99-22314. Food Additives Permitted in the Feed and Drinking Water of Animals; Menadione Nicotinamide Bisulfite  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 166 (Friday, August 27, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 46841-46843]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-22314]
    
    
    
    [[Page 46841]]
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 573
    
    [Docket No. 94F-0283]
    
    
    Food Additives Permitted in the Feed and Drinking Water of 
    Animals; Menadione Nicotinamide Bisulfite
    
    AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION:  Final rule; republication and opportunity to file objections 
    or additional information.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is republishing, with 
    additional information, a final rule that published in the Federal 
    Register of January 2, 1996 (61 FR 5). The rule amended the food 
    additive regulations (animal use) to reflect approval of a food 
    additive petition (FAP) filed by Vanetta (U.S.A.) Inc. Objections to 
    the final rule were filed. FDA is not acting on the objections in this 
    document, but is clarifying the basis of approval of the petition and 
    providing additional information. The agency also is providing a new 
    30-day period for the submission of objections or of additional 
    information in support of the objections that were previously filed. 
    FDA has not stayed the effective date of the final rule, effective 
    January 2, 1996.
    DATES: Objections, additional information in support of the previously 
    filed objections, or additional written objections and requests for a 
    hearing, must be submitted by September 27, 1999.
    ADDRESSES:  Submit written objections and/or additional information in 
    support of objections previously submitted to the Dockets Management 
    Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 
    1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Sharon A. Benz, Center for Veterinary 
    Medicine (HFV-228), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., 
    Rockville, MD 20855, 301-827-6656.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    I. Background
    
         In the Federal Register of January 2, 1996, FDA published a final 
    rule that amended the food additive regulations (animal use) to reflect 
    approval of an FAP (FAP 2228) filed by Vanetta (U.S.A.) Inc., 1770 East 
    Market St., York, PA 17402. The final rule provides for the safe use of 
    menadione nicotinamide bisulfite (MNB) as a nutritional supplement in 
    chicken and turkey feeds for the prevention of vitamin K deficiency and 
    as a source of supplemental niacin when used at a rate not to exceed 2 
    grams per ton (g/t) of complete feed. Heterochemical Corp., 111 East 
    Hawthorne Ave., Valley Stream, NY 11580, filed objections to the final 
    rule in its entirety alleging that the studies upon which the petition 
    relies failed to conform to good laboratory practices (GLP's) or good 
    clinical practices (GCP's), and that the regulation promotes deception 
    of the consumer and misbranding of the product. Heterochemical's 
    objections are:
        1. The record of the studies fails to establish that any of the 
    nonclinical laboratory studies (including target animal safety) on 
    which the regulation is based were conducted in accordance with GLP's 
    as described in part 58 (21 CFR part 58). The record also fails to 
    provide, alternatively, a reason for noncompliance as required by 
    Sec. 571.1(k) (21 CFR 571.1(k)). Furthermore, the record does not 
    provide a basis for identifying the differences between the practices 
    used and those required by the GLP regulations, so as to permit an 
    evaluation of the studies' integrity and reliability (i.e., if the 
    target animal safety studies are flawed, there is no information in 
    support of the safety of the food additive) (Ref. 1).
        2. The record of the studies fails to establish that any of the 
    clinical studies on which the regulation is based were conducted in 
    accordance with GCP's as illustrated in FDA's Center for Veterinary 
    Medicine's (CVM's) guidance document entitled ``Guideline on the 
    Conduct of Clinical Investigations: Responsibility of Clinical 
    Investigators and Monitors for Investigational New Animal Drug 
    Studies,'' October 1992 (the guidelines cited by the objection were 
    supplanted by a revised document in May 1997) (Ref. 2).
        3. Heterochemical objects to the regulation in that it establishes 
    MNB as a source of supplemental niacin and authorizes labeling the 
    product as a source of supplemental niacin. Based on a low level of 
    niacin supplementation, the firm contends that the labeling promotes 
    deception of the consumer and results in misbranding of food within the 
    meaning of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act).
         The preamble of the January 2, 1996, final rule stated that FDA 
    evaluated the data presented in the petition and concluded that use of 
    the product is safe. The final rule stated that the food additive 
    regulations would be amended as requested in the FAP. FDA is now 
    republishing the final rule to clarify its basis for approval, and to 
    provide additional information supporting approval of the petitioned 
    use, specifically the GLP statement as described in Sec. 571.1(k). FDA 
    believes this course of action is appropriate to supplement the record. 
    FDA will also clarify the reasons for approving the FAP, and provide 
    Heterochemical and any other interested party with an opportunity to 
    proffer facts that demonstrate FDA's basis for approving FAP 2228 was 
    incorrect.
        FDA is therefore republishing the final rule and providing an 
    additional 30 days for submission of objections or of additional 
    information in support of the objections that have already been filed. 
    In accordance with its discretion under section 409(f) of the act (21 
    U.S.C. 348(f)), FDA is not staying the final rule. FDA will consider a 
    stay, however, if one is requested, after having evaluated any 
    objections or other information filed in response to this document.
    
