99-22365. Consumer Information Regulations; Utility Vehicle Label  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 167 (Monday, August 30, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 47119-47125]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-22365]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
    
    49 CFR Parts 571 and 575
    
    [Docket No. NHTSA-98-3381, Notice 3]
    RIN 2127-AH68
    
    
    Consumer Information Regulations; Utility Vehicle Label
    
    AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final Rule; Response to Petition for Reconsideration.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On March 9, 1999, we published a final rule modifying the 
    rollover warning currently required for small- and mid-sized utility 
    vehicles. In response to a petition for reconsideration of that final 
    rule, this document amends the utility vehicle and air bag warning 
    label requirements to allow manufacturers to combine the rollover and 
    air bag alert labels in one label, permits manufacturers to comply with 
    either of two options for installing both labels on the same side of 
    the sun visor until September 1, 2000, and allows manufacturers to 
    voluntarily install on the same side of the sunvisor as the air bag 
    label, rollover warning labels in vehicles for which they are not 
    required, such as pickup trucks and large utility vehicles. Today's 
    final rule will provide manufacturers with additional flexibility to 
    determine the location of air bag and rollover warning labels in sport 
    utility vehicles.
    
    DATES: This final rule is effective September 1, 1999, however, 
    voluntary compliance with the final rule is allowed as of August 30, 
    1999. Petitions for reconsideration must be received by October 14, 
    1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration should refer to the docket and 
    notice number of this final rule and be submitted to: Administrator, 
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20590.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The following persons at the National 
    Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW, 
    Washington, DC 20590:
        For labeling issues: Mary Versailles, Office of Planning and 
    Consumer Programs, NPS-31, telephone (202) 366-2057, facsimile (202) 
    366-4329.
        For legal issues: Nicole Fradette, Office of Chief Counsel, NCC-20, 
    telephone (202) 366-2992, facsimile (202) 366-3820.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        On March 9, 1999, we published a final rule amending the rollover 
    warning label and owner's manual requirements for small- and mid-sized 
    utility vehicles.1 (64 FR 11724) The agency explained that 
    the new label and owner's manual requirements will more effectively 
    alert drivers to the risk the vehicles will roll over, the steps they 
    can take to avoid that risk, and the steps they can take to reduce the 
    chance of injury in the event of a rollover. The new label replaced the 
    former text-only format with a format using bright colors, graphics, 
    and short bulleted text messages. The rule requires the label's header 
    to have an alert symbol (a triangle containing an exclamation point) 
    followed by the statement ``WARNING: Higher Rollover Risk'' in black 
    text on a yellow background. The following three statements must appear 
    below the header in the center of the label: ``Avoid Abrupt Maneuvers 
    and Excessive Speed,'' ``Always Buckle Up,'' and ``See Owner's Manual 
    For Further Information.'' The rule specifies that the label must 
    contain two pictograms: one showing a tilting utility vehicle on the 
    left of the label, and the other showing a seated vehicle occupant with 
    a secured three-point belt system on the right. The pictograms and the 
    statement must be in black on a white background. The rule requires the 
    label to be placed on either the driver's sun visor or the driver's 
    side window. If the label is placed on the back of the driver's sun 
    visor, the rule requires an alert label to be placed on the front of 
    the visor urging the person to flip the visor over and read the 
    information on the other side. The new label is required on utility 
    vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches or less. The rule also requires 
    additional information on rollover be included in the owner's manuals 
    of these vehicles. The new requirements are effective September 1, 
    1999.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ ``Utility vehicles'' are defined in 49 CFR Part 575 as 
    multipurpose passenger vehicles (other than those which are 
    passenger car derivatives) with a wheelbase of 110 inches or less 
    and with special features for off-road operation. 49 CFR Part 
    575.105. These vehicles are commonly referred to as sport utility 
    vehicles in the media.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        On April 26, 1999, we published a notice clarifying that 
    manufacturers of utility vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches or 
    less may comply with the upgraded requirements in advance of the 
    September 1, 1999, mandatory compliance date. (64 FR 20209) We 
    explained that any manufacturer choosing to comply with the new rule 
    before September 1, 1999, must comply with the new rule in its entirety 
    (i.e., they must comply with the new owners'
    
    [[Page 47120]]
    
    manual information requirements as well as with the new, improved 
    labeling requirements).
    
