95-20632. Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and -3R) Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 166 (Monday, August 28, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 44419-44421]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-20632]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 95-NM-139-AD; Amendment 39-9344; AD 95-17-14]
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600), 
    CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and -3R) Series 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to certain Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11, CL-600-2A12, and 
    CL-600-2B16 series airplanes. This action requires functional testing 
    of the brake of the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA); and 
    exercising the pitch trim system, revising the FAA-approved Airplane 
    Flight Manual (AFM), operational testing of the HSTA, and replacing the 
    HSTA or horizontal stabilizer trim control unit, if necessary. This 
    amendment is prompted by reports of overspeed annunciation of the pitch 
    trim due to slippage of the no-back device on the HSTA. The actions 
    specified in this AD are intended to prevent uncommanded movement of 
    the HSTA due to failure of the no-back device on the HSTA to operate 
    properly; this condition could adversely affect the controllability of 
    the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective September 12, 1995.-
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of September 12, 1995.-
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before October 27, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 95-NM-139-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056. -
        The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from 
    Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station 
    Centre-ville, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. This information may be examined 
    at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, 
    Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 
    North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Cuneo, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Systems and Equipment Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth 
    Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 
    256-7506; fax (516) 568-2716.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Transport Canada Aviation, which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Canada, recently notified the FAA that an 
    unsafe condition may exist on certain Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-
    600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and -3R) series 
    airplanes. Transport Canada Aviation advises that it has received 
    reports of overspeed annunciation of the pitch trim. Each time such 
    annunciation occurred, the horizontal stabilizer trim actuator (HSTA) 
    mechanical brake prevented uncommanded movement of the HSTA, i.e., HSTA 
    runaway. Investigation has revealed that the reported overspeed 
    annunciation of the pitch trim may be attributed to slippage of the no-
    back device on the HSTA. Further investigation revealed that the no-
    back device on the HSTA failed to operate properly at low temperatures, 
    but operated properly at ambient temperatures above zero degrees 
    centigrade. This condition, if not corrected, could result in 
    uncommanded movement of the HSTA, which could adversely affect the 
    controllability of the airplane. -
        Bombardier has issued Alert Service Bulletins A600-0645 (for Model 
    CL-600-1A11 series airplanes), and A601-0443 (for Model CL-600-2A12 and 
    CL-600-2B16 series airplanes), both dated January 11, 1995, which 
    describe procedures for an operational test of the HSTA brake, and 
    replacement of the HSTA or horizontal stabilizer trim control unit 
    (HSTCU) with a serviceable unit. Transport Canada Aviation approved 
    these service bulletins and issued Canadian airworthiness directive CF-
    95-02, dated February 28, 1995, in order to assure the continued 
    airworthiness of these airplanes in Canada. -
        This airplane model is manufactured in Canada and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, Transport Canada Aviation has kept 
    the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined 
    the findings of Transport Canada Aviation, 
    
    [[Page 44420]]
    reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is 
    necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States. -
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, this AD is being issued to prevent uncommanded 
    movement of the HSTA. This AD requires repetitive functional testing of 
    the HSTA brake for all airplanes. If certain conditions are found to 
    exist during the functional tests, this AD also requires exercising of 
    the pitch trim system, revising the Limitations Section of the FAA-
    approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM), operational testing of the HSTA, 
    and replacing the HSTA or HSTCU with a serviceable unit. Accomplishment 
    of the replacement terminates the requirement to exercise the pitch 
    trim system and revise the AFM.
        -Operational testing of the HSTA and replacement of the HSTA or 
    HSTCU are required to be accomplished in accordance with the applicable 
    alert service bulletin described previously. -
        As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport 
    Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, 
    some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes 
    that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that 
    have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA 
    points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision 
    of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered 
    or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance 
    with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval 
    for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with 
    the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has 
    been included in this rule to clarify this long-standing requirement. -
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited -
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed. -
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket. -
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 95-NM-139-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter. -
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment. -
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 -
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment -
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES -
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended] -
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    95-17-14  Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Amendment 39-9344. 
    Docket 95-NM-139-AD. -
        Applicability: Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) series airplanes 
    having serial numbers 1004 through 1085 inclusive; Model CL-600-2A12 
    (CL-601) series airplanes having serial numbers 3001 through 3066 
    inclusive; and Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and -3R) series 
    airplanes having serial numbers 5001 through 5137 inclusive, and 
    5139 through 5299 inclusive; certificated in any category.
    
