99-21891. Notice of Intent To Prepare Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements for Permit Applications To Incidentally Take the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse in Boulder, Douglas, Elbert, El Paso, and Jefferson Counties, Colorado  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 46703-46705]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-21891]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Notice of Intent To Prepare Environmental Assessments or 
    Environmental Impact Statements for Permit Applications To Incidentally 
    Take the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse in Boulder, Douglas, Elbert, El 
    Paso, and Jefferson Counties, Colorado
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent and announcement of meetings.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are issuing 
    this notice to advise the public that one or more Environmental 
    Assessments (EA) and/or Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) will be 
    prepared regarding applications for permits under section 10(a) of the 
    Endangered Species Act to allow the incidental take of the Preble's 
    meadow jumping mouse (Zapus hudsonius preblei) in those counties with 
    an accompanying Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). Public scoping 
    meetings will be held as identified below.
    
    DATES: See ``Supplementary Information'' section for times and places 
    of Public scoping meetings to discuss the proposed action as it affects 
    each county identified with each meeting date. Additional dates may be 
    announced in the future for meetings sponsored by other local 
    governments.
    
    ADDRESSES: Kathleen Linder, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 755 Parfet 
    Street, Suite 361, Lakewood, Colorado 80215.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Carlson, Colorado Field 
    Supervisor, (see ADDRESSES above), or telephone (303) 275-2370.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    [[Page 46704]]
    
    Public Participation
    
        1. October 18, 1999, 6:00 p.m., Boulder County--County Courthouse, 
    County Commissioners' Hearing Room, Third Floor, 1325 Pearl Street, 
    Boulder, Colorado 80306.
        2. September 29, 1999, 9:00 a.m., Douglas County--Phillip S. Miller 
    County Building, Commissioners' Hearing Room, 100 Third Street, Castle 
    Rock, Colorado 80104.
        3. September 21, 1999, 7:00 p.m., Elbert County--County Courthouse, 
    215 Comanche Street, Kiowa, Colorado 80117.
        4. October 13, 1999, 6:00 p.m., El Paso County--Pikes Peak 
    Community College, Rampart Range Campus, 11195 Highway 83, Colorado 
    Springs, Colorado 80921.
        5. September 30, 1999, 6:00 p.m., Jefferson County--County 
    Courthouse, 100 Jefferson County Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80419.
        Each meeting will include a presentation about the Preble's meadow 
    jumping mouse, the background and history of the HCP development 
    process, the information available on the presence of this species in 
    the county, activities that may be affected by their presence, and 
    strategies to conserve the species while allowing land use activities 
    to continue. Submission of written and oral comments and questions will 
    be accepted at the meeting. Written comments regarding EA or EIS 
    scoping also may be submitted by October 30, 1999, to the address 
    above.
        The Preble's meadow jumping mouse was listed as a threatened 
    species on May 11, 1998. Because of that listing, the species is 
    protected by the Act's prohibition against ``taking.'' The Act defines 
    ``take'' to mean--to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, 
    trap, capture, or collect, or attempt to engage in such conduct. 
    ``Harm'' is further defined by regulation as any act that kills or 
    injures wildlife including significant habitat modification or 
    degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by 
    significantly impairing essential behavior patterns, including 
    breeding, feeding, or sheltering (50 CFR 17.3). However, we may issue 
    permits to carry out prohibited activities involving threatened species 
    under certain circumstances. Regulations governing permits for 
    endangered and threatened wildlife are at 50 CFR 17.22.
        Each of the Colorado counties listed above is preparing to apply to 
    the Service for an incidental take permit pursuant to section 
    10(a)(1)(b) of the Act, which authorizes the issuance of incidental 
    take permits to non-Federal landowners. Each permit would authorize the 
    incidental take of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse, and possibly 
    other threatened or endangered species listed in the HCP(s), during the 
    course of conducting otherwise lawful land use or development 
    activities in the county. Although public and private entities or 
    individuals have participated in development of the HCP(s) and may 
    benefit by issuance of the incidental take permit, each county 
    government listed above has accepted the responsibility of coordinating 
    preparation of an HCP, submission of the permit application, and 
    coordination of the preparation and processing of an EA or EIS for 
    Service review and approval.
        The action to be described in each HCP is a program that will 
    ensure the continued conservation of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse 
    in the county for which the HCP(s) is prepared, while resolving 
    potential conflicts that may arise from the otherwise lawful activities 
    that may involve this species and its habitat on non-Federal lands in 
    that county. The environmental impacts that may result from 
    implementation of a conservation program described in the HCP(s) or as 
    a result of implementing other alternatives will be evaluated in the EA 
    or EIS. The county governments listed above, the Colorado Department of 
    Natural Resources (CDNR), and numerous other entities are engaged in 
    gathering information and developing HCP(s), section 10(a)(1)(B) permit 
    applications, and related EA's and/or EIS's in the counties listed 
    above. In this case, the HCP(s), section 10(a)(1)(B) permit 
    application, and EA or EIS materials are being developed concurrently.
        Development of the HCP has involved, and will continue to involve, 
    an open process coordinated by CDNR. A total of 15 open meetings have 
    been held on February 4, February 13, February 18, February 19, 
    February 20, March 10, March 11, March 17, April 15, September 1, 
    September 3, September 8, and September 15, 1998, and June 21, 1999. 
    Those involved in this effort to date include other State and Federal 
    agencies, counties, cities, towns, industry representatives, 
    agricultural representatives, environmental representatives, and 
    biologists. It is anticipated that implementation of the conservation 
    strategies identified in the HCP(s) may be through purchases of 
    habitat, voluntary management agreements, county staff actions, 
    implementing agreements with property owners, and other techniques.
    