    II. Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers' Petition for 
    Reconsideration
    
        On April 23, 1999, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM) 
    submitted a petition for reconsideration of the March 9 final rule. The 
    petition raised issues regarding (1) the requirement that the air bag 
    warning label be to the left of the rollover warning label; (2) the 
    requirement that the air bag warning label and rollover warning label 
    not be contiguous; (3) the air bag and rollover alert label 
    requirements; and (4) the air bag label requirement's prohibition of 
    ``other information'' as it pertains to a rollover warning label 
    installed in a vehicle that is not required to have the label. The AAM 
    also wrote to the agency on April 8, 1999, requesting clarification as 
    to whether foreign language translations of the rollover warning label 
    were allowed and whether voluntary compliance with the new requirements 
    was permitted. As noted above, on April 28, 1999, we published a notice 
    clarifying that early compliance with the new rule was permitted. A 
    discussion of the remaining issues raised by AAM and our response to 
    them follows.
    
    III. Agency's Response to Petition for Reconsideration
    
    A. Restriction on Label's Location
    
        To keep the pictograms of the air bag and rollover warning labels 
    from running together visually, the final rule specified that the air 
    bag warning label must be to the left of the utility vehicle rollover 
    warning label when both labels are placed on the same side of the sun 
    visor. We reasoned that since the pictogram on the air bag warning 
    label in Figure 6a (after which the majority of air bag warning labels 
    are modeled) of the air bag warning requirements is on the label's left 
    side, placing that label to the left of the rollover warning label 
    would put the air bag pictogram far from the pictograms on the rollover 
    warning label. We believed that such a placement would prevent the 
    pictograms of the two labels from blending together visually.
        In its petition, AAM asked that we delete the requirement that the 
    air bag warning label be to the left of the rollover warning label. AAM 
    stated that, unlike the rollover warning label which specifies the 
    content, form, and sequence of the label, the air bag warning label 
    requirements specify only the content of the label--not the location of 
    the pictogram. The form and sequence of the air bag label and the 
    placement of the pictogram is left to the discretion of the 
    manufacturer. Consequently, the air bag pictogram could be to the right 
    on some air bag warning labels and the pictograms of the two labels 
    could, in some situations, be adjacent. Since the purpose of this 
    requirement is to keep the pictograms from running together visually, 
    such a placement, while permitted, would thwart the requirement's 
    purpose.
        We are, therefore, replacing the requirement that the air bag 
    warning label be placed to the left of the rollover warning label with 
    a requirement that there be text between the air bag pictogram and the 
    rollover pictogram whenever both labels are affixed to the same side of 
    the sun visor. We believe that this change will prevent the pictograms 
    from visually blending. This provision will also provide manufacturers 
    with additional label placement options.
    
