97-23033. Extension of Operating Permits Program Interim Approvals  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 45732-45735]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-23033]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 70
    
    [FRL-5884-6]
    
    
    Extension of Operating Permits Program Interim Approvals
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The EPA is promulgating revisions to Appendix A of the 
    operating permits regulations codified in part 70 of chapter I of title 
    40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Those regulations were 
    originally promulgated on July 21, 1992. These revisions to Appendix A 
    extend up to October 1, 1998 all operating permits program interim 
    approvals that expire before that date. This action will allow the 
    program revisions necessary to correct interim approval deficiencies to 
    be combined with program revisions necessary to implement the revisions 
    to part 70 that are anticipated to promulgated mid-summer of 1998.
    
    DATES: The regulatory amendments announced herein take effect on 
    September 29, 1997. For those programs whose interim approval dates are 
    amended by today's action, interim approval will expire on October 1, 
    1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Supporting material used in developing the proposal and 
    final regulatory revisions is contained in Docket Number A-93-50. This 
    docket is available for public inspection and copying between 8:30 a.m. 
    and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the address listed below. A 
    reasonable fee may be charged for copying. The address of the EPA air 
    docket is: EPA Air Docket, Mail Code 2311, Attention: Docket Number A-
    93-50, Room M-1500, Waterside Mall, 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 
    20460.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Powell (telephone 919-541-5331), 
    Mail Drop 12, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
    Air Quality Planning and Standards, Information Transfer and Program 
    Integration Division, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On August 29, 1994 (59 FR 44460) and August 31, 1995 (60 FR 45530), 
    EPA proposed revisions to the part 70 operating permits regulations. 
    Primarily, the notices proposed changes to the system for revising 
    permits. A number of other less detailed proposed changes were included 
    in the notices. Altogether, State and local permitting authorities will 
    have a complicated package of program revisions to prepare in response 
    to these changes once promulgated. The part 70 revisions are 
    anticipated to take place in mid-summer of 1998.
        Contemporaneous with permitting authorities revising their programs 
    to meet the revised part 70, many programs have been granted interim 
    approval which will require permitting authorities to prepare program 
    revisions to correct those deficiencies identified in the interim 
    approval notice. The preamble to the August 31, 1995 proposal noted the 
    concern of many permitting authorities over having to revise their 
    programs twice; once to correct interim approval deficiencies, and 
    again to address the revisions to part 70. In the August 1995 preamble, 
    the Agency proposed that States with interim approval ``* * * should be 
    allowed to delay the submittal of any program revisions to address 
    program deficiencies previously listed in their notice of interim 
    approval until the deadline to submit other changes required by the 
    proposed revisions to part 70'' (60 FR 45552). Comment was solicited on 
    this action and on a legal rationale. The Agency also proposed ``* * * 
    to exercise its discretion under proposed section 70.4(i)(1)(iv) to 
    provide States 2 years to submit program revisions in response to the 
    proposed part 70 revisions * * *'' (60 FR 45551).
        In combination, these actions could extend all interim approvals 
    such that permitting authorities would not have to submit program 
    revisions addressing interim approval deficiencies until up to 2 years 
    after part 70 is revised. Six comments were received on this subject 
    during the public comment period on the August 1995 proposal. Five of 
    these commenters supported either the extension or efforts to minimize 
    the burden on permitting authorities, but none provided a reasonable 
    legal rationale. One of the commenters indicated the action is not 
    consistent with title V.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        On October 31, 1996 (61 FR 56368), EPA amended section 70.4(d)(2) 
    to allow the Administrator to grant the proposed additional extension 
    to interim approvals. The Agency does not believe, however, that the 
    August 31, 1995 blanket proposal to extend all interim approval program 
    revision submittal dates until up to 2 years after part 70 is revised 
    is appropriate. Program deficiencies that caused granting of interim 
    approval of permitting programs vary from a few problems that can be 
    easily corrected to complex problems that will require regulatory 
    changes and, in some cases, legislative action. Where an undue burden 
    will be encountered by developing two program revisions, combining 
    program revisions and thus granting a longer time period for submission 
    of the program revision to correct interim approval deficiencies is 
    warranted. Where no such burden will occur, the Agency encourages 
    permitting authorities to proceed with correcting their interim 
    approval program deficiencies and not wait for the revised part 70.
        To encourage permitting authorities to proceed with program 
    revisions within their interim approval timeframes, rather than wait 
    for the revised part 70, all interim approvals granted prior to the 
    date of issuance of a memorandum announcing EPA's position on this 
    issue (memorandum from Lydia N. Wegman to Regional Division Directors, 
    ``Extension of Interim Approvals of Operating Permits Programs,'' June 
    13, 1996) were extended in the October 1996 notice by 10 months. The 
    June 1996 memorandum is in the docket for this action.
        The reason for this automatic extension was that permitting 
    authorities, upon reading the August 1995 proposed action, may have 
    delayed their efforts to develop program revisions to address interim 
    approval deficiencies because they believed the
    