    Alternatives
    
        1. County HCP(s) and Incidental Take Permit(s) (Proposed Action)--
    This action, which is the proposed action, seeks to address lands that 
    constitute potential Preble's meadow jumping mouse habitat within each 
    county, whether publicly or privately owned or large or small in size. 
    Such lands may include publicly owned lands, (such as Federal 
    facilities, State land board lands, State park lands, and other State-
    owned lands; utility, highway, and railroad rights-of-ways; facilities, 
    parks, and open spaces owned by local governments; facilities and lands 
    owned by municipal utilities; and other lands owned by local 
    governments) as well as private and publicly owned land being used for 
    other land uses, such as agriculture or development. Individual 
    conservation strategies of landowners may include:
        a. Avoiding disturbance of floodplains or nearby areas;
        b. Engaging in agricultural practices designed to maintain habitat;
        c. Revegetating riparian corridors between significant habitat 
    areas;
        d. Participating in Federal or State land conservation incentive 
    programs;
        e. Creating conservation easements with tax benefits;
        f. Creating habitat banks and selling conservation credits to 
    others;
        g. Mitigating lost habitat through the creation or enhancement of 
    habitat off site;
        h. Participating in existing local government development review 
    processes;
        i. Avoiding the grazing of large numbers of animals on small 
    acreage tracts;
        j. Engaging in other practices or strategies designed to maintain 
    habitat, or possibly to enhance habitat, as science confirms their 
    effectiveness;
        k. Creating an individual HCP if participation in the county HCP(s) 
    and incidental take permit(s) is not attractive or feasible for the 
    landowner.
        This alternative seeks authority for long-term incidental take 
    permit(s). The HCP(s) will assure continued conservation measures as 
    well as monitoring and reporting procedures, as required by the Service 
    for the issuance of an incidental take permit. Service issuance of the 
    incidental take permit will authorize certain activities to proceed in 
    each county without violating the Act. Individual landowners may 
    participate in the HCP(s) through voluntary management programs, 
    implementing agreements with the county government, certificates of 
    inclusion in a county permit, sale or
    
    [[Page 46705]]
    