    B. Contiguous Label Prohibition
    
        To maintain the separateness of the two labels and their messages, 
    the agency specified that the air bag and rollover warning labels could 
    not be contiguous. In its petition for reconsideration, AAM asked the 
    agency to delete this requirement and replace it with a requirement 
    that the labels be visually separate. AAM argued that specifying that 
    the labels may not be connected ``without specifying a minimum 
    separation distance means that labels 1 mm apart'' would comply with 
    the requirement. AAM stated that it believed the agency's intent was to 
    visually separate the two messages, but suggested that other methods 
    could be effectively used to maintain the separateness of the two 
    labels. For example, AAM suggested using one label with clear, 
    transparent material between the two messages to give the appearance of 
    separate labels when placed on the sun visor. AAM also suggested 
    placing a border around each message to separate the two messages from 
    one another. AAM argued that the requirement should be revised to 
    specify that the messages of the two labels be ``visually separated'' 
    when placed on the same side of the sun visor.
        We do not believe that the requirement suggested by AAM is readily 
    enforceable. Manufacturers are required to certify that their products 
    conform to NHTSA's regulations before they can be offered for sale. 
    Manufacturers must know how NHTSA plans to determine compliance with a 
    particular regulation if they are to ensure that their vehicles comply. 
    The requirement that the labels be ``visually separated'' is too 
    subjective. Consequently, manufacturers would have difficulty 
    determining whether their labels were ``visually separate'' within the 
    meaning of the standard.
        By specifying that the two labels not be contiguous, we intended to 
    require a clear demarcation between the two messages to ensure that the 
    two warnings did not run together visually and confuse the 
    reader.2 We did not specify the amount of space between the 
    two labels because we did not want to be unnecessarily design 
    restrictive. However, based on AAM's petition and several other 
    manufacturer inquiries, it is apparent that manufacturers believe that 
    this provision requires them to separately affix each label to the 
    vehicle and prohibits them from using one material to affix the labels 
    to the sunvisor.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ As discussed in the March 9, 1999 final rule, when multiple 
    hazard warnings are placed in the same location, ANSI Z535.4 (1991) 
    recommends that individual messages have sufficient space around 
    them to prevent them from visually blending together.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We still believe it important to maintain the separateness of the 
    two labels and their messages. AAM suggested that placing a border 
    around each label would be one way of ensuring that the labels remained 
    visibly distinct. We note, however, that unless we specify the distance 
    between the borders, labels placed 1 millimeter apart could comply with 
    the requirement. Therefore, simply placing a border around each label 
    without specifying a distance between the borders would not address 
    AAM's earlier concern that manufacturers could place the labels one 
    millimeter apart and still comply with the noncontiguous requirement.
        In response to the concerns raised by AAM in its petition, we have 
    decided to replace the requirement that the labels not be contiguous 
    with a requirement that the labels must be situated so that the 
    shortest distance from any of the lettering or graphics on the rollover 
    warning label to any of the lettering or graphics on the air bag 
    warning label is not less than three centimeters or, in the case of 
    rollover warning and air bag warning labels that are each completely 
    surrounded by a continuous solid-lined border, the shortest distance 
    from the border of the rollover warning label to the border of the air 
    bag warning label must be not less than one centimeter when both labels 
    are affixed to the same side of the sun visor. We believe that this 
    provision, unlike the provision suggested by AAM, is objective, readily
    
    [[Page 47121]]
    
    enforceable, and will ensure that the warning labels remain visually 
    distinct.
        We are also amending the March 9 final rule to explicitly allow 
    manufacturers to meet the rollover labeling requirements by permanently 
    marking or molding the required information to the vehicle. This 
    provision will ensure that manufacturers may, if they so choose, use 
    one material or process to affix the two labels to the vehicle. This 
    means that a manufacturer could, at its option, silkscreen, emboss, or 
    in some other way permanently mark the rollover warning to the vehicle. 
    We believe that these changes will alleviate any confusion as to what 
    is required and will give manufacturers the flexibility to determine 
    the best way to affix the required warnings to their vehicles.
    
    C. Compliance options for placing labels on the same side of the sun 
    visor
    
        In the March 9 final rule we established a September 1, 1999, 
    effective date for the new labeling and owner's manual requirements. 
    With respect to the labeling requirement, we noted that all of the 
    commenters agreed that a leadtime of 180 days was sufficient to design, 
    produce and install a new label. On April 26, 1999, we published a 
    notice clarifying that manufacturers could voluntarily comply with the 
    new requirements in advance of the September 1, 1999 mandatory 
    compliance date. We understand that some manufacturers intend to do so.
        We are concerned that requiring manufacturers to comply with the 
    new requirements by September 1, 1999, would not give manufacturers who 
    wish to install both labels on the same side of the sun visor 
    sufficient lead time to design, produce, and install new labels that 
    comply with the new requirements. We also believe, however, that those 
    who can comply with the requirements of today's rule should be allowed 
    to do so. Therefore, manufacturers who install both labels on the same 
    side of the sunvisor may, until September 1, 2000, choose between two 
    compliance options. The first option would require the air bag label to 
    be to the left of the rollover warning label and the labels to be 
    noncontiguous. The second option would require there to be text 
    separating the pictograms of the two labels and that either the labels 
    must be located such that the shortest distance from any of the 
    lettering or graphics on the rollover warning label to any of the 
    lettering or graphics on the air bag warning label is at least three 
    centimeters, or where the rollover warning and air bag warning labels 
    are each completely surrounded by a continuous solid-lined border, the 
    shortest distance from the border of the rollover warning label to the 
    border of the air bag warning label must be at least one centimeter. As 
    of September 1, 2000, manufacturers would have to comply with the 
    requirements of the second option. We believe that this provision will 
    give manufacturers sufficient lead time to comply with the new 
    requirements for placing labels on the same side of the sun visor.
        A manufacturer must select one of the compliance options at the 
    time it certifies the vehicle and may not thereafter select the other 
    option for the vehicle. Failure to comply with the selected option 
    would constitute a noncompliance with the standard regardless of 
    whether the vehicle complies with the other option.
    
