99-22190. Notice of Filing; Pesticide Petition  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 165 (Thursday, August 26, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 46677-46680]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-22190]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [PF-880; FRL-6090-1]
    
    
    Notice of Filing; Pesticide Petition
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide 
    petition proposing the establishment of regulations for residues of 
    chlorfenapyr in or on various food commodities.
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-880, must 
    be received on or before September 27, 1999.
    ADDRESSES: By mail submit written comments to: Information and Records 
    Integrity Branch, Public Information and Services Division (7502C), 
    Office of Pesticides Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
    St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person bring comments to: Rm. 1132, 
    CM #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by following 
    the instructions under ``SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (CBI).'' No 
    confidential business information (CBI) should be submitted through e-
    mail.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this document may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    CBI. CBI should not be submitted through e-mail. Information marked as 
    CBI will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set 
    forth in 40 CFR part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI 
    must be submitted for inclusion in the public record. Information not 
    marked confidential may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 
    notice. All written comments will be available for public inspection in 
    Rm. 1132 at the address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Sibold, Insecticide Branch, 
    Registration Division (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Rm. 212, Crystal 
    Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 305-
    6502; e-mail: sibold.ann@epa.gov.
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received a pesticide petition as 
    follows proposing the establishment and/or amendment of regulations for 
    residues of chlorfenapyr in or on various food commodities under 
    section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Comestic Act (FFDCA), 21 
    U.S.C. 346a. EPA has determined that this petition contains data or 
    information regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2); 
    however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted 
    data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the 
    petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the 
    petition.
        The official record for this notice of filing, as well as the 
    public version, has been established for this notice of filing under 
    docket control number [PF-880] (including comments and data submitted 
    electronically as described below). A public version of this record, 
    including printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does 
    not include any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection 
    from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 
    holidays. The official record is located at the address in 
    ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this document.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epa.gov
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comment and data 
    will also be accepted on disks in Wordperfect 5.1 file format or ASCII 
    file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be 
    identified by the docket control number (PF-880) and appropriate 
    petition number. Electronic comments on this proposed rule may be filed 
    online at many Federal Depository Libraries.
    
    List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives, 
    Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
        Dated: August 19, 1999.
    
    James Jones,
    
    Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
    Summary of Petition
    
        The petitioner summary of the pesticide petition is printed below 
    as required by section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA. The summary of the 
    petition was prepared by the petitioner and represents the views of the 
    petitioner. EPA is publishing the petition summary verbatim without 
    editing it in any way. The petition summary announces the
    
    [[Page 46678]]
    
    availability of a description of the analytical methods available to 
    EPA for the detection and measurement of the pesticide chemical 
    residues or an explanation of why no such method is needed.
    
     American Cyanamid
    
    PP 6E4683
    
        EPA has received a pesticide petition (6E4683) from American 
    Cyanamid, P.O. Box 400, Princeton, NJ 08543-0400 proposing, pursuant to 
    section 408(d) of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR 180 by 
    establishing a tolerance for residues of chlorfenapyr [4-bromo-2-(4-
    chlorophenyl)-1-(ethoxymethyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1-pyrrole-3-
    carbonitrile] in or on the raw agricultural commodity (RAC) imported 
    citrus at 0.5 ppm. As citrus processed commodities fed to food animals 
    may be transferred to milk and edible tissues, tolerances are also 
    proposed for the following ruminant food items, milk at 0.01 parts per 
    million (ppm); milk fat at 0.15 ppm; meat at 0.01 ppm; and meat 
    byproducts (including fat) at 0.10 ppm. EPA has determined that the 
    petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth 
    in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated 
    the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data 
    supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before 
    EPA rules on the petition.
    
    A. Residue Chemistry
    
        1. Plant metabolism. The nature of the residues of chlorfenapyr in 
    plants is adequately understood and the residue of concern in citrus 
    consists of the parent molecule. Expressed on a whole basis, the parent 
    compound accounted for 56-75% of the total radioactive residue (TRR) 
    98% of which was associated with the external rinse and peel.
        2. Analytical method. The gas chromatography (GC) analytical method 
    M2284, which is proposed as the enforcement method for the residues of 
    chlorfenapyr in citrus, has a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.01 ppm 
    (0.025 ppm for juice), and a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.05 ppm.
        3. Magnitude of residues. Extensive citrus field trials have been 
    conducted over multiple growing seasons in all major citrus growing 
    regions of the United States, Argentina, and Brazil. The results of 
    these studies indicate that at application rates of 1.05 lbs active 
    ingredient acre (ai/A), the maximum expected chlorfenapyr residues are 
    0.4 ppm in oranges, 0.38 ppm in lemons, and 0.27 ppm in grapefruit 
    samples harvested at a minimum of 7 days following the last 
    application. These field trial data are adequate to support the 
    proposed tolerance of 0.5 ppm in/on citrus. The results of processing 
    studies indicate that chlorfenapyr residues do not concentrate in 
    molasses and juice. The actual concentration factors in dried pulp 
    (2.4x), and citrus oil (70x) are well below the maximum theoretical 
    concentration factors for these commodities. Although citrus oil is not 
    considered to be a ready-to-eat item and is not expected to contribute 
    to the dietary exposure, a tolerance at 35 ppm (0.5 ppm x 70) is 
    proposed for enforcement purposes.
    