    [[Page 45733]]
    
    proposed policy to extend interim approvals until revised part 70 
    program revisions are due would be adopted for all programs. The EPA 
    has been informed that this was the case in many States. Approximately 
    10 months passed since the August 1995 proposal until issuance of the 
    memorandum previously noted. The additional 10-month extension to all 
    interim approvals offset any time lost in permitting authority efforts 
    to develop program revisions addressing interim approval deficiencies. 
    This 10-month extension was not applicable to application submittal 
    dates for the second group of sources covered by a source-category 
    limited interim approval.1
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Several States have been granted source-category limited 
    interim approvals. Under that type approval, a subset of the part 70 
    source population is to submit permit applications during the first 
    year of the program. The application submittal period for the 
    remaining sources begins upon full approval of the program. The 
    Agency concludes this second group of sources should still submit 
    permit applications during a period beginning on the original 
    expiration date of a State's interim approval as opposed to that 
    date extended by 10 months. The other interim approval program 
    deficiencies, however, will be eligible for the 10-month extension.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        As noted in the June 1996 memorandum, where the permitting 
    authority applies for it after part 70 is revised, EPA may grant a 
    longer extension to an interim approval so that the program revision to 
    correct interim approval program deficiencies may be combined with the 
    program revision to meet the revised part 70. Such extensions will only 
    be granted once per State and will not be of a duration which exceeds 2 
    years after promulgation of revisions to part 70. Such a request must 
    be made within 30 days of promulgation of the part 70 revisions. This 
    will make it possible for EPA to take a single rulemaking action (if 
    such action is warranted) to adopt new interim approval deadlines. All 
    programs with interim approval are eligible for this longer extension, 
    even if interim approval was granted after the June 1996 memorandum.
        As required by section 70.4(f)(2), program revisions addressing 
    interim approval deficiencies must be submitted to EPA no later than 6 
    months prior to the expiration of the interim approval. The dates for 
    permitting authorities to submit their combined program revisions to 
    address the revised part 70 and the interim approval deficiencies will 
    be 6 months prior to the interim approval expiration dates which will 
    be set through a future rulemaking.
        Any longer extension allowing combining of program revisions to 
    meet both the revised part 70 and interim approval deficiencies will 
    occur only once for a permitting authority and will be based on the 
    promulgation date of the revisions to part 70. If only regulatory 
    changes to a program are needed to meet the revised part 70, the 
    extension may be for up to 18 months after the part 70 revisions. If 
    legislative changes are needed to a program to meet the revised part 
    70, the extension may be for up to 2 years. As previously noted, the 
    program revision submittal date will be 6 months prior to expiration of 
    the extended interim approval.
    
    III. Rulemaking Action
    
        The June 13, 1996 memorandum and the October 31, 1996 notice 
    anticipated promulgation of the part 70 revisions no later than early 
    1997. The EPA believes that the action in this rulemaking notice is 
    necessary because of further delays in promulgation of the part 70 
    revisions. Due to these delays, a number of interim approvals will 
    expire before part 70 is revised, thus denying these agencies the 
    opportunity to combine program revisions. The EPA has been informed 
    that States were relying on the October 31, 1996 notice, which 
    anticipated a promulgation date of early 1997 for part 70 revisions, 
    and expected to be able to combine their interim approval deficiencies 
    with the program revisions to address the revised part 70. However, now 
    that the EPA anticipates a mid-summer 1998 promulgation date for the 
    part 70 revisions, the Agency estimates that it may take until October 
    1, 1998 to receive all State requests for combining program revisions 
    and to take the necessary rulemaking action to grant the final 
    extension to those interim approvals. The action in this notice, 
    therefore, moves all interim approvals that expire before October 1, 
    1998 up to that date. All agencies with interim approvals prior to 
    October 1, 1998 will, therefore, be granted interim approval extensions 
    until that date to have the opportunity to submit requests to combine 
    program revisions.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Docket
    
        The docket for this regulatory action is A-93-50. The docket is an 
    organized and complete file of all the information submitted to, or 
    otherwise considered by, EPA in the development of this proposed 
    rulemaking. The principal purposes of the docket are: (1) To allow 
    interested parties a means to identify and locate documents so that 
    they can effectively participate in the rulemaking process, and (2) to 
    serve as the record in case of judicial review (except for interagency 
    review materials). The docket is available for public inspection at 
    EPA's Air Docket, which is listed under the ADDRESSES section of this 
    notice.
    
    B. Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
    
        Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency must 
    determine whether each regulatory action is ``significant,'' and 
    therefore subject to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review 
    and the requirements of the Order. The Order defines ``significant'' 
    regulatory action as one that is likely to lead to a rule that may:
        1. Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, 
    adversely and materially affecting a sector of the economy, 
    productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
    safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities.
        2. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency.
        3. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligation of recipients 
    thereof.
        4. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    E.O. 12866.
        Pursuant to the terms of E.O. 12866, it has been determined that 
    this action is not a ``significant'' regulatory action because it does 
    not substantially change the existing part 70 requirements for States 
    or sources; requirements which have already undergone OMB review. 
    Rather than impose any new requirements, this action only extends an 
    existing mechanism. As such, this action is exempted from OMB review.
    