    D. Air Bag and Rollover Alert Label Requirements
    
        The final rule requires that an alert label be placed on the front 
    of the sun visor if the rollover label is not visible when the sun 
    visor is in the stowed position. The air bag warning label has a 
    similar requirement. Currently, these two alert labels may not be 
    combined. AAM requested that we amend the rollover and air bag alert 
    label requirements to allow the two labels to be combined when both the 
    air bag and rollover warning labels are not visible when the visor is 
    in the stowed position. AAM argued that it was redundant and 
    unnecessary to require two separate alert labels with two ``flip visor 
    over'' text messages on the driver's sun visor.
        We agree that only one alert label is needed to alert the driver to 
    turn the visor over for an important safety message. Therefore, we are 
    amending the alert label requirements to allow the warnings to be 
    combined in one label. The combined alert label must contain the 
    following statements in yellow text on a black background: ``Air Bag 
    and Rollover Warnings'', ``Flip Visor Over''. In addition, the label 
    must include a black pictogram on a white background of an air bag 
    deploying into a rearfacing infant seat. The pictogram must be 
    encircled by a red circle with a slash through it. We believe the 
    combined alert label will effectively alert drivers to the importance 
    of turning the visor over to read the label and will give manufacturers 
    the option of affixing one alert label instead of two.
    
    E. Voluntary placement of rollover warning labels
    
        In the March 9, 1999 final rule, we amended the text of the air bag 
    warning label requirement (49 CFR 571.208, S4.5.1(b)(3)) to allow both 
    the air bag label and the rollover label to be placed on the same side 
    of the sun visor. In its petition, AAM noted that the change made to 
    the provision's regulatory text prohibits the voluntary installation of 
    the rollover warning label on the same side of the sun visor as the air 
    bag warning label in vehicles such as large SUVs or pickup trucks.
        The text of S4.5.1(b)(3) prohibits manufacturers from affixing to 
    the same side of the sun visor as the air bag label anything other than 
    the air bag maintenance label and the rollover label required on 
    utility vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches or less. Specifically, 
    S4.5.1(b)(3) states:
    
        Except for the information on an air bag maintenance label 
    placed on the visor pursuant to S4.5.1(a) of this standard, or on a 
    utility vehicle label placed on the visor pursuant to 49 CFR 
    575.105(d)(1), no other information shall appear on the same side of 
    the sun visor to which the sun visor air bag warning label is 
    affixed. Except for the information in an air bag alert label placed 
    on the visor pursuant to S4.5.1(c) of this standard, no other 
    information about air bags or the need to wear seat belts shall 
    appear anywhere on the sun visor.
    
    Under S4.5.1(b)(3), as currently drafted, a rollover warning label 
    installed on the same side of the sun visor as the air bag warning 
    label on a large-sized utility vehicle or a pickup truck would be 
    prohibited as ``other information'' since it would not be installed 
    pursuant to 49 CFR 575.105(d)(1), which applies only to utility 
    vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches or less.
        Although we decided not to extend the rollover warning labeling 
    requirement to other vehicles in the March 9 final rule, we have no 
    objection to manufacturers voluntarily installing rollover warning 
    labels in pickups, vans, or other vehicles. Rollovers occur in vehicles 
    other than small and mid-sized utility vehicles, albeit at a lower 
    rate.
        NHTSA analyzed the statistics for percent rollovers per single 
    vehicle crashes for vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches 
    compared to vehicles with a wheelbase of >110 inches to determine the 
    rollover rate for different vehicle types. The results are included in 
    Table 1.
    