    II. Administrative Record
    
    A. Question of Adherence to GLP's (Part 58 and Sec. 571.1(k))
    
        In filing an FAP, the petitioner is required to provide data and 
    information to support the safe use of the product as required by 
    section 409(c)(1) of the act. The supporting data and information 
    include full reports of investigations made with respect to the safety 
    of use of the additive, including information as to the methods and 
    controls used in conducting the investigations. Part 58 prescribes 
    GLP's for conducting those nonclinical laboratory studies that are used 
    to support or are intended for use to support FAP's or marketing 
    permits for products regulated by FDA. Compliance with GLP's is 
    intended to ensure the quality and integrity of the safety data filed 
    to support approval of an FAP. If nonclinical laboratory studies are 
    involved, an FAP shall include, for each study, a statement that the 
    study was conducted in compliance with GLP requirements set forth under 
    part 58, or if the study was not conducted in compliance with the 
    GLP's, a brief statement with the reason for noncompliance.
        In FAP 2228, Vanetta submitted a journal article (Ref. 1) 
    supporting approval of its petition. The studies reported in the 
    article were not conducted in accordance with GLP's, and Vanetta did 
    not submit a statement of the reason for noncompliance. Accordingly, 
    FDA is reopening the administrative record to include a statement from 
    Vanetta on the reasons for the studies' noncompliance with GLP's, as 
    required under Sec. 571.1(k).
    
    [[Page 46842]]
    