    B. Toxicological Profile
    
        1. Acute toxicity. Based on EPA's toxicity category criteria, the 
    acute toxicity category for chlorfenapyr technical is Category II or 
    moderately toxic (signal word WARNING), and the acute toxicity category 
    for the 2SC formulation is Category III or slightly toxic (signal word 
    CAUTION). Males appear to be more sensitive to the effects of 
    chlorfenapyr than females. The acute toxicity profile indicates that 
    absorption by the oral route appears to be greater than by the dermal 
    route. The following are the results from the acute toxicity tests 
    conducted on the technical material.
        i. Rat oral LD50 441/1,152 milligrams/kilograms/body 
    weight (mg/kg/bwt) male/female -- Toxicity Category II.
        ii. Rabbit dermal LD50: > 2,000 mg/kg/bwt male/female -- 
    Toxicity Category III.
        iii. Acute inhalation. LC50 0.83/ > 2.7 milligrams per 
    liter (mg/L) male/female -- Toxicity Category III.
        iv. Eye irritation. Moderately irritating -- Toxicity Category III.
        v. Dermal irritation. Non-irritating -- Toxicity Category IV.
        vi. Dermal sensitization. Non-sensitizer -- Non Sensitizer.
        vii. Acute neurotoxicity. No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) 
    45 mg/kg bwt. Not an acute neurotoxicant.
        2. Genotoxicty. Chlorfenapyr technical (94.5% a.i.) was examined in 
    a battery of in vitro, and in vivo tests to assess its genotoxicity and 
    its potential for carcinogenicity. These tests are summarized below.
        i. Microbial/microsome mutagenicity assay. Non-mutagenic.
        ii. Mammalian Cell Chinese hampster ovary/hypoxanthine guanine 
    phophoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) Mutagenicity Assay. Non-
    mutagenic.
        iii. In vivo micronucleus assay. Non-genotoxic.
        iv. In vitro--chromosome aberration assay in CHO. Non-clastogenic.
        v. In vitro--chromosome aberration assay in CHLC. Non-clastogenic.
        vi. Unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay. Non-genotoxic.
        3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. Chlorfenapyr is neither 
    a reproductive or developmental toxicant and is not a teratogenic agent 
    in the Sprague-Dawley rat, or the New Zealand white rabbit. This is 
    demonstrated by the results of the following studies:
        i. Rat oral teratology. NOAEL for maternal toxicity 25 mg/kg bwt/
    day, and NOAEL for fetal/development toxicity 225 mg/kg/bwt/day.
        ii. Rabbit oral teratology. NOAEL for maternal toxicity 5 mg/kg/ 
    bwt/day and NOAEL for fetal/development toxicity 30 mg/kg/bwt/day.
        iii. Rat 2-generation reproduction. NOAEL for parental toxicity/
    growth and offspring development 60 ppm (5 mg/kg/bwt/day). NOAEL for 
    reproductive performance 600 ppm (44 mg/kg/bwt/day).
        4. Subchronic toxicity. The following are the results of the 
    subchronic toxicity tests that have been conducted with chlorfenapyr:
        i. 28-Day rabbit dermal. NOAEL 100 mg/kg/bwt/day.
        ii. 28-Day rat feeding. NOAEL > 600 ppm (< 71.6="" mg/kg/bwt/day).="" iii.="" 28-day="" mouse="" feeding.="" noael=""> 160 ppm (< 32="" mg/kg/bwt/day).="" iv.="" 13-week="" rat="" dietary.="" noael="" 150="" ppm="" (11.7="" mg/kg/bwt/day).="" v.="" 13-week="" mouse="" dietary.="" noael="" 40="" ppm="" (8.2="" mg/kg/bwt/day).="" vi.="" 13-week="" dog="" dietary.="" noael="" 120="" ppm="" (4.2="" mg/kg/bwt/day).="" 5.="" chronic="" toxicity.="" chlorfenapyr="" is="" not="" oncogenic="" in="" either="" sprague="" dawley="" rats="" or="" cd-1="" mice="" and="" is="" not="" likely="" to="" be="" carcinogenic="" in="" humans.="" the="" following="" are="" the="" results="" of="" the="" chronic="" toxicity="" tests="" that="" have="" been="" conducted="" with="" chlorfenapyr:="" i.="" 1-year="" neurotoxicity="" in="" rats.="" noael="" 60="" ppm="" (2.6/3.4="" mg/kg/bwt/="" day="" male/female).="" ii.="" 1-year="" dog="" dietary.="" noael="" 120="" ppm="" (4.0/4.5="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" male/="" female).="" iii.="" 24-month="" rat="" dietary.="" noael="" for="" chronic="" effects="" 60="" ppm="" (2.9/="" 3.6="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" male/female)="" and="" noael="" for="" oncogenic="" effects="" 600="" ppm="" (31/37="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" male/female).="" iv.="" 18-month="" mouse="" dietary.="" noael="" for="" chronic="" effects="" 20="" ppm="" (2.8/="" 3.7="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" male/female)="" and="" noael="" for="" oncogenic="" effects="" 240="" ppm="" (34.5/44.5="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" male/female).="" 6.="" animal="" metabolism.="" a="" metabolism="" study="" was="" conducted="" in="" sprague="" dawley="" rats="" at="" approximately="" 20="" and="" 200="" mg/kg/bwt="" using="" radiolabeled="" chlorfenapyr.