96-21623. Common Crop Insurance Regulations; ELS Cotton Crop Insurance Provisions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 27, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 43999-44001]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-21623]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 27, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 43999]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
    
    7 CFR Part 457
    
    RIN 0563-AB52
    
    
    Common Crop Insurance Regulations; ELS Cotton Crop Insurance 
    Provisions
    
    AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to 
    amend the Extra Long Staple (ELS) Cotton Crop Insurance Provisions. The 
    intended effect of this action is to provide policy changes to better 
    meet the needs of the insured.
    
    DATES: Written comments, data, and opinions on this proposed rule will 
    be accepted until close of business September 26, 1996 and will be 
    considered when the rule is to be made final. The comment period for 
    information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
    continues through October 25, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments to 
    the Chief, Product Development Branch, Federal Crop Insurance 
    Corporation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 9435 Holmes Road, Kansas 
    City, MO 64131. Written comments will be available for public 
    inspection and copying in room 0324, South Building, 14th and 
    Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C., 8:15 a.m.-5:45 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Hoy, Program Analyst, Research 
    and Development Division, Product Development Branch, FCIC, at 9435 
    Holmes Road, Kansas City, MO 64131, telephone (816) 926-7730.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Executive Order No. 12866 and Departmental Regulation 1512-1
    
        This action has been reviewed under United States Department of 
    Agriculture (USDA) procedures established by Executive Order No. 12866 
    and Departmental Regulation 1512-1. This action constitutes a review as 
    to the need, currency, clarity, and effectiveness of these regulations 
    under those procedures. The sunset review date established for these 
    regulations is March 1, 1999.
        This rule has been determined to be significant for the purposes of 
    Executive Order No. 12866 and, therefore, has been reviewed by the 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    
    Cost-Benefit Analysis
    
        A Cost-Benefit Analysis has been completed and is available to 
    interested persons at the address listed above. In summary, the 
    analysis finds that the expected benefits of this action outweigh the 
    costs. Clarification of the provisions and administrative changes that 
    simplify program operations will benefit producers, FCIC, and insurance 
    providers.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
    
        The information collection requirements contained in the these 
    regulations were previously approved by OMB pursuant to the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) under OMB control number 
    0563-0003 through September 30, 1998.
        The amendments set forth in this proposed rule do not contain 
    additional information collections that require clearance by the OMB 
    under the provisions of 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
        The title of this information collection is ``Catastrophic Risk 
    Protection Plan and Related Requirements including, Common Crop 
    Insurance Regulations; ELS Cotton Crop Provisions.'' The information to 
    be collected includes: a crop insurance acreage report, an insurance 
    application, and a continuous contract. Information collected from the 
    acreage report and application is electronically submitted to FCIC by 
    the reinsured companies. Potential respondents to this information 
    collection are producers of ELS cotton that are eligible for Federal 
    crop insurance.
        The information requested is necessary for the insurance company 
    and FCIC to provide insurance and reinsurance, determine eligibility, 
    determine the correct parties to the agreement or contract, determine 
    and collect premiums or other monetary amounts, and pay benefits.
        All information is reported annually. The reporting burden for this 
    collection of information is estimated to average 16.9 minutes per 
    response for each of the 3.6 responses from approximately 1,755,015 
    respondents. The total annual burden on the public for this information 
    collection is 2,676,932 hours.
        FCIC is soliciting comments for the following: (a) whether the 
    proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper 
    performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the 
    information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 
    agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
    information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
    the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of 
    the collection of information on respondents, including the use of 
    automated collection techniques or other forms of information gathering 
    technology.
        Comments regarding paperwork reduction should be submitted to the 
    Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory 
    Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503 and to 
    Bonnie Hart, Advisory and Corporate Operations Staff, Regulatory Review 
    Group, Farm Service Agency, P.O. Box 2415, Ag Box 0570, U.S. Department 
    of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20013-2415. Telephone (202) 690-2857. 
    Copies of the information collection may be obtained from Bonnie Hart 
    at the above stated address.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
        Title II of the Unfunded Mandate Reform of 1995 (UMRA), Pub. L. 
    104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
    effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal 
    governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, FCIC 
    generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
    analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
    may result in expenditures of state, local, or tribal governments, in 
    the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
    one year. When such a statement is needed for a rule, section 205 of 
    the UMRA generally requires
    
    [[Page 44000]]
    
