[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 163 (Monday, August 24, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45097-45098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-22633]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281]
Virginia Electric and Power Company (Surry Power Station, Units 1
and 2); Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is
considering issuance of an exemption from certain requirements of its
regulations with respect to Facility Operating License No. DPR-32 and
Facility Operating License No. DPR-37, issued to Virginia Electric and
Power Company (VEPCO, the licensee) for operation of the Surry Power
Station (SPS), Units 1 and 2 located in Surry County, Virginia.
Environmental Assessment
Identification of Proposed Action
The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's
application dated
[[Page 45098]]
March 3, 1998, as supplemented May 5, 1998, concerning the use of
respiratory protection equipment which has not been tested by the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health/Mine Safety and
Health Administration (NIOSH/MSHA). Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2301, the
licensee has requested exemptions from the following:
1. 10 CFR 20.1703(a)(1) which requires that ``* * * the licensee
shall use only respiratory protection equipment that is tested and
certified or had certification extended by NIOSH/MSHA;''
2. 10 CFR 20.1703(c) which requires that ``the licensee shall use
as emergency devices only respiratory protection equipment that has
been specifically certified or had certification extended for emergency
use by NIOSH/MSHA;'' and
3. 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix A, Protection Factors for Respirators,
Footnote d.2.(d), which states, in part, that ``* * * the protection
factors apply for atmosphere-supplying respirators only when supplied
with adequate respirable air. Respirable air shall be provided of the
quality and quantity required in accordance with NIOSH/MSHA
certification (described in 30 CFR Part 11). Oxygen and air shall not
be used in the same apparatus.''
The Need for the Proposed Action
Subpart H to 10 CFR Part 20, ``Respiratory Protection and Controls
to Restrict Internal Exposure in Restricted Areas'' states in 10 CFR
20.1702, ``When it is not practical * * * to control the concentrations
of radioactive material in air to values below those that define an
airborne radioactivity area, the licensee shall, consistent with
maintaining the total effective dose equivalent ALARA, increase
monitoring and limit intakes by * * * (c) Use of respiratory protection
equipment* * *.''
It is necessary for station personnel to periodically enter
containments while the units are operating in order to perform
inspection or maintenance. The SPS1&2 containments are designed to be
maintained at subatmospheric pressure during power operations. The
containment pressure can range from 9.0 to 11.0 pounds per square inch,
absolute (psia). This containment environment could potentially impact
the safety of personnel donning respiratory protection equipment, due
to reduced pressure and resulting oxygen deficiency. Under these
circumstances, the use of a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)
with enriched oxygen breathing gas is required. The licensee initially
purchased Mine Safety Appliances, Inc. (MSA) Model 401 open-circuit,
dual-purpose, pressure-demand SCBAs constructed of brass components
which were originally intended for use with compressed air. The
licensee qualified the Model 401 cylinders for use with 35% oxygen/65%
nitrogen following the recommendations of the Compressed Gas
Association's Pamphlet C-10, ``Recommended Procedures for Changes of
Gas Service for Compressed Gas Cylinders,'' established procedures to
utilize these devices with an enriched oxygen mixture, and is currently
using these SCBAs with a 35% oxygen/65% nitrogen mixture instead of
compressed air. The MSA Model 401 SCBA has received the NIOSH/MSHA
certification for use with compressed air, but has not been tested for
35% enriched oxygen applications. Using these SCBAs without the NIOSH/
MSHA certification requires an exemption from 10 CFR 20.1703(a)(1), 10
CFR 20.1703(c), and 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix A, Protection Factors for
Respirators, Footnote d.2.(d).
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The proposed action will not alter plant operations, result in an
increase in the probability or consequences of accidents, or result in
a change in occupational or offsite dose. Therefore, there are no
significant radiological impacts associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed
action will not result in a change in nonradiological plant effluents
and will have no other nonradiological environmental impact.
Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Because the Commission's staff has concluded that there is no
significant environmental impact associated with the proposed
exemption, any alternative to the proposed exemption will have either
no significantly different environmental impact or greater
environmental impact. The principal alternative would be to deny the
requested exemption. Denial would result in no change in current
environmental impact.
Alternative Use of Resources
This action does not involve the use of resources not previously
considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the Surry Power
Station.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
In accordance with its stated policy, the NRC staff consulted with
Mr. Foldesi of the Virginia Department of Health on July 27, 1998,
regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. Mr. Foldesi
had no comments on behalf of the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Finding of No Significant Impact
Based upon the foregoing environmental assessment, the Commission
concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect
on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission
has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the
proposed exemption.
For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the
licensee's letter dated March 3, 1998, as supplemented May 5, 1998,
which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public
Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the
local public document room located at the Swem Library, College of
William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23185.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day of August 1998.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
G.E. Edison, Sr.,
Project Manager, Project Directorate II-1, Division of Reactor
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 98-22633 Filed 8-21-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