="" approximately="" 65%="" of="" the="" administered="" [[page="" 46679]]="" dose="" was="" eliminated="" during="" the="" first="" 24="" hours="" (62%="" in="" feces="" and="" 3%="" in="" urine)="" and="" by="" 48="" hours="" following="" dosing,="" approximately="" 85%="" of="" the="" dose="" had="" been="" excreted="" (80%="" in="" feces="" and="" 5%="" in="" urine).="" the="" absorbed="" chlorfenapyr-related="" residues="" were="" distributed="" throughout="" the="" body="" and="" detected="" in="" tissues="" and="" organs="" of="" all="" treatment="" groups.="" the="" principal="" route="" of="" elimination="" was="" via="" feces,="" mainly="" as="" unchanged="" parent="" plus="" minor="" n-dealkylated,="" debrominated="" and="" hydroxylated="" oxidation="" products.="" the="" metabolic="" pathway="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" the="" laying="" hen="" and="" the="" lactating="" goat="" was="" also="" similar="" to="" that="" in="" laboratory="" rats.="" 7.="" metabolite="" toxicology.="" the="" parent="" molecule="" is="" the="" only="" moiety="" of="" toxicological="" significance="" which="" needs="" regulation="" in="" plant="" and="" animal="" commodities.="" 8.="" endocrine="" disruption.="" collective="" organ="" weights="" and="" histopathological="" findings="" from="" the="" 2-generation="" rat="" reproduction="" study,="" as="" well="" as="" from="" the="" subchronic="" and="" chronic="" toxicity="" studies="" in="" two="" or="" more="" animal="" species,="" demonstrate="" no="" apparent="" estrogenic="" effects="" or="" effects="" on="" the="" endocrine="" system.="" there="" is="" no="" information="" available="" which="" suggests="" that="" chlorfenapyr="" would="" be="" associated="" with="" endocrine="" effects.="" c.="" aggregate="" exposure="" 1.="" food.="" for="" purposes="" of="" assessing="" the="" potential="" dietary="" exposure,="" a="" theoretical="" maximum="" residue="" contribution="" (tmrc)="" has="" been="" calculated="" from="" the="" tolerance="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in/on="" citrus="" at="" 0.5="" ppm.="" this="" exposure="" assessment="" is="" based="" on="" very="" conservative="" assumptions,="" namely="" 100%="" of="" all="" citrus="" is="" treated="" with="" chlorfenapyr="" and="" that="" the="" residues="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" citrus="" are="" at="" the="" tolerance="" level.="" although="" there="" are="" no="" other="" established="" united="" states="" permanent="" tolerances="" for="" chlorfenapyr,="" a="" petition="" for="" a="" permanent="" tolerance="" at="" 0.5="" ppm="" in="" cottonseed="" is="" pending="" at="" the="" agency.="" therefore,="" the="" dietary="" exposures="" to="" residues="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" or="" on="" food="" will="" be="" limited="" to="" residues="" in="" cottonseed,="" citrus="" and="" food="" and="" feed="" items="" derived="" from="" them.="" as="" dried="" citrus="" pulp="" is="" a="" dairy="" and="" beef="" cattle="" feed="" item,="" a="" cold="" feeding="" study="" with="" dairy="" cattle="" was="" conducted.="" since="" this="" study="" demonstrated="" that="" measurable="" residues="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" may="" occur="" in="" milk,="" meat,="" and="" meat="" byproducts,="" appropriate="" residue="" tolerances="" for="" these="" items="" are="" proposed.="" the="" contribution="" of="" the="" citrus="" tolerances="" alone="" to="" the="" daily="" consumption="" uses="" only="" 0.23%="" of="" the="" reference="" dose="" (rfd)="" for="" the="" overall="" u.s.="" population.="" the="" combined="" contributions="" of="" the="" citrus="" and="" the="" pending="" cottonseed="" tolerances="" to="" the="" daily="" consumption="" uses="" less="" than="" 1%="" (actual="" 0.85%)="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" overall="" u.s.="" population="" and="" less="" than="" 3%="" (actual="" 2.23%)="" and="" less="" than="" 1%="" (actual="" 0.89%)="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" children="" aged="" 1-6="" and="" for="" non-nursing="" infants,="" respectively.="" 2.="" drinking="" water.="" this="" proposed="" tolerance="" is="" for="" imported="" citrus.="" since="" there="" are="" no="" currently="" registered="" uses="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" the="" united="" states,="" potential="" exposure="" from="" drinking="" water="" is="" not="" relevant="" to="" this="" petition.="" 3.="" non-dietary="" exposure.="" this="" petition="" is="" for="" a="" tolerance="" on="" imported="" citrus.="" as="" there="" are="" no="" registered="" uses="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" the="" united="" states="" at="" present,="" the="" potential="" for="" non-dietary="" exposure="" is="" not="" pertinent="" to="" this="" petition.="" d.="" cumulative="" effects="" the="" pyrrole="" insecticides="" represent="" a="" new="" class="" of="" chemistry="" with="" a="" unique="" mechanism="" of="" action.