97-22645. Oriental Fruit Fly; Designation of Quarantined Area  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 45141-45142]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-22645]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 165 / Tuesday, August 26, 1997 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 45141]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    7 CFR Part 301
    
    [Docket No. 97-073-1]
    
    
    Oriental Fruit Fly; Designation of Quarantined Area
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim rule and request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are amending the Oriental fruit fly regulations by 
    quarantining a portion of Los Angeles County, CA, and restricting the 
    interstate movement of regulated articles from the quarantined area. 
    This action is necessary on an emergency basis to prevent the spread of 
    the Oriental fruit fly into noninfested areas of the United States.
    
    DATES: Interim rule effective August 20, 1997. Consideration will be 
    given only to comments received on or before October 27, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Please send an original and three copies of your comments to 
    Docket No. 97-073-1, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, 
    suite 3C03, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please 
    state that your comments refer to Docket No. 97-073-1. Comments 
    received may be inspected at USDA, room 1141, South Building, 14th 
    Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 
    4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. Persons wishing to 
    inspect comments are requested to call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to 
    facilitate entry into the comment reading room.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael B. Stefan, Operations 
    Officer, Domestic and Emergency Programs, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road 
    Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, (301) 734-8247; or e-mail: 
    mstefan@aphis.usda.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), is a 
    destructive pest of citrus and other types of fruit, nuts, and 
    vegetables. The short life cycle of the Oriental fruit fly allows rapid 
    development of serious outbreaks and can cause severe economic losses. 
    Heavy infestations can cause complete loss of crops.
        The Oriental fruit fly regulations, contained in 7 CFR 301.93 
    through 301.93-10 (referred to below as the regulations), were 
    established to prevent the spread of the Oriental fruit fly to 
    noninfested areas of the United States. Section 301.93-3(a) provides 
    that the Administrator will list as a quarantined area each State, or 
    each portion of a State, in which the Oriental fruit fly has been found 
    by an inspector, in which the Administrator has reason to believe that 
    the Oriental fruit fly is present, or that the Administrator considers 
    necessary to regulate because of its proximity to the Oriental fruit 
    fly or its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from 
    localities in which the Oriental fruit fly has been found. The 
    regulations impose restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated 
    articles from the quarantined areas. Quarantined areas are listed in 
    Sec. 301.93-3(c).
        Less than an entire State will be designated as a quarantined area 
    only if the Administrator determines that the State has adopted and is 
    enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of the regulated 
    articles that are substantially the same as those imposed on the 
    interstate movement of regulated articles, and the designation of less 
    than the entire State as a quarantined area will prevent the interstate 
    spread of the Oriental fruit fly.
        Recent trapping surveys by inspectors of California State and 
    county agencies and by inspectors of the Animal and Plant Health 
    Inspection Service (APHIS) reveal that a portion of Los Angeles County, 
    CA, is infested with the Oriental fruit fly. The Oriental fruit fly is 
    not known to exist anywhere else in the continental United States.
        Officials of State agencies of California have begun an intensive 
    Oriental fruit fly eradication program in the quarantined area in 
    California. Also, California has taken action to restrict the 
    intrastate movement of certain articles from the quarantined area.
        Accordingly, to prevent the spread of the Oriental fruit fly to 
    other States, we are amending the regulations in Sec. 301.93-3 by 
    designating as a quarantined area a portion of Los Angeles County, CA. 
    The resulting quarantined area is described in the rule portion of this 
    document.
    
    Emergency Action
    
        The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
    has determined that an emergency exists that warrants publication of 
    this interim rule without prior opportunity for public comment. 
    Immediate action is necessary to prevent the Oriental fruit fly from 
    spreading to noninfested areas of the United States.
        Because prior notice and other public procedures with respect to 
    this action are impracticable and contrary to the public interest under 
    these conditions, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553 to make it 
    effective upon signature. We will consider comments that are received 
    within 60 days of publication of this rule in the Federal Register. 
    After the comment period closes, we will publish another document in 
    the Federal Register. It will include a discussion of any comments we 
    receive and any amendments we are making to the rule as a result of the 
    comments.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. For this 
    action, the Office of Management and Budget has waived its review 
    process required by Executive Order 12866.
        This action amends the Oriental fruit fly regulations by adding a 
    portion of Los Angeles County, CA, to the list of quarantined areas. 
    The regulations restrict the interstate movement of regulated articles 
    from the quarantined areas.
        Within the quarantined portion of Los Angeles County, there are 
    approximately 143 entities that will be affected by this rule. All 
    would be considered small entities. These include 2 farmers' markets, 1 
    community garden, 4 distributors, 93 fruit sellers, 7 vendors, 2 
    growers, 2 haulers, 27 nurseries, 2 packers, 2 processors, and 1 swap 
    meet. These small entities
    
