, 450 5th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Applicants, c/o Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, 
    Unit Investment Trusts, P.O. Box 9051, Princeton, New Jersey 08543-
    9051.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Sarah A. Buescher, Staff Attorney, at (202) 942-0573, or Robert A. 
    Robertson, Branch Chief, at (202) 942-0564 (Division of Investment 
    Management, Office of Investment Company Regulation).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the 
    application. The complete application may be obtained for a fee from 
    the SEC's Public Reference Branch.
    
    Applicants' Representations
    
        1. Each series of the Trusts is a separate unit investment trust 
    created under New York law by a trust indenture and agreement (``Trust 
    Agreement'') among one or more of the Sponsors, a trustee 
    (``Trustee''), and an evaluator. The investment objective of each 
    series is receipt of interest income exempt from federal income 
    taxation through investment in a fixed portfolio of interest-bearing 
    municipal bonds (``Bonds''). Applicants request that the order extend 
    to future unit investment trusts sponsored by one or more of the 
    sponsors.
        2. The Sponsors intend to maintain a market for units of each Trust 
    and continuously offer to purchase those units at the redemption price. 
    If the Sponsors no longer maintain a secondary market, certificate 
    holders may redeem their units. If cash held by a Trust is insufficient 
    to pay any redemption, the Trustee is authorized to sell Bonds held by 
    the Trust. The Trustee also may sell Bonds to meet expenses. In 
    addition, the Sponsors may direct the Trustee to sell Bonds in specific 
    circumstances, such as a default by an issuer or the Bonds becoming 
    subject to federal income taxation.
        3. Trustees have two principal methods for selling Bonds: (1) The 
    Trustee can approach several non-Sponsor dealers and sell to the non-
    Sponsor dealer making the highest bid; or (2) the Trustee can place an 
    order to sell Bonds with one non-Sponsor dealer (``Introducing 
    Dealer''), who in turn retains a broker (``Clearing Broker'') to 
    communicate the availability of the Bonds by posting the offer on a 
    wire system with contact to 300 to 400 dealers. The Clearing Broker 
    receives the bids and selects the highest bidder. Applicants represent 
    that the latter method has obtained more favorable prices for the 
    Trusts because of the broader exposure to the bond offering by 
    potential purchasers. The Clearing Broker and the Introducing Dealer 
    retain a concession. Merrill Lynch has negotiated a fixed fee of $2 per 
    bond with independent Introducing Dealers. Pursuant to an SEC order 
    (Investment Company Act Release No. 14958) (Feb. 25, 1986)) (``1986 
    Exemption''), sales of Bonds from the Trusts may be made to any of the 
    Sponsors if, among other conditions, the Sponsor is the highest bidder. 
    DAF-MIF was not a party to this order.
        4. Clearing Brokers only will accept transactions from Introducing 
    Dealers who are registered as broker-dealers under the Securities 
    Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''). Since the Trustee is not a 
    registered broker-dealer, it must retain an Introducing Dealer who 
    receives a concession for writing an order and approaching a Clearing 
    Broker. Each of the Sponsors is a municipal securities dealer who acts 
    as Introducing Dealer in connection with non-Trust Bond sales.
        5. Applicants represent that if the requested exemptive relief is 
    granted, not only would the Trusts continue to be permitted to effect 
    principal transactions with the Sponsors in selling Bonds from their 
    portfolios, but the conditions to the 1986 Exemption would be modified 
    to permit the Trusts to use Sponsors as Introducing Dealers in those 
    and other sale transactions. Merrill Lynch's Defined Asset Funds 
    Division will select a Sponsor to act as Introducing Dealer for a wire 
    service transaction for the Trusts only if it believes in good faith 
    that those Trusts are reasonably likely to receive a better execution 
    thereby.
        6. Applicants represent that permitting the proposed transaction 
    will benefit the Trusts and the certificateholders. The Sponsors have 
    resources to bear the financial responsibility if a trade is not 
    completed properly and experience with wire service executions of 
    municipal securities transactions. Merrill Lynch believes that these 
    firms can be of substantial value in obtaining more timely and cost-
    effective executions of wire service transactions for the Trusts. In 
    addition, with the continuing consolidation of major broker-dealers, if 
    the Sponsors continue to be excluded from acting as Introducing 
    Dealers, the Trusts are likely to be permitted only to use smaller, 
    less capitalized firms, which applicants believe may result in less 
    favorable prices and execution for the Trusts.
    