    FCIC to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory 
    alternatives and adopt the least costly, more cost-effective or least 
    burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule.
        This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory 
    provisions of title II of the UMRA) for state, local, and tribal 
    governments or the private sector. Thus, this rule is not subject to 
    the requirements of section 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
    
    Executive Order No. 12612
    
        It has been determined under section 6(a) of Executive Order No. 
    12612, Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The 
    provisions contained in this rule will not have a substantial direct 
    effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the distribution 
    of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This regulation will not have a significant impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. Under the current regulations, a producer is 
    required to complete an application and acreage report. If the crop is 
    damaged or destroyed, the insured is required to give notice of loss 
    and provide the necessary information to complete a claim for 
    indemnity. If the insured elects to use actual records of acreage and 
    production as the basis for the production guarantee, the insured may 
    elect to report this information on a yearly basis. This regulation 
    does not alter those requirements. Therefore, the amount of work 
    required of the insurance companies and FSA offices delivering and 
    servicing these policies will not increase significantly from the 
    amount of work currently required. This rule does not have any greater 
    or lesser impact on the insured. Therefore, this action is determined 
    to be exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 
    U.S.C. 605), and no Regulatory Flexibility Analysis was prepared.
    
    Federal Assistance Program
    
        This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic 
    Assistance under No. 10.450.
    
    Executive Order No. 12372
    
        This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order 
    No. 12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and 
    local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, 
    published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
    
    Executive Order No. 12778
    
        The Office of the General Counsel has determined that these 
    regulations meet the applicable standards provided in sections 2(a) and 
    2(b)(2) of Executive Order No. 12778. The provisions of this rule will 
    not have a retroactive effect prior to the effective date. The 
    provisions of this rule will preempt state and local laws to the extent 
    such state and local laws are inconsistent herewith. The administrative 
    appeal provisions in 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted before 
    action for judicial review may be brought.
    
    Environmental Evaluation
    
        This action is not expected to have a significant impact on the 
    quality of the human environment, health, and safety. Therefore, 
    neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact 
    Statement is needed.
    
    National Performance Review
    
        This regulatory action is being taken as part of the National 
    Performance Review Initiative to eliminate unnecessary or duplicative 
    regulations and improve those that remain in force.
    
    Background
    
        FCIC proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance Regulations (7 CFR 
    part 457) by revising 7 CFR Sec. 457.105 effective for the 1997 and 
    succeeding crop years. The principal changes to the provisions for 
    insuring ELS cotton are as follows:
        1. Section 1--Specify that the yield conversion factor normally 
    applied to non-irrigated skip-row cotton acreage will not be used if 
    the land between the rows of cotton is planted to any other spring 
    crop. Current regulations specify that the yield conversion factor 
    cannot be applied if the land between the rows of cotton is planted to 
    any crop. This conflicts with the definition of ``skip-row'' in section 
    1(o)(1), which allows a planting pattern of alternating rows of cotton 
    and land planted to another crop planted the previous fall. Change 
    ``Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service'' to ``Farm 
    Service Agency (FSA)'' to conform with the United States Department of 
    Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994. Amend the definition of 
    ``written agreement'' to remove the substantive provisions.
        2. Section 2(d)(1) and (2)--change ``ASCS'' to ``FSA''.
        3. Section 2(d)(2)--Clarify unit division for non-irrigated corners 
    of center pivot irrigation systems.
        4. Section 5--Change the cancellation and termination dates of 
    March 15 to February 28 for all states except New Mexico. This change 
    is necessary to comply with the requirement of the Federal Crop 
    Insurance Reform Act of 1994 that moved the sales closing dates for 
    spring planted crops 30 days earlier. The present cancellation and 
    termination dates of March 15 for New Mexico will remain the same 
    because the date has already been moved 30 days earlier in the 1995 
    crop year.
        5. Section--Move the substantive provisions for providing insurance 
    coverage by written agreement from section 1(q) to this new section for 
    clarification.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
    
        Crop insurance, ELS Cotton, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    Proposed Rule
    
        Pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Crop Insurance 
    Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.), the Federal Crop Insurance 
    Corporation hereby proposes to amend the Common Crop Insurance 
    Regulations, (7 CFR part 457), effective for the 1997 and succeeding 
    crop years, to read as follows:
    
    PART 457--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l) and 1506(p).
    
        2. Section 457.105 is amended by revising subsection 1(j) as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 457.105   Extra long staple cotton crop insurance provisions.
    