    [[Page 45142]]
    
    comprise less than 1 percent of the total number of similar small 
    entities operating in the State of California. In addition, these small 
    entities sell regulated articles primarily for local intrastate, not 
    interstate, movement so the effect, if any, of this regulation on these 
    entities appears to be minimal.
        The effect on those few entities that do move regulated articles 
    interstate will be minimized by the availability of various treatments, 
    that, in most cases, will allow these small entities to move regulated 
    articles interstate with very little additional cost.
        Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and 
    Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action will 
    not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Executive Order 12372
    
        This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
    Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372, 
    which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local 
    officials. (See 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.)
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State and local laws and 
    regulations that are inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no 
    retroactive effect; and (3) does not require administrative proceedings 
    before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        An environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact 
    have been prepared for the Oriental fruit fly regulatory program. The 
    site specific environmental assessment provides a basis for the 
    conclusion that implementation of integrated pest management to achieve 
    eradication of the Oriental fruit fly will not have a significant 
    impact on human health and the natural environment. Based on the 
    finding of no significant impact, the Administrator of the Animal and 
    Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that an environmental 
    impact statement need not be prepared.
        The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact 
    were prepared in accordance with: (1) The National Environmental Policy 
    Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) Regulations of the 
    Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural 
    provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations 
    implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing 
    Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
        Copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no 
    significant impact are available for public inspection at USDA, room 
    1141, South Building, 14th street and Independence Avenue SW., 
    Washington, DC, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    except holidays. Persons wishing to inspect copies are requested to 
    call ahead on (202) 690-2817 to facilitate entry into the reading room. 
    In addition, copies may be obtained by writing to the individual listed 
    under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        This rule contains no new information collection or recordkeeping 
    requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 
    et seq.).
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
    
        Agricultural commodities, Incorporation by reference, Plant 
    diseases and pests, Quarantining, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Transportation.
    
        Accordingly, 7 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 301--DOMESTIC QUARANTINE NOTICES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 147a, 150bb, 150dd, 150ee, 150ff, 161, 162, 
    and 164-167; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(c).
    
        2. In Sec. 301.93-3, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 301.93-3  Quarantined areas.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) The areas described below are designated as quarantined areas:
    
    California
    
        Los Angeles County. That portion of Los Angeles County beginning 
    at the intersection of Arrow Highway and Interstate Highway 605; 
    then west along Arrow Highway to Buena Vista Street; then north 
    along Buena Vista Street to Huntington Drive; then east along 
    Huntington Drive to Foothill Boulevard; then east along Foothill 
    Boulevard to the shoreline of the San Gabriel River; then northeast 
    along the shoreline of the San Gabriel River to State Highway 39 
    (San Gabriel Canyon Road); then southeast along an imaginary line to 
    the intersection of Sierra Madre Avenue and Glendora Avenue; then 
    south along Glendora Avenue to Alosta Avenue; then east along Alosta 
    Avenue to Lone Hill Avenue; then south along Lone Hill Avenue to 
    Cypress Street; then west along Cypress Street to Badillo Street; 
    then southwest along Badillo Street to Reeder Avenue; then south 
    along Reeder Avenue to Puente Street; then southeast along Puente 
    Street to Via Verde; then southwest along Via Verde to The Mall; 
    then south along The Mall to Interstate Highway 10; then west along 
    Interstate Highway 10 to Grand Avenue; then southeast along Grand 
    Avenue to Amar Road; then west and northwest along Amar Road to 
    Baldwin Park Boulevard; then northeast along Baldwin Park Boulevard 
    to Francisquito Avenue; then northwest along Francisquito Avenue to 
    Ramona Boulevard; then west along Ramona Boulevard to Interstate 
    Highway 605; then northeast along Interstate Highway 605 to the 
    point of beginning.
    
        Done in Washington, DC, this 20th day of August 1997.
    Terry L. Medley,
    Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-22645 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/20/1997
Published:
08/26/1997
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim rule and request for comments.
Document Number:
97-22645
Dates:
Interim rule effective August 20, 1997. Consideration will be given only to comments received on or before October 27, 1997.
Pages:
45141-45142 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-073-1
PDF File:
97-22645.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 301.93-3(c)
7 CFR 301.93-3