    donation of lands to a public or private conservation organization, 
    participation in State or Federal incentive programs for land 
    conservation, partnerships with other participants in the HCP effort, 
    agreement to the terms of the HCP(s) and the incidental take permit(s), 
    exemption from regulation based on the terms of the HCP or permit, or 
    other methods.
        2. Multiple Individual HCP(s) and Incidental Take Permits for 
    Individual Landowners--This alternative would involve individual 
    landowners, or groups of landowners, preparing individual HCP(s) for 
    individual land use or development projects as the need arises. Any 
    conservation strategy listed in the proposed action could be applied to 
    similar facts or circumstances in an individual HCP. Conservation 
    strategies not discussed earlier also could be developed. This 
    alternative would involve separate HCP development and application 
    processes. In addition, it would require separate permit review 
    processes by the Service with the necessity of conducting separate EA 
    or EIS review procedures and documents. Implementation and oversight 
    would probably not involve the county government or CDNR, but would 
    require oversight and implementation as described in separate 
    implementation agreements and the permits themselves.
        3. Single Statewide HCP and Incidental Take Permit--This 
    alternative would involve the development of a single HCP for the seven 
    Colorado counties listed, and a single incidental take permit related 
    to that HCP. Individual public and private landowners, including 
    county, town, and city governments, might participate in the HCP 
    through voluntary management programs, implementing agreements, 
    certificates of inclusion in the single incidental take permit, sale or 
    donation of lands to a public or private conservation organization, 
    participation in State or Federal incentive programs for land 
    conservation, partnerships with other participants in the HCP effort, 
    agreement to the terms of the HCP and the incidental take permit, 
    exemption from regulation based on the terms of the HCP or permit, or 
    other methods. Implementation of the terms of the HCP might require an 
    intergovernmental agreement with each local government whose boundaries 
    include a participating landowner.
        Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 also incorporate the concept of ``adaptive 
    management.'' As science and conservation strategies evolve or 
    demonstrate a need to change, the landowner could modify the 
    conservation strategies as needed. Therefore, as science and 
    information progress, so may the conservation strategies and activities 
    under the HCP(s) and permit(s).
        4. No Action Alternative--Under the No Action Alternative, no 
    section 10(a)(1)(B) permit would be issued and activities involving the 
    take of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse would remain prohibited under 
    section 9 of the Act. Activities that would avoid the take of the 
    species could continue. Proposed activities on non-Federal land that 
    may affect the Preble's meadow jumping mouse would require submitting 
    an individual section 10(a)(1)(B) permit to the Service. If a Federal 
    action (such as construction of a proposed road or interchange with 
    Federal funds) would affect the species, incidental take could be 
    allowed through the consultation process outlined in section 7 of the 
    Act, and through the development of an incidental take statement if the 
    proposed action were determined to not jeopardize the continued 
    existence of the species.
    
    Issue Resolution and Environmental Review
    
        The primary issue to be addressed through the scoping and planning 
    process for the HCP(s) and related EA or EIS documents is how to 
    resolve potential conflicts between development and land management 
    practices and listed species in each county. A tentative list of 
    issues, concerns, and opportunities has been developed. There will be 
    discussion of the potential effects of each alternative, which will 
    include the following areas:
        a. The Preble's meadow jumping mouse and its habitat in each 
    county.
        b. Other federally listed threatened or endangered species in each 
    county.
        c. State listed species in the State of Colorado.
        d. Effects on other species of plants and animals.
        e. Socioeconomic effects.
        f. The use of Federal, State, county, or local public lands for 
    conservation of the Preble's meadow jumping mouse.
        g. The use of privately owned lands for conservation of the 
    Preble's meadow jumping mouse.
        h. Need for adequate funding.
        i. Effects on species recovery.
        Environmental review of the proposed action will be conducted in 
    accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy 
    Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), National 
    Environmental Policy Act regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), other 
    appropriate Federal regulations, and our procedures for compliance with 
    those regulations. This notice is being furnished in accordance with 
    section 1501.7 of the National Environmental Policy Act to obtain 
    suggestions from other agencies, tribes, and the public on the scope of 
    issues to be addressed in the EA or EIS.
    
    Public Comments Solicited
    
        We solicit written comments on the information described above. All 
    comments received by the date specified in the DATES section above will 
    be considered.
    
        Authority: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended 
    (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    
        Dated: August 17, 1999.
    Terry Terrell,
    Regional Director, Denver, Colorado.
    [FR Doc. 99-21891 Filed 8-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/26/1999
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent and announcement of meetings.
Document Number:
99-21891
Dates:
See ``Supplementary Information'' section for times and places of Public scoping meetings to discuss the proposed action as it affects each county identified with each meeting date. Additional dates may be announced in the future for meetings sponsored by other local governments.
Pages:
46703-46705 (3 pages)
PDF File:
99-21891.pdf