    [[Page 44104]]
    
        7. Merrill Lynch submits that the fee of $2 per Bond that it has 
    negotiated with independent Introducing Dealers is reasonable 
    compensation for performing these services. Because Bonds can only be 
    sold under limited circumstances specified in the Trust Agreement, a 
    Sponsor could not cause a Trust to sell Bonds merely to generate 
    commissions. Applicants represent that the Trustee and Merrill Lynch 
    will monitor currently prevailing rates of Introducing Dealers to 
    assure that the Trusts are charged no more than the current rates.
        8. The requested relief would amend the 1986 Exemption in several 
    respects. First, applicants request that the relief granted in the 1986 
    Exemption, amended as requested herein, be extended to DAF-MIF. Second, 
    applicants request that the first condition of the 1986 Exemption be 
    deleted. This condition reads as follows:
    
        Merrill Lynch will not advise the [Merrill Lynch, White Weld 
    Capital Markets] Group or the municipal securities dealer department 
    of any other Sponsor when giving instructions to sell a Municipal 
    Bond.
    
    Since a municipal dealer's trading department (which may make bids to 
    purchase the Bonds) is generally not separate from the personnel who 
    act as Introducing Dealers on wire services transactions, applicants 
    wish to delete this condition. Applicants also request to amend other 
    conditions so as to permit any Sponsor to act as an Introducing Dealer. 
    Applicants represent that the transactions would remain anonymous even 
    if a Sponsor is both the Introducing Dealer and a purchasing dealer 
    since the transaction would be effected through the Clearing Broker, an 
    independent party.
    Applicant's Legal Analysis
    
        1. Applicants request an order under sections 6(c) and 17(b) of the 
    Act from section 17(a) to permit a Sponsor to purchase Bonds from the 
    Trustee as an Introducing Dealer. Section 17(a) of the Act generally 
    makes it unlawful for an affiliated person of a registered investment 
    company, acting as principal, knowingly to purchase securities from the 
    company.
        2. Section 17(b) permits the SEC to exempt a proposed transaction 
    from section 17(a) if evidence establishes that: (a) The terms of the 
    proposed transaction are reasonable and fair and do not involve 
    overreaching; (b) the proposed transaction is consistent with the 
    policy of each registered investment company concerned; and (c) the 
    proposed transaction is consistent with the general purposes of the 
    Act. Under section 6(c), the SEC may exempt classes of transactions if 
    and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in 
    the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and 
    the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act. 
    Applicants believe that the proposed transactions satisfy the 
    requirements of sections 6(c) and 17(b).
        3. Applicants state that the regulations to which the Sponsors and 
    the Trusts are subject, the provisions of the Trust Agreement, and the 
    conditions stated below will prevent any overreaching. Because the 
    price received by the Trust upon the sale of a security depends on bids 
    made by purchasing dealers through the wire service, the Sponsor cannot 
    influence the price received by the Trust. The Sponsors are registered 
    as municipal securities dealers, and acknowledge that they are subject 
    to the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (``MSRB''), 
    which require members to deal fairly with all persons and to use 
    reasonable efforts to obtain a fair and reasonable price. Merrill Lynch 
    has agreed, and each Sponsor before acting as Introducing Dealer for 
    any Trust will agree, to make available for ready inspection by the SEC 
    all records required to be kept by applicants relating to the proposed 
    transactions pursuant to the Exchange Act and MSRB rules.
        4. Applicants represent that the sales will be consistent with the 
    policy of the selling series, as recited in its registration statement 
    and Trust Agreement.
    
    Applicants' Conditions
    
        Applicants agree that the order granting the requested relief shall 
    be subject to the following conditions:
        1. The Clearing Broker will in all cases be not affiliated with any 
    Sponsor.
        2. Offers will be made through a major wire service in municipal 
    bonds and will be kept open for three hours after initial appearance on 
    the wire, to be reduced to not less than two hours in the discretion of 
    the Clearing Broker in a declining market.
        3. A Sponsor's bid will be accepted only if a minimum of three bids 
    are received from persons other than a Sponsor or its affiliates.
        4. The Trustee will be instructed not to inquire as to the identity 
    of a bidding dealer, and if it receives such information, will not 
    transmit it to any Sponsor or its agents.
        5. Clearing Brokers effecting the sales will be instructed to 
    obtain the best available price and execution and will instruct the 
    wire services not to report any bid from a Sponsor unless it is higher 
    than the best price available from non-affiliated broker-dealers.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-21046 Filed 8-23-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/24/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of application for exemption under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ``Act'').
Document Number:
95-21046
Dates:
The application was filed on March 13, 1995 and amended on July 20, 1995 and August 17, 1995.
Pages:
44103-44104 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Rel. No. IC-21314, 812-9520
PDF File:
95-21046.pdf