="" the="" parent="" molecule,="" ac="" 303,630="" is="" a="" pro-="" insecticide="" which="" is="" converted="" to="" the="" active="" form,="" cl="" 303,268,="" via="" rapid="" metabolism="" by="" mixed="" function="" oxidases="" (mfos).="" the="" active="" form="" uncouples="" oxidative="" phosphorylation="" in="" the="" insect="" mitochondria="" by="" disrupting="" the="" proton="" gradient="" across="" the="" mitochondrial="" membrane.="" the="" production="" of="" adenosine="" triphosphate="" (atp)="" is="" inhibited="" resulting="" in="" the="" cessation="" of="" all="" cellular="" functions.="" because="" of="" this="" unique="" mechanism="" of="" action,="" it="" is="" highly="" unlikely="" that="" toxic="" effects="" produced="" by="" chlorfenapyr="" would="" be="" cumulative="" with="" those="" of="" any="" other="" pesticide="" chemical.="" in="" mammals,="" there="" is="" a="" lower="" titer="" of="" mfos,="" and="" chlorfenapyr="" is="" metabolized="" by="" different="" pathways="" (including="" dehalogenation,="" oxidation="" and="" ring="" hydroxylation)="" to="" other="" polar="" metabolites="" without="" any="" significant="" accumulation="" of="" the="" potent="" uncoupler,="" cl="" 303,268.="" in="" the="" rat,="" approximately="" 85%="" of="" the="" administered="" dose="" is="" excreted="" in="" the="" feces="" within="" 48="" hours,="" thereby="" reducing="" the="" levels="" of="" ac="" 303,630="" and="" cl="" 303,268="" that="" are="" capable="" of="" reaching="" the="" mitochondria.="" this="" differential="" metabolism="" of="" ac="" 303,630="" to="" cl="" 303,268="" in="" insects="" versus="" to="" other="" polar="" metabolites="" in="" mammals="" is="" responsible="" for="" the="" selective="" insect="" toxicity="" of="" the="" pyrroles.="" e.="" safety="" determination="" 1.="" u.s.="" population.="" the="" rfd="" of="" 0.03="" mg/kg/bwt/day="" for="" the="" residues="" of="" chlorfenapyr="" in="" citrus="" is="" calculated="" by="" applying="" a="" 100-fold="" safety="" factor="" to="" the="" overall="" noael="" of="" 3="" mg/kg/bwt/day.="" this="" noael="" is="" based="" on="" the="" results="" of="" the="" chronic="" feeding="" studies="" in="" the="" rat="" and="" mouse="" and="" the="" 2-generation="" reproduction="" study="" in="" the="" rat.="" the="" theoretical="" maximum="" residue="" contribution="" (tmrc)="" for="" the="" proposed="" tolerances="" in="" citrus="" alone,="" (0.0000692="" mg/kg/bwt/day),="" will="" utilize="" only="" 0.23%="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" general="" u.s.="" population="" and="" the="" combined="" tmrc="" for="" the="" proposed="" chlorfenapyr="" tolerances="" in="" cottonseed,="" citrus,="" milk,="" and="" meat="" (0.0002558="" mg/kg/bwt/day)="" will="" utilize="" approximately="" 0.85%="" of="" the="" rfd="" for="" the="" general="" u.s.="" population.="" 2.="" infants="" and="" children.="" the="" tmrc="" in="" milk="" consumed="" by="" a="" non-nursing="" infant="" (=""> 1-year of age) is 0.0002435 mg/kg/bwt/day. The combined 
    tolerances will use less than 1% (actual 0.89%) of the RfD for non-
    nursing infants. The TMRC in milk consumed by a child (1-6 years of 
    age) is 0.0003886 mg/kg/bwt/day. The combined TMRC for the proposed 
    chlorfenapyr tolerances in cottonseed, citrus meat and milk consumed by 
    a child 1-6 years of age is 0.0006708 mg/kg/bwt/day, which is less than 
    3% (actual 2.23%) of the RfD. Therefore, the results of the toxicology 
    and metabolism studies support both the safety of chlorfenapyr to 
    humans based on the intended use as an insecticide-miticide on citrus 
    and cottonseed and the granting of the requested tolerances in 
    cottonseed, citrus, milk, milk fat solids, meat, and meat by-products.
        Based on the conservative assumptions used in proposing the above 
    tolerances and the absence of other non-dietary routes of exposure to 
    chlorfenapyr, and since the calculated exposures are well below 100% of 
    the reference dose, there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will 
    result from aggregate exposure to residues of chlorfenapyr, including 
    all anticipated dietary exposure and all other non-occupational 
    exposures. The use of a 100-fold safety factor ensures an acceptable 
    margin of safety for both the overall U.S. population as well as 
    infants and children. As the toxicology database (reproduction/
    developmental and teratology studies) is complete, valid and reliable, 
    no additional safety factor is needed.
        The 100-fold margin of safety is adequate to assure a reasonable 
    certainty of no harm to infants and children from the proposed use. As 
    stated earlier, the NOAEL is based on the effects observed in the rat 
    and mouse chronic oncogenicity studies, (reduced bwt gains, increased 
    globulin and cholesterol values and increased liver weights in the rat 
    and reduced bwt gains and vacuolation of white matter of the mouse 
    brain), the 1-year neurotoxicity study in the rat, (reduced bwt gains 
    and vacuolar myelinopathy of
    
