98-20654. General Motors; Grant of Application for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 148 (Monday, August 3, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 41320-41321]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-20654]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    [Docket No. NHTSA 98-4075]
    
    
    General Motors; Grant of Application for Decision of 
    Inconsequential Noncompliance
    
        General Motors Corporation (GM) of Warren, Michigan, determined 
    that some of its 1997 model Chevrolet Corvettes failed to meet the 
    requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 124, 
    ``Accelerator Control Systems,'' and filed an appropriate report 
    pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, ``Defects and Noncompliance Reports.'' GM 
    also applied to be exempted from the notification and remedy 
    requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301--``Motor Vehicle Safety'' on the 
    basis that the noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle 
    safety.
        Notice of receipt of the application was published on September 16, 
    1997, and an opportunity afforded for comment (Docket No. 97-58, Notice 
    1; 62 FR 48708).
        Paragraph S5.2 of FMVSS No. 124 requires the throttle to return to 
    idle position within the time limits specified in S5.3, whenever any 
    component of the accelerator control system is disconnected or severed 
    at a single point. S5.3 requires return to idle within 3 seconds for 
    any vehicle exposed to temperatures of 0 degrees to -40 degrees F (-18 
    degrees to -40 degrees C). During the 1997 model year, GM produced 
    9,500 Chevrolet Corvettes, which will not comply with FMVSS No. 124 
    because, when tested with one return spring removed at temperatures 
    below -26 degrees F, their accelerator pedal module assembly does not 
    move quickly enough to cause the throttle to return to the idle 
    position within 3 seconds.
        GM described the noncompliance and supported its application with 
    the following arguments:
        The Chevrolet Corvette employs an electronic throttle control which 
    adjusts the throttle position based on input from the accelerator pedal 
    position. The accelerator pedal is equipped with three springs, any two 
    of which are capable of returning the pedal to rest position. Once this 
    occurs, the throttle returns to idle position approximately 0.2 seconds 
    later. A test run in early May, however, raised a question about the 
    ability of the pedal assembly to return at low temperatures.
        GM believes that the failure of the pedal assembly to meet the 
    throttle closing time requirements of FMVSS No. 124 at extremely low 
    temperatures is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for the 
    following reasons.
        1. Vehicle Controllability--In the unlikely event that all of the 
    prerequisites necessary for the noncompliance occurred--that is, a 
    return spring was disconnected or severed on a pedal assembly with 
    residual oil, and the vehicle soaked at ambient temperatures below -32 
    degrees C--the vehicle would continue to be controllable both by the 
    service brakes and as a result of the Brake Torque Management System.
        2. Reliability of the Accelerator Springs--The condition which is 
    the subject of GM's noncompliance decision can only occur if one of the 
    return springs is severed or disconnected. The springs in the Corvette 
    pedal assembly, however, have extremely high reliability and are not 
    likely to fail in the real world.
        3. Condition Requires Extreme Temperatures; Pedal Assembly Warms 
    Quickly--As mentioned above, the root cause of the noncompliance 
    condition is the residual oil on the pedal assemblies congealing below 
    -32 degrees C. Testing at temperatures above that level resulted in 
    full compliance with the FMVSS No. 124 time limits for all pedal 
    assemblies tested. Therefore, the ambient temperatures required for the 
    possibility of this noncompliance to exist are severe. Even if a 
    vehicle with a disconnected return spring soaked under the necessary 
    harsh conditions for a sufficient time to congeal the residual oil, the 
    potential for the noncompliance to occur would exist for only a short 
    time, because the pedal assembly would warm up quickly with activation 
    of the vehicle heating system.
        4. Condition is Self-correcting--Durability testing indicates that 
    the condition improves with wear. Bench testing was conducted on five 
    production pedal assemblies with poor
    
    [[Page 41321]]
    
    return times. The pedals on these assemblies were cycled at room 
    temperature. Since the vast majority of driving is done with a only 
    limited pedal movement, each cycle consisted of a 10 per cent 
    application of pedal travel. Every 2,000 cycles the pedal return at -40 
    degrees F (-40 degrees C) was checked. The results, shown in Figure 5 
    [of the application], indicate that most pedals will return within the 
    specified time limit after 10,000 cycles, and all pedals will easily 
    meet the time limits after 15,000 cycles.
        5. Warranty Data--GM has reviewed recent warranty data for the 1997 
    Corvette, as well as complaint data. We are unaware of any data 
    suggesting the subject condition is a real world safety issue.
        No comments were received on the application.
        FMVSS No. 124 requires that the accelerator control system return 
    to the idle position in the event of a single point disconnection or 
    severance of the system in no more than three seconds after the pedal 
    is released when tested at temperatures from -18 degrees C (0 degrees 
    F) to -40 degrees C (-40 degrees F also). If the severance is of one of 
    the three pedal return springs inside the passenger compartment, full 
    return will take longer than three seconds when the temperature of the 
    passenger compartment is below -32 degrees C (-26 degrees F).
        In this instance, there are many mitigating circumstances that 
    render the noncompliance inconsequential to safety. First, the 
    noncompliance does not result in the throttle sticking open at extreme 
    low temperatures. It merely closes more slowly as a result of congealed 
    lubricant on a new pedal assembly with tightly fitting parts. (GM 
    determined that the lubricant was not necessary for long term 
    durability or corrosion protection and discontinued its use to avoid 
    further non-compliances.) Even with one return spring removed, the 
    accelerator pedal returns at least 85 percent of full travel within the 
    specified time. The worst consequence is merely the duration of an 
    elevated idle speed for about six seconds, and the vehicle is subject 
    to this condition only for periods when the temperature in the 
    passenger compartment is below -26 degrees F. Second, the pedal 
    assemblies loosen up enough in about 2000 miles of normal driving to 
    correct the noncompliance. While pedal assemblies with all three return 
    springs satisfy the performance requirements of FMVSS No. 124 under all 
    temperature conditions regardless of congealed lubrication or tight fit 
    of parts, even those with one spring removed will satisfy the standard 
    after about 2,000 miles of use despite the congealed lubrication at -40 
    degrees F. It is unlikely that many of the first 9,500 1997 Corvettes, 
    which had lubricated pedal assemblies, have not yet corrected 
    themselves. Third, it is extremely unlikely that a pedal return spring 
    would fail during the first 2000 miles of driving. The springs are 
    designed for an infinite fatigue life, and they are mounted in a 
    protected area. Also, they are direct acting compression springs not 
    dependent upon connections.
        In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby found that General 
    Motors Corporation has met its burden of persuasion that the 
    noncompliance discussed herein is inconsequential to motor vehicle 
    safety, and its application is granted.
    
    (49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 
    501.8)
    
        Issued on: July 28, 1998.
    L. Robert Shelton,
    Associate Administrator for Safety Performance Standards.
    [FR Doc. 98-20654 Filed 7-31-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
08/03/1998
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-20654
Pages:
41320-41321 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA 98-4075
PDF File:
98-20654.pdf