    [[Page 47122]]
    
    
    
              Table 1.--Percent Rollover per Single Vehicle Crashes
                                   [% RO/SVC]
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               110''     >110''
                                      All          wheelbase      wheelbase
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Car.........................         17.4            20.1           11.0
    Utility Vehicle.............         48.9            57.5            9.5
    Van.........................         22.2             8.3           30.4
    Pickup......................         37.5            41.4           25.6
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        We believe that manufacturers should be allowed to alert their 
    drivers to the risk that the vehicles will roll over, the steps they 
    can take to avoid that risk, and the steps they can take to reduce the 
    chance of injury in the event of a rollover. While manufacturers may 
    voluntarily install a rollover warning in vehicles other than utility 
    vehicles with a wheelbase of 110 inches or less, S4.5.1(b)(3) prohibits 
    them from installing them on the same side of the sunvisor as the air 
    bag warning label. We believe that manufacturers should be able to 
    voluntarily affix the rollover warning label in the exact same places 
    the required label can be affixed. We are, therefore, amending the 
    March 9 final rule to allow the voluntary installation of the rollover 
    warning label on the same side of the sun visor as the air bag warning 
    label in vehicles that are not required by 49 CFR 575.105 to have them.
    
    F. Foreign Language Translations
    
        In an April 8, 1999 letter, AAM asked that we allow foreign 
    language translations of the new rollover warning label. AAM stated 
    that this would be consistent with prior agency interpretations 
    concerning the use of foreign languages on required labels.
        We have long held that manufacturers may present information in 
    addition to the required information as long as the information is 
    presented in a way that does not obscure or confuse the meaning of the 
    required information. The labeling requirement of the March 9 final 
    rule requires manufacturers to supply the rollover warning information 
    in English. However, once manufacturers meet this requirement, they may 
    supply the same information in other languages, so long as it does not 
    confuse consumers. Manufacturers may apply an additional rollover 
    warning label in a foreign language and may include a foreign language 
    translation of the required owner's manual information, in addition to 
    the required English text.
        We note that S4.5.1 of Standard No. 208 prohibits ``other 
    information'' from being placed on the sunvisor with the air bag label. 
    We want to make it clear that as long as the non-English language label 
    is an exact translation of the required information, we do not 
    interpret it to be ``other information''. Information that is not a 
    translation of the required information is considered ``other 
    information'' and is not permitted.
    
    G. Voluntary early compliance
    
        The effective date of today's rule is September 1, 1999. 
    Manufacturers may, however, comply early with the requirements included 
    in today's rule. If a manufacturer chooses to do so, it must comply 
    with all of the requirements.
    
    IV. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
    
    Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
    
        Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 
    51735, October 4, 1993), provides for making determinations whether a 
    regulatory action is ``significant'' and therefore subject to Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) review and to the requirements of the 
    Executive Order. The Order defines a ``significant regulatory action'' 
    as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
        (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
    adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
    economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
    health or safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or 
    communities;
        (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency;
        (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or
        (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    the Executive Order.
        NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under 
    E.O. 12866 and the Department of Transportation's regulatory policies 
    and procedures. This rulemaking document was not reviewed under E.O. 
    12866. Further, this action has been determined to be not 
    ``significant'' under the Department of Transportation's regulatory 
    policies and procedures.
        NHTSA believes that this rule will result in a minimal cost to 
    manufacturers and consumers of utility vehicles with a wheel base of 
    less than 110 inches since this rule only involves minor changes.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
    as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 
    (SBREFA) of 1996) whenever an agency is required to publish a notice of 
    rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make 
    available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that 
    describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small 
    businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions). 
    However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of 
    an agency certifies the rule will not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities. SBREFA amended the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a 
    statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have 
    a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
        NHTSA has considered the impacts of this rule under the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. I hereby certify that this rule will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    As explained above, NHTSA believes this rule will have minimal economic 
    impact.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, a person is not required 
    to respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless 
    the collection displays a valid OMB control number. The OMB Clearance 
    number for the utility vehicle warning (49 CFR 575.105) is 2127-0049. 
    NHTSA has considered the impact of the changes required by today's rule 
    and determined that they will not have any effect on the
    
    [[Page 47123]]
    
    total burden hours imposed on the public by 49 CFR 575.105.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        NHTSA has also analyzed this rule under the National Environmental 
    Policy Act and determined that it will not have a significant impact on 
    the human environment.
    
