94-21051. Banc One Corporation, CoreStates Financial Corp, PNC Bank Corp., KeyCorp, National City Corporation, Mellon Bank Corporation; Applications to Engage in Certain Nonbanking Activities  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-21051]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: August 26, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
     
    
    Banc One Corporation, CoreStates Financial Corp, PNC Bank Corp., 
    KeyCorp, National City Corporation, Mellon Bank Corporation; 
    Applications to Engage in Certain Nonbanking Activities
    
        Banc One Corporation, Columbus, Ohio (Banc One), CoreStates 
    Financial Corp, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (CoreStates), PNC Bank 
    Corp., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PNC), and KeyCorp, Cleveland, Ohio 
    (KeyCorp), have applied pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding 
    Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8)) (BHC Act) and Sec. 225.23 of the 
    Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.23), to acquire, through their joint 
    venture subsidiary, Electronic Payment Services, Inc., Wilmington, 
    Delaware (EPS): (1) Substantially all the assets of the Network 
    Services Division (NSD) of Mellon Bank, N.A., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 
    and thereby engage in providing automated teller machine (ATM) 
    services, point of sale (POS) services, and merchant processing 
    services; and (2) certain data processing assets of National City 
    Corporation, Cleveland, Ohio (National City), which include assets 
    relating to the provision of ATM services and POS services. EPS 
    currently is authorized to engage, through its existing operating 
    subsidiaries (EPS Subsidiaries), in certain permissible nonbanking 
    activities. In connection with these transactions, and the transactions 
    described below, EPS will form a series of corporations, EPS 1, Inc., 
    EPS 2, Inc., EPS 3, Inc., and EPS Corp., all of Wilmington, Delaware. 
    EPS Corp. will hold all the shares of the EPS Subsidiaries and engage, 
    through the EPS Subsidiaries, in the activities currently conducted by 
    the EPS Subsidiaries and NSD.
        KeyCorp also has applied, pursuant to section 4(c)(8) of the BHC 
    Act, to increase its indirect ownership interest in the EPS 
    Subsidiaries through the acquisition of an interest in EPS 1, Inc., the 
    shares of which will be owned by EPS and a wholly-owned nonbanking 
    subsidiary of KeyCorp. In addition, National City has applied, pursuant 
    to section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act, to acquire an indirect ownership 
    interest in the EPS Subsidiaries through the acquisition of an interest 
    in EPS 2, Inc., the shares of which will be owned by EPS 1, Inc. and a 
    wholly-owned nonbanking subsidiary of National City, and thereby engage 
    in certain nonbanking activities described below. Finally, Mellon Bank 
    Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Mellon), has applied, pursuant 
    to section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act, to acquire an indirect ownership 
    interest in the EPS Subsidiaries through the acquisition of an interest 
    in EPS 3, Inc., the shares of which will be owned by EPS 2, Inc. and a 
    wholly-owned nonbanking subsidiary of Mellon, and thereby engage in 
    certain nonbanking activities described below.
        Upon consummation of the above transactions, Banc One, CoreStates, 
    PNC, KeyCorp, National City, and Mellon (collectively, Applicants) each 
    will indirectly control more than 5 percent of the voting shares of a 
    company controlling the EPS Subsidiaries. Applicants maintain that, 
    under this proposal, the EPS Subsidiaries would engage in the following 
    nonbanking activities:
        1. Providing data processing and transmission services permissible 
    under Sec. 225.25(b)(7) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25(b)(7)), 
    including certain ATM services,1 POS services,2 electronic 
    benefit transfer services, and electronic data interchange services;
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\Applicants maintain that ATM services include: ATM switching, 
    terminal driving, and gateway services; ATM network branded debit 
    card services; administrative terminal and ATM authorization 
    services; ATM card production and issuance; telephone banking and 
    bill paying services; information terminal and point of banking 
    services; and proprietary ATM services for non-financial 
    institutions.
        \2\Applicants maintain that POS Services include: POS switching 
    and terminal driving services; POS electronic data capture and 
    authorization services; POS gateway, terminal software, and utility 
    payment services; and POS terminal sale, rental, and maintenance 
    services.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2. Providing stored value card services; and
        3. Providing merchant processing services.
        Applicants seek approval to conduct the proposed activities 
    throughout the United States.
    