        -Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (e) of this AD to request approval from the 
    FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current 
    configuration eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions 
    necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such 
    a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD. -
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously. -
        To prevent uncommanded movement of the horizontal stabilizer 
    trim actuator (HSTA), accomplish the following: -
        (a) Within 20 hours time-in-service after the effective date of 
    this AD, perform the following ``Functional Test Procedures of the 
    HSTA Brake'': -
        (1) Press the CHAN 1 INOP/CHAN 2 INOP switch/light and then the 
    OVSP/CHNG CHAN switch/light on the center pedestal control panel. -
    
    [[Page 44421]]
    
        (2) Set and hold the pitch trim switch on the pilot's control 
    wheel until the stabilizer is in full NOSE UP position. -
        (3) Set and hold the pitch trim switch on the pilot's control 
    wheel to NOSE DOWN position and, while the stabilizer is moving, 
    press the PITCH TRIM DISC switch on the pilot's control wheel when 
    the needle on the stabilizer trim position indicator reaches the 
    first marking of the take-off configuration green band. Verify that 
    both CHAN INOP lights are on. -
        (4) Verify that the stabilizer over-travel is less than one 
    degree, as read on the stabilizer trim position indicator on the 
    center instrument panel.
    
        -Note 2: One increment on the stabilizer trim position indicator 
    is equal to one degree of stabilizer travel.
    
        (i) If the stabilizer over-travel is less than or equal to one 
    degree, the pitch trim brake performance meets the ground 
    performance requirements and is considered serviceable.
        -(ii) If the stabilizer over-travel is more than one degree, 
    dispatch is prohibited. Correction is required prior to further 
    flight, in accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-
    0645, dated January 11, 1995 (for Model CL-600-1A11 series 
    airplanes), or A601-0443, dated January 11, 1995 (for Model CL-600-
    2A12 and CL-600-2B16 series airplanes), as applicable.
        -(b) For airplanes on which the stabilizer over-travel is shown 
    to be equal to or less than 1 degree during the functional test 
    required by paragraph (a) of this AD, and no overspeed annunciation 
    has been reported previously, repeat the functional test thereafter 
    at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time-in-service.
        -(c) For airplanes on which the stabilizer over-travel is shown 
    to be equal to or less than 1 degree during the functional test 
    required by paragraph (a) of this AD, and overspeed annunciation has 
    been reported previously, accomplish paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), 
    (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD.
        -(1) Prior to each flight, exercise the pitch trim system by 
    accomplishing the following: ``Command full NOSE DOWN, then full 
    NOSE UP and re-position.''
        -(2) Prior to further flight following accomplishment of the 
    functional test required by paragraph (a) of this AD, revise the 
    Limitations Section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) 
    to include the following information. This may be accomplished by 
    inserting a copy of this AD in the AFM.
    
        ``1. Do not engage autopilot at an altitude below 1,000 feet 
    AGL.
        ``2. Monitor 8 CH annunciator for FLT CONT light.
        ``3. Maximum flap setting to be used is Flap 20 degrees.''
    
        -(3) Within 50 hours time-in-service after the effective date of 
    this AD, perform an operational test to identify the unserviceable 
    HSTA or horizontal stabilizer trim control unit (HSTCU) and replace 
    it with a serviceable unit, in accordance with Bombardier Alert 
    Service Bulletin A600-0645, dated January 11, 1995 (for Model CL-
    600-1A11 series airplanes), or A601-0443, dated January 11, 1995 
    (for Model CL-600-2A12 and CL-600-2B16 series airplanes), as 
    applicable. Replacement of the unserviceable unit with a serviceable 
    unit constitutes terminating action for the requirements of 
    paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD. Following such replacement, 
    exercise of the pitch trim system may be discontinued and the 
    limitation may be removed from the AFM.
        -(4) Thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time-in-
    service repeat the functional test of the HSTA brake as specified in 
    paragraph (a) of this AD.
        -(d) For airplanes on which the stabilizer over-travel is shown 
    to be more than 1 degree during the functional test required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD, accomplish the requirements of paragraphs 
    (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this AD.
        -(1) Prior to further flight, perform an operational test to 
    identify the unserviceable HSTA or HSTCU and replace it with a 
    serviceable unit, prior to further flight, in accordance with 
    Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0645, dated January 11, 1995 
    (for Model CL-600-1A11 series airplanes), or A601-0443, dated 
    January 11, 1995 (for Model CL-600-2A12 and CL-600-2B16 series 
    airplanes), as applicable.
        -(2) Thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours time-in-
    service repeat the functional test of the HSTA brake as specified in 
    paragraph (a) in this AD.
        -(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, New York ACO.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
    
        -(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        -(g) The operational test and replacement shall be done in 
    accordance with Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0645, dated 
    January 11, 1995, or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601-0443, 
    dated January 11, 1995, as applicable. This incorporation by 
    reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 
    6087, Station Centreville, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft 
    Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth 
    Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
        -(h) This amendment becomes effective on September 12, 1995.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 15, 1995.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 95-20632 Filed 8-25-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/12/1995
Published:
08/28/1995
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
95-20632
Dates:
Effective September 12, 1995.-
Pages:
44419-44421 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95-NM-139-AD, Amendment 39-9344, AD 95-17-14
PDF File:
95-20632.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13