    Executive Order 12612 (Federalism)
    
        NHTSA has analyzed this rule in accordance with the principles and 
    criteria contained in E.O. 12612, and has determined that this rule 
    will not have significant federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Civil Justice Reform
    
        This rule will not have any retroactive effect. Under 49 U.S.C. 
    30103, whenever a Federal motor vehicle safety standard is in effect, a 
    State may not adopt or maintain a safety standard applicable to the 
    same aspect of performance which is not identical to the Federal 
    standard, except to the extent that the state requirement imposes a 
    higher level of performance and applies only to vehicles procured for 
    the State's use. 49 U.S.C. 30161 sets forth a procedure for judicial 
    review of final rules establishing, amending or revoking Federal motor 
    vehicle safety standards. That section does not require submission of a 
    petition for reconsideration or other administrative proceedings before 
    parties may file suit in court.
    
    Executive Order 13045
    
        Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any 
    rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as 
    defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental, health or 
    safety risk that NHTSA has reason to believe may have a 
    disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets 
    both criteria, we must evaluate the environmental health or safety 
    effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned 
    regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably 
    feasible alternatives considered by us.
        This rule is not subject to the Executive Order because it is not 
    economically significant as defined in E.O. 12866, and does not have a 
    disproportionate effect on children.
    
    National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    
        Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
    Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272) 
    directs us to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory 
    activities unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
    otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
    standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling 
    procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by 
    voluntary consensus standards bodies, such as the Society of Automotive 
    Engineers (SAE). The NTTAA directs us to provide Congress, through OMB, 
    explanations when we decide not to use available and applicable 
    voluntary consensus standards.
        We reviewed all relevant American National Standards Institute 
    (ANSI) standards as part of developing the labeling and information 
    requirements that are the subject of this document. We used the 
    following voluntary consensus standard in developing the labeling and 
    information requirements:
         American National Standard Institute (ANSI) standard for 
    product safety signs and labels (ANSI Z535.4).
    
    List of Subjects
    
    49 CFR Part 571
    
        Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Tires.
    
    49 CFR Part 575
    
        Consumer protection, Labeling, Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements, Tires.
    
        In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA amends chapter V of Title 
    49 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 571--FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 571 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30117, and 30166; 
    delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
    
        2. In Sec. 571.208, in S4.5.1, revise paragraph (b)(3) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 571.208  Standard No. 208; Occupant crash protection.
    
    * * * * *
        S4.5.1 * * *
    * * * * *
        (b) Sun visor air bag warning label.
        (3) Except for the information on an air bag maintenance label 
    placed on the visor pursuant to S4.5.1(a) of this standard, or on a 
    utility vehicle warning label placed on the visor that conforms in 
    content, form, and sequence to the label shown in Figure 1 of 49 CFR 
    575.105, no other information shall appear on the same side of the sun 
    visor to which the sun visor air bag warning label is affixed. Except 
    for the information in an air bag alert label placed on the visor 
    pursuant to S4.5.1(c) of this standard, or on a utility vehicle warning 
    label placed on the visor that conforms in content, form, and sequence 
    to the label shown in Figure 1 of 49 CFR 575.105, no other information 
    about air bags or the need to wear seat belts shall appear anywhere on 
    the sun visor.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 575--CONSUMER INFORMATION REGULATIONS
    
        3. The authority citation for Part 575 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30111, 30115, 30117, and 30166; 
    delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
    