    B. Clarification of the Record
    
        The objections Heterochemical filed in response to FDA's approval 
    of MNB point out that the basis for the agency's decision was not 
    clear. The administrative record for FAP 2228 included various agency 
    comments on the studies reported in the journal article by Oduho et al. 
    The objector interpreted the comments to mean that the studies were 
    invalid and thus did not support approval of the FAP. Contrary to the 
    objector's interpretation, the agency's comments on the Oduho studies 
    did not question their validity, and do not invalidate the agency's 
    final decision that MNB is safe and achieves its intended technical 
    effect. However, the objections made it clear that the agency needed to 
    make additional comments to clarify the record.
    1. Target Animal Safety
        FAP 2228 included the Oduho article to support safety of MNB. The 
    Oduho article included what was described as a chronic study (Ref. 1). 
    The results reported in the article indicated that MNB is a safe and 
    effective source of vitamin K and niacin activities. Niacin can serve 
    as a generic name for all pyridine-3-carboxylic acids that exhibit 
    nicotinamide activity (Ref. 3). Only when doses exceed 1,000 times the 
    chick's vitamin K requirement did the article's authors report 
    morbidity or mortality. The data generated by the chronic study, where 
    up to 6 g of menadione per kilogram (kg) complete feed were fed to 
    chick's, support the safety of the substance.
        Although this chronic study was of relatively short duration (14 
    days), the agency believes that it is sufficient to support its 
    conclusion that MNB is safe. The agency evaluated the results of the 
    study in conjunction with the following and other available information 
    that further supported its final determination that MNB is safe and 
    achieves its intended technical effect. MNB hydrolyzes into menadione 
    and nicotinamide. Menadione is prior sanctioned as a source of vitamin 
    K activity (Ref. 4), and nicotinamide (niacinamide) is generally 
    recognized as safe as a nutrient and/or dietary supplement under 21 CFR 
    582.5535 and section 201(s) of the act (21 U.S.C. 321(s)). Both 
    components have a long history of safe use in animal diets (Refs. 4 and 
    5).
    2. Utility
        Menadione and many of its derivatives have vitamin K activity. This 
    vitamin has several biological functions, one of the most important 
    being in blood clot formation (Ref. 6). The Oduho article included a 
    study demonstrating that inclusion of MNB in chick diets improved blood 
    clotting when compared to negative controls. The improvements observed 
    in the study were similar to those seen when another accepted source of 
    vitamin K activity was added to experimental diets.
        The highest level of menadione utilized in this study, 0.4 
    milligram (mg)/kg diet, approaches that recommended by the National 
    Research Council, 0.5 mg/kg, for the type of birds used in this 
    experiment (Ref. 7). The adequacy of 0.4 mg to meet the birds' 
    nutritional requirement is demonstrated by the fact that the 
    prothrombin times of 17 and 19 seconds for MNB and menadione 
    dimethylpyrimidinol bisulfite (MPB), an accepted source of vitamin K 
    activity (21 CFR 573.620), fall very close to the normal range for 
    chickens, which has been reported to vary from 20 to 25 seconds (Ref. 
    8). The Oduho article reported the normal prothrombin range for chicks 
    to be 12 to 25 seconds. The bioavailability of the vitamin K activity, 
    supplied by the menadione component of MNB, did not differ 
    significantly from that of the positive control substance, MPB. Both 
    MNB and MPB were bioequivalent as an active source of menadione.
        The agency noted that the levels of nicotinamide utilized in Oduho 
    experiment number 2 are below those accepted as nutritionally adequate. 
    However, this study did demonstrate that the nicotinamide portion of 
    the MNB molecule was available to the chicks, i.e., that it is 
    bioavailable to a similar extent as pure nicotinamide, which served as 
    a control in the study. In addition, the low level of nicotinamide 
    supplementation is closer to the level of this vitamin supplied by MNB 
    with the mandated 2 g per ton complete feed restriction. Both the 
    amount of nicotinamide supplied by MNB and other dietary sources of 
    this compound will be utilized to formulate a diet which meets the 
    animal's niacin nutritional requirements.
        Vanetta amended its petition and submitted a preliminary report on 
    clinical studies conducted at the University of Georgia. This report 
    supported the utility of MNB as a source of vitamin K activity. Because 
    the bioavailabilities of both the menadione and nicotinamide components 
    of MNB were established by the Oduho article, and the utility of MNB as 
    a source of vitamin K activity was confirmed in the University of 
    Georgia experiments, the utility portion of the amended petition was 
    acceptable.
    3. Conditions of Use and Directions for Use
        The approved conditions of use, as specified in the MNB regulation 
    (21 CFR 573.625(b)), state that MNB can be used as a ``nutritional 
    supplement in chicken and turkey feeds for both the prevention of 
    vitamin K deficiency and as a source of supplemental niacin.''
        The conditions of use appropriately compare the levels of vitamin K 
    activity from menadione and nicotinamide by stating that MNB can 
    prevent a vitamin K deficiency, but is simply a source of niacin. As 
    noted previously, niacin can serve as a generic name for all pyridine-
    3-carboxylic acids that exhibit nicotinamide activity (Ref. 3). By 
    using the different terms, the conditions of use establish that MNB 
    provides different levels of vitamin K and niacin activities.
        The directions for use on the product label specify the minimum 
    amount of menadione and niacin in MNB, and do so in units commonly used 
    in the feed industry (Ref. 9). Animal nutritionists routinely mix feed 
    ingredients to obtain a complete, balanced animal diet, and the 
    composition of this diet normally changes with an animal's weight and 
    age (Ref. 7). Therefore, users of the product will refer to the minimum 
    amounts specified on the MNB label and mix feed accordingly with MNB 
    and other sources of niacin to provide all nutritional needs based on 
    the weight and age of the animals being fed.
        Finally, the agency notes that the MNB label follows the 
    Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) format, which 
    the agency concluded was acceptable. AAFCO, primarily composed of State 
    regulatory officials, has developed a set of model regulations 
    concerning feed labeling. FDA generally concurs with the AAFCO model 
    regulations although these model regulations are not binding. Feed 
    manufacturers routinely follow the model regulations when labeling feed 
    and are familiar with the AAFCO requirements.
    