    Closely Related to Banking Standard
    
        Section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act provides that a bank holding company 
    may, with Board approval, engage in any activity ``which the Board 
    after due notice and opportunity for hearing has determined (by order 
    or regulation) to be so closely related to banking or managing or 
    controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto''. In determining 
    whether a proposed activity is closely related to banking for purposes 
    of the BHC Act, the Board considers, inter alia, the matters set forth 
    in National Courier Association v. Board of Governors of the Federal 
    Reserve System, 516 F.2d 1229 (D.C. Cir. 1975). These considerations 
    are (1) Whether banks generally have in fact provided the proposed 
    services, (2) whether banks generally provide services that are 
    operationally or functionally so similar to the proposed services as to 
    equip them particularly well to provide the proposed services, and (3) 
    whether banks generally provide services that are so integrally related 
    to the proposed services as to require their provision in a specialized 
    form. See 516 F.2d at 1237. In addition, the Board may consider any 
    other basis that may demonstrate that the activity has a reasonable or 
    close relationship to banking or managing or controlling banks. Board 
    Statement Regarding Regulation Y, 49 FR 806 (1984).
        Applicants maintain that the Board previously has determined that 
    the proposed data processing and transmission services and stored value 
    card services, when conducted within the limitations established by the 
    Board in its regulations and prior orders, are closely related to 
    banking within the meaning of section 4(c)(8) of the BHC Act. See 12 
    CFR 225.25(b)(7); Banc One Corporation, et al., 79 Federal Reserve 
    Bulletin 1158 (1993) (1993 EPS Order). See also Letter dated November 
    30, 1992, from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland to Robert E. 
    Mannion, Esq.; Letter dated November 30, 1992, from the Federal Reserve 
    Bank of Philadelphia to Allen L. Raiken, Esq. (1992 EPS Approval 
    Letters). Applicants have stated that they will engage in the proposed 
    activities in conformity with the limitations established by the Board 
    in Regulation Y, the 1992 EPS Approval Letters, and the 1993 EPS Order.
        Applicants also maintain that the proposed merchant processing 
    services are operationally and functionally similar to the permissible 
    nonbanking activities in which they currently engage and are 
    permissible data processing activities under Sec. 225.25(b)(7) of 
    Regulation Y. In addition, Applicants state that the Board previously 
    has approved similar merchant processing services as a loan servicing 
    activity permissible under Sec. 225.25(b)(1) of Regulation Y (12 CFR 
    225.25(b)(1)). See Citicorp, 76 Federal Reserve Bulletin 549 (1990).
    
    Proper Incident to Banking Standard
    
        In order to approve the proposal, the Board must determine that the 
    proposed activities to be conducted by EPS and its subsidiaries ``can 
    reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
    greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
    that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
    resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
    unsound banking practices.'' 12 U.S.C. 1843(c)(8).
        Applicants believe that the proposal will produce public benefits 
    that outweigh any potential adverse effects. In particular, Applicants 
    maintain that the proposal will enhance customer convenience and 
    efficiency. In addition, Applicants state that the proposed activities 
    will not result in adverse effects such as an undue concentration of 
    resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
    unsound banking practices.
        In publishing the proposal for comment, the Board does not take a 
    position on issues raised by the proposal. Notice of the proposal is 
    published solely in order to seek the views of interested persons on 
    the issues presented by the applications, and does not represent a 
    determination by the Board that the proposal meets or is likely to meet 
    the standards of the BHC Act.
        Any comments or requests for hearing should be submitted in writing 
    and received by William W. Wiles, Secretary, Board of Governors of the 
    Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551, not later than 
    September 19, 1994. Any request for a hearing on this proposal must, as 
    required by Sec. 262.3(e) of the Board's Rules of Procedure (12 CFR 
    262.3(e)), be accompanied by a statement of the reasons why a written 
    presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
    specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
    evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
    party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal. The 
    applications may be inspected at the offices of the Board of Governors, 
    the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, or the Federal Reserve Bank of 
    Philadelphia.
    
    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 22, 1994.
    Jennifer J. Johnson,
    Deputy Secretary of the Board.
    [FR Doc. 94-21051 Filed 8-25-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/26/1994
Department:
Federal Reserve System
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-21051
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: August 26, 1994