        4. In Section 575.105 revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii) and add 
    paragraphs (d)(1)(iii) and (iv), (d)(5) and (6) and Figure 2 to 
    Sec. 575.105 to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 575.105  Vehicle rollover.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) Required information.
        (1) Rollover Warning Label.
    * * * * *
        (ii) Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 1999 and before 
    September 1, 2000. When the rollover warning label required by 
    paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section and the air bag warning label 
    required by paragraph S4.5.1(b) of 49 CFR 571.208 are affixed to the 
    same side of the driver side sun visor, either:
        (A) the rollover warning label must be affixed to the right (as 
    viewed from the driver's seat) of the air bag warning label and the 
    labels may not be contiguous; or
        (B) the pictogram of the air bag warning label must be separated 
    from the pictograms of the rollover warning label by text, and
        (1) the labels must be located such that the shortest distance from 
    any of the lettering or graphics on the rollover warning label to any 
    of the lettering or graphics on the air bag warning label is not less 
    than 3 cm, or
        (2) if the rollover warning and air bag warning labels are each 
    completely surrounded by a continuous solid-lined border, the shortest 
    distance from the border of the rollover warning label to the border of 
    the air bag warning label is not less than 1 cm.
        (iii) The manufacturer must select the option to which a vehicle is 
    certified by the time the manufacturer certifies the vehicle and may 
    not thereafter select a different option for that vehicle. If a 
    manufacturer chooses to certify
    
    [[Page 47124]]
    
    compliance with more than one compliance option, the vehicle must 
    satisfy the requirements applicable to each of the options selected.
        (iv) Vehicles manufactured on or after September 1, 2000. When the 
    rollover warning label required by paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section 
    and the air bag warning label required by paragraph S4.5.1(b) of 49 CFR 
    571.208 are affixed to the same side of the driver side sun visor the 
    pictogram of the air bag warning label must be separated from the 
    pictograms of the rollover warning label by text and:
        (A) the labels must be located such that the shortest distance from 
    any of the lettering or graphics on the rollover warning label to any 
    of the lettering or graphics on the air bag warning label is not less 
    than 3 cm, or
        (B) If the rollover warning and air bag warning labels are each 
    completely surrounded by a continuous solid-lined border, the shortest 
    distance from the border of the rollover warning label to the border of 
    the air bag warning label must be not less than 1 cm.
    * * * * *
        (5) Combined Rollover and Air Bag Alert Warning. If the warnings 
    required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section and paragraph S4.5.1(b) of 
    49 CFR 571.208 to be affixed to the driver side sun visor are not 
    visible when the sun visor is in the stowed position, a combined 
    rollover and air bag alert label may be permanently affixed to that 
    visor in lieu of the alert labels required by paragraph (d)(3) of this 
    section and paragraph S4.5.1(c)(2) of 49 CFR 571.208. The combined 
    rollover and air bag alert label must be visible when the visor is in 
    the stowed position. The combined rollover and air bag alert warning 
    must conform in content to the label shown in Figure 2 of this section, 
    and must comply with the following requirements:
        (i) The label must read:
    
    AIR BAG AND ROLLOVER WARNINGS
    Flip Visor Over
    
        (ii) The message area must be black with yellow text. The message 
    area must be no less than 20 square cm.
        (iii) The pictogram shall be black with a red circle and slash on a 
    white background. The pictogram must be not less than 20 mm in 
    diameter.
        (6) At the option of the manufacturer, the requirements in 
    paragraph (d)(1)(i) for labels that are permanently affixed to 
    specified parts of the vehicle may instead be met by permanent marking 
    and molding of the required information.
    
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
    
    [[Page 47125]]
    
    [GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30AU99.020
    
    
    
        Issued on: August 24, 1999.
    Frank Seales, Jr.
    Acting Deputy Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 99-22365 Filed 8-25-99; 4:19 pm]
    BILLING CODE 4910-59-C
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/1/1999
Published:
08/30/1999
Department:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final Rule; Response to Petition for Reconsideration.
Document Number:
99-22365
Dates:
This final rule is effective September 1, 1999, however, voluntary compliance with the final rule is allowed as of August 30, 1999. Petitions for reconsideration must be received by October 14, 1999.
Pages:
47119-47125 (7 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. NHTSA-98-3381, Notice 3
RINs:
2127-AH68
PDF File:
99-22365.pdf
CFR: (2)
49 CFR 571.208
49 CFR 575.105