    III. Opportunity for Objection
    
        A food additive shall, with respect to any particular use or 
    intended use of such additive, be deemed to be unsafe, unless it and 
    its use or intended use conform to the terms of an exemption that is in 
    effect for investigational use, or there is in effect, and it and its 
    use or intended use are in conformity with, a regulation issued under 
    section 409(a) of the act. With respect to any intended use of a food 
    additive, a person may file a petition with the appropriate center 
    within FDA proposing the issuance of a regulation prescribing the 
    conditions under which said additive may be safely used. The petition 
    shall, in addition to any explanatory or supporting data,
    
    [[Page 46843]]
    
    contain the name of the food additive, its chemical name and 
    composition, a statement of the conditions of the proposed use of such 
    additive, together with all directions, recommendations, and 
    suggestions proposed for the use of such additive with specimens of 
    proposed labeling. The petition shall also contain relevant data 
    bearing on the physical or other technical effect the additive is 
    intended to produce, the quantity of the additive required to produce 
    the desired effect, a description of practicable methods for 
    determining the quantity of the additive in or on food and any 
    substance formed in or on food because of its use, and full reports of 
    investigations made with respect to the safety of the use of the 
    additive, including information as to the methods and controls used in 
    conducting the investigations.
        Any party who will be adversely affected by this regulation may at 
    any time on or before September 27, 1999, file with the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written objections thereto. Each 
    objection shall be separately numbered, and each numbered objection 
    shall specify with particularity the provisions of the regulation to 
    which objection is made and the grounds for the objection. Each 
    numbered objection on which a hearing is requested shall specifically 
    so state. Failure to request a hearing for any particular objection 
    shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on that objection. 
    Each numbered objection for which a hearing is requested shall include 
    a detailed description and analysis of the specific factual information 
    intended to be presented in support of the objection in the event that 
    a hearing is held. Failure to include such a description and analysis 
    for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to 
    a hearing on the objection. Three copies of all documents shall be 
    submitted and shall be identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document. Any objections received in 
    response to the regulation may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    IV. References
    
        1. Oduho, G. W., T. K. Chung, and D. H. Baker, ``Menadione 
    nicotinamide bisulfite is a bioactive source of vitamin K and niacin 
    activity for chicks,'' Journal of Nutrition, 123: 737-743, 1993.
        2. ``Guideline on the Conduct of Clinical Investigations: 
    Responsibility of Clinical Investigators and Monitors for 
    Investigational New Animal Drug Studies'' (``Guideline No. 39,'' 
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, CVM, October 
    1992) (superseded by ``Guidance for Industry No. 58,'' May 1997).
        3. National Research Council, Vitamin Tolerance of Animals, 
    National Academy Press, 1987.
        4. ``Food Additive Status of Vitamin K Active Substances in 
    Animal Food'' (48 FR 16748, April 19, 1983).
        5. Title 21 CFR 121.101, ``Substances that are generally 
    recognized as safe,'' 1974 (21 CFR part 582, 1998).
        6. Suttie, J. W., ``Vitamin K,'' Handbook of Vitamins, edited by 
    L. J. Machlin, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1991.
        7. National Research Council, The Nutritional Requirements of 
    Poultry, National Academy Press, 1994.
        8. Swenson, M. J. ``Physiological properties and cellular and 
    chemical constituents of blood,'' Duke's Physiology of Domestic 
    Animals, edited by M. J. Swenson, Cornell University Press, 1977.
        9. Official Publication, Association of American Feed Control 
    Officials, Inc., 1998.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 573
    
        Animal feeds, Food additives.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, FDA is 
    republishing in its entirety the text of the final regulation that 
    appeared in the Federal Register of January 2, 1998. This republication 
    of the final rule does not amend the regulation in any way.
    
    PART 573--FOOD ADDITIVES PERMITTED IN FEED AND DRINKING WATER OF 
    ANIMALS
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 573 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348.
    
        2. Section 573.625 is republished as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 573.625   Menadione nicotinamide bisulfite.
    
        The food additive may be safely used as follows:
        (a) Product. The additive is 1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-methyl-1, 4-
    dioxo-2-naphthalene sulfonic acid with 3-pyridine carboxylic acid amine 
    (CAS No. 73581-79-0).
        (b) Conditions of use. As a nutritional supplement in chicken and 
    turkey feeds for both the prevention of vitamin K deficiency and as a 
    source of supplemental niacin.
        (c) Limitations. Not to exceed 2 grams per ton of complete feed. To 
    assure safe use, the label and labeling shall bear adequate directions 
    for use.
    
        Dated: August 11, 1999.
    Stephen F. Sundlof,
    Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
    [FR Doc. 99-22314 Filed 8-26-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/27/1999
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; republication and opportunity to file objections or additional information.
Document Number:
99-22314
Dates:
Objections, additional information in support of the previously filed objections, or additional written objections and requests for a hearing, must be submitted by September 27, 1999.
Pages:
46841-46843 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 94F-0283
PDF File:
99-22314.pdf
CFR: (2)
21 CFR 571.1(k)
21 CFR 573.625