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Compliance
    
        Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
    U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator certifies that this action will not 
    have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. In developing the original part 70 regulations, the Agency 
    determined that they would not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Similarly, the same conclusion 
    was reached in an initial regulatory flexibility analysis performed in 
    support of the proposed part 70 revisions (a subset of which 
    constitutes the action in this rulemaking notice). This action does not 
    substantially alter the part 70 regulations as they pertain to small 
    entities and accordingly will not have a
    
    [[Page 45734]]
    
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    D. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The OMB has approved the information collection requirements 
    contained in part 70 under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2060-
    0243. The Information Collection Request (ICR) prepared for part 70 is 
    not affected by the action in this rulemaking notice because the part 
    70 ICR determined burden on a nationwide basis, assuming all part 70 
    sources were included without regard to the approval status of 
    individual programs. The action in this rulemaking notice, which simply 
    provides for an extension of the interim approval of certain programs, 
    does not alter the assumptions of the approved part 70 ICR used in 
    determining the burden estimate. Furthermore, this action does not 
    impose any additional requirements which would add to the information 
    collection requirements for sources or permitting authorities.
        Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the 
    accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods 
    for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of 
    automated collection techniques, to:
    
    Director, Regulatory Information Division, Office of Policy, Planning, 
    and Evaluation (2136), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
    Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.
    Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
    Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW, 
    Washington, DC 20503.
    
    Include the ICR number in any correspondence.
    
    E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    
        Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
    Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
    effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
    governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA 
    generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
    analysis, for proposed and final rules with Federal mandates that may 
    result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 1 
    year.
        The EPA has determined that the action in this rulemaking notice 
    does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of 
    $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the 
    aggregate, or the private sector, in any 1 year. Although the part 70 
    regulations governing State operating permit programs impose 
    significant Federal mandates, this action does not amend the part 70 
    regulations in a way that significantly alters the expenditures 
    resulting from these mandates. Therefore, the Agency concludes that it 
    is not required by section 202 of the UMRA of 1995 to provide a written 
    statement to accompany this regulatory action.
    
    F. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office.
    
        Under section 801(a)(1)(A) of the Administrative Procedures Act 
    (APA) as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
    Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the General Accounting 
    Office prior to publication of the rule in this Federal Register. This 
    rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by section 804(2) of the APA as 
    amended.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
    
        Environmental protection, air pollution control, prevention of 
    significant deterioration, new source review, fugitive emissions, 
    particulate matter, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen dioxide, 
    carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, lead, operating permits.
    
        Dated: August 22, 1997.
    Carol M. Browner,
    Administrator.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of 
    the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth below.
        Appendix A of part 70 is amended by the following:
        a. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a) under Virgin 
    Islands;
        b. Revising the third sentence of paragraph (a) under Texas; and
        c. Replacing the end date of each paragraph with ``October 1, 
    1998'' as follows: Paragraph (a) of Arkansas, Colorado, District of 
    Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, 
    Montana, North Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming; Paragraphs (a) through 
    (m), (o), (p), (r) through (w), (bb), (cc), (ee), (ff), and (hh) of 
    California; paragraphs (b) and (c) of Nevada; paragraphs (a) and (e) of 
    Tennessee; and paragraphs (a) through (i) of Washington.
    
    Appendix A--to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local 
    Operating Permits Programs
    
    Arkansas
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    
    California * * *
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (b) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (c) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (d) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (e) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (f) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (g) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (h) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (i) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (j) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (k) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (l) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (m) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (o) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (p) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (r) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (s) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (t) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (u) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (v) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (w) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (bb) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (cc) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (ee) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (ff) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (hh) * * * October 1, 1998.
    
    Colorado
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    District of Columbia
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Florida
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Hawaii
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Illinois
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Iowa
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Maryland
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Minnesota
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    [[Page 45735]]
    
    Montana
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Nevada
    
        (a) * * *
        (b) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (c) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    North Dakota
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Tennessee
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
        (e) * * * October 1, 1998.
    
    Texas
    
        (a) * * * Interim approval will expire October 1, 1998. * * *
    * * * * *
    
    Virgin Islands
    
        (a) * * * Interim approval will expire October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Washington
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (b) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (c) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (d) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (e) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (f) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (g) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (h) * * * October 1, 1998.
        (i) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Wisconsin
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    * * * * *
    
    Wyoming
    
        (a) * * * October 1, 1998.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-23033 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/29/1997
Published:
08/29/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-23033
Dates:
The regulatory amendments announced herein take effect on September 29, 1997. For those programs whose interim approval dates are amended by today's action, interim approval will expire on October 1, 1998.
Pages:
45732-45735 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5884-6
PDF File:
97-23033.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 70