    [[Page 46680]]
    
    the brain and spinal cord that is completely reversible following 
    termination of treatment and is not associated with any damage to 
    neuronal cell bodies or axons; vacuolation of the white matter is a 
    consequence of edema (water) formation between the myelin layers which 
    result from the unrestricted movement of ions across the cell 
    membranes) and the 2-generation rat reproduction study, (reduced bwt 
    gains for parental animals and reduced pup body weights for the F1 and 
    F2 litters; however no behavioral changes were observed in either F1 or 
    F2 offsprings in the 2-generation reproduction study). Moreover, as the 
    NOAELs for fetal/developmental toxicity are significantly higher than 
    those for maternal toxicity, the results indicate that chlorfenapyr is 
    neither a developmental toxicant nor a teratogenic agent in either the 
    Sprague-Dawley rat or New Zealand White rabbit. Thus, there is no 
    reliable information to indicate that there would be a variability in 
    the sensitivities of infants and children and adults to the effects of 
    exposure to chlorfenapyr.
    
    F. International Tolerances
    
         Section 408(b)(4) of the amended FFDCA requires EPA to determine 
    whether a maximum residue level has been established for the pesticide 
    chemical by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. There is neither a Codex 
    proposal, nor Canadian, or Mexican tolerances/limits for residues of 
    chlorfenapyr in/on citrus. Therefore, a compatibility issue is not 
    relevant to the proposed tolerance.
    [FR Doc. 99-22190 Filed 8-25-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/26/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
99-22190
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket control number PF-880, must be received on or before September 27, 1999.
Pages:
46677-46680 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-880, FRL-6090-1
PDF File:
99-22190.pdf