    * * * * *
        1. Definitions
    * * * * *
        (j) Planted acreage--Land in which seed has been placed by a 
    machine appropriate for the insured crop and planting method, at the 
    correct depth, into a seedbed which has been properly prepared for 
    the planting method and production practice. Cotton must be planted 
    in rows to be considered planted. Planting in any other manner will 
    be considered as a failure to follow recognized good farming 
    practices and any loss of production will not be insured unless 
    otherwise provided by the Special Provisions or by written agreement 
    to insure such crop. The yield conversion factor normally applied to 
    non-irrigated skip-row cotton acreage will not be used if the land 
    between the rows of cotton is planted to any other spring planted 
    crop.
    * * * * *
        3. In Sec. 457.105, Section 1(o)(2) is revised to read as follows:
    * * * * *
    
    [[Page 44001]]
    
        (o) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (2) Qualifies as a skip-row planting pattern as defined by the 
    Farm Service Agency (FSA).
    * * * * *
        4. In Sec. 457.105, Section 1(q) is revised to read as follows:
     * * * * *
        (q) Written agreement--A written document that alters designated 
    terms of a policy in accordance with section 13.
    * * * * *
        5. In Sec. 457.105, Section 2(d)(1) is amended by removing ``ASCS'' 
    and inserting in its place ``FSA.''
        6. In Sec. 457.105, Section 2(d)(2) is revised to read as follows:
    
        2. Unit Division
    * * * * *
        (d) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (2) Optional Units on Acreage Including Both Irrigated and Non-
    Irrigated Practices: In addition to, or instead of, establishing 
    optional units by section, section equivalent, or FSA Farm Serial 
    Number, optional units may be based on irrigated acreage or non-
    irrigated acreage if both are located in the same section, section 
    equivalent, or FSA Farm Serial Number. To qualify as separate 
    irrigated and non-irrigated optional units, the non-irrigated 
    acreage may not continue into the irrigated acreage in the same rows 
    or planting pattern. The irrigated acreage may not extend beyond the 
    point at which the irrigation system can deliver the quantity of 
    water needed to produce the yield on which the guarantee is based, 
    except that the corners of a field in which a center pivot 
    irrigation system is used will be considered as irrigated acreage if 
    separate acceptable records of production from the corners are not 
    provided. If the corners of a field in which a center-pivot 
    irrigation system is used do not qualify as a separate non-irrigated 
    optional unit, they will be considered part of the unit containing 
    the irrigated acreage. However, non-irrigated acreage that is not a 
    part of a field in which a center-pivot irrigation system is used 
    may qualify as a separate optional unit provided that all other 
    requirements of this section are met.
    * * * * *
        7. In Sec. 457.105, Section 5 is revised to read as follows:
    * * * * *
        5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
        In accordance with section 2 (Life of Policy, Cancellation, and 
    Termination) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy (Sec. 457.8), the 
    cancellation and termination dates are:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Cancellation and termination--
                     States                                dates            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    New Mexico..............................  March 15                      
    All other States........................  February 28                   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * * * * *
        8. In Sec. 457.105, Section 13 is added to read as follows:
     * * * * *
        13. Written Agreement
        Designated terms of this policy may be altered by written 
    agreement. The following conditions will apply:
        (a) You must apply in writing for each written agreement no 
    later than the sales closing date, except as provided in section 
    13(e).
        (b) The application for written agreement must contain all terms 
    of the contract between the insurance provider and the insured that 
    will be in effect if the written agreement is not approved.
        (c) If approved, the written agreement must include all variable 
    terms of the contract, including, but not limited to, crop type or 
    variety, the guarantee, premium rate, and price election.
        (d) Each written agreement will only be valid for one year. If 
    the written agreement is not specifically renewed the following 
    year, insurance coverage for subsequent crop years will be in 
    accordance with the printed policy.
        (e) An application for written agreement submitted after the 
    sales closing date may be approved if, after a physical inspection 
    of the acreage, it is determined that no loss has occurred and the 
    crop is insurable in accordance with the policy and written 
    agreement provisions.
    
        Signed in Washington D.C., on August 20, 1996.
    Kenneth D. Ackerman,
    Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
    [FR Doc. 96-21623 Filed 8-26-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-FA-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/27/1996
Department:
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
96-21623
Dates:
Written comments, data, and opinions on this proposed rule will be accepted until close of business September 26, 1996 and will be considered when the rule is to be made final. The comment period for information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 continues through October 25, 1996.
Pages:
43999-44001 (3 pages)
RINs:
0563-AB52
PDF File:
